DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION
POSTED ON
NOVEMBER 15, 2015
Civil Forfeiture Aug – Sept 2015 DEA
http://www.forfeiture.gov/pdf/DEA/OfficialNotification.pdf
“The names of persons or businesses appearing in this notice are not necessarily criminal defendants or suspects, nor does the appearance of their names in this notice necessarily mean that they are the target of DEA investigations or other activities.”
Filed under: General Problems
This is what the War on Drugs has reaped for us in terms of our 4th and 5th Amendment Constitutional Guarantees. The State was charged with protecting us against such notions as Civil Asset Forfeiture in those Amendments and yet here we are; the State is the Great Usurper once and again. Highway robbery is alive and well in the Amerika of 2015.
I think the most sickening aspect of this is the fact that the SCOTUS could sit on their nine elevated thrones and with a straight face, rule that this policy is legal because the asset, i.e., the money, the house, the car, etc. was guilty of the crime of narcotics trafficking and not necessarily the individual in possession of the assets; it was not necessary to convict the individual of the crime in order to legally seize the asset. I cannot site chapter and verse, so if one is interested in confirming that I speak the truth, then I suggest using Google to locate the particulars of the ruling that I refer to.