Not Even Regulations The CDC’s guidelines alone created increasingly harsh con

Not Even Regulations: The CDC’s guidelines alone created increasingly harsh conditions for Americans with chronic and severe pain.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-159290287

President Trump’s first week in office included an order effective til at least February 1st, suspending all CDC, HHS and NIH communications: regulations, announcements, reports, advisories, updates and online posts. This aligns with pruning federal bureaucracy. But silencing these 3, of hundreds of agencies, is interesting.

Covid was, for many Americans, their first personal experience of vast, unregulated power imposed by federal agencies. Without enforcing laws or interpreting regulations, just publishing claims and data have unrestrained power.

For many Americans, it was shocking and novel seeing suggestions rapidly morph into mandates, while mainstream and social media stripped contradictory evidence and contrary opinions from public discourse. Some citizens were inspired to push others to wear masks.

But covid wasn’t the first time government actions that were neither laws nor regulations, imposed dire consequences on ordinary, law-abiding Americans.

One agency muzzled by Trump, CDC, exemplifies far-reaching federal influence. One example of the profound impact of CDC publications is the 2016 CDC guidelines for pain treatment with opioids. These guidelines — not regulations, not laws — initiated drastic, ongoing reductions in pain care nationwide.

The guidelines discussed pain patients who had never been prescribed opioids. CDC recommended for these patients’ doses below 90MME per day. The guidelines didn’t discuss established patients with severe and chronic pain, or the wide genetic variability of sensitivity to pain and sensitivity to opioids. Although pain is often described as a subjective experience, it’s observable in animals and people unable to verbalize, including infants, coma patients and dementia patients. Four the top ten reasons for US ER visits are pain (abdomen, chest, head and general). Another, back problems, entail pain. Only for Spock, a fictional alien, is pain merely “a thing of the mind.”

Caution introducing new medication sounds reasonable. However, variability in pain and opioid sensitivity makes a one-size dosing, even for one subset of patients, or medical condition, unworkable. Chronic and severe pain often requires much more than 90 MME per day. Individual morphine tablets of 200mg are legally manufactured and prescribed.

Between 2011 and 2021, US opioid prescriptions were down 40%. According to JAMA, from 2016 to 2018, prescriptions were down sharply. This trend began years before the guidelines.

After 2016, many insurers and medical groups, and state governments, drastically reduced prescribing, even for long established, successfully treated patients. The 90 MME limit is currently enshrined in laws in 40 states, often applying to all pain patients. Inpatient palliative care, especially for economically disadvantaged patients, has been significantly reduced.

In 2014, approximately 39.4 million Americans suffered chronic and severe pain. As of 2024, that number was over 60 million. In 2016, 1 in 10 US veterans had chronic pain, and after the guidelines were published veterans complained of insufficient pain treatment, and rising veteran suicides.

Facing widespread criticism, CDC expressed surprise the guidelines had been applied widely and swiftly. In a 2019 paper the guidelines’ authors claimed recommendations were implemented incorrectly and pain patients were deprived of necessary medications. Revised guidelines published in 2022 softened some recommendations, with no effect on post-2016 legislation.

The 2016 guidelines didn’t arise in a vacuum. Years of prior CDC publications featured flawed data. There was a detectable inference that legally-manufactured opioids prescribed by professionals present a uniquely serious threat not only to patients, but to society.

To illustrate how prescription opioid deaths were supposedly under-reported, a 2017 CDC report

discussed Minnesota patients with pneumonia and opioid prescriptions who died between 2006 and 2015. CDC argued these should be counted as opioid deaths, not pneumonia, as they had been.

A 2021 report in the medical journal “Cureus,” examined a decade of CDC publications about opioid-linked deaths. From 2006 to 2016, CDC’s opioid prescription death totals were inflated by counting deaths linked to illicit fentanyl and methadone dispensed for substance abuse treatment. Methadone prescriptions for pain started declining prior to 2016. “What is clear from the authors’ inquiry is that, even today, the CDC has no way of determining the actual number of prescription opioid overdose deaths each year. For more than a decade, the CDC’s erroneous reports went unchallenged while being used by Congress and the Executive Branch as the basis for public policy.”

A 2021 Pain Therapy report shows death attributed to opioids were over-reported by 20-30% — virtually the same percentage by which the CDC claimed opioid deaths were increasing. Almost 90% of deaths attributed to opioids included 1-4 other drugs on the death certificate, most frequently benzodiazepines. A 2021 CDC publication bluntly states that agency efforts to quantify overdose deaths are “falling short.” As of 2021, CDC hadn’t complied with Congress’ mandate to improve its methods for tabulating OD deaths. While one CDC publication reported opioid deaths were up in 2020, another, in 2023, stated they were up for the first time since 2018.

Considering the influence wrought by one publication on one subset of patients, data on that subset might be pertinent. A 2018 study in the BJM studied over two million opioid-naive patients receiving surgery between 2008 and 2016. Their subsequent opioid misuse rate was 0.6%.

In 2016, JAMA published data for 641,941 subjects, with no opioid prescriptions for at least a year, receiving major surgery between 2001 and 2013. The reference sample of 18 million, received no surgery. Depending on the surgery, rates of subsequent misuse ranged from 0.119% following C-sections, to 1.141% for total knee replacement. For the no-surgery control group, the rate was 0.136%.

Despite revised guidelines, and documented flaws in their opioid data, CDC continues to publish flawed data. The influence of the 2016 guidelines continues to spread. We now have a return of opioid-free surgery, as well as the opioid-free emergency room.

Many medical professionals fear prescribing appropriate opioids from misguided belief that opioid prescriptions are uniquely lethally dangerous, or fear facing legal battles like the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court Ruan case.

The influence the CDC exerted via publications alone cannot be undone with publications.

At this point, CDC officials could appear in sackcloth and ashes, on social media blast, vigorously repenting the 2016 guidelines, without affecting the sequela of their work in 2016. For reasonable pain care, we’d need: 1. legislatures in 40 states to repeal post 2016 laws, 2. professional medical education to cease depicting prescribed opioids as uniquely dangerous to patients and society, 3. the White House to stop financial rewards for Hollywood productions pushing narratives crafted by government drug warriors.

Even if all effects of the 2016 guidelines were entirely reversed, it will do nothing for patients and who died by suicide following the sudden withdrawal or forced tapering of their prescriptions. How many there have been has not be the subject of any federal research.

Originally Published by American Thinker February 8, 2025 under the title “The CDC’s Big Mistake”

3 Responses

  1. Great article

  2. Again,,I do not know how u met this very smart lady,,,but agree,,,,,mostly,,,,but as many know,,I willl always believe kolodny gave them the blueprints,,,on how to torture both physcally,then mentally all pre-existing MEDICALLY ill in non choice physical pain ,from a non choice medical condtion,,kolodny designed those blueprints of torture upon us,,,how to torture ,for a renew of his profession for $$$$,,,after the forced closure of all psychiatrist asylums for abuse in 2010 ,,Also to Ms,Randals point,,the cdc has retracted a lot,,yet still we are dieing by forced torture,either using death,as physical pain control,,or loss of individualized effective dosages,,via forced reduction,,why…$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$,,,look at all the $$$$$$,,the dea/doj,addictionist psychiatry, has brought in,,,look at all the $$$$$$$ the new rehabs built or being built on promised $$$$Another government own agency abusing their power for $$$$$,,thus using torture upon us,,,,as their commodity..All the new psych admission to psych wards when folks go nutts from forced physical pain,,,,,As Steve said long ago,,,their not gonna hand out alllll those pink slips to the dea/doj,or psych wards ,rehabs ,or money $$$$$ to government funded programs from opiates lawsuit money,promised money,,,not factual money in the banks yet,,wow,,,,
    ,As to pain is subjective,,Again I see fact here,,It is literally Imposible, for anyone else to physically feel the physical pain of another,,,it is,literally impossible,,thats just fact,,,I can’t truthfully feel the broken leg of another,,its impossible,,thus,to the ideation that physical pain is subjective,,I agree ,,to those observing it,,but not by those enduring by force,,that physical pain from a medical condition,,Thee only ones that are objective,is the poor soul endureing that physical pain,from a non choice medical condition,for they are thee ONLY ONE physically enduring it,,By bringing is,,pain is ,”subjective,” brings in a ,”emotional,” component/degree /a ,”lesser than ,” addition to your claim of physical pain,therefore,brings in a justification to deny the person in physical pain,what they truly need,as they are truly thee only 1 who know,how much it physicaly hurts,for they are factually thee only 1 ns physically feeling the physical pain,,no-one else can physically feel the physical pain of another,it is impossible!,,So if u say your physical pain is a 10,,well,,,maybe subjectively a doctor will say,, your emotionally over-reacting soo the person qualified to give u pain meds will claim its only a 4,,,again the person NOT
    endureing the physical pain ,,when the person endureing the physical pain knows its a 10.,Truth dictates’ it is impossible,to physically feel the physical pain of another,sorry,but that is factual truth,being ignored, Using the word subjective by others,to describe someone else physical pain gives them the justification to deny the poor soul in physical pain,,truly effective physical pain relief,,but,,,in reality,thus fact,,truth dictates,,,it is literally IMPOSSIBLE,, to physically feel the physical pain of another,,,thus ,,using ,”physical pain is subjective,” is then being used,,to deny,,effective physical pain relief unto the actual person enduring that physical pain from a medical condition,,,,Thats not in my wheel house,,thank God,,,I NEVER have the rite to torture another living entity for my ,”subjective,’ opinion,”’..Which is why I will always believe,,the FORCED combination of mental and medical,,always harms ,tortures the medically ill,,,via torture upon them,delay of medical diagnoses’,, ie,,oh thats just anxiety, ,nope,,was a heart attack in reality,,Women are thee ones most negatively effective by this theory of combining by force,,wrong ,mental diagnoses via subjective opinions.True medical conditions always missed,,, thus some even die from this huge medical error,or are damage physically for life,,by deeming a true medical issue,,falsely,,, a mental issue,Again,medicine operates on facts,it is factually impossible, to physically feel the physical pain of another from a medical condition that is physically painful,,it is impossible//Maybe there ought to be a law,,that NO MENTAL
    diagnoses for physical pain will ever be done,,,,until alll medical testing is completed,,,,,,,maryw

  3. Thanks for posting this, Steve!

Leave a Reply to ccahillmsncomCancel reply

Discover more from PHARMACIST STEVE

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading