Outrageous Massachusetts Drug Bill Would Send You to Prison and Steal Your Car—No Drugs Needed
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2017/jul/12/outrageous_massachusetts_drug_bi
With the support of state law enforcement, a Massachusetts Democratic state representative has filed a drug war bill that would send violators to prison for a mandatory minimum two years (five years for a second offense) and allow police to seize their vehicles—all without the presence of any actual drugs.
Sponsored by Rep. Stephan Hay (D-Fitchfield), the measure, House Bill 1266, makes it a crime to have a hidden compartment in one’s vehicle or to try to add one—and it presumes that any hidden compartment in a vehicle is for “for the purpose of transporting or distributing controlled substances” and related contraband, such as cash or weapons. As the bill specifies in its asset forfeiture section:
Proof that a conveyance contains a hidden compartment as defined in this section shall be prima facie evidence that the conveyance was used intended for use in and for the business of unlawfully manufacturing, dispensing, or distributing controlled substances.
This is a legislative attempt to redefine reality in the name of drug war priorities akin to South Dakota’s law deeming meth use or possession by a parent as child abuse. Despite that law, meth use is not child abuse, although it could lead to it. Similarly, having a hidden compartment in a car does not mean one is involved in trafficking, although one could be. But in both cases, legislators seek to twist reality to sync with prohibitionist—and punitive—ideology.
Only one state, Ohio, actually has a similar law on the books, and it has only been used once, but that one instance should be disturbing. In 2013, state troopers stopped Norman Gurley and discovered a secret compartment in his vehicle. They found absolutely no drugs but arrested him anyway on charges he broke the secret compartment law. That case briefly became a national news sensation before fading into obscurity, but it still lives: Gurley is set for a jury trial in December.
Police in Massachusetts are supporting this bill not only because it gives them one more tool in their war on drugs, but also because they get to keep any cars they seize. Massachusetts has the worst civil asset forfeiture laws in the country, and unlike states that are lining up to end forfeitures without a criminal conviction, as neighboring Connecticut did this week, cops only need to reach the threshold of probable cause that someone’s cash or car or other property is related to a crime to seize it.This bill would make it all the easier, and they wouldn’t even need to find any drugs.
Filed under: General Problems
What the people there should do is leave the state and move to another state in droves by any means necessary. Take away any chance for the police to suspect probable cause. Because them saying they have probable cause doesn’t mean they really have it. Maybe it’s a slow day for criminal activity or their bored and mad so pulling purple over to take a look see for a broken taillight could make them say oh can we search your car. If you are not on probation or parole the answer is no you may not search my car/ property then a canine will come sniff out your car around the exterior. If alerted to any drugs guns or dead bodies you should be free to go. Although canine can react to a nonverbal command to make them react so either way they will do what they want. Leaving Massachusetts in droves would collapse their economy and put politicians and other idiots that think like this and are in a position to push somehing like this into effect would not have a job vey long without people to control . If this actuality does go into effect it won’t be long until its nation wide. Seriously thos country and it’s people are losing their rights our culture and soon it’ll be our entire civilization in ruin . If so i hope then end is soon because my untreated anxiety is so bad i can’t take a breath of air hardly I feel like I’m suffocating.