Barb is no longer on Medicare disability – she is just OLD NOW !… so this video is of no real interest to me… but this appears to be made by -maybe – an attorney firm DISABILITY RESOLUTION, PA
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
Barb is no longer on Medicare disability – she is just OLD NOW !… so this video is of no real interest to me… but this appears to be made by -maybe – an attorney firm DISABILITY RESOLUTION, PA
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
As far as I can tell the Astra Zeneca version of a COVID-19 vaccine was never approved by our FDA. Because of the “bum’s rush” (operation warp speed) to get a COVID-19 vaccine to market – as I remember – the USA ordered 300-400 million doses prior to that vaccine even getting a FDA EUA (Emergency Use Authorization). I remember hearing that we sent hundred of millions of doses to India or Pakistan when they had a huge outbreak.
Back in 2020-2021, I remember questioning putting a new medication on the market with < one year of clinical trials – a new med typically takes 10+ yrs to get thru all the appropriate clinical trials and on to the market place..
As part of this “operation warp speed”, Congress indemnified everyone involved in getting these vaccines to market – that they could not be sued for any harm/damages that these vaccines could/would cause.
This video suggests that there was not only some harm to many pts getting these vaccinations, but there may have been some sort of purging of “bad data” and pts with adverse events and the woman in this video read a “suicide letter” from one such pt who experienced such bad outcomes that life was no longer worth living.
I am sure there will be more coming to light in the near/far future.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
https://youtu.be/iGjKHrD1OW0
American Medical Association is asking for your stories. We If you have had problems obtaining proper or any dose of opiate pain medicines. AMA wants to know.
If you have had limitations on your pain medications by pharmacists, insurance companies, ER’s, after surgery or by any doctors NP’s or who ever trying to limiting opioid pain medications including tapering and being cut off.
send your BRIEF story to AMA to be counted. see email address below
Yes, I retired but one last video, it wore me out, back to my canoe
Your report needs your name (or the name of a representative, if you are shy), city, state, zip, no address or phone. plus – your primary diagnosis, just 1, what happened to you 1-3 sentences and what medicines were involved( if just a denial to treat AT ALL put “opiate pain medicine”) add the insurance company if they were a problem and thats all. Make it brief they are just counting. Maybe add “suspend cdc guidelines” if u want. Tell friends. spread the word!
EMail report to:
opioidtaskforce@ama-assn.org
They have said they want to hear from as many as possible. JUST DO IT! easy, they are primarily counting
Help get others do this, it is ok if if the sick person cannot do it.
Speak up, someone is listening, doctors not the government.
National Pain Council supports this effort
National Pain Council.org
Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »
The feds are providing this medication at NO CHARGE to community pharmacies and apparently the PBM’s have established a pharmacy reimbursement to fill these medications for pts at a ONE WHOLE DOLLAR. Years ago, when I was actively practicing pharmacy it was claimed that the business overhead in providing/filling a Rx for pts cost abt $12 EACH. But I retired in 2013, and part of that $12 cost would be the cost of carrying and insuring inventory, so that cost would/could be subtracted from that $12 cost, but NINE YEARS have passed since I last practiced, so nearly a TEN YEAR inflation, would most likely pushed that $12 cost back in 2013 would be much above that $12 dollar figure today. Just last month the current inflation for Dec 2021 was pushing TEN PERCENT on a annualized basis. Of course, the PBM industry has always fought financial transparency and if the numbers on this program are eventually leaked…I would not be surprised to see the PBM’s administration cost could be $20- $30 per Rx – charged back to the federal program. I would not be surprised that many pharmacies will just “be out of stock” of these two new anti-viral… I doubt that pharmacy software drug to drug interactions system will not be fully updated and I suspect that there is going to be a lot of drug-drug interactions that were not uncovered under the brief clinical trials under the EUA (Emergency Use Authorization). The Pfizer anti-viral version is known to have many serious drug to drug interactions and possible many undocumented drug to comorbidity health issues and the Pfizer med is reported to be nearly 3 times more effective than the Merck version.
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
ATLANTA — COVID-19 brought a wave of burnout among physicians and other health professionals – while nurses and doctors are feeling the elevated stress and staffing shortages in the wake of the new omicron variant, they’re not the only ones feeling overwhelmed.
Pharmacists were seeing high burnout levels from their profession long before the COVID-19 pandemic. As the pandemic has continued, the situation has only worsened.
“Pharmacists have been dealing with this for a long time and COVID just took it to another level,” said Shirin Zadeh, pharmacist and president of the Atlanta region at the Pharmacy Association of Georgia.
In 2017 pharmacists reported higher rates of burnout in practice than surgeons, oncologists, and emergency-medicine practitioners. Right before the start of the pandemic, a 2020 study found 75% of pharmacists reported burnout.
The stress pharmacists are under can lead to mistakes in prescriptions, which can cause hospitalizations or even cost somebody’s life, said Zadeh.
The Pharmacy Association of Georgia, a pharmacist union, currently has 1,500 pharmacists and 537 pharmacy technicians.
Of those, 301 pharmacists and 88 of the technicians are under Zadeh’s supervision in the Atlanta region.
“I have so many pharmacists coming to me saying, ‘I just need a new job. I don’t care if I’m a pharmacist anymore. This is just not what I want to do with my life, because basically, I don’t have a life anymore,'” said Zadeh.
According to the U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics, about 11,300 openings for pharmacists are projected each year, on average, over the decade. All of these openings are expected to result from the need to replace workers who transfer to other occupations or exit the labor force, such as to retire.
The pharmacists under Zadeh in the Atlanta region feel like it’s impossible to get anything done and they come to her with these concerns. COVID-19 has forced them to quickly adapt to ever-changing regulations and practices.
“Hey, if we get these new guidelines every day, we get all these things that we need to do. Every news station says, ‘Oh, go to your pharmacy and get your immunization.’ Then we wake up and they say, ‘Oh, you have to do this many shots today.’ We go to work and how am I supposed to finish everything that I was doing. And top of that do immunizations,” said Zadeh.
Pharmacists are thinking about their patients’ safety when they decide to leave the field, according to Zadeh.
“Not only do they tired feel, but they feel unsafe for their patients. They think this is somebody’s mom, this is somebody’s dad, this is somebody’s kids and I’m not 100% and I don’t have time to look at their profile, go to their medication history because I’m the only one here and I have so many things to do,” said Zadeh.
It’s better for pharmacists to leave before someone gets hurt, she added.
The mindset, Zadeh said, is: “I’m going to get my license and I don’t want to kill someone, so I’m just going to leave.”
Zadeh wants everyone to know and value their pharmacist for the services they provide, both during the pandemic and under normal circumstances.
‘Pharmacists are the most trusted health care workers, they are everybody’s first phone call, the first person that the patient goes to ask for medical advice is their pharmacist. They’re just available, accessible all the time,” said Zadeh.
Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »
Just imagine your loved one has been on a vent for over TWO WEEKS and the hospital (MAYO) that the pt is in .. is playing “hardball” because the hospital’s policy disagrees with another prescriber that is willing prescribe Ivermectin for this pt… and the family’s fight is CRAWLING thru our court system – while the pt gets closer and closer to death and judge A-HO …declared …“An individual’s right to privacy is one of self-determination, the right to accept or refuse. It is not a right to demand a particular treatment. It is not a right to substitute one’s judgment as to which treatments must be made available by others. There is no right, constitutional or otherwise, of a patient to substitute one’s judgment for a medical professional.” And chose to pick one mediical professional’s opinion over another – as to what medication the pt can receive. AND if this pt dies – waiting for our laboric judicial system to come to a final decision… after it was determined that the LEGAL PROCESS NEEDS TO BE EXPEDITED. Aren’t we all grateful that when someone goes into a hospital’s Emergency Dept and critically ill that their “expedited process” takes weeks ? If this pt dies, is anyone going to be held responsible for all the “FEET DRAGGING ” and the pt’s death ?
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/florida-family-fighting-ivermectin-appeals-court-expedites-case
Florida’s First District Court of Appeal has expedited the process to decide a lawsuit filed by the family of a COVID-19 patient on a ventilator at a Jacksonville hospital
Attorneys for Mayo Clinic Florida have until 10 a.m. Jan. 13 to respond to the appeal filed by the family of 70-year-old Daniel Pisano.
Then the family’s attorneys will have until Jan. 14 to file additional arguments. At that time, a three-panel judge could be appointed to decide the case.
Mayo Clinic has said Pisano, who has been on a ventilator 22 days, has a slim chance of survival.
But an outside doctor, who is not affiliated with Mayo Clinic, testified in an emergency hearing Dec. 30 that there’s still a good chance to save him—although there’s no time to delay, the physician said.
Chris and Lauren Pisano were elated when his parents Daniel and Claudia decided to move from North Carolina to Florida in early December, and bought a lot where they planned to build a home nearby to be close to their only two grandsons.
In a desperate attempt to save their loved one, the Pisano family has begged Mayo Clinic to try a protocol widely used by independent physicians around the country and developed by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.
Mayo Clinic officials have refused and attorneys have fought the family’s wishes vigorously in court.
Claudia Pisano, Daniel Pisano’s wife of 51 years, and their son, Chris, have power of attorney and legally have the right to ask for the treatment of their choice, their attorneys have argued. But Daniel Pisano is declining fast and running out of time, they say.
The family’s trusted doctor, Dr. Eduardo Balbona of Jacksonville, testified that in order to save him the hospital must quickly allow treatment—with ivermectin and other drugs and supplements—he’s used to help dozens of critically ill COVID-19 patients recover.
Being on the ventilator is doing harm to Pisano and other patients fighting COVID-19, Balbona testified.
After considering the testimony in the three-hour hearing, Judge Marianne Aho, of Florida’s Fourth Judicial Circuit, denied the family’s plea to force Mayo Clinic doctors to step aside and let Balbona treat their dying loved one.
Aho wrote, “An individual’s right to privacy is one of self-determination, the right to accept or refuse. It is not a right to demand a particular treatment. It is not a right to substitute one’s judgment as to which treatments must be made available by others. There is no right, constitutional or otherwise, of a patient to substitute one’s judgment for a medical professional.”
The family disagrees saying the Florida Patient’s Bill of Rights gives them the right to choose between treatment options and they’ve offered to release Mayo Clinic from all liability in following through with that care. They filed an appeal Jan. 9.
After Mayo Clinic submits a response by Jan. 13, attorneys for the family will have until 3 p.m. on Jan. 14 to add to their arguments.
Meanwhile, on Jan. 12 Daniel Pisano clung to life in a drug-induced coma, on a ventilator, and on his sixth day of dialysis for kidneys that have shut down.
Doctors monitoring his chart for the family through an online portal say his lab work suggests internal bleeding, says attorney Nick Whitney, of the AndersonGlenn law firm in Jacksonville.
For days, Chris and Claudia Pisano have begged Mayo Clinic to do a CT scan to identify the cause of the bleeding.
“Mayo has refused, saying the CT scan is not medically appropriate,” Whitney says.
Mayo Clinic officials have not responded to requests for comment. Attorneys for the hospital have asked for their filings in the case be sealed from pubic view, citing privacy concerns.
The Mayo Clinic logo at Mayo Clinic Square, Minneapolis, Minn., on June 24, 2018. (Tony Webster via Wikimedia Commons)
The family’s search to find a hospital able to take Daniel Pisano has led only to dead-ends, Whitney said.
Still the Pisanos hope to continue raising money through donations to keep their legal fight going and to be able to pay$40,000 to $50,000 for air ambulance transport.
As of Jan. 12, 142 donors had given more than $28,000 toward the effort.
Since news of the case began spreading other families facing similar heartbreak have reached out to Whitney and to Jeff Childers, of Childers Law in Gainesville, another attorney on the Pisano legal team.
And on Jan. 12, a patient was driving from Chicago to Florida to meet with Balbona.
Whitney said it’s not easy for patients to find a doctor like Balbona willing to step up and make an alternative treatment plan for a patient hospitalized with COVID-19. And that’s the first step, he’s told those who have contacted him.
Families desperate for help say they don’t know where to turn, he said.
When they reach out for help through independent doctors, they’re told that the person can’t take on more cases, he added.
“The bottleneck, in my opinion, is that physicians who are willing to do this are overwhelmed,” Whitney said. “There’s a need for intensive care physicians to come forward and say they’re willing to treat with ivermectin.”
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has posted strict warnings against using ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
More than 90 peer-reviewed studies have been published, which supporters say demonstrates the drug’s efficacy at treating patients suffering from COVID-19.
Claudia Pisano is fighting to try to save the life of her husband of 51 years, Daniel, by asking a judge to order Mayo Clinic to allow treatment with ivermectin. (Photo courtesy of Chris Pisano)
Part of the frustration families face when they’re seeking alternative treatments for COVID-19 surrounds the Right to Try Act signed into law May 30, 2018.
It gives patients access to some unapproved treatments, if they have been diagnosed with life-threatening diseases or conditions, have tried all approved treatment options, and are unable to participate in a clinical trial to access certain unapproved treatments, according to the FDA.
But ivermectin and other drugs used as part of the FLCCC protocol for treating COVID-19 have already been approved by the FDA for some uses, so they don’t qualify to be used under the Right to Try Act.
“Right to Try only applies to experimental medications,” says Childers. “It says nothing about FDA-approved meds like fluvoxamine, ivermectin, or hydroxychloroquine.”
The Mayo Clinic is a nonprofit American academic medical center employing more than 4,500 physicians and scientists and 58,400 other staff members across campuses in Florida, Minnesota, and Arizona.
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
https://medium.com/@fightthefeds/scotus-rejects-ny-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-challenge-b6d6d880282c
The Supreme Court issued shadowy denial of several NY physicians’ challenge to the New York vaccine mandate. The opinion amounted to one sentence concluding with the word:
DENIED
The dissent was a fourteen page onslaught against the reckless nature of the mandate, its lack of clarity, and its infringement of the first amendment. The applicants were not “anti-vaxers but rather cited deeply held religious beliefs that reject abortion in any form. Given that the vaccine uses fetal cells in production and testing the applicants refused.
Justice Gorsuch, authoring for the dissent described how the mandate came into place. One day before Governor Cuomo left office the State’s Public Health and Health Planning Counsel proposed the mandate and removed the religious exemption but failed to state their reasons for doing so.
In response to a reporter’s question 12 days before the mandate was set to take place Governor Hochul elected to speak for every religion in the United States by stating “there is no sanctioned religious exemption from any organized religion.” The Governor further claimed that religions were stating the opposite — that they wanted everyone to take the vaccine. The governor later elaborated “how can you believe that God would give a vaccine that would cause you harm?” Again just a day before the mandate took effect the Governor proclaimed that objections to the vaccines are “theologically flawed”.
To make matters worse, the Governor elected to strip unemployment compensation from workers who refused the vaccine and were terminated.
Justice Gorsuch correctly identifies in the dissent that the “free exercise clause” protects not only the right to hold unpopular religious beliefs inwardly and secretly — it protects the right to live out those beliefs publicly in the performance of physical acts”. The Court has traditionally struck down laws that threaten religion if there is even a slight suspicion that those actions stem from animosity to religion or distrust of its practices. The NY Governor’s actions here are overtly animus.
In an overt slight to religious practices the New York law rejects religious challenges while permitting medical exemptions for a broad range of reasons. Coupled with the fact that nearly every other vaccine mandate permits a religious exemption — New York is not in good company.
Justice Gorsuch took a bold position but regrettably not one that would save the First Amendment from the court’s shadow docket. This case was not just a rejection of a vaccine challenge it cosigned the practices of a government who holds its knowledge and authority higher than that of the constitution.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/966562
Orally dissolving medications containing buprenorphine are linked to severe dental problems, including total tooth loss, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns in a safety communication.
The oral side effects of these medications, which are used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) and pain, include cavities/tooth decay, including rampant caries; dental abscesses/infection; tooth erosion; fillings falling out; and, in some cases, total tooth loss.
Multiple cases have been reported even in patients with no history of dental problems.
The FDA is adding a warning about the risk of dental problems to the prescribing information and the patient medication guide for all buprenorphine-containing medicines dissolved in the mouth.
The FDA emphasizes, however, that buprenorphine remains “an important treatment option for OUD and pain, and the benefits of these medicines clearly outweigh the risks.”
Buprenorphine was approved in 2002 as a sublingual tablet, and in 2015 as a film to be placed inside the cheek to treat pain. Both delivery methods have been associated with dental problems.
Since buprenorphine was approved, the FDA has identified 305 cases of dental problems associated with orally dissolving buprenorphine, including 131 classified as serious.
There may be other cases, the FDA says, as these represents only cases reported to the FDA or published in the medical literature.
The average age of the patients who developed dental problems while taking buprenorphine is 42 years, but those as young as 18 years old were also affected.
Most cases occurred in patients using the medicines for OUD; however, 28 cases of dental problems occurred in patients using it to treat pain.
In 26 cases, patients had no prior history of dental problems. Some dental problems developed as soon as 2 weeks after treatment began; the median time to diagnosis was about 2 years after starting treatment.
The most common treatment for the dental problems was tooth extraction/removal, which was reported in 71 cases. Among all 305 cases reported, 113 involved two or more teeth. Other cases required root canals, dental surgery, and other procedures such as crowns and implants from https://www.vanhoofdental.com/implants/.
The FDA says healthcare providers should counsel patients that severe and extensive tooth decay, tooth loss, and tooth fracture have been reported with the use of transmucosal buprenorphine-containing medicines and emphasize the importance of visiting their dentist to closely monitor their teeth.
Patients should be counseled to continue taking buprenorphine medications as prescribed and not stop suddenly without first talking to their healthcare provider as this could lead to serious consequences, including relapse, misuse or abuse of other opioids, overdose, and death.
Patients are also being advised to take extra steps to help lessen the risk of serious dental problems.
Patients should also be educated on strategies to maintain or improve oral health while taking transmucosal buprenorphine medicines.
After the medicine is completely dissolved, the patient should take a large sip of water, swish it gently around the teeth and gums, swallow, and wait at least 1 hour before brushing their teeth, the FDA advises. This will allow time for the mouth to gradually return to oral homeostasis and avoid any mechanical damage that may occur due to brushing.
The FDA also advises that patients tell their provider about any history of tooth problems, including cavities, and schedule a dentist visit soon after starting the medicine. Another option to take care of dental hygiene and its condition is to take a supplement with which you can have a considerable improvement, for more information you can visit https://observer.com/2022/09/prodentim-reviews/.
Dental problems related to transmucosal buprenorphine-containing medicines should be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch program.
Filed under: General Problems | 4 Comments »