PHARMACIST STEVE

AttorneyGenerals to Insurance Companies    Click on link to see *.pdf of the original letter

September 18, 2017 Marilyn Tavenner President and CEO America’s Health Insurance Plans 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004

Re: Prescription Opioid Epidemic

Dear Ms. Tavenner,

The undersigned State Attorneys General are sending you this letter to urge America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) to take proactive steps to encourage your members to review their payment and coverage policies and revise them, as necessary and appropriate, to encourage healthcare providers to prioritize non-opioid pain management options over drug offences for opioid prescriptions  for the treatment of chronic, non-cancer pain. We have witnessed firsthand the devastation that the opioid epidemic has wrought on our States in terms of lives lost and the costs it has imposed on our healthcare system and the broader economy. As the chief legal officers of our States, we are committed to using all tools at our disposal to combat this epidemic and to protect patients suffering from chronic pain or addiction, who are among the most vulnerable consumers in our society.
The opioid epidemic is the preeminent public health crisis of our time. Statistics from the Surgeon General of the United States indicate that as many as 2 million Americans are currently addicted to or otherwise dependent upon prescription opioids.1 Millions more are at risk of developing a dependency— in 2014, as many as 10 million people reported using opioids for nonmedical reasons.2 The economic toll of the epidemic is tremendous, costing the U.S. economy an estimated $78.5 billion annually.3 State and local governments alone spend nearly 8 billion dollars a year on criminal justice costs related to
1 Surgeon General of the United States, Opioids, https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/priorities/opioids/index.html (last updated June 1, 2017); Nora D. Volkow, M.D., America’s Addiction to Opioids: Heroin and Prescription Drug Abuse, National Institute on Drug Abuse (May 14, 2014), https://www.drugabuse.gov/about-nida/legislativeactivities/testimony-to-congress/2016/americas-addiction-to-opioids-heroin-prescription-drug-abuse. 2 See Surgeon General, supra fn. 1 (citing National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014). 3 Healthday News, Opioid Epidemic Costs U.S. $78.5 Billion Annually: CDC (Sept. 21, 2016), http://www.health.com/healthday/opioid-epidemic-costs-us-785-billion-annually-cdc.

1850 M Street, NW Twelfth Floor Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 326-6000 http://www.naag.org/
opioid abuse.4 The human cost is even more staggering: Opioid overdoses kill 91 Americans every single day.5 More than half of those deaths involve prescription opioids.6
The unnecessary over-prescription of opioid painkillers is a significant factor contributing to the problem. Although the amount of pain reported by Americans has remained steady since 1999, prescriptions for opioid painkillers have nearly quadrupled over the same timeframe.7 This four-fold increase in prescriptions has contributed to a commensurate increase in the number of opioid overdose deaths.8 The dramatic increase in supply has also made it relatively easy to obtain prescription opioids without having to resort to the black market: Over 50% of people who misuse opioids report that they obtained them for free from a friend or relative, while another 22% misused drugs that they obtained directly from a doctor.9 While illegal opioids like heroin remain a serious problem that also must be addressed, the role played by prescription opioids cannot be ignored. While there is no panacea, any comprehensive effort to address and end the opioid epidemic must tackle the ever-increasing number of prescriptions for opioid painkillers. You could see page and see what needs to be done when it comes to the legalities.
Reducing the frequency with which opioids are prescribed will not leave patients without effective pain management options. While there are certainly situations where opioids represent the appropriate pain remedy, there are many other circumstances in which opioids are prescribed despite evidence suggesting they are ineffective and even dangerous. For example, the American Academy of Neurology has explained that while the use of opioid painkillers can provide “significant short-term pain relief,” there is “no substantial evidence for maintenance of pain relief or improved function over long periods of time.”10 Another recent study concluded that the use of opioids to treat chronic, non-cancer related pain lasting longer than three months is “ineffective and can be life-threatening.”11 When patients seek treatment for any of the myriad conditions that cause chronic pain, doctors should be encouraged to explore and prescribe effective non-opioid alternatives, ranging from non-opioid medications (such as NSAIDs) to physical therapy, acupuncture, massage, and chiropractic care.
4 Id. See also Costs of US Prescription Opioid Epidemic Estimated at $78.5 Billion, Wolters Kluwer (Sept. 14, 2016),http://wolterskluwer.com/company/newsroom/news/2016/09/costs-of-us-prescription-opioid-epidemicestimated-at-usd78.5-billion.html 5 Understanding the Epidemic: Drug overdose deaths in the United States continue to increase in 2015, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/ (last updated Dec. 16, 2016). 6Prescription Opioid Overdose Data, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/overdose.html (last updated Dec. 16, 2016). 7 See Surgeon General, supra fn. 1; Opioid Addiction 2016 Facts and Figures, American Society of Addiction Medicine (2016), https://www.asam.org/docs/default-source/advocacy/opioid-addiction-disease-facts-figures.pdf. 8 Vivek Murthy, The Opioid Crisis: Our Solution, TIME (Oct. 13, 2016), http://time.com/4521562/2016-electionopioid-epidemic/ 9 Opioids, Substance Abuse and Mental Services Administration, https://www.samhsa.gov/atod/opioids (last updated Feb. 23, 2016). 10 Gary M. Franklin, MD, MPH, Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: A position paper of American Academy of Neurology, 83 Neurology 1277 (2014). 11 Eric Scicchitano, Geisinger doctors: Opioids ineffective for chronic pain put patients at risk, The Daily Item (Dec. 7, 2016), http://www.dailyitem.com/news/local_news/geisinger-doctors-opioids-ineffective-for-chronic-pain-putpatients-at/article_2d66014f-511e-554f-bed5-768886b48616.html (citing, generally, Mellar P. Davis & Zankhana Mehta, Opioids and Chronic Pain: Where is the Balance? 18 Current Oncology Reports 71 (2016), available at https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s11912-016-0558-1)
Insurance companies can play an important role in reducing opioid prescriptions and making it easier for patients to access other forms of pain management treatment. Indeed, simply asking providers to consider providing alternative treatments is impractical in the absence of a supporting incentive structure. All else being equal, providers will often favor those treatment options that are most likely to be compensated, either by the government, an insurance provider, or a patient paying out-of-pocket. Insurance companies thus are in a position to make a very positive impact in the way that providers treat patients with chronic pain.
Adopting an incentive structure that rewards the use of non-opioid pain management techniques for chronic, non-cancer pain will have many benefits. Given the correlation between increased supply and opioid abuse, the societal benefits speak for themselves. Beyond that, incentivizing opioid alternatives promotes evidence-based techniques that are more effective at mitigating this type of pain, and, over the long-run, more cost-efficient.12 Thus, adopting such policies benefit patients, society, and insurers alike. When it comes to accidents and injuries the truck accident attorneys from Thon Beck Vanni Callahan & Powell Company can provide the required legal assistance.
The undersigned Attorneys General serve an important role in combating the opioid epidemic. As the chief legal officers of our States, we are charged with protecting consumers, including patients suffering from chronic pain and opioid addiction. Among other things, we are committed to protecting patients from unfair or deceptive business practices and ensuring that insurers provide consumers with transparent information about their products and services.
We are thus committed to utilizing all the powers available to our individual offices to ameliorate the problems caused by the over-prescription of opioids and to promote policies and practices that result in reasonable, sustainable, and patient-focused pain management therapies. In the near future, working in conjunction with other institutional stakeholders (such as State Insurance Commissioners), we hope to initiate a dialogue concerning your members’ incentive structures in an effort to identify those practices that are conducive to these efforts and those that are not. We hope that this process will highlight problematic policies and spur increased use of non-opioid pain management techniques. In case of workplace related injuries workers comp law firm has lawyers that can help you get the compensation you deserve. The status quo, in which there may be financial incentives to prescribe opioids for pain which they are ill-suited to treat, is unacceptable. We ask that you quickly initiate additional efforts so that you can play an important role in stopping further deaths.
We look forward to having this discussion with you.

Sincerely,

Leslie Rutledge Pamela Jo Bondi Arkansas Attorney General Florida Attorney General

12 Harrison Jacobs, Pain doctors: Insurance companies won’t cover the alternatives to opioids, Business Insider (Aug. 10, 2016), http://www.businessinsider.com/doctors-insurance-companies-policies-opioid-use-2016-6 (“If you look at the long-term cost of [opioids], plus monitoring, office visits and drug screenings . . . it’s cheaper long-term to do the more advanced therapy,”) (quoting Dr. Timothy Deer, co-chair, West Virginia Expert Pain Management Panel).

Derek Schmidt Andy Beshear Kansas Attorney General Kentucky Attorney General

Jim Hood Hector Balderas Mississippi Attorney General New Mexico Attorney General

Sean Reyes Mark R. Herring Utah Attorney General Virginia Attorney General

Patrick Morrisey Mark Brnovich West Virginia Attorney General Arizona Attorney General

Xavier Becerra George Jepsen California Attorney General Connecticut Attorney General

Karl. A. Racine Christopher M. Carr District of Columbia Attorney General Georgia Attorney General

Douglas S. Chin Lisa Madigan Hawaii Attorney General Illinois Attorney General

Curtis T. Hill Jr. Janet T. Mills Indiana Attorney General Maine Attorney General

Maura Healey Bill Schuette Massachusetts Attorney General Michigan Attorney General

Josh Hawley Tim Fox Missouri Attorney General Montana Attorney General

Douglas Peterson Adam Paul Laxalt Nebraska Attorney General Nevada Attorney General

Gordon MacDonald Christopher S. Porrino New Hampshire Attorney General New Jersey Attorney General

Eric T. Schneiderman Josh Stein New York Attorney General North Carolina Attorney General

Wayne Stenehjem Ellen F. Rosenblum North Dakota Attorney General Oregon Attorney General

Josh Shapiro Wanda Váquez Garced Pennsylvania Attorney General Puerto Rico Attorney General

Peter Kilmartin Alan Wilson Rhode Island Attorney General South Carolina Attorney General

Marty Jackley T.J. Donovan South Dakota Attorney General Vermont Attorney General

Brad Schimel Wisconsin Attorney General

Wasn’t it 46 state attorney generals in the late 90’s that sued all the Tobacco Industry and got a settlement of a minimum of 206 BILLION dollars paid out over 25 yrs.. 

Isn’t some of the same members that signed this letter are lining up to sue the pharmaceutical industry over causing the opiate crisis ?  How much do you think that settlement is going to total ?

Do you think that these same AG’s would hesitate to sue the health insurance industry for failing to conform to the AG’s wishes to reduce opiate prescriptions and/or limit opiates to only those who have cancer ?

They have already successfully sued a industry for the “damages” of producing and selling a LEGAL PRODUCT… and after that settlement that same industry went back to selling that same LEGAL PRODUCT.

After all it was our judicial system that in 1917 declared opiate addiction was a CRIME and NOT A DISEASE.. and they have operated under that judicial decision and in 1970 our Congress passed the Controlled Substance Act…that created the Federal Narcotic Bureau and its two million/yr budget with the BNDD (Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs) with a 1200-1500 new agents and a 43 million/yr budget. Which has now entails abt 12,000 employees of the DEA and the war on drugs now costing 81 billion/yr AND GROWING.

It would appear that now our judicial system is trying to prove that they can stop opiate use/abuse/addiction by eliminating the prescribing of legal opiates for all pts except those suffering from cancer.

For over ONE HUNDRED YEARS our judicial system has attempted to “cure addiction” by using the only “treatment/cure” that they have available to them and that is jail/prison….. and we have seen how well that has worked over the past ONE HUNDRED YEARS

So now our judicial system has decided that abstinence will solve the opiate crisis.

Filed under: General Problems