Police in Illinois will begin roadside drug tests for drivers

http://fox59.com/2017/12/18/police-in-illinois-will-begin-roadside-drug-tests-for-drivers/

CAROL STREAM, Ill. — Police in northwestern Illinois will soon try out a new test meant to quickly detect if drivers have drugs in their system.

Carol Stream police will begin testing drivers in February for marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, methamphetamines and opiates like heroin. The test is designed to be quick and portable.

Officers will use mouth swabs to screen for the drugs. The P.I.A.2 device will then test the swab and give officers measurements for the amount of drugs present.

The state no longer assumes that any trace of a drug means intoxication and has instead set certain thresholds for controlled substances.

“We want to give officers all the tools they need to make sure they’re making the right decisions and removing intoxicated drivers from the roads,” said Sgt. Brian Cluever.

The device was created by Protzek, a German company, and is distributed by Judicial Testing Systems.

In 2015, the amount of drivers involved in fatal crashes in the U.S. who tested positive for drugs surpassed the number of drivers who had alcohol in their systems, according to a report by the Governors Highway Safety Association.

Officers said they’re expanding their focus to drugs because they can often see the effects on drivers but can’t always identify the drug.

Law enforcement officials will have to prove to the courts that the testing is deemed consistent, reliable and accurate by the scientific community before results can be used as conclusive evidence in court.

The system will begin testing on a voluntary basis. Drivers will be asked if they’re willing to give a saliva sample, Cluever said. The roadside test results would then be compared to blood tests police conduct afterward to see if they match.

“The science is proven,” Cluever said. “We just want to show it works on our roadsides, it works in our station and it works for the purposes we need it.”

Testing for “drugs” is one thing… but with this cheek swab… they will be pulling a person’s DNA as well..  Where is the ACLU when THE STATE trammels the 4th Amendment ?

“Carol Stream police will begin testing drivers in February for marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, methamphetamines and opiates like heroin”

Heroin the body is metabolized into MORPHINE.. so a chronic pain pt could be charged with taking HEROIN… some in law enforcement have suggest that anyone testing positive for Heroin should be charged with POSSESSION.

The state no longer assumes that any trace of a drug means intoxication and has instead set certain thresholds for controlled substances.

How does a state come up with “threshold levels” for intoxicated when these drugs can have certain tolerance levels at which a person would not be intoxicated.

In 2015, the amount of drivers involved in fatal crashes in the U.S. who tested positive for drugs surpassed the number of drivers who had alcohol in their systems, according to a report by the Governors Highway Safety Association.

We fill 4+ billion prescriptions a year.. nearly everyone is going to test positive for some medications..  what about a diabetic and low blood sugar and “acting drunk”… what about a epileptic or a Parkinson patient… whose disease could cause their actions to be viewed by a non-medically trained police officer as being “drunk ” ?

 

 

 

3 Responses

  1. Just like the drug tests in your doctor office they can come up positive for drugs you never took, many articles online about tests inaccuracies. More civil rights violations on the way!

  2. I no longer give money to ACLU because they are remaining silent over chronic pain patient abuse!

  3. A mouth swab has to be done a certain way means they will.have to detain the subject for a period of.time.before they can do to count which then court rulings on detention times, probable cause, and 4th amendement, the article.doesnt.state when they would use the tests. It says voluntary so if one declines aa is ones right as is ones right.to.declines vehicle search then what….is one bullied by a dog to be forced searched? Have your laywers.number handy folks…this.may make a good.court.case

Leave a Reply

Discover more from PHARMACIST STEVE

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading