Now the CDC Seems to Be Pushing Fentanyl Myths in Its New Video

https://youtu.be/T2mhmLsd79E

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/fentanyl/risk.html

On March 27, the Centers for Disease Control, in collaboration with the Fredericksburg, Virginia Police and Fire Departments, released this video (above) to “help emergency responders understand the risks and what they can do to protect themselves from exposure to illicit drugs,” according to its description.

Introduced with a crime-drama soundtrack announcing a “real-life” scenario, police officers respond to an overdose call in a residential building. Needles and white powder are found in the bathroom. While the officers wait for a search warrant, with the suspects seated on the two beds, one officer begins experiencing distorted vision and dizziness. Eventually, the other decides to administer naloxone to his partner. The officer concludes that he must have been overdosing by merely being in the room with what is implied to be fentanyl, the bogeyman of opioids.

In the scenario, portrayed from body-camera footage, the CDC attributes the officer’s alleged overdose to “inhalation and touching eyes/nose/mouth,” “flushing drugs down the toilet [which] may have contaminated the towel” that one of the officers held, “respiratory protection donned incorrectly,” and “not changing gloves when contaminated.”

The sources of exposure alleged by the video fall in line with the broader narrative pushed by the Drug Enforcement Administration and other law enforcement sources that just one touch of fentanyl can be deadly—a myth that has been widely debunked by national organizations like American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) and American Academy of Clinical Toxicology (AACT) .

“If you rush, you’ll make small mistakes. And those could cost you,” says Officer Johnathan Piersol solemnly in the film. “For example, my respirator was hung up on my camera mount, and it didn’t create the proper seal.”

Drug journalist Zachary Siegel raised questions about the accuracy of the video’s implication that just sharing space with the drug could create immediate life-threatening health risks.

.@CDCgov: In this video, are you suggesting that illicit fentanyl was concentrated enough in the air of this rather spacious apartment with windows and A/C to cause officer’s to succumb to fentanyl exposure? https://t.co/Zhu3jTXfqI pic.twitter.com/xUA8DV8R67

Ironically, the CDC itself has published findings that contradict the messages communicated in the video.

“Symptoms of acute opioid intoxication resulting from incidental dermal contact with fentanyl … appears to be an unlikely occurrence,” wrote John Howard, MD and Jennifer Hornsby-Myers, MS for the CDC. Chronic low-level exposure could cause health problems, they noted, but people working with the substance in chemical manufacturing contexts are usually the ones at risk.

Siegel also pointed out that only law enforcement officers—not toxicologists—were interviewed.

7 Responses

  1. They are making themselves so obvious. If they succeed with this project to vilify opiates then certainly it could not be their fault.

  2. NEXT: FEET declared addicting. Cause people to walk in front of moving trains.

  3. I agree something more was going on that’s not covered in the video. I’m a retired anesthetist and have had fentanyl contact my skin hundreds of times in my career and never with the results suggested in the video.

    • A Chinese friend and colleague ( who had opened 60 plus companies in China) of my husband’s warned that Americans should NEVER but any Chinese product that you eat or put in your mouth. So, who knows what the Chinese have been up to, but it certainly has not been the chronic pain community who fueled the drug crisis and fentanyl deaths.

  4. Nice. A scenario from ncis.

  5. goodness, why should we expect any higher a factual level for training vids for responders/LEOs than any place else, including medical care rules for millions? (or I should say, “denial of medical care for millions”).

    They gotta keep cranking up the fear level, pump up the idea that even being in the same room, or on the same block*, with those evil, insta-fatal opioids will kill everybody. The few who manage to survive will be instant addicts, of course.

    *there’s already moves afoot in at least one state to investigate people who live with someone being prescribed opioids –spouse, roommates, whatever: the folks behind that one insist that mere proximity to a chronic pain patient means you’re probably an addict. If they pass that one, I insist that everyone who lives with an alcoholic must have their car & drivers license taken away; by their (il)logic, if being near a CPP means you’re likely an addict, then certainly the MUCH more common addiction to alcohol means you’ll cause a fatal accident. Hey, CPPs no longer have any civil rights whatsoever; why should alcoholics?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from PHARMACIST STEVE

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading