• Home
  • About Us
  • Graphics
  • Pt Stories
  • Resources
  • Vblog/videos
  • Actions

PHARMACIST STEVE

Entries RSS | Comments RSS
  • “The moral test of a government is how it treats those who are at the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those who are in the shadow of life, the sick and the needy, and the handicapped.” – Hubert Humphrey

  • passionate pachyderms

  • Pharmacist Steve steve@steveariens.com 502.938.2414

    steve@steveariens.com

    Email steve@steveariens.com 502-938-2414

  • Top Posts & Pages

    • More FACTS of opioid overdoses misconstrued by the CDC and others
    • HHS Officially Rescinds Nursing Home Minimum Staffing Rule
    • New research from JAMA Neurology just dropped, and the numbers are staggering
    • Time to speak up - if the DEA will listen
    • Blood pressure drug recalled for possible cross-contamination
  • Phil Mypockets – PBM – this is your life

  • Recent Posts

    • Time to speak up – if the DEA will listen
    • Blood pressure drug recalled for possible cross-contamination
    • HHS Officially Rescinds Nursing Home Minimum Staffing Rule
    • Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it
    • New research from JAMA Neurology just dropped, and the numbers are staggering
  • Recent Comments

    • fuzzyf0b1f652fe on Blood pressure drug recalled for possible cross-contamination
    • Rodney Hipsher on Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it
    • fuzzyf0b1f652fe on Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it
    • fuzzyf0b1f652fe on New research from JAMA Neurology just dropped, and the numbers are staggering
    • Rodney Hipsher on Often the first answer from a AI prgm – is not the best answer
  • Archives

    • December 2025 (9)
    • November 2025 (10)
    • October 2025 (31)
    • September 2025 (26)
    • August 2025 (35)
    • July 2025 (48)
    • June 2025 (27)
    • May 2025 (31)
    • April 2025 (28)
    • March 2025 (25)
    • February 2025 (23)
    • January 2025 (26)
    • December 2024 (25)
    • November 2024 (19)
    • October 2024 (26)
    • September 2024 (13)
    • August 2024 (32)
    • July 2024 (56)
    • June 2024 (16)
    • May 2024 (30)
    • April 2024 (39)
    • March 2024 (20)
    • February 2024 (42)
    • January 2024 (37)
    • December 2023 (39)
    • November 2023 (30)
    • October 2023 (32)
    • September 2023 (44)
    • August 2023 (37)
    • July 2023 (46)
    • June 2023 (44)
    • May 2023 (51)
    • April 2023 (47)
    • March 2023 (32)
    • February 2023 (38)
    • January 2023 (38)
    • December 2022 (38)
    • November 2022 (52)
    • October 2022 (47)
    • September 2022 (41)
    • August 2022 (64)
    • July 2022 (49)
    • June 2022 (64)
    • May 2022 (53)
    • April 2022 (57)
    • March 2022 (52)
    • February 2022 (53)
    • January 2022 (77)
    • December 2021 (85)
    • November 2021 (57)
    • October 2021 (34)
    • September 2021 (45)
    • August 2021 (38)
    • July 2021 (43)
    • June 2021 (44)
    • May 2021 (30)
    • April 2021 (29)
    • March 2021 (24)
    • February 2021 (47)
    • January 2021 (51)
    • December 2020 (42)
    • November 2020 (34)
    • October 2020 (34)
    • September 2020 (41)
    • August 2020 (63)
    • July 2020 (69)
    • June 2020 (57)
    • May 2020 (49)
    • April 2020 (55)
    • March 2020 (41)
    • February 2020 (36)
    • January 2020 (42)
    • December 2019 (87)
    • November 2019 (67)
    • October 2019 (84)
    • September 2019 (89)
    • August 2019 (59)
    • July 2019 (112)
    • June 2019 (115)
    • May 2019 (83)
    • April 2019 (113)
    • March 2019 (122)
    • February 2019 (126)
    • January 2019 (95)
    • December 2018 (69)
    • November 2018 (85)
    • October 2018 (67)
    • September 2018 (62)
    • August 2018 (98)
    • July 2018 (102)
    • June 2018 (95)
    • May 2018 (118)
    • April 2018 (108)
    • March 2018 (161)
    • February 2018 (138)
    • January 2018 (111)
    • December 2017 (128)
    • November 2017 (101)
    • October 2017 (146)
    • September 2017 (87)
    • August 2017 (100)
    • July 2017 (91)
    • June 2017 (89)
    • May 2017 (120)
    • April 2017 (148)
    • March 2017 (119)
    • February 2017 (107)
    • January 2017 (143)
    • December 2016 (115)
    • November 2016 (119)
    • October 2016 (134)
    • September 2016 (134)
    • August 2016 (137)
    • July 2016 (131)
    • June 2016 (118)
    • May 2016 (116)
    • April 2016 (95)
    • March 2016 (105)
    • February 2016 (113)
    • January 2016 (103)
    • December 2015 (92)
    • November 2015 (105)
    • October 2015 (119)
    • September 2015 (112)
    • August 2015 (105)
    • July 2015 (76)
    • June 2015 (92)
    • May 2015 (115)
    • April 2015 (84)
    • March 2015 (108)
    • February 2015 (133)
    • January 2015 (129)
    • December 2014 (139)
    • November 2014 (123)
    • October 2014 (119)
    • September 2014 (65)
    • August 2014 (57)
    • July 2014 (62)
    • June 2014 (63)
    • May 2014 (47)
    • April 2014 (63)
    • March 2014 (54)
    • February 2014 (47)
    • January 2014 (38)
    • December 2013 (25)
    • November 2013 (20)
    • October 2013 (34)
    • September 2013 (33)
    • August 2013 (30)
    • July 2013 (29)
    • June 2013 (46)
    • May 2013 (37)
    • April 2013 (40)
    • March 2013 (40)
    • February 2013 (64)
    • January 2013 (46)
    • December 2012 (50)
    • November 2012 (34)
    • October 2012 (60)
    • September 2012 (28)
    • August 2012 (15)
    • July 2012 (27)
    • June 2012 (27)
    • May 2012 (24)
    • April 2012 (24)
    • March 2012 (41)
    • February 2012 (32)
    • January 2012 (18)
    • December 2011 (15)
    • November 2011 (10)
    • October 2011 (8)
    • September 2011 (9)
    • February 2011 (5)
    • August 2010 (1)
    • July 2010 (3)
    • June 2010 (1)
    • March 2010 (1)
    • July 2000 (1)
  • Categories

  • replica rolex

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
  • Arachnoiditis Hope

  • Genocide in America updated 02/04/2016

  • Being Denied Meds – how to file complaints updated 11/12/2015

    Being Denied Meds - how to file complaints
  • Pay Attention

    Pay Attention

  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 685 other subscribers
  • License to lie

  • Will Pill Control “Fix” Our Problem?: The Allure of Simple Solutions to the Opioid Crisis

    https://www.ukmeds.co.uk/

Time to speak up – if the DEA will listen

Posted on December 7, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

Below is the comments that I made. Please DO NOT COPY THEM and submit them as yours. If the DEA sees a lot of “identical submissions” will just dilute the impact of what was submitted.

What I did was ask perplexity.ai a half dozen questions. Asking it to refine/expound its previous answer. Ended up asking 5-6 additional questions on the subject matter. 

Then I took all the answers and asked perplexity to created a concise synopsis of all the answers. 

I figured the longer any submission the less that it is likely to be read.

I consider perplexity’s final summary is pretty damning to what the DEA/DOJ and many in our judicial system has – and is – doing to the chronic pain community.

But pretty much what has been done and what is going to be done could. Clearly outlined as a “culling of the herd” or a covert genocide, and there will be little/few stats on the deaths will be tracked or if tracked, never see the light of day.

Below is a link to another blog post that I made with some more information, and links to where you can read the proposal and a link to make your comments

 

 

DEA Plans Further Cuts in Oxycodone Supply

here is a link to the entire proposal https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/28/2025-21509/proposed-aggregate-production-quotas-for-schedule-i-and-ii-controlled-substances-and-assessment-of

click here to make your comments:  https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/DEA-2025-0654-0001

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »

Blood pressure drug recalled for possible cross-contamination

Posted on December 6, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/blood-pressure-drug-recalled-for-possible-cross-contamination/ar-AA1RQr2x

Thousands of bottles of a commonly used prescription drug to treat hypertension has been recalled for possible contamination with another drug.

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., which has U.S. headquarters in Elmwood Park, New Jersey, has recalled multiple lots of bisoprolol fumarate and hydrochlorothiazide tablets (brand name Ziac), because the tablets may have been cross contaminated with other products, according to a recall report published online by the Food and Drug Administration.

The global drug maker, which is headquartered in Mumbai, India, said testing of reserve samples showed presence of traces of ezetimibe, a cholesterol drug the company also produces, according to the recall, posted Dec. 1.

The recall involves an undeclared number of lots of tablets, from 2.5 mg to 6.25 mg dosages, in various sized bottles, manufactured in Madhya Pradesh, India for Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., USA.

These lots were recalled:

  • 30-tablet bottles, NDC-68462-878-30. Lot 17232401, exp. 11/2025.
  • 100-tablet bottles, NDC-68462-878-01. Lot 17232401, exp. 11/2025.
  • 500-tablet bottles, NDC-68462-878-05. Lots 17232401, exp. 11/2025 and 17240974, exp. 05/2026.

USA TODAY has reached out to Glenmark Pharmaceuticals. Neither Glenmark nor the FDA have issued guidance on what to do with the recalled tablets.

But according to GoodRx, anyone affected by a drug recall is advised to check their medication’s lot number, contact their pharmacist as well as their prescriber and throw away the recalled medication.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »

HHS Officially Rescinds Nursing Home Minimum Staffing Rule

Posted on December 6, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

“The moral test of a government is how it treats those who are at the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those who are in the shadow of life, the sick and the needy, and the handicapped.” – Hubert Humphrey, Pharmacist,VP

Nursing home providers praised the move, while one patient group called it “very disappointing”

https://www.medpagetoday.com/geriatrics/generalgeriatrics/118802

The Trump administration on Tuesday rescinded a Biden-era rule that required a minimum number of healthcare staff in nursing homes.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said Tuesday in a press release

it is taking the action “after determining the final rule imposed by the Biden administration disproportionately burdened facilities, especially those serving rural and tribal communities, and jeopardized [patients’] access to care.”

“Today’s decision to repeal these provisions, in alignment with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, underscores HHS’s commitment to practical, sustainable approaches to improving nursing home care, and allows for further opportunity for engagement with community and tribal stakeholders,” the release stated.

“Safe, high-quality care is essential, but rigid, one-size-fits-all mandates fail patients,” HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in the release. “This administration will safeguard access to care by removing federal barriers — not by imposing requirements that limit patient choice.”

Mehmet Oz, MD, MBA, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) said in the release that “At CMS, our mission is not only to improve outcomes, but to ensure those outcomes are achievable for all communities. We cannot meet that goal by ignoring the daily realities facing rural and underserved populations. This repeal is a step toward smarter, more practical solutions that truly work for the American people.”

The rule, enacted in May 2024

by the Biden administration, required nursing homes that participate in federal programs such as Medicare and Medicaid to meet a total nurse staffing standard of 3.48 hours per resident day (HPRD), which must include at least 0.55 HPRD of direct registered nurse (RN) care and 2.45 HPRD of direct nurse aide care, according to a CMS fact sheet

. Facilities could use any combination of nurse staff (RNs, licensed practical nurses [LPNs] and licensed vocational nurses, or nurse aides) to account for the additional 0.48 HPRD needed to comply with the total nurse staffing standard, the agency said. The rule also required nursing homes to have an RN on site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to provide skilled nursing care.

CMS gave nursing homes 2 years to comply with some parts of the rule and 3 years for other parts; rural facilities were given extra time. However, Republicans and nursing home organizations pushed back on the rule

, saying it would force some nursing homes to close. Two large nursing home provider organizations sued over the regulations; a federal court judge ruled in their favor and struck down several of the rule’s key provisions. In addition, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delayed implementation of the rule for 10 years. Tuesday’s announcement was not a surprise, because HHS in August had sent the proposed rescission

to the Office of Management and Budget for review.

Nursing home and hospital groups praised the rule’s rescission. “The CMS staffing mandate repeal is a much-needed recognition of the very real barriers that our nursing home members navigate in recruiting and retaining staff,” Katie Smith Sloan, president and CEO of LeadingAge, an association of nonprofit aging services providers, said in a statement. “We will continue to engage with federal policymakers and advocate for meaningful investments in the long-term care workforce and the advancement of smart policies to realize the necessary numbers of trained and qualified nurse aides, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and other [nursing home] caregivers.”

The American Hospital Association (AHA) also applauded the move. “The AHA applauds CMS’s repeal of the misguided minimum staffing requirements for long-term care facilities,” Stacey Hughes, the AHA’s executive vice president for government relations and public policy, said in a statement. “The AHA has repeatedly raised concerns that the requirements could exacerbate workforce shortages, lead to facility closures, and jeopardize access to care, especially in rural and underserved communities that often do not have the workforce levels to support these requirements.”

But nursing home consumer groups felt otherwise. “We were very disappointed by CMS’s announcement today,” Sam Brooks, director of public policy for the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, a patient advocacy group, wrote in an email to MedPage Today. “Even though it claimed the rescission was in part due to congressional and judicial developments, it repeated the often-debunked lines from the nursing home industry that there are not enough staff and that rural facilities will be harmed. Both of these claims are not true.”

“The rule had numerous opportunities for exceptions, meaning that nursing homes with legitimate hiring challenges would be exempted from compliance,” he continued. “Further, there was no evidence rural facilities would have a harder time complying [than] non-rural facilities…. The real problem is that nursing homes treat workers poorly and cannot retain them.”

“Most disheartening was that CMS offered no plan to address the staffing crisis in nursing homes,” Brooks added. “Instead, it is returning to the status quo, which results … in residents suffering and dying because nursing homes are not staffed adequately.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »

Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it

Posted on December 6, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

Former DEA agent charged with agreeing to launder millions of dollars for Mexican drug cartel

https://www.bastillepost.com/global/article/5430623-former-dea-agent-charged-in-alleged-deal-to-launder-millions-of-dollars-for-mexican-drug-cartel

NEW YORK (AP) — A former high-level agent with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and an associate have been charged with conspiring to launder millions of dollars and obtain military-grade firearms and explosives for a Mexican drug cartel, according to an indictment unsealed Friday in New York.

Paul Campo, 61, of Oakton, Virginia, who retired from the DEA in 2016 after a 25-year career, and Robert Sensi, 75, of Boca Raton, Florida, were caught in sting involving a law enforcement informant who posed as a member of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, prosecutors said.

The cartel, also know as CJNG, was designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. in February.

U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton said Campo betrayed his DEA career by helping the cartel, which he said was responsible for “countless deaths through violence and drug trafficking in the United States and Mexico.”

Campo and Sensi appeared Friday afternoon before a magistrate judge in New York, who ordered them detained without bail. Their lawyers entered not guilty pleas on their behalf.

Campo’s lawyer, Mark Gombiner, called the indictment “somewhat sensationalized and somewhat incoherent.” He denied the two men had agreed to explore obtaining weapons for the cartel.

Over the past year, Campo and Sensi agreed to launder about $12 million in drug proceeds for the cartel and converted about $750,000 in cash to cryptocurrency, thinking it was going to the group when it really went to the U.S. government, the indictment said. They also provided a payment for about 220 kilograms of cocaine they were told would be sold in the U.S. for about $5 million, thinking they would get a cut of the proceeds, prosecutors said.

The two men also said they would look into procuring commercial drones, AR-15 semiautomatic rifles, M4 carbines, grenade launchers and rocket-propelled grenades for the cartel, the indictment said.

Campo boasted about his law enforcement experience during conversations with the informant and offered to be a “strategist” for the cartel, authorities said. He began his career as a DEA agent in New York and rose to become deputy chief of financial operations for the agency, the indictment said.

Evidence in the case includes hours of recordings of the two men talking with the informant, as well as cellphone location data, emails and surveillance images, Assistant U.S. Attorney Varun Gumaste said in court Friday.

Sensi’s attorney, Amanda Kramer, unsuccessfully argued that Sensi should be freed while he awaits trial, saying he wouldn’t flee partly because he has multiple health problems, including injuries from a fall two months ago, early-stage dementia and Type II diabetes.

Sensi was convicted in the late 1980s and early 1990s of mail fraud, defrauding the government and stealing $2.5 million, said the prosecutor, Gumaste. He said evidence shows Sensi also was engaged in a scheme to procure military-grade helicopters for a Middle East country.

DEA Administrator Terrance Cole said in a statement that while Campo is no longer employed by the DEA, the allegations undermine trust in law enforcement.

The DEA has been roiled in recent years by several embarrassing instances of misconduct in its ranks. The Associated Press has tallied at least 16 agents over the past decade brought up on federal charges ranging from child pornography and drug trafficking to leaking intelligence to defense attorneys and selling firearms to cartel associates, revealing gaping holes in the agency’s supervision.

Starting in 2021, the agency placed new controls on how DEA funds can be used in money laundering stings, and warned agents they can now be fired for a first offense of misconduct if serious enough, a departure from prior administrations.

Campo and Sensi are charged with four conspiracy counts related to narcoterrorism, terrorism, narcotics distribution and money laundering.

Collins reported from Hartford, Connecticut. Associated Press writer Joshua Goodman in Miami contributed to this report.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »

New research from JAMA Neurology just dropped, and the numbers are staggering

Posted on December 5, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

New research from JAMA Neurology just dropped, and the numbers are staggering.

According to this national analysis, more than half of American adults meet criteria for disorders of the nervous system. And this count does not even include many major psychiatric conditions like depression, anxiety, PTSD, or substance use disorders.

That means the true burden on our nervous systems is likely far higher than what the study captured. Yet as a healthcare system and as a society, we often under-attend to these conditions compared with other organ systems.

To put the study in context
🧠 Over 50 percent of adults screened met criteria for at least one neurologic condition
🧠 The most common were migraine, tension-type headache, neuropathic pain, ADHD, and autism
🧠 The prevalence was consistent across demographic groups, showing this is not a niche issue
🧠 These conditions carry significant personal, economic, and societal impact

The brain is not separate from the rest of medicine. It is the command center of the nervous system, and this study reinforces why we need more clinicians who are trained and comfortable treating the brain and central nervous system health across settings.

If more than half the country is experiencing these disorders, then nervous system health is not a specialty issue. It is a public health issue.

Full study here: https://lnkd.in/eppPxs8X

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »

More FACTS of opioid overdoses misconstrued by the CDC and others

Posted on December 4, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »

Often the first answer from a AI prgm – is not the best answer

Posted on December 4, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

Below is a good example why NO ONE should believe the first answer that one would get when asking a AI program a question. I first asked the AI program about the safety of a person taking both a opioid and Benzo concurrently and if at some point if the pt has no problem taking the two together, does the risk of the pt having little/no problem going forward, and gave the consistent answer was there was ALWAYS a risk of the pt having a problem.

I changed the question to reflect the typical chronic pain pt who has had a need for being prescribed concurrently a opioid and benzo for many years or a few decades. The answer is quite a bit different, starting to point out the adverse health issues that the pt may experience if the opioid and benzo was decreased or stopped.

Question: Are there any studies on a pt being taken off concurrently taking a opioid & benzo for a couple of decades without any adverse events and the pt is taken off the benzo what is the potential for the pt to experience high anxiety levels, perhaps some depression from loss of sleep and perhaps increased suicidal idealization?

There are studies on long‑term benzodiazepine discontinuation (including many patients also on opioids), and they do show increased anxiety/insomnia and small but real increases in suicidal ideation and related harms after stopping, even in previously “stable” patients. The evidence supports being very cautious about deprescribing in someone who has done well for decades.

Key data on long‑term benzo discontinuation

A large target‑trial–emulation study of over 350,000 adults on stable long‑term benzodiazepines found that discontinuation was associated with small absolute but consistent increases in several harms over 1 year compared with continuation: all‑cause mortality, nonfatal overdose, suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, and emergency department visits. The absolute risk increases for suicidal ideation and nonfatal overdose were on the order of a few tenths of a percent, but the direction of effect was worse, not better, after discontinuation.jamanetwork+1​

A Cleveland Clinic review summarizing this work highlighted that deprescribing in stable long‑term benzo users led to higher mortality and more nonfatal overdoses and suicidal ideation than continuing therapy, challenging the assumption that stopping always improves net risk in this population. This pattern held both in patients with and without recent opioid exposure, though absolute risks were higher in those with opioid co‑prescribing.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+1​

Anxiety, insomnia, and mood after stopping

Clinical and observational reports describe benzodiazepine withdrawal and post‑withdrawal symptoms that commonly include marked anxiety, insomnia, irritability, and mood disturbance, and in some cases emergence or worsening of depression and suicidal thoughts. A large patient survey on benzodiazepine use, tapering, and discontinuation found that many long‑term users reported severe and prolonged withdrawal symptoms, with over half endorsing suicidal thoughts or attempts at some point in the course of use or discontinuation; while this is a self‑selected sample, it underscores how significant anxiety, insomnia, and emotional dysregulation can be.vumc+2​

A recent systematic review on benzodiazepines and suicidality concluded that benzo use is linked to increased suicide risk in vulnerable groups, and that changes in benzodiazepine regimens (including abrupt stops) can be a period of elevated risk for suicidal behavior and ideation. Case reports also document serious self‑harm temporally associated with withdrawal or rapid regimen changes, even in previously “stable” older adults.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+2​

Interaction with long‑term opioid therapy

For opioids, a separate VA cohort showed that stopping long‑term opioid therapy was associated with a higher risk of death from overdose or suicide, and that this risk increased the longer the patient had been on opioids before stopping (hazard ratios for overdose/suicide rose markedly once prior exposure exceeded about a year). When considering patients on both opioids and benzos for many years, this suggests that major changes to either drug, and especially to both, can unmask or precipitate distress, destabilization of sleep and pain control, and higher risk of overdose or suicide in at least a subset of patients.bmj+2​

What is reasonable to infer for your scenario

There are not many granular studies limited specifically to patients with “couple of decades” of uneventful concurrent opioid–benzo use who are then taken off only the benzo, but the best available evidence supports these points:

  • Long‑term “stable” benzodiazepine users, including many with concurrent opioids, who are discontinued have a higher short‑term risk of mortality, nonfatal overdose, suicidal ideation, and ED use compared with similar patients who continue.ccjm+2​

  • Anxiety, insomnia, and mood symptoms are common during and after discontinuation, and can be severe and prolonged in some patients, even when the drug history is years to decades of “benign” use.benzoinfo+2​

  • Opioid and benzodiazepine regimen changes in long‑term users are periods of elevated vulnerability, so abrupt or forced discontinuation—particularly without strong psychosocial and sleep support—can plausibly increase anxiety, worsen sleep and mood, and raise suicidal ideation risk for at least a subset of such patients.ncbi.nlm.nih+2​

So, for a patient on an opioid–benzo combination for decades without prior adverse psychiatric events, it is very plausible—and supported by current data—that taking away the benzodiazepine (especially rapidly or involuntarily) can lead to high anxiety, sleep disruption with secondary depressive symptoms, and a measurable, though still numerically small, increase in suicidal ideation and related harms over the following year.jamanetwork+2​

  1. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2813161
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10733804/
  3. https://www.ccjm.org/content/92/9/531
  4. https://www.vumc.org/poison-control/sites/default/files/QOW/Experiences%2520with%2520BZ%2520use.pdf
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2047018/
  6. https://www.benzoinfo.com/ashtonmanual/chapter3/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12171941/
  8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13582
  9. https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m283
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK614569/
  11. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/benzodiazepine-discontinuation-associated-with-increased-mortality-in-patients-on-stable-long-term-benzodiazepines
  12. https://www.cureus.com/articles/358611-suicidal-ideation-and-suicide-completion-in-benzodiazepine-users-a-systematic-review-of-current-evidence
  13. https://americanaddictioncenters.org/benzodiazepine/length-of-withdrawal
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6544552/
  15. https://www.substanceusehealth.ca/resource/benzodiazepine-discontinuation-and-mortality-among-patients-receiving-long-term
  16. https://www.pbm.va.gov/pbm/academicdetailingservice/documents/benzodiazepine_provider_ad_educational_guide.pdf
  17. https://www.samhsa.gov
  18. https://www.rutgers.edu/news/va-investigates-impact-opioids-sedatives-veterans
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979125000137
  20. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/03-09-2023/docs/D1A22FBD9C95378822926AC6A651D159975B713CD575?noSaveAs=1

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »

Some pts who follow my advice – get a new lease on life

Posted on December 3, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

The note below IN RED I got today from a 60 y/o disabled female and on abt 90 MMEs of opioids for some 10-15 yrs. A couple of months ago, her pain doc decided to cut her oral opioids down to 15-20 MME/day and put a buprenorphine patch on her without any attempt to give her body to metabolize the opioid MMEs she was taking. 

This threw her into a COLD/HARD WITHDRAWAL and per BP spiked to 240/120. After several back/forth messages – I finally got her to agree to take the patch off and go to the local ED. Where she was placed in ICU and blood tests indicated that there was some cardiac enzymes – suggesting that she could be in a heart attack and/or having some cardiac muscle damage happening.

Her pain doc insisted that she put the patch back on and it would not cause her BP to spike

Her pain doc told her that he was prescribing a “different medication” to take and when she told me what it was… it was the same medication – but the one you put on your tongue, under your tongue or between cheek and gum, and will rot the pt’s teeth.

She has found a new pain doc who put her back on the opioids that she had been taking for 10-15 yrs and her blood pressure is once again “normal-tensive”

As this pt put it… following my advice… gave her a new lease on life

My b p. Was 120/90 at the Dr today. I got the. Mast virus that’s going around ugh you should be a Dr. cause. You was. A 10000 percent right. By putting me on the 15 it would. Bring it. Down. Hmmm Yes I am forever Grateful. For You, you gave me a new lease on life

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »

7 deaths, hundreds of injuries may be linked to glucose monitor errors

Posted on December 3, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

7 deaths, hundreds of injuries may be linked to glucose monitor errors

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/7-deaths-hundreds-of-injuries-may-be-linked-to-glucose-monitor-errors/ar-AA1RDKn5

Patients are being warned to stop using some glucose monitors made by Abbott Diabetes Care after the company found malfunctioning sensors may be linked to hundreds of adverse events and several deaths, the Food and Drug Administration said Tuesday. 

Internal testing by Abbott found that some sensors in certain FreeStyle Libre 3 and FreeStyle Libre 3 Plus devices may provide incorrect low glucose readings, the company said in a news release. Abbott said it had received reports of 736 adverse events potentially linked to the issue. Fifty-seven were reported in the United States. Seven deaths, none of which were in U.S., were potentially associated with the sensor error, Abbott said. The FDA referred to the error as a “potentially high-risk issue” in a news release. 

People with diabetes depend on glucose readings to manage their care. Incorrect low readings can lead to excessive carbohydrate intake or skipped or delayed insulin doses, Abbott said. Those decisions “may pose serious health risks, including potential injury or death,” the company said. 

The sensor issue was related to one production line among the several that make the Libre 3 and Libre 3 Plus sensors, Abbott said. About three million devices are affected, about half of which are estimated to have expired or been used. 

Anyone using a Libre 3 or Libre 3 Plus sensor should check its model number and unique device identifiers to see if it is one of the affected devices, the FDA and Abbott said.  

The model numbers for the affected FreeStyle Libre 3 sensors are 72081-01 and 72080-01, and the unique device identifiers are 00357599818005 and 00357599819002. The model numbers for the affected FreeStyle Libre 3 sensors are 78768-01 and 78769-01, and the unique device identifiers are 00357599844011 and 00357599843014. The full list of affected lots is available on the FDA’s website. 

Anyone with an impacted device should stop using it, Abbott and the FDA said. Patients can request free replacement devices on www.FreeStyleCheck.com, Abbott said. Patients should use a blood glucose meter or the built-in meter on a FreeStyle Libre 3 Reader to make treatment decisions when sensor readings don’t match symptoms or expectations, Abbott said. 

Abbott and the FDA said that FreeStyle Libre 3 readers and mobile apps have not been impacted, and that no other Libre-brand sensors are affected by the sensor issue. The cause of the sensor issue has been identified and resolved, Abbott said, and no supply disruptions are expected. 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »

DEA Plans Further Cuts in Oxycodone Supply

Posted on November 30, 2025 by Pharmaciststeve

According to perplexity.ai the USA’s population was 318 million in 2014 and 340 million in 2024, a 7% INCREASE in our population. If one come to the conclusion that the percentage of our population is going to need opioids for acute/chronic pain and the DEA decreases the available Oxycodone by 6%.

This law – 42 USC 1395: apparently this law was appended along with Pres Johnson’s “great society” program that created Medicare & Medicaid in 1965. So we are approaching 60 yrs that not a single DOJ has bothered to try to enforce this law.

When the “Great Society” was created in 1965 our national debt was 260 billion and today about national debt is in the ~ 35 Trillion and roughly 36–38% of the U.S. population had Medicare or Medicaid coverage in 2014.

The question has to be asked – how many people are on Medicare Disability & Medicaid because their pain management meds have been taken away by various parts of our bureaucratic/judicial system? How many chronic pain pts are no longer around because they could no longer tolerate their torturous level of pain and committed suicide or died a premature death from their under/untreated pain.

here is a link to the entire proposal https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/28/2025-21509/proposed-aggregate-production-quotas-for-schedule-i-and-ii-controlled-substances-and-assessment-of

click here to make your comments:  https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/DEA-2025-0654-0001

 

435 members of the House are up for re-election next year and 35 Senators are up for re-election next year.


Then there is the agreement between most state AG’s and the 3 major drug wholesalers that control about 85% of the wholesale community pharmacy market

Agreement with State Attorney Generals and three major (short version)

agreement with state AGs (long version)

Then there is this law from 1935 – 35 yrs before the Controlled Substance Act was signed into law

42 USC 1395: Prohibition against any Federal interference

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:42%20section:1395%20edition:prelim)

From Title 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 7-SOCIAL SECURITY SUBCHAPTER XVIII-HEALTH INSURANCE FOR AGED AND DISABLED

§1395. Prohibition against any Federal interference

Nothing in this sub chapter shall be construed to authorize any Federal officer or employee to exercise any supervision or control over the practice of medicine or the manner in which medical services are provided, or over the selection, tenure, or compensation of any officer or employee of any institution, agency, or person providing health services; or to exercise any supervision or control over the administration or operation of any such institution, agency, or person.(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVIII, §1801, as added Pub. L. 89–97, title I, §102(a), July 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 291 .)

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Short Title

For short title of title I of Pub. L. 89–97, which enacted this subchapter as the “Health Insurance for the Aged Act”, see section 100 of Pub. L. 89–97, set out as a Short Title of 1965 Amendment note under section 1305 of this title.

Protecting and Improving Guaranteed Medicare Benefits

Pub. L. 111–148, title III, §3601, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 538 , provided that:

“(a) Protecting Guaranteed Medicare Benefits.-Nothing in the provisions of, or amendments made by, this Act [see Short Title note set out under section 18001 of this title] shall result in a reduction of guaranteed benefits under title XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.].

“(b) Ensuring That Medicare Savings Benefit the Medicare Program and Medicare Beneficiaries.-Savings generated for the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act under the provisions of, and amendments made by, this Act shall extend the solvency of the Medicare trust funds, reduce Medicare premiums and other cost-sharing for beneficiaries, and improve or expand guaranteed Medicare benefits and protect access to Medicare providers.”

 According to Perplexity.ai :
42 U.S.C. 1395 has not been used by any Attorney General to shut down or seriously limit federal enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) or other federal oversight tools; courts and agencies read it as a Medicare-specific “no control of medical practice” statement, not as a general bar on federal regulation of medicine. In practice, federal criminal/CSA enforcement, DEA registration actions, and many Medicare regulatory conditions have all proceeded without being invalidated on the basis of §1395.

​

What §1395 actually limits

Section 1395 is part of the Medicare statute and says only that “nothing in this subchapter” (i.e., the Medicare title) authorizes federal officers to supervise or control medical practice, how services are provided, or the operation of providers. Courts and commentators treat this as a construction rule: Congress was assuring physicians that creating Medicare would not itself federalize control over clinical practice, not as a global ban on all federal influence over medicine.

​

Use of §1395 in litigation

Section 1395 is occasionally cited in cases to argue that Medicare does not preempt state regulation of medical practice or billing, and courts have used it as evidence that Congress meant to leave core practice-of-medicine regulation to the states. However, those opinions treat §1395 as limiting how Medicare statutes are interpreted, not as a weapon to invalidate other federal laws or DOJ/DEA enforcement based on separate statutory authority such as the CSA.

​

Relationship to the CSA and DOJ/DEA

The CSA is codified in Title 21, enacted years after §1395, and expressly authorizes the Attorney General to register, regulate, and take action against practitioners regarding controlled substances. Because §1395 is confined to “this subchapter” of Title 42, courts and agencies have not read it as restricting the Attorney General’s CSA authority, so prescriber prosecutions, registration revocations, and more recent telemedicine-prescribing rules have all gone forward without being blocked by §1395.

​

Has any Attorney General tried to “enforce” §1395?

Enforcement of §1395 is mostly indirect: it is invoked as a rule of statutory interpretation, not as something DOJ brings standalone cases under. No reported example shows an Attorney General using §1395 to prevent DEA or other federal agencies from pursuing drug-control enforcement or other health-related regulations, and the long trend has been toward greater, not lesser, federal involvement in medicine despite this Medicare clause.

DEA Plans Further Cuts in Oxycodone Supply

https://www.painnewsnetwork.org/stories/2025/11/28/dea-wants-to-cut-supply-of-oxycodone

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Twitter
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »

Next Page »

Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: Digg 3 Column by WP Designer.

%d