Stand and Fight Podcast – Darleen H. Palmer forced reduce dosages and SUICIDE

Click on the link below to listen to a 32 minute pod cast that details how a ultra fast metabolizer intractable chronic pain pt was forced to decrease his dose OVER 75% and he ended up committing suicide… evening behind a young wife with FOUR KIDS.

http://standandfight.buzzsprout.com/359756/2002150-stand-and-fight-podcast-darleen-h-palmer-pain-managment-vs-addiction

In this episode Darleen shares the story of her husband Adam. He caught a rare disease from a tick called Rocky mountain spotted fever which left him dependent on pain meds to function. The problem became dealing with the insurance companies and his struggle to find common ground with them. In the end her husband took his own life. Now she is her to tell his story and to help other families in need. She is now a single mother of 4. Sometimes we don’t think about the 1% who live with an insane amount of pain on a daily basis. They need medication just to function. Myself being a recovering addict i always fight for everyone to be drug free but this conversation helped me with the other patients who actually need it. A voice clip of the husband’s suicide goodbye message is on this podcast so if you are vulnerable or feel you might be triggered please don’t listen or listen with a friend.

Trial by Fire-CRPS documentary

https://youtu.be/5WZCh3TeTa0

RSD/CRPS is a condition that needs much attention. Charles saw this dire need and wanted to contribute to get that need filled. Charles has talked to many, heard scores of stories and researched the condition; with this knowledge, his heart was moved to get involved and become an advocate for the condition through the love of his mother and the heartfelt for the countless others suffering. This moving piece takes us on a journey that will impact the perspective of how we view healthcare and the caregivers of those suffering daily. We walk with Charles as he helps his mother through her own treatment and life changes. We will also meet others fighting to stay alive from this deadly disease. We will fight to help this project move the health care system to figure out ways to help those who need the funding or the health care coverage to get the needed treatment to allow them to live. We will expose what at times seems like Guinea pig-type of treatments that at times can do more harm than good. This is a story that needs to be told and this documentary will open the eyes of many around the world that never knew of this condition and bring hope to those with CRPS. For more info on Charles and his work visit. To work or book Charles visit http://charlesmattocks.com PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL AS WE ARE LOOKING AT DOING ANOTHER FILM BASED ON CRPS AND RARE DISEASE, GET THE LATEST UPDATES. All rights and music belong to our company.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WZCh3TeTa0

What do you get when you have a national health emergency with a FOR PROFIT healthcare system ?

kaiser permanente: S CALF – If it involves controlled medication you won’t get diagnosed , they also lie on your chart and black ball you from all care of you switch DRs

I have Kaiser SoCal but prior to the last two years I had a private dr in Texas and took pain medication, 6 mg of Xanax & ambien for 7 years. No overdose no narcan required. I moved back to Ca after surviving a brutal attack now having anxiety so bad I am having psychogenic blackouts and the ambulance is coming to my job. Kaiser refuses to give me more than 2mg of Xanax even though it’s become physically dangerous s they also refuse to properly diagnose the blackouts as well as the very obvious adhd I’ve always had. If it involves controlled medication you won’t get diagnosed , they also lie on your chart and black ball you from all care of you switch DRs. I have fought them like crazy for proper care and they refuse to do anything stating I refused their treatment plan which is a lie. I already take gabapentin and have tried hydroxozine which is a joke for anxiety at my level, increased gabapentin is not going to stop the severe stress skyrocketing my cortisol and me passing out. I can’t believe there aren’t major groups fighting Kaiser for their horrific treatment.

I realize that not all readers of my blog read all the comments… but this is not the first time that I have received a similar comment – or email – from a pt that has health insurance from Kaiser Permanente telling about similar denial of care from them.

Kaiser Permanente is considered a HMO

Health Maintenance Organization (HMO)

and the definition of a HMO:

A type of health insurance plan that usually limits coverage to care from doctors who work for or contract with the HMO. It generally won’t cover out-of-network care except in an emergency. An HMO may require you to live or work in its service area to be eligible for coverage.

HMOs often provide integrated care and focus on prevention and wellness.

Does the care that this pt is claiming to be receiving has a focus on PREVENTION & WELLNESS ?

Note from TED talk: Please do not look to this talk for medical advice

COVID-19 policy recommendations for OUD, pain, harm reduction

Read on to *2, you’ll see great news! Share this far and wide Please!
Also there are a few links about a briefing for stopping the barriers for vital pain medications.
PUBLIC HEALTH
COVID-19 policy recommendations for OUD, pain, harm reduction
Updated Nov. 2, 2020

The AMA is providing the following policy recommendations to help states and others with specific policy recommendations amid the COVID-19 global outbreak. These recommendations are to help guide policymakers reduce the stress being experienced by patients with an opioid use disorder (OUD) and pain as well as support efforts to continue harm reduction efforts in communities across the United States. Read about examples of these efforts.

Featured updates: COVID-19
Track the evolving situation with the AMA’s library of the most up-to-date resources from JAMA, CDC and WHO.
“2. Protecting patients with pain
Adopt DEA guidance (PDF) authorizing physicians to prescribe opioid medications to existing patients without an in-person evaluation; authorize the prescription to be sent to the pharmacy via telephone.
Waive limits and restrictions on prescriptions for controlled substances, waive for the period of state and national emergency the restrictions on dose and/or quantity as well as refills.
Waive requirements for electronic prescribing of controlled substances, including requirements for an in-person evaluation for patients requiring a refill; provide liability protections for physicians who prescribe controlled substances for current patients the physician believes in good faith is stable and compliant with taking his or her medications.
For patients with chronic pain, waive testing requirements and in-person counseling requirements for refills; allow for telephonic counseling to fulfill state prescribing and treatment requirements.
Enhance home-delivery medication options for patients with chronic pain.
Issue brief: Reducing barriers to vital pain medication during the COVID-19 pandemic (PDF): The AMA is strongly urging legislators, regulators, governors and policymakers to remove additional barriers to pain treatment to help ensure that patients with pain have access to the treatments prescribed by their physician while remaining safe, reducing travel and unnecessary exposure to potential infection.”
https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-policy-recommendations-oud-pain-harm-reduction

Click to access issue-brief-reducing-barriers-vital-pain-medication.pdf

Biden coronavirus adviser wants US to distribute vaccine globally before it’s available to all Americans

For those of you who read my blog and are disabled… if this part of the President-elect team – his coronavirus  adviser – gets his way… your are going to be put way down the list of getting a COVID-19 vaccine… NO MORE AMERICA FIRST ?

Even if he doesn’t get his way… it would seems that those “high risk individual in the general pouplation” will be about THIRD in line… to get the COVID-19 vaccination… and it is to be given in two shots – one month apart…  So if everything goes well… immunity should come up to full effectiveness sometime late spring – early summer.

Biden coronavirus adviser wants US to distribute vaccine globally before it’s available to all Americans

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-coronavirus-adviser-emanuel-vaccine-distribution

Oncologist Dr. Zeke Emanuel, one of 10 advisory board members named to Democratic President-elect Joe Biden’s coronavirus task force, has pushed the U.S. and other countries to not hoard a coronavirus vaccine.

Emanuel, who served as a key architect of the Affordable Care Act under the Obama administration, co-authored a paper in September in which he encouraged officials to follow the “Fair Priority Model,” which calls for a “fair international distribution of vaccine,” rather than what he and his co-authors characterized as “vaccine nationalism.”

The model allows the country that produces the vaccine to hold onto enough of a supply to keep the transmission rate below 1%, but says that beyond that, the vaccine should be distributed internationally. That means giving away or selling doses of the vaccine before it’s available to every citizen in that country, Emanuel explained to Scientific American.

“Reasonable national partiality does not permit retaining more vaccine than the amount needed to keep the rate of transmission (Rt) below 1, when that vaccine could instead mitigate substantial COVID-19–related harms in other countries that have been unable to keep Rt below 1 through ongoing public-health efforts,” the Science magazine article titled “An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation” argues.

“Associative ties only justify a government’s giving some priority to its own citizens, not absolute priority,” Emanuel wrote with his co-authors.

The Trump administration had said that the U.S. will share any coronavirus vaccine it develops with other countries after American needs are met and that the U.S. will not coordinate with the World Health Organization (WHO) on distribution.

“Our first priority of course is to develop and produce enough quantity of safe and effective FDA-approved vaccines and therapeutics for use in the United States,” Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said during an August visit to Taiwan.

“But we anticipate having capacity that, once those needs are satisfied, those products would be available in the world community according to fair and equitable distributions that we would consult in the international community on,” Azar said.

Congress approved nearly $10 billion for the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed, which is working with private companies to produce and distribute a vaccine in the U.S.

On Monday, Pfizer and BioNTech’s coronavirus vaccine moved a step closer toward approval, with the company announcing 90% efficacy in its phase 3 clinical trial.

Emanuel and his co-authors argued against a proposal by the WHO to distribute vaccines globally at a rate proportional to each country’s population, and dismissed the belief that high death toll could be avoided by providing vaccines to countries based on “the number of frontline health care workers, the proportion of population over 65, and the number of people with comorbidities.”

The WHO proposal fails to consider the fact that death is not the only form of harm, Emanuel argued, and that prioritizing seniors at higher risk would mean sending a disproportionate amount of vaccines to wealthier countries, where average life expectancies tend to be longer.

Instead, Emanuel and his co-authors advocated for focusing on preventing premature death, the consequences of school and business closures and reducing general transmission of the virus.

Emanuel came under focus over the weekend after a 2014 essay he wrote, in which he outlines why he doesn’t want to live past 75, resurfaced. 

Emanuel, 63, wrote that “by 75, creativity, originality and productivity are pretty much gone for the vast, vast majority of us” in his essay titled “Why I Hope to Die at 75.”

“Since 1960, however, increases in longevity have been achieved mainly by extending the lives of people over 60. Rather than saving more young people, we are stretching out old age,” Emanuel wrote.

Biden is 77.

Other coronavirus task force advisory board members selected by Biden include Rick Bright, who said he left his position at NIH under President Trump over the administration’s embrace of hydroxychloroquine, and Dr. Atul Gawande, former CEO of Haven, a health care venture founded by AmazonBerkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase in 2018.

Emanuel did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment at this time. 

DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance

DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance

DEA Pursues Vast Expansion of Patient Surveillance

https://filtermag.org/dea-expand-patient-surveillance/amp/

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is looking to expand its anti-diversion surveillance infrastructure by being able to search and analyze myriad patient behaviors for the vast majority of controlled and scheduled drug prescriptions—all accompanied by a rapid process for legally unveiling personally identifying information.

In early September, the agency requested proposals for the creation of software capable of searching at least 85 percent of all US residents’ controlled-substance prescriptions for certain patient behaviors, as well as prescriber and pharmacist practices.

The Pharmacy Prescription Data system would cede patient-level data to the federal drug-war agency to a far greater extent than comparable existing databases.

According to the agency’s request for proposal (RFP), the DEA is interested in its agents having “unlimited access to patient de-identified data” on re/filled prescriptions, daily supply, payment type, dosing information and gender, among other characteristics, until at least 2025.

At publication time, the DEA had not responded to Filter‘s request for comment. This article will be updated if comment is received.

The Pharmacy Prescription Data system, as the RFP calls it, would cede patient-level data to the federal drug-war agency to a far greater extent than comparable existing databases. The current Automated Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS), created by the Controlled Substances Act alongside the DEA itself, only monitors controlled substances’ manufacture, supply chains and distribution.

RFP for DEA’s Prescription Data Software

The DEA’s desired ability to search controlled-substance prescriptions to this degree targets seemingly mundane behaviors—like the number of times a patient paid in cash for a Schedule II substance like Adderall or OxyContin, or the geographic distances between patients and their prescribers and pharmacies.

But it also subjects people prescribed medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) to even more surveillance than is currently the case. In particular, the Pharmacy Prescription Data system would allow the DEA to track patients by their “Number of Opiate and Buprenorphine combinations.”

Buprenorphine patients’ records have already been available to some state law enforcement, if such agencies operate a state’s prescription drug monitoring program (PMDP). As of August 2020, a new federal regulation permits patients’ methadone records to be entered into state PMDPs by providers.

PDMPs’ capabilities are a patchwork in comparison to the streamlined Pharmacy Prescription Data system requested by the DEA. For example, PDMPs’ data refresh at varying intervals by state, ranging from real-time to daily to weekly updates, as Dr. Peter Kreiner, a senior scientist at Brandeis University’s Institute for Behavioral Health, explained to Filter. The DEA’s software would involve data refreshed each day.

“The impact of including buprenorphine will be appalling for people’s health.”

Scrutiny of OUD treatments will also be applied to prescribers and pharmacists. For the former, the DEA will be able to scrutinize their “percentage of patients receiving an Opioid and Buprenorphine together,” and, for the latter, the “Number of Oxycodone and Buprenorphine within an overlapping window” and “Percentage of scripts that are Oxy Buprenorphine within an overlapping window.”

“The impact of including buprenorphine will be appalling for people’s health,” Dr. Hannah Cooper, the chair of substance use disorder research at Emory University, told Filter. Applying more scrutiny to an already stigmatized medication could deter patients from accessing it and pharmacists from providing it, she said. That would add onto pharmacists’ existing hesitations, or oughtright refusal, to supply buprenorphine, which has been linked by Cooper and colleagues to existing DEA regulations.

Although the Pharmacy Prescription Data system will track individual patients with unique “encrypted identifiers,” the chosen contractor must be able to facilitate a three-business-day retrieval of personally identifying patient information when served with an administrative subpoena by the DEA.

The DEA has a history of exploiting administrative subpoenas to build a mass surveillance apparatus. Pre-dating—and outlasting—the National Security Agency’s infamous bulk telephone metadata collection revealed by whistleblower Edward Snowden, one DEA program, launched in 1992 and apparently still kicking, gathers international phone call data en masse.

The drug-war agency used its administrative subpoena power, according to a 2019 DEA inspector general report, to “collect data in bulk without making a prior finding that the records were […] ‘relevant or material’ to any specific defined investigation”, and it failed to develop “a robust legal review” of its practices. The watchdog agency called the DEA’s conduct “troubling.”

“The idea that patient-level data is available to the DEA is quite frightening. We don’t want to make people worry that their decisions will be monitored by this highly punitive federal agency,” said Cooper. “If you’ve been inhabiting a space where you’ve been persecuted by the federal government for some time, and they now have access to your private medical information, there will be tremendous consequences for population health and health equity.”

WTH ? : In 1973, President Richard Nixon created the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) through an executive order

In 1973, President Richard Nixon created the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) through an executive order

https://www.jems.com/2009/12/31/brief-history-dea-sup/

In 1973, President Richard Nixon created the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) through an executive order that established a centralized command structure to combat “an all-out global war on the drug menace.”[1] Currently, the DEA retains a presence in the U.S. and 63 foreign countries, and has an operating budget in excess of $2.3 billion.[1] The DEA’s stated mission is to “enforce the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States.”[1] This is accomplished through use of U.S. civil and criminal courts, as well as international courts of competent jurisdiction.

Of increasing importance for health care and EMS providers is a core function of the DEA—”Enforcement of the provisions of the Controlled Substances Act as they pertain to the manufacture, distribution, and dispensing of legally produced controlled substances.”[1] The DEA is particularly concerned with the “alarming prescription drug abuse problem in America.”[2] Under current estimates, more than 6 million Americans abuse prescription meds, which is more than cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens and inhalants combined.[2] Also, more Americans are abusing pain medications (2.4 million) than marijuana (2.1 million) or cocaine (1.0 million).[2] Accordingly, the DEA has set a course and regulatory framework that demands the health-care community be “vigilant in prevention diversion.”[2]

Through passage of the Controlled Substances Act, Congress established a comprehensive framework concerning registering, reporting, prescribing and other regulation of controlled substances to be enforced by the DEA.[3] Congress provided the attorney general the power and authority to both delegate enforcement and promulgate regulations deemed “necessary and appropriate” to regulate all controlled substances. In an effort to accomplish its mission, the DEA created the Office of Diversion Control, which seeks to limit, investigate, prosecute and eliminate diversion of controlled pharmaceuticals and controlled chemicals.[4] The attorney general and DEA have also set forth extensive regulations outlining drug diversion policy.[5]

The Office of Drug Diversion Web site contains an amazing amount of valuable information, including an electronic copy of the Controlled Substances Act and corresponding regulations applicable to drug diversion, registration, etc.[6] Specific questions regarding controlled substances can be addressed to the applicable diversion field office.[7]

Does this mean …. that any President since Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974 … could have “used their pen” to GET RID OF THE DEA ? We have had EIGHT different Presidents since then – from both parties …  Does this suggest that no one bureaucrat/politician believes that the DEA and their 50 yrs war on drugs – regardless of the outcomes of their actions – we should continue to fund them for many more decades to come ?  The only “social war” that we have fought longer is the “war on poverty”…. and spent some 20+ TRILLION dollars in fighting that social war.

Just what we need ANOTHER PRESIDENT with a family member with a substance abuse problem

Biden Opioid Plan Puts Pharmacies On Notice

https://www.law360.com/publicpolicy/articles/1323869/biden-opioid-plan-puts-pharmacies-on-notice

Law360 (November 8, 2020, 5:16 PM EST) — President-elect Joe Biden will enter office with a plan to curb the nation’s opioid crisis by increasing federal investigations into distributors of the drug, signaling that smaller companies should be aware that it’s not just big businesses that can become the focus of federal prosecutors.

Biden delivered a victory speech in Delaware on Saturday night after projected wins in Pennsylvania and Nevada handed him the electoral votes needed to take the presidency. Though President Donald Trump continues to fight in court, Biden is now poised to put into action an opioid plan he announced in March.

Biden’s plan would hold pharmaceutical companies, executives and others accountable for contributing to the opioid crisis, which has killed more than 750,000 people in the country since 1999 from overdoses, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

While larger companies such as Purdue Pharma LP have so far been the subject of U.S. Department of Justice investigations and the target of civil suits, smaller companies should heed the message that no one in the opioid market is safe, said Jodi Avergun, the head of Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP’s white collar defense group and a former U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration counsel.

“This is a message that no one in the market is safe from these responsibilities … [and] once opioid cases are settled in the current MDL, all of the scrutiny will go away from the whole issue,” she said. “This is a warning to middle-market companies who might not have been wrapped up in an all-consuming basis in the opioid litigation.”

The federal multidistrict litigation consolidated in Ohio contains roughly 3,000 cases filed by cities and counties, as well as Native American tribes, that want money for health care and law enforcement costs related to the opioid epidemic. The suits accuse the opioid manufacturers, distributors and pharmacy chains of feeding the epidemic by downplaying the risks of addiction and failing to monitor suspicious orders.

Under the Trump administration, the DOJ’s focus has only been on a relatively small number of participants in the DEA’s registry. Conversely, Biden’s policy tells government investigators to make sure companies are complying with regulations for monitoring and reporting suspicious orders of opioids, Avergun said.

“The next wave of enforcement actions is going to be who else is there beside the primary [manufacturers], distributors and pharmacy chains,” she said.

Product liability attorney and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP partner Jay Stroble pointed out that Biden has said he would instruct his attorney general to support municipalities that have sued oil companies over climate change, so it may be that the DOJ under Biden would become more “activist.”

Attorneys also noted that investigations into pharmaceutical companies over their opioid marketing and distribution are popular on both sides of the political divide.

“There’s this sense of going after the big pockets and getting these big press releases, sometimes with good reason, looking for a deterrent to try to change behaviors,” said Larry Cote of Cote Law PLLC, a former DEA compliance attorney.

During the last months of the Obama administration, the DOJ made a $150 million deal with McKesson Corp. and a $44 million deal with Cardinal Health Inc. for failing to report suspicious opioid orders.

The Trump administration also moved aggressively against opioid companies, making it a top priority in 2017 when Trump declared the opioid crisis a national emergency. Since then, the DOJ has pursued investigations into opioid companies and reached settlements with multiple companies, most recently with Purdue. That October agreement includes the company’s guilty plea to three felony counts, $8 billion in financial penalties, and the dissolution of the company and the Sackler family’s ownership interests in it.

Still, attorneys questioned the wisdom of pursuing actions against pharmaceutical companies without meaningfully addressing other issues related to the opioid crisis, such as prevention and prescriber education.

“We’re living through a time where the drug companies are still the villains,” Harry Nelson of Nelson Hardiman LLP said.

The coronavirus pandemic has also caused a surge in opioid overdoses, according to the Overdose Mapping Application Program, which is run by the University of Baltimore. Reports of suspected opioid overdose submissions rose by 18% following lockdown orders in March, according to the program.

“If you look at the numbers, it becomes impossible to avoid the link between all the isolation and despair and trauma of the last six, seven months,” Nelson said.

But those overdoses have been largely caused by illicit drugs, including nonprescription fentanyl, according to the American Medical Association. There was also a nearly 40% drop in opioid prescribing between 2017 and 2019.

“The whole problem on a supply-side level is fentanyl, not prescriptions,” Nelson said.

Nelson, who authored a book on the opioid crisis and talked to Vice President-elect Kamala Harris’ campaign during the primaries about opioids, said that while he saw nothing negative in Biden’s plan, there’s too narrow a focus on pharmaceutical companies and there should be more of a focus on early intervention and prescriber education.

“I think the pharmaceutical industry has learned its lesson,” Nelson said. “And now the crisis has changed. You have patients who are genuinely in pain who aren’t getting access to medication.”

Biden’s plan does call for more education, Cote said, but that’s been proposed before and there’s always a question of who will fund it: the DEA or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Cote said that distributors could opt to drop out of the opioid market if they decide there’s too much risk of investigation, and it’s not worth the risk of the cost of running that part of their business.

One marked difference between Trump, whose brother Fred died of alcohol addiction, and Biden is that Biden has been open about his son Hunter’s struggles with addiction, saying that he was proud of Hunter during one of the debates, Nelson said.

“His comments … hold out the hope of somebody who really understands this in a lived way,” he said. “So I think that he can help reduce the shame that people feel, that families feel.”