Midwest meth-making down, but Mexican imports fill the void
ST. LOUIS (AP) — The manufacture of methamphetamine is sharply down in certain Midwestern states that have had the most trouble with the drug over the years, but it remains as popular as ever with users because of an influx of cheap Mexican imports, experts say.
Laws restricting the sale of an ingredient found in many cold medicines and key to making meth seem to have had their intended effect: The Drug Enforcement Administration does not provide partial-year data on meth lab seizures, but drug fighters in several states that generally register the most meth lab busts say they have seen a startling decline.
Missouri is on pace for 40 percent fewer meth lab seizures this year than last, according to Missouri State Highway Patrol data. Oklahoma busts are on pace to drop 33 percent, and Tennessee’s are down 48 percent.
But the steep decline does not mean users are turning away from the highly addictive drug.
“What we’re hearing throughout the Midwest from our colleagues is they’re all seeing meth labs drop, but it’s critical to note that no state is saying meth use is down,” said Mark Woodward of the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics. “It’s just that they’ve switched sources from cooking it to importing it.
“Meth use and addiction are still epidemic,” he said.
The number of meth lab seizures nationwide peaked at nearly 24,000 in 2004. The problem got so bad that restrictions were placed on the sale of cold and allergy pills containing pseudoephedrine, which gets mixed with household products like lighter fluid or drain cleaner to make homemade meth. Those medications were placed behind the counter, with buying limits and tracking of sales.
By 2007, fewer than 7,000 meth labs were seized across the country. Makers and users responded by finding a way to make meth with fewer pills — a dangerous concoction typically mixed in a 2-liter soda bottle. This “one-pot” or “shake-and-bake” method led to more people making the drug and a corresponding spike in busts, with the national total back above 15,000 in 2010.
Laws got even tougher. Oregon, Mississippi and some cities and counties in high-meth states began requiring a prescription to buy pills containing pseudoephedrine.
By last year, seizures had dropped to about 9,500, according to DEA statistics.
Seizing the opportunity provided by the tougher enforcement of homemade meth in the United States, Mexican cartels have turned to an old recipe known as P2P that first appeared in the 1960s and 1970s, experts said. It uses the organic compound phenylacetone — banned in the United States but obtainable in Mexico, the DEA said — rather than pseudoephedrine.
As a result, the purity of Mexican meth rose from 39 percent in 2007 to essentially 100 percent, Jim Shroba, special agent in charge of the DEA office in St. Louis, has said. Meanwhile, the price dropped by two-thirds.
Tennessee, which often has been No. 1 or No. 2 in seizures, is “seeing a significant influx in availability of Mexican meth,” said Tommy Farmer, director of the Tennessee Methamphetamine and Pharmaceutical Task Force.
Woodward said Oklahoma police commonly hear that users have accepted Mexican meth, once considered inferior to the homemade drug.
“And they don’t have to risk blowing up their lab or getting caught at a pharmacy,” he said.
For more than a decade in the early 2000s, Missouri was the national leader in meth lab seizures. But data from the Highway Patrol for the first six months of 2015 shows Missouri with 314 seizures, on pace for 628. That would be a big drop from the 1,045 seizures last year. Just three years ago, Missouri had more than 2,000 meth lab seizures.
Filed under: General Problems
Once and again the DEA and their state counterparts are engaged in playing the game known as “Whack-a-Mole. They’ve played this game on some level for most of their existence. It doesn’t work and is a waste of time, money and resources in general. They either need to come up with an effective plan or there needs to be some sort of huge paradigm shift in terms of public policy. I strongly tend towards the latter as they’ve had 45 years of experience with the former (and longer in terms of the several states) and it does not work. What was that old chest nut about the definition of insanity?
Until they figure out how to eliminate the mental health condition of addiction as well as eliminate the criminal element in our society that would rather commit crimes to fund their life style… nothing is going to change… Prohibition and criminalization of a mental health disease has NEVER solved the problem. Congress and our judicial system created the black market of illegal drugs and the criminals will find a methodology to fulfill that need/want..