Lawsuit targets Medicaid policy that limits spendy hepatitis C drugs
A new lawsuit seeks to force state Medicaid officials to revoke a policy limiting high-priced drugs to treat hepatitis C to only the sickest patients. After a similar suit last month, a private insurer changed its policy.
Two weeks after suing private insurers for improperly denying costly drugs to patients with hepatitis C infections, Seattle lawyers have expanded the fight to Washington state’s Medicaid provider.
A class-action lawsuit filed this week on behalf of two Apple Health clients — and nearly 28,000 others with the liver-damaging disease — seeks to force the Health Care Authority (HCA) to change a policy that limits the spendy drugs to only the sickest patients.
Two Medicaid patients, a 53-year-old Seattle woman and a 47-year-old Lakewood man, were prescribed the drug Harvoni to cure their hepatitis C infections. However, the prescriptions were denied because the drug is too expensive, according to the complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Western Washington.
The plaintiffs were not identified by name in the lawsuit.
Most Read Stories
null
Why I stopped wearing the hijab
Woman killed in University Place sought restraining order against boyfriend a day earlier
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to members of the audience during a commercial break at a CNN town hall at the University of South Carolina in Columbia, S.C., Thursday, Feb. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
Trump’s warning about Boeing jobs dismissed by experts
null
Is Seattle still a great city? Checklist reflects doubts
FILE – In this April 23, 2014, file photo, Daryl Cura demonstrates an e-cigarette at Vape store in Chicago. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh, File)
E-cigs are exploding in vapers’ mouths, leaving gruesome injuries
Save 50% on a subscription today.
“It is unlawful to withhold prescription drugs that cure a disease from Medicaid beneficiaries based on the cost of those drugs,” the complaint filed by the firm Sirianni, Youtz, Spoonemore and Hamburger states. Co-filers include Columbia Legal Services and the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation at Harvard Law School.
The HCA denied the lawyers’ written demand to remove the policy restricting access to the hepatitis C drugs.
“This is a complex situation and my client would like more time,” Angela Coats McCarthy, an assistant attorney general representing the HCA, wrote in a Feb. 12 response. “As you know, this is a national issue which many state and insurers are struggling with — my client is no different.”
An HCA spokeswoman said the agency hadn’t seen the lawsuit and couldn’t comment on pending or active litigation.
Harvoni is among the newest highly effective drugs that can halt the hepatitis C virus (HCV). It has a cure rate of 90 percent — but comes with a retail price tag of about $95,000 for a 12-week course of therapy.
Like dozens of state Medicaid programs across the nation, the HCA plan limits treatment with Harvoni and other direct-acting anti-viral drugs to patients with the most severe fibrosis, or liver scarring. Fibrosis is measured on a scale of F0 to F4, with the highest level indicating cirrhosis. Patients with high scores can develop liver cancer or require liver transplants.
In a letter sent to the U.S. Senate in September, Washington Medicaid Director MaryAnne Lindeblad estimated it would cost $242 million just to provide drugs for high-risk hepatitis C patients in fiscal 2016.
“If HCA were to pay for hepatitis C treatment for all Medicaid clients infected with hepatitis C, the cost would be three times the current total pharmacy budget,” she wrote. That budget is $1 billion a year.
Medical guidelines previously supported limiting the drugs to the sickest patients, but that changed last year. Experts with the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) updated their guidelines, saying that drugs such as Harvoni should be used to treat all patients with HCV, “including mild liver disease.”
Limits based on severity of illness are no longer supported by best medical practice, the lawsuit claims.
Two similar class-action lawsuits were filed late last month against private insurers Group Health Cooperative and BridgeSpan, a subsidiary of Regence BlueShield, for imposing similar limits. BridgeSpan last week updated its policy to provide the direct-acting anti-viral drugs to all hepatitis C patients, regardless of liver-fibrosis stage, a spokeswoman said.
Group Health has changed its policy to allow consideration of treatment for patients with fibrosis scores of F2 and higher rather than F3 and higher, a spokesman said.
In supplemental budget documents, HCA officials initially requested $77.7 million to expand treatment to patients with less severe liver disease, but later submitted an adjustment that would give back $44 million. The agency originally projected treating 3,600 Medicaid clients with HCV by June 2015, but actually treated about 1,200 clients.
JoNel Aleccia: 206-464-2906 or jaleccia@seattletimes.com. On Twitter @JoNel_Aleccia
Filed under: General Problems
I was put on oxycontin about 2yrs. after it came out & it REALLY changed my life! I did very good on it w/o any increase for about 5yrs. Then while watching 20/20 about oxycontin where they said it was nothing but heroin & that it was killing everybody. This scared me so much that I told my doc I wanted to stop taking, so he started a taper. I had been on 40mg. X3 per day of oxycontin & 10mg of oxycodone for break thru up to 4 a day for 5yrs.
The taper was to be done over a 3-4 day period, however by the 7th day(2days w/o any)I thought I was dying & was told to come in asap! When I got there, his office manager met w/ me instead of him, to inform me that unless I agreed to go thru drug treatment. I had no idea what she was talking about as I have NEVER abused ANY drug; but she said that I was in withdrawal & that only those abusing & addicted go into withdrawal after a taper, either that or I was lying about my pain as “real” compliant patients do not get dependent!
So I went for rehab, not because I was abusing or addicted, but because they could help me get thru the withdrawal. Because my I had 2 little girls & a very disabled mom to care for I could not do a 30 day rehab, so I went for a brand new treatment called ultra rapid detox by Dr Rick sponagule (sp?) in tarpon springs. They did not except ins. & had to pay $10,000 out of pocket up front, which I really could not afford to take a loan out.
Everyone was so kind to me & the treatment was a lot easier than I thought as I was so scared! Unlike other rapid detox, Dr. S would slow the patients heart way down during the procedure as is keeps you from having seizures which can be very hard on patient. However they had a hard time keeping mine up & stable due to the damage & congestive heart failure caused by celebrex, which also left me w/ uncontrollable high bp. The other problem was that the med he used to raise my heartbeat also raised my bp up to 225/123 & led to me having a stroke! this damaged my eye sight & short term memory. what was supposed to be a 2 day stay, end up being a 9 day stay in cardiac ICU!
Dr.S said that what my doc did was very wrong & cruel & told me the he was 100% sure & would go on record that I was not an addict or abusing it if I decided to sue. I tried to find a lawyer, but all wanted paid up front & even then my chances were not good. It’s funny that a man sued mcdonalds for a too hot pickle that burned his lip; but I can’t sue my doc for negligence & putting my life in danger because he did not know what he was talking about, so I had to pay the price for HIS ignorance? Something is very wrong here, when a doc can treat a patient this way!!
The people with damaged livers will explode due to the CDC lies about NASIDS being an effective replacement for opiates. What then? Chronic pain patients who are under treated for pain have a much more difficult time bringing lawsuits for denial of care.
As soon as the CDC guidelines are put into action we will have too many people to count that can bring a lawsuit for denial of care.