Mayo Hospital FL: things are done OUR WAY – even if alternative treatment could save the pt’s life.

Just imagine your loved one has been on a vent for over TWO WEEKS and the hospital (MAYO) that the pt is in .. is playing “hardball” because the hospital’s policy disagrees with another prescriber that is willing prescribe Ivermectin for this pt…  and the family’s fight is CRAWLING thru our court system – while the pt gets closer and closer to death and judge A-HO …declared …“An individual’s right to privacy is one of self-determination, the right to accept or refuse. It is not a right to demand a particular treatment. It is not a right to substitute one’s judgment as to which treatments must be made available by others. There is no right, constitutional or otherwise, of a patient to substitute one’s judgment for a medical professional.”   And chose to pick one mediical professional’s opinion over another – as to what medication the pt can receive.  AND if this pt dies – waiting for our laboric judicial system to come to a final decision…  after it was determined that the LEGAL PROCESS NEEDS TO BE EXPEDITED.  Aren’t we all grateful that when someone goes into a hospital’s Emergency Dept and critically ill that their “expedited process” takes weeks ?   If this pt dies, is anyone going to be held responsible for all the “FEET DRAGGING ” and the pt’s death ?

 

Florida Family Fighting For Ivermectin: Appeals Court Expedites Case

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/florida-family-fighting-ivermectin-appeals-court-expedites-case

Florida’s First District Court of Appeal has expedited the process to decide a lawsuit filed by the family of a COVID-19 patient on a ventilator at a Jacksonville hospital

 

Attorneys for Mayo Clinic Florida have until 10 a.m. Jan. 13 to respond to the appeal filed by the family of 70-year-old Daniel Pisano.

Then the family’s attorneys will have until Jan. 14 to file additional arguments. At that time, a three-panel judge could be appointed to decide the case.

Mayo Clinic has said Pisano, who has been on a ventilator 22 days, has a slim chance of survival.

But an outside doctor, who is not affiliated with Mayo Clinic, testified in an emergency hearing Dec. 30 that there’s still a good chance to save him—although there’s no time to delay, the physician said.

Chris and Lauren Pisano were elated when his parents Daniel and Claudia decided to move from North Carolina to Florida in early December, and bought a lot where they planned to build a home nearby to be close to their only two grandsons.
In a desperate attempt to save their loved one, the Pisano family has begged Mayo Clinic to try a protocol widely used by independent physicians around the country and developed by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.

Mayo Clinic officials have refused and attorneys have fought the family’s wishes vigorously in court.

Claudia Pisano, Daniel Pisano’s wife of 51 years, and their son, Chris, have power of attorney and legally have the right to ask for the treatment of their choice, their attorneys have argued. But Daniel Pisano is declining fast and running out of time, they say.

The family’s trusted doctor, Dr. Eduardo Balbona of Jacksonville, testified that in order to save him the hospital must quickly allow treatment—with ivermectin and other drugs and supplements—he’s used to help dozens of critically ill COVID-19 patients recover.

Being on the ventilator is doing harm to Pisano and other patients fighting COVID-19, Balbona testified.

After considering the testimony in the three-hour hearing, Judge Marianne Aho, of Florida’s Fourth Judicial Circuit, denied the family’s plea to force Mayo Clinic doctors to step aside and let Balbona treat their dying loved one.

Aho wrote, “An individual’s right to privacy is one of self-determination, the right to accept or refuse. It is not a right to demand a particular treatment. It is not a right to substitute one’s judgment as to which treatments must be made available by others. There is no right, constitutional or otherwise, of a patient to substitute one’s judgment for a medical professional.”

The family disagrees saying the Florida Patient’s Bill of Rights gives them the right to choose between treatment options and they’ve offered to release Mayo Clinic from all liability in following through with that care. They filed an appeal Jan. 9.

After Mayo Clinic submits a response by Jan. 13, attorneys for the family will have until 3 p.m. on Jan. 14 to add to their arguments.

Meanwhile, on Jan. 12 Daniel Pisano clung to life in a drug-induced coma, on a ventilator, and on his sixth day of dialysis for kidneys that have shut down.

Doctors monitoring his chart for the family through an online portal say his lab work suggests internal bleeding, says attorney Nick Whitney, of the AndersonGlenn law firm in Jacksonville.

For days, Chris and Claudia Pisano have begged Mayo Clinic to do a CT scan to identify the cause of the bleeding.

“Mayo has refused, saying the CT scan is not medically appropriate,” Whitney says.

Mayo Clinic officials have not responded to requests for comment. Attorneys for the hospital have asked for their filings in the case be sealed from pubic view, citing privacy concerns.

The Mayo Clinic logo at Mayo Clinic Square, Minneapolis, Minn., on June 24, 2018. (Tony Webster via Wikimedia Commons)
The family’s search to find a hospital able to take Daniel Pisano has led only to dead-ends, Whitney said.

Still the Pisanos hope to continue raising money through donations to keep their legal fight going and to be able to pay$40,000 to $50,000 for air ambulance transport.

As of Jan. 12, 142 donors had given more than $28,000 toward the effort.

Since news of the case began spreading other families facing similar heartbreak have reached out to Whitney and to Jeff Childers, of Childers Law in Gainesville, another attorney on the Pisano legal team.

And on Jan. 12, a patient was driving from Chicago to Florida to meet with Balbona.

Whitney said it’s not easy for patients to find a doctor like Balbona willing to step up and make an alternative treatment plan for a patient hospitalized with COVID-19. And that’s the first step, he’s told those who have contacted him.

Families desperate for help say they don’t know where to turn, he said.

When they reach out for help through independent doctors, they’re told that the person can’t take on more cases, he added.

“The bottleneck, in my opinion, is that physicians who are willing to do this are overwhelmed,” Whitney said. “There’s a need for intensive care physicians to come forward and say they’re willing to treat with ivermectin.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has posted strict warnings against using ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

More than 90 peer-reviewed studies have been published, which supporters say demonstrates the drug’s efficacy at treating patients suffering from COVID-19.

Claudia Pisano is fighting to try to save the life of her husband of 51 years, Daniel, by asking a judge to order Mayo Clinic to allow treatment with ivermectin. (Photo courtesy of Chris Pisano)
Part of the frustration families face when they’re seeking alternative treatments for COVID-19 surrounds the Right to Try Act signed into law May 30, 2018.

It gives patients access to some unapproved treatments, if they have been diagnosed with life-threatening diseases or conditions, have tried all approved treatment options, and are unable to participate in a clinical trial to access certain unapproved treatments, according to the FDA.

But ivermectin and other drugs used as part of the FLCCC protocol for treating COVID-19 have already been approved by the FDA for some uses, so they don’t qualify to be used under the Right to Try Act.

“Right to Try only applies to experimental medications,” says Childers. “It says nothing about FDA-approved meds like fluvoxamine, ivermectin, or hydroxychloroquine.”

The Mayo Clinic is a nonprofit American academic medical center employing more than 4,500 physicians and scientists and 58,400 other staff members across campuses in Florida, Minnesota, and Arizona.

 

High Court Shadow Docket Delivers Silent Blow to the First Amendment

High Court Shadow Docket Delivers Silent Blow to the First Amendment

https://medium.com/@fightthefeds/scotus-rejects-ny-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-challenge-b6d6d880282c

Gorsuch Issues a Blistering Dissent in COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Ruling

The Supreme Court issued shadowy denial of several NY physicians’ challenge to the New York vaccine mandate. The opinion amounted to one sentence concluding with the word:

Justice Gorsuch’s COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Dissent

Justice Gorsuch, authoring for the dissent described how the mandate came into place. One day before Governor Cuomo left office the State’s Public Health and Health Planning Counsel proposed the mandate and removed the religious exemption but failed to state their reasons for doing so.

CDC and POLITICAL SCIENCE

Orally Dissolving Buprenorphine Tied to Severe Tooth Decay, FDA Warns

Orally Dissolving Buprenorphine Tied to Severe Tooth Decay, FDA Warns

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/966562

Orally dissolving medications containing buprenorphine are linked to severe dental problems, including total tooth loss, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns in a safety communication.

The oral side effects of these medications, which are used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) and pain, include cavities/tooth decay, including rampant caries; dental abscesses/infection; tooth erosion; fillings falling out; and, in some cases, total tooth loss.

Multiple cases have been reported even in patients with no history of dental problems.

The FDA is adding a warning about the risk of dental problems to the prescribing information and the patient medication guide for all buprenorphine-containing medicines dissolved in the mouth.

The FDA emphasizes, however, that buprenorphine remains “an important treatment option for OUD and pain, and the benefits of these medicines clearly outweigh the risks.”

More Than 300 Reported Cases

Buprenorphine was approved in 2002 as a sublingual tablet, and in 2015 as a film to be placed inside the cheek to treat pain. Both delivery methods have been associated with dental problems.

Since buprenorphine was approved, the FDA has identified 305 cases of dental problems associated with orally dissolving buprenorphine, including 131 classified as serious.

There may be other cases, the FDA says, as these represents only cases reported to the FDA or published in the medical literature.

The average age of the patients who developed dental problems while taking buprenorphine is 42 years, but those as young as 18 years old were also affected.

Most cases occurred in patients using the medicines for OUD; however, 28 cases of dental problems occurred in patients using it to treat pain.

In 26 cases, patients had no prior history of dental problems. Some dental problems developed as soon as 2 weeks after treatment began; the median time to diagnosis was about 2 years after starting treatment.

The most common treatment for the dental problems was tooth extraction/removal, which was reported in 71 cases. Among all 305 cases reported, 113 involved two or more teeth. Other cases required root canals, dental surgery, and other procedures such as crowns and implants from https://www.vanhoofdental.com/implants/.

Recommendations

The FDA says healthcare providers should counsel patients that severe and extensive tooth decay, tooth loss, and tooth fracture have been reported with the use of transmucosal buprenorphine-containing medicines and emphasize the importance of visiting their dentist to closely monitor their teeth.

Patients should be counseled to continue taking buprenorphine medications as prescribed and not stop suddenly without first talking to their healthcare provider as this could lead to serious consequences, including relapse, misuse or abuse of other opioids, overdose, and death.

Patients are also being advised to take extra steps to help lessen the risk of serious dental problems.

Patients should also be educated on strategies to maintain or improve oral health while taking transmucosal buprenorphine medicines.

After the medicine is completely dissolved, the patient should take a large sip of water, swish it gently around the teeth and gums, swallow, and wait at least 1 hour before brushing their teeth, the FDA advises. This will allow time for the mouth to gradually return to oral homeostasis and avoid any mechanical damage that may occur due to brushing.

The FDA also advises that patients tell their provider about any history of tooth problems, including cavities, and schedule a dentist visit soon after starting the medicine. Another option to take care of dental hygiene and its condition is to take a supplement with which you can have a considerable improvement, for more information you can visit https://observer.com/2022/09/prodentim-reviews/.

Dental problems related to transmucosal buprenorphine-containing medicines should be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch program.

Supreme Court blocks Biden OSHA vaccine mandate, allows rule for health care workers

Maybe I am just being political …but… wasn’t it under the administration that Biden was part of when the CDC opiate dosing guidelines were published ?   The community needs to ask… where were all those state AG’s when the CDC published those guidelines – why did they not question/challenge these ? CDC’s statutory authority is to deal with contagious diseases and  back in 2016 many believed that the CDC did not have the statutory authority to publish those guidelines.   Where were all those AG’s  when the DEA & VA decided to basically determine that those guidelines were in fact LAW and implement edicts that mandated the lowering or stopping the treatment of tens of millions of chronic pain pts’ with FDA APPROVED MEDICATION(S) ?  Could this SCOTUS ruling draw a “legal line” between it is ILLEGAL to mandate citizens to get a FDA APPROVED vaccination to “prevent a disease(s) ” and being legal for our bureaucracy to mandate the denial of treating an existing chronic health disease with FDA approved medication(s) ? 

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/supreme-court-biden-vaccine-mandates-osha-health-care-workers

Supreme Court blocks Biden OSHA vaccine mandate, allows rule for health care workers

Supreme Court blocks Biden OSHA vaccine mandate, allows rule for health care workers

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued mixed rulings in a pair of cases challenging Biden administration COVID-19 vaccine mandates, allowing the requirement for certain health care workers to go into effect while blocking enforcement of a mandate for businesses with 100 or more employees.

The latter, an Occupational Safety and Health Administration rule that took effect on Monday, said that businesses with at least 100 employees needed to require workers to get vaccinated, or get tested weekly and wear a mask.

The Court ruled that OSHA lacked the authority to impose such a mandate because the law that created OSHA “empowers the Secretary to set workplace safety standards, not broad public health measures.”

Could the illegality of mandatory vaccinations – reverse many denial of pain management therapy mandates ?

FAKE BOOK ADMITS in court – UNDER OATH – that their FACT CHECKERS – USE JUST OPINIONS

Going silent – for a while

If you wish to share this video – use the link below …  it should not be banned by any other website  – just copy/paste it to where you wish to share

 http://www.steveariens.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/finorijan102022.mp4

Did TWITTER just declared that the CDC is NOT A VALID HEALTH EXPERT ?

I made this post just last night and I shared it on TWITTER

CDC just announced that AOC qualifies for Ivermectin ( Horse Medicine)

and I got this back on this twitter post this AM

Does this mean that TWITTER no longer considers CDC a valid medical information source and/or health experts ?

Years ago, I use to do ultra specialty computer coding as a “side gig” and it would appear to me that TWITTER’S algorithm or so called Artificial Intelligence (AI) apparently can only READ WORDS and no real “intelligence” to read context or content  within just a sentence .

Ivermectin was a “Trump promoted medication” so it was automatically vilified as “not meeting the science” – even though it has been a FDA approved med and safe for human use.

Ivermectin is a FDA approved med for use in horses to treat parasites https://www.allthingsnature.org/what-are-the-uses-of-ivermectin-for-horses.htm  

It comes as a paste and in a syringe… and contains many more mgs of invermectin than the 12 mg dose tablet that is commercially made for human use.

As one person put it… horses eats carrots… so is carrots “horse food” ?

I read this week where COVID-19 pts with lung/breathing problems are getting good recovery rates by taking VIAGRA – that’s right – the med that has been used/approved by the FDA for erectile dysfunction.

Could the illegality of mandatory vaccinations – reverse many denial of pain management therapy mandates ?

You take this narrative from this law firm/attorney and substitute pain management for vaccinations and denial of pain management for mandatory vaccinations by various bureaucracies… It would pretty much read THE SAME.  So if all these law suits are successful in shutting down  all the bureaucrats down in mandating vaccinations …could the inverse/reciprocal be applied to the limiting/denial of pain management as being ILLEGAL ?  Could the CDC opiate dosing guidelines and Civil Asset Forfeiture Act and some of the functions of the DEA BE SHUT DOWN ?

New data reveals that the vaccinated are more likely than the unvaccinated to contract Covid-19 from the Omicron strain. The evidence continues to mount that the vaccines are not nearly as effective as expected. Meanwhile, the infusion of mRNA which produces what may be dangerous levels if spike proteins in the vaccinated body should cause alarm, according to this article’s author. Yet companies still are forcing vaccines on employees.

My partner Gwyneth K. Murray-Nolan and I own the Murray-Nolan Berutti LLC law firm. We are challenging New York City’s vaccine passport mandate in the federal courts, and are building a network of attorneys nationally who work with us to assist individuals with vaccine mandate exemptions, and vaccine-related litigation. Several groups of active and terminated employees, and even some employers have approached us to bring litigation seeking to end vaccine mandates. We maintain that the US Supreme Court ultimately will agree with us that all current public and private COVID-related vaccine mandates are illegal and unconstitutional. If you or someone you know is faced with a job loss or other discrimination related to vaccines, please feel free to reach out to us. We will do our best to help to vindicate your civil rights. And if you support our cause, please feel free to connect with both of us.

Ron B. Esq.

Contact Info

Ron B.’s Profile

Email

Prescriber induced SUICIDE

Prescriber induced suicide- jury awards a SEVEN MILLION JUDGEMENT

https://www.pharmaciststeve.com/one-million-dollar-settlement-usa-paid-for-va-prescribed-induced-suicide/