All of these lawsuits seem somewhat similar to the Tobacco Lawsuit… with ONE MAJOR EXCEPTION… the Tobacco lawsuit was solely against the manufacturers. With the opiate crisis lawsuit… they are suing the manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers… why weren’t they including in these lawsuits – all the prescribers who wrote these prescriptions and all the Pharmacists that filled these prescription and they only sue the MAJOR CHAIN PHARMACIES… The pharma, wholesaler, corporate pharmacy chains – are not at the deciding point to write or fill a prescription. It does not appear that smaller chain pharmacies and independent pharmacies, hospital pharmacies or major nursing home pharmacies nor prescribers and chain pharmacy employee pharmacists. Could it be that JUSTICE can only be served on entities that have DEEP POCKETS ?
Also notice that all these various bureaucratic entities are not putting any taxpayers’ money at risk, they are employing law firms that will put up their money – taking these cases on a contingency basis… the law firms only get paid if they WIN.
Maybe the chronic pain community needs to pay attention to this… JUSTICE seems to be centered on suing corporate entities with DEEP POCKETS. There is all too many healthcare corporations that are limiting or denying “you” medically necessary therapies. Various bureaucracies are using our laws and our judicial system (law firms & courts) to pad their individual budgets while constructing a barrier between you and your medically necessary therapy. They bankrupted Purdue pharma and blamed them for the entire opiate crisis – whose opiate meds account to only 4% of all opiate Rxs – and put them out of business… a couple of other pharmas has or in the process of some sort of bankruptcy.
Judge: Pharmacies owe 2 Ohio counties $650M in opioids suit
CLEVELAND (AP) — A federal judge in Cleveland awarded $650 million in damages Wednesday to two Ohio counties that won a landmark lawsuit against national pharmacy chains CVS, Walgreens and Walmart, claiming the way they distributed opioids to customers caused severe harm to communities and created a public nuisance.
U.S. District Judge Dan Polster said in the ruling that the money will be used to abate a continuing opioid crisis in Lake and Trumbull counties, outside Cleveland. Attorneys for the counties put the total price tag at $3 billion for the damage done to the counties.
Lake County is to receive $306 million over 15 years. Trumbull County is to receive $444 million over the same period. Polster ordered the companies to immediately pay nearly $87 million to cover the first two years of the abatement plan.
In his ruling, Polster admonished the three companies, saying they “squandered the opportunity to present a meaningful plan to abate the nuisance” after a trial that considered what damages they might owe.
Walmart and Walgreens both said they will be appealing the ruling. CVS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trumbull County Commissioner Frank Fuda praised the award in a statement, saying “the harms caused by this devastating epidemic” can now be addressed.
Lake County Commissioner John Hamercheck said in a statement “Today marks the start of a new day in our fight to end the opioid epidemic.”
A jury returned a verdict in November in favor of the counties after a six-week trial. It was then left to Polster to decide how much the counties should receive from the three pharmacy companies. He heard testimony in May to determine damages.
The counties convinced the jury that the pharmacies played an outsized role in creating a public nuisance in the way they dispensed pain medication into their communities.
It was the first time pharmacy companies completed a trial to defend themselves in a drug crisis that has killed a half-million Americans since 1999.
Attorneys for the pharmacy chains maintained they had policies to stem the flow of pills when their pharmacists had concerns and would notify authorities about suspicious orders from doctors. They also said it was doctors who controlled how many pills were prescribed for legitimate medical needs not their pharmacies.
Walmart issued a statement Wednesday saying the counties’ attorneys “sued Walmart in search of deep pockets, and this judgment follows a trial that was engineered to favor the plaintiffs’ attorneys and was riddled with remarkable legal and factual mistakes. We will appeal.”
Walgreens spokesperson Fraser Engerman said “The facts and the law did not support the jury verdict last fall, and they do not support the court’s decision now.
“The court committed significant legal errors in allowing the case to go before a jury on a flawed legal theory that is inconsistent with Ohio law and compounded those errors in reaching its ruling regarding damages.”
CVS is based in Rhode Island, Walgreens in Illinois and Walmart in Arkansas.
Two chains — Rite Aid and Giant Eagle — settled lawsuits with the counties before trial. The amounts they paid have not been disclosed publicly.
Mark Lanier, an attorney for the counties, said during trial that the pharmacies were attempting to blame everyone but themselves.
The opioid crisis has overwhelmed courts, social services agencies and law enforcement in Ohio’s blue-collar corner east of Cleveland, leaving behind heartbroken families and babies born to addicted mothers, Lanier told jurors.
Roughly 80 million prescription painkillers were dispensed in Trumbull County alone between 2012 and 2016 — equivalent to 400 for every resident. In Lake County, some 61 million pills were distributed during that period.
The rise in physicians prescribing pain medications such as oxycodone and hydrocodone came as medical groups began recognizing that patients have the right to be treated for pain, Kaspar Stoffelmayr, an attorney for Walgreens, said at the opening of the trial.
The problem, he said, was “pharmaceutical manufacturers tricked doctors into writing way too many pills.”
The counties said pharmacies should be the last line of defense to prevent the pills from getting into the wrong hands.
The trial before Polster was part of a broader constellation of about 3,000 federal opioid lawsuits consolidated under the his supervision. Other cases are moving ahead in state courts.
Kevin Roy, chief public policy officer at Shatterproof, an organization that advocates for solutions to addiction, said in November the verdict could lead pharmacies to follow the path of major distribution companies and some drugmakers that have reached nationwide settlements of opioid cases worth billions. So far, no pharmacy has reached a nationwide settlement.
Filed under: General Problems
U know what i also find very curious,,,All day u see commercials for Kolodnys’ psychiatry,,Get bit by a snake,,,call a shrink,,,Go grocery shopping,drop a orange take a anti-depressent,,Commercials alll day,,to sell psychaitry and their medicines,everywhere,,.How many commercials did we see for thee essential medicine opiates???0000000000..I saw a ,”tweet” a little while back from a lawyer,,claiming 1 judge got paid by the anti-opiate .ie tortures,,for ruling against opiates,,,I wonder also,,,,,how many judges are getting paid$$ in some way,,,to rule against these good folks??
U know every single mass shooter was on psychotropics,,why aren’;t they suing the shrink,manufacturere etc for the psychotropic shooting???Double standard,,thus corruption for sure,,Something is very very corrupt for sure,,,and jmo,,i believe its a entire ,”family” of corrupted people behind it w/lots of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$,,,,jmo,maryw
I keep being astounded at the repeated wins of the anti-opioid zealots in the courts. How in the world could those “deep pockets” not hire an attorney good enough to shovel aside the steaming piles of the Church of Opiophobia’s PR bullspit & expose their complete lack of supporting data??? The whole opioid hysteria is driving me crazy.