http://www.fox9.com/news/mn-penny-a-pill-opioids-fee
ST. PAUL, Minn. (KMSP) – Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a “penny-a-pill” paid for by drug companies to fund an opioid stewardship program for addiction prevention, treatment and recovery efforts in Minnesota. The governor estimates the program would raise $20 million each year.
Minnesota Department of Health data shows the state had 395 opioid deaths in 2016, an 18 percent increase over 2015. Of those 395 deaths, 194 were linked to prescription opioids.
CHANGING GUIDELINES: Last December, Minnesota announced new guidelines to change how physicians are writing prescriptions for painkillers. These new guidelines were the product of 18 months of planning by a group of physicians on both sides of the aisle.
The new guidelines include:
1. Prescribing the lowest effective dose and duration of opioids when used for acute pain.
2. Monitoring the patients closely, including prescribing opioids in multiples of seven days.
3. Avoid initiating chronic opioid therapy, make it so long term prescriptions would include face-to-face visits with the provider at least every three months.
“To our patients already on these pain medications, we are not abandoning you,” said Dr. Chris Johnson leading the group.
Johnson emphasized the focus will be on educating and guiding physicians, patients and their families. Minnesota is currently the fifth lowest state in the country when it comes to prescribing opioids, but everyone involved in this effort points out doing better is vital.
“One opioid prescription can start the downward spiral in the right person,” said Dr. Rahul Koranne, Chief Medical Officer for the Minnesota Hospital Association.
LAWSUITS AGAINST DRUG COMPANIES: Multiple Minnesota counties have filed lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies, accusing the drugmakers of using an aggressive marketing campaign to change the culture of prescribing opioids. A lawsuit filed by Anoka County last month claims pharmaceutical companies convinced doctors that it was safe to prescribe opioids to treat not only severe and short-term pain, but also for less severe and longer-term pain, such as back pain and arthritis.
“The defendants knew, however, that their opioid products were addictive, subject to abuse and not safe of efficacious for long-term use,” the lawsuit says.
In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration recognized opioid abuse as a public health crisis. Despite this, the lawsuit says pharmaceutical companies have maintained that prescription opioids are not dangerous and have continued to sell the drugs.
About 20 other Minnesota county attorneys filed similar lawsuits in November, led by Washington County Attorney Pete Orput.
Only a BUREAUCRAT/POLITICIAN would believe that they could impose a “tax” on a business and/or their product and it will not be passed along to the final customer. The problem may be that pharmacy may end up taking the blunt of this new tax.. PBM (Prescription Benefit Managers) control what pharmacy gets paid… Pharma passes the cost to the wholesaler… wholesaler passes the cost to the pharmacy.. but.. the PBM refuses to reimburse the pharmacy for the additional cost. Independents will probably get hit the worse, because the typical independent 95% of their revenue is from the Rx dept and the contracts that the pharmacy has with the PBM.. prohibits the pharmacy from collecting anything additional from the pt.. above what the PBM states is owed by the pt. Since >50% of independent pharmacies are located in towns <20,000… so those people living in rural Minnesota will get hit the hardest. Losing maybe their only local pharmacy and the next closest pharmacy being miles away… Since Minnesota is in “snow country” … how many pts may be forced to be out of their medication(s) for chronic conditions.. because of this whole fiasco ?
Filed under: General Problems
I can understand trying to get funds but most people who are in rehab have multiple drugs problems and not just one. To only put a charge on opiates only is not fair or right since other drugs also cause death including alcohol so they all should be taxed. That would include alcohol. My guess if they had to do that it would not get in. If this passes then we need to file a lawsuit for discrimination.
We really need representatives that are not emotionally involved in the process. Both representatives have lost children to opiate overdoses. They are going to be very biased! We need representatives that have not been personally effected by the heroin problem! We need representatives that are not biased in one way or another to either side. And we definitely need people who are effected by chronic pain involved in these “groups”!