nothing is going to change until Trump and all of his enablers are out of office. The only hope I have is that I believe Biden and Harris both have empathy and have critical thinking skills and can think “outside the box.” It starts from the top, and hopefully Biden will put qualified intelligent people in charge who will be willing to listen and acknowledge the “unintended consequences” and devastation that is being done to chronic pain patients and will not be afraid to speak out and start to fix this horror we are going through. One of many reasons IMO to vote no matter how hard Trump and his cronies try to invalidate ballots.

Does anyone know what Biden/Harris platform really is ?  First of all they are both ATTORNEYS… We had that  also with Obama/Biden 8 yrs…  Biden got his license to practice law in the early 70’s … not sure if he ever really practiced law… but at about the same time that the DEA was created.  Around the same time that I got out of college and I know the propaganda/fear that the DEA spread around back then.   They were actually going after the cartels, because there was no computerized PDMP databases for them to data mine on prescribers.

Harris is also an attorney and according to Wikipedia she si She is the first African-American, the first Asian-American, and the third female vice presidential running mate on a major party ticket https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris.  But her parents were from Jamaica and India. According to this website https://www.quora.com/Are-Jamaicans-living-in-the-United-States-considered-African-Americans-Do-they-consider-themselves-African-Americans it is unusual for some from Jamaica to identify as black or African/American.  Maybe she is just following in Elizabeth Warren’s footsteps when she claimed that she was a “native American”

Those hoping that Biden/Harris will listen to the chronic pain community on being unfairly treated, but according to her felony conviction rate:

Felony conviction rate

Just prior to Harris taking office the felony conviction rate was 50 percent;^[51] by 2009 it was 76 percent.^[52] Convictions of drug dealers increased from 56 percent in 2003 to 74 percent in 2006.

It has been reported that she sent 1500 people to jail for smoking MJ, yet in a public interview… admitted to using MJ. Didn’t we have another President – who was an attorney – that admitted to “trying” MJ ?

During the Presidential debates Harris accused Biden of being a racist and agreed with the women that accused Biden of inappropriate touching.  Now that doesn’t seem of concern to her ?

Yesterday during one of their first public appearances, they refused to take any questions from the press that was in attendance ?

This is Biden’s THIRD TIME running for President – the previous two times .. he never got any traction and Harris’ attempt this time, she dropped out of the race BEFORE THE FIRST PRIMARY.

Of course this has happened before, Nixon lost to Kennedy and then came back a few years later to be elected President and this Presidency brought us the Controlled Substance act/DEA , Watergate, and his resignation and his VP Spiro Theodore Agnew had resigned – only the second VP in our history to do so and we got Gerald Ford as President .. because he was Speaker of the House and next in line in our order of succession.

If you consider what both Biden & Harris stated during the Presidential debates… they are for “Medicare for all”… but what has been described is really “Medicaid for all” … no premiums, no deductibles, no copays… price tag… about 3-4 trillion/yr…  and if they confiscated all the assets of the billionaires that would pay for the first six months and then confiscate all the assets of all the millionaires would pay for the second 6 months… I guess they haven’t thought out how they are going to pay for it after the first year.. If anyone wants to get a idea of what a national health insurance would look like.. just look at our VA medical system… that is a single payer system.

They indicated that they want to get rid of fracking… there goes a lot of jobs in PENN & Ohio… fuel prices jump dramatically… remember back in early 2000 when fuel was $4.00+/gal ?  and we will no longer be energy independent… and have to purchase energy from some countries that really are not our friends.

Both Biden/Harris has indicated that they want open borders and Harris has stated in a interview that she wanted everyone that is in our country would be entitled to safety, education and healthcare.

But wait, while she was CALF Attorney General she wanted more money to fund police but now she is behind defunding law enforcement or just rearrange how money is used by law enforcement.

She has already stated she is in favor of a “mandatory buy-back of  AR type guns”.. by the way “AR” stands for AUTOMATIC RIFLE and only the military have AR’s that are capable of shooting automatically..the ones sold to the general public are SEMI-AUTOMATIC and those AR guns are  only involved in < 1% of mass shooting.  Beside a mandatory buy-back of guns is basically a confiscation of guns.  First it is rifles… then it will be all hand guns… and there goes the second  amendment !  They want to defund law enforcement and disarm our citizens.

Just pay attention, Illinois has one of the most strict gun ownership laws and yet Chicago typically has at least a couple of dozen of shooting EVERY WEEKEND.

According to this Harris is a anti-catholic bigot and Biden is a active practicing Catholic

Our national debt was 10 trillion when Obama took over and he passed a 20 trillion debt  to Trump and if Nancy & Chuckie gets want they want on this next “pandemic money” our country will end this fiscal year (09/30/2020) with a national debt at or exceeding 30 trillion..  We are quickly becoming the Argentina of North America.

My Father’s had a favorite saying … that I heard often when I screwed up as a kid… “now that you have shit in your nest… you will just have to learn to sit in it’

Filed under: General Problems | 9 Comments »

https://pharmacistactivist.com/2020/August15_2020.shtml

Two are Needed and Two Should be Rescinded!

The cost of many drugs is far too high!

Pharmaceutical companies, pharmacy benefit “managers” (PBMs), and health insurance companies have been engaged in a “blame game” for many years in faulting the others for the high cost of drugs. While they do this, drug costs continue to increase! These companies will not identify an equitable strategy and solution that will serve society well.

Elected officials and government agencies are engaged in partisan politics to such an extent that they have failed to effectively address the issue of excessive drug costs. This political impasse is not likely to be resolved anytime soon. The victims of these failures are patients and society, and the prescribers, pharmacists, and other health professionals who have the responsibility for assuring the most appropriate and effective use of medications with the least risk possible.

President Trump has issued four executive orders (EOs) regarding drug prices. I give him credit for recognizing the importance of taking action and his boldness in acting at a time when others who should be effectively addressing these matters have failed to do so. We can’t expect anyone who does not have expertise in the areas of health care and medication use and costs to be in a position to identify the best strategies and actions. Indeed, many of the “experts” in health care, including health professionals do not agree on a course of needed action. However, the added challenges for the President are that many of those who have the greatest access to him and the opportunity to contribute to and influence decisions, have vested interests and/or political agendas. The consequence is actions that include some that are flawed. Let’s consider the EOs on an individual basis.

Access to affordable life-saving medications

This EO is applicable to insulin and epinephrine (e.g., EpiPen) products. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and hospitals that serve eligible patients (e.g., those with low income who do not have health insurance) participate in the 340B program and are able to obtain medications at large discounts from pharmaceutical companies. The EO directs FQHCs to pass along discounts for insulins and epinephrine (“life-saving” drugs) to patients.

This is a needed and important action BUT, it must be viewed as a small first step in eliminating the widespread abuses in the 340B program. The EO is only applicable to FQHCs and not the hospitals and PBMs involved in the program, it only includes the drugs considered life-saving, and the policies for implementation and monitoring compliance with the order have not yet been identified.

Increasing drug importation to lower prices for American patients

This is a seriously flawed concept and order, and should be rescinded! This EO would permit individual states to develop programs that would enable safe importation of certain drugs, and would enable personal importation waivers at authorized pharmacies. Such a system would be a great disservice for patients and place them at increased risk of drug-related problems. It would enable even more fragmentation of health care and drug therapy for patients, create additional questions about the quality and potency of imported medications, have a disruptive impact on the supplies of drugs in the countries from which they are imported, have a harmful economic impact on many pharmacies and other healthcare entities in the U.S., and require inefficient and costly regulations and procedures that would erode much of the anticipated cost savings.

The problem of excessive prices for many drugs has occurred and been enabled and exploited in the U.S., and must be resolved within this country!

Lowering prices for patients by eliminating kickbacks to middlemen

This EO is needed and extremely important BUT, it must be viewed as an essential first step in restoring the integrity of drug prices and the drug distribution system. Although there are some relatively small PBM middlemen who are committed to providing transparent and financially responsible services, the marketplace is dominated by three huge PBMs – CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, and Optum – that engage in secretive, deceptive, and highly profitable (for themselves) practices. If government officials and the public were specifically aware of the high percentage (often well above 50%) of the price of some drugs that is extracted as kickbacks/rebates by PBMs, there would be outrage and refusal to tolerate the continuation of these self-serving practices that are at the expense of patients, society, and health professionals. The terms of their secret deals are so fiercely hidden and protected that even government officials are not able to obtain the details of the financial arrangements. Government regulators in Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and some other states have made progress in identifying the deception and fraud in certain government-funded programs, but even they are stonewalled and mislead by these PBMs.

Eliminating kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies to PBMs is a positive first step. However, this action must be accompanied by strong regulation of PBM practices in both government-funded and other prescription benefit programs, prohibiting direct and indirect remuneration (DIR) clawback fees from pharmacies, very close regulatory monitoring of their operations, and strong criminal and/or civil actions when harm from and fraud in their operations and programs are identified. Even if rebates from companies to PBMs are eliminated, if these other reforms and actions are not also taken, these PBMs will identify other secretive strategies to recoup their losses and continue their costly programs to the great disadvantage of patients, health professionals, and the healthcare system. More whistleblowers who are current or former employees of these PBMs are needed!

Restricting prices of the most costly Medicare Part B drugs to no more than the amounts charged in other economically comparable countries

This is the second seriously flawed concept and EO that should be rescinded! Suffice it to say that, if government regulators are not able to completely and accurately identify the amounts of kickbacks/rebates and other financial parameters of drug pricing in this country, there is no way of obtaining specific and accurate drug pricing information in other countries beyond knowing that their drug prices are lower.

Recommendations

Pharmaceutical companies, PBMs, and health insurance companies will continue their current drug pricing strategies and programs, and further increase drug prices, unless firm actions are taken to prevent them from doing so. The President, other elected officials, and appropriate government agencies must learn from and act on the counsel and recommendations of patients, pharmacists, and other health professionals who are victims of the destructive present healthcare system. They must give the highest priority to eliminating kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies to PBMs, and to eliminating the unnecessary and costly involvement of PBMs, or rigidly controlling their policies, operations, and programs. Organizations of pharmacists and other health professionals must work together with a united voice and strategy to lower drug prices and attain reforms in the health care system.

Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »

Book smarts vs age/experience/wisdom ?

An old geezer became very bored in retirement and decided to open a medical clinic.
His sign read: “Dr.Geezer’s clinic. Get your treatment for $500, if not cured, get back $1,000.”
Doctor “Young,” who was positive that this old geezer didn’t know beans about medicine,
thought this would be a great opportunity to get $1,000. So he went to Dr.Geezer’s clinic.

Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »

Is the Medicare ‘Inpatient Only’ List History?

— “Drastic” changes in CMS proposed rule worry surgeons: outpatient amputation is “kind of crazy”

https://www.medpagetoday.com/surgery/generalsurgery/88061

Medicare’s new proposed rule would move 266 procedures — including dozens of amputation, replantation, and bone graft surgery codes — out of the federal “inpatient only,” or IPO, reimbursement list so they could be performed in a hospital outpatient department.

If the rule is finalized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, beneficiaries undergoing those procedures would generally have an option to leave the facility the same day, or before two midnights have elapsed, to complete their recovery at home.

CMS also is pushing to entirely eliminate the list, which now contains 1,740 procedures, saying “we no longer believe there is a need … to identify services that require inpatient care.”

Rather, “the physician should use his or her clinical knowledge and judgment, together with consideration of the beneficiary’s specific needs,” to determine whether an inpatient or outpatient setting is more appropriate, the agency said, saying that “emerging new technologies” are making it safe for these operations to be performed outside of an acute care setting.

The remaining 1,474 codes would be phased out over the next several years if the rule is approved.

But approving this rule as is, which would take effect Jan. 1, 2021, also could delay care and pave the way for many unintended consequences that may not be in the patient’s best interest.

That’s the opinion of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, which called the proposed change “drastic” and said it could increase the burden on physicians to appeal health plan denials, and make it tougher for doctors to make sure the patient’s surgery takes place in the safest, most appropriate setting, which may be more expensive.

Orthopedists Are Nervous

AAOS members are worried that the rule could pave the way for health plans to use less expensive surgical settings as the default sites for such procedures and require lengthy appeals and prior authorization paperwork to override those defaults.

“Sometimes contesting those denials is easy, but sometimes it can take months,” said Joseph A. Bosco, III, MD, AAOS president, who called the process a series of “onerous hoops.” The resulting delay can carry its own form of harm.

The AAOS said that’s what happened when total knee and hip replacement procedures were removed from the IPO in recent years. Health plans interpreted the rule as requiring that beneficiaries must have these procedures as outpatients, going home the same day or early the next.

“In pushing forward such a drastic change, CMS may exacerbate many of the unresolved issues that our surgeons continue to face as a result of hip and knee arthroplasty being recently removed from the Inpatient Only list,” the AAOS said in a statement.

“Payers, including Medicare Advantage and commercial carriers, often misinterpret the policy change to mean that these procedures must be performed exclusively in the outpatient setting.”

Bosco, vice chair of NYU Langone Health’s department of orthopedic surgery, emphasized that physicians and surgeons must consider each patient’s environment and social support concerns during their recovery at home, especially if a post-surgical complication might arise.

But health plans may not always think about that or be aware of those considerations, he said.

“You have an 80-year-old woman or man who lives in a five-story walk-up in New York, and they have no family or friends that can take care of them,” he said. “To expect that person to go home the same day after a hip or knee replacement and take care of themselves and make it up five flights of stairs and be independent — it’s not tenable. No surgeon I am aware of would allow that patient to go home to an apartment on the fifth floor if they can’t make it up the stairs.”

“Kind of Crazy”

A second concern is the high level of complexity and risk in many of the 266 procedures that CMS thinks could be done safely in an outpatient setting, Bosco noted. Given today’s surgical tools and skills, some are just too dangerous for an outpatient setting.

“If a person in New York gets run over by the subway and gets his foot amputated, you’re going to reattach that foot on an ambulatory basis? I don’t think so,” he said.

“That’s kind of crazy that you would consider doing a hand reimplantation, or if a person, God forbid, has their arm amputated as an outpatient, and upper extremity from shoulder to elbow? It’s silly.”

“These are major large procedures, after which the patients need intensive monitoring in an inpatient setting.”

Bosco acknowledged that times can change and probably will. Decades ago, surgeons couldn’t imagine performing an outpatient hip replacement, while today such surgeries are more routine.

“In 30 years, will we be doing hand transplants or replants safely if our patients are outpatients? I don’t know. But I can tell you nowhere in the near future will we able to do so.”

The bottom line, he said, is that it would be fine to entirely eliminate the IPO list, which was established 20 years ago, but only if “the physician is unencumbered, and is allowed to make that decision, again, along with consultation with the patient, on where the procedure should take place.”

ASCs Left Out for Now

CMS is not proposing that those codes would be reimbursed in ambulatory surgical centers, at least not yet. But historically, many codes that have been removed from the IPO have been added to the ASC payable list one or two years later.

None of the codes currently on the IPO list in 2020 are eligible to be added to the ASC payable list for 2021. However, Kara Newbury, director of government affairs for the Ambulatory Surgical Center Association, which represents 5,800 Medicare-certified ASCs nationally, said in an ASCA podcast that “ASCA will certainly advocate strongly for those codes that our members tell us are safe and should be eligible for the ASC payable covered procedure list moving forward.”

“CMS has acknowledged that many of these codes are not only being done in hospital outpatient departments already on private payer cases, but also in the ASC setting,” she said.

The ASCA hopes that will be the next step for Medicare beneficiaries too, and CMS will eliminate the two payment silos separating reimbursement for ASCs and hospital outpatient departments. They also hope that commercial payers take a cue from the removal of these 266 codes from the IPO list and approve payment for ASCs to take some of them on.

IPO Needs Fixing

Ted Mazer, MD, a past president of the California Medical Association, and a San Diego otolaryngologist, acknowledged that some health plans may push to drive some cases to the outpatient ambulatory surgical center. But on the other hand, “the fact is, the list of procedures required to be inpatient is way out of date with respect to safety. It needs to be revised. The physician should decide the appropriate site of service.”

While this proposed list of 266 procedures that would be dropped from the IPO list all involve the musculoskeletal system, Mazer encountered a similar problem with some neck procedures that “are completely safe as outpatient surgery, whether at a hospital or an ASC.”

Yet, he said, he is told by hospital administration and payers, “I must schedule and treat as an inpatient (because it’s on the IPO list). That needs to be changed.”

Mazer suggested that perhaps regulations could be developed, at least for Medicare Advantage plans and for commercial payers with help from state regulatory oversight, that would require a plan to justify a decision to override a physician’s preference for site of service. Such rules, he said, should include anti-retaliation protections for physicians who might feel pressure to follow plan rules.

Because so many of the procedures scheduled to be cut Jan. 1 involve orthopedic surgeries, it’s not surprising the AAOS was the first to weigh in. But other major stakeholders are still studying the proposal.

The American Hospital Association and the California Hospital Association, whose members see many procedures moving to physician-owned surgery centers, said they had not had time to form an opinion on the rule and could not comment. Likewise, the American College of Surgeons and the American Medical Association was still digesting the proposed rule.

The rule could have other ramifications as well: an impact on the beneficiary’s pocketbook.

If finalized, some stakeholders told CMS that the new rule would mean that if a procedure is now an outpatient surgery, falling under Part B instead of Part A, beneficiaries would pay 20% of their cost in co-payments. Currently, Part A, or hospital care, requires the patient to pay a deductible of $1,408 for each benefit period up to a 60-day hospital stay.

But CMS says in its proposed rule that those procedures that might be separately billed would be grouped as a single episode of care and capped at the applicable Part A deductible amount, so the patient may not have to pay more.

Comments on the proposed rule are due no later than 5 p.m. ET on Oct. 5.

Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »

Suicidal thoughts in US adults nearly doubled in June, CDC says

https://www.foxnews.com/health/suicidal-thoughts-u-s-adults-nearly-doubled

The study found that there was also an increase in symptoms of depression and anxiety

Nearly 11% of United States adults reported seriously contemplating suicide in June. That is nearly double the percentage who did so last summer, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated.

According to a report released Thursday, the CDC asked 5,412 participants in a survey if they seriously considered suicide in the 30 days preceding the survey performed the last week of June. The findings revealed that 10.7% of Americans reported contemplating suicide compared to 4.3% who reported the same thing throughout 2018. The study also found that 40% of Americans reported some form of mental health issue or substance abuse related to the coronavirus pandemic.

The percentages were far higher in certain groups, including essential workers and ethnic and racial minorities. The study found that the groups with the highest rates of suicide ideation were unpaid caregivers for adults, citing 30% who contemplated it in June. The other group highly affected was the 18- to 24 age group with 25% reporting having those thoughts.

Ethnic and racial minority groups were found to be disproportionately affected as well.  The report said 15.1% of Black and 18.6% of Hispanic Americans reported seriously thinking about suicide in June.

Besides an increase in suicide ideation, the study found that there was also an increase in symptoms of depression and anxiety. The rate of depression symptoms quadrupled in number and anxiety tripled compared to the second quarter of 2019.

About 13% of those surveyed said they increased or started using substances to cope with stress during June.

The authors of the report stated factors need to be investigated such as social isolation, unemployment and financial concerns, lack of school structure, and forms of violence, to see how they serve as additional stressors. The report pointed out that the increased percentages of these mental and behavioral health effects highlights the impact this pandemic has on the population. The study authors stated the report also helped with “identification of populations at increased risk for psychological distress and unhealthy coping.” It suggested expanded use of telehealth to provide services to those in need and suggested future studies to identify drivers of adverse mental and behavioral health during the COVID-19 pandemic and community programs.

The suicide prevention lifeline stated on their website the following warning signs may help determine if a loved one is at risk for suicide. It stated if the behavior has increased, is new, or is related to a recent loss or painful event, seek help by calling the lifeline.

• Talking about wanting to die or to kill themselves
• Talking about feeling hopeless or having no reason to live
• Looking for a way to kill themselves, like searching online or buying a gun
• Talking about being a burden to others
• Talking about feeling trapped or in unbearable pain 
• Sleeping too little or too much
• Acting anxious or agitated; behaving recklessly
• Showing rage or talking about seeking revenge
• Increasing the use of alcohol or drugs
• Withdrawing or isolating themselves
• Extreme mood swings

The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline toll-free number is 1-800-273-TALK (8255) and will connect the caller to a certified crisis center near where the call is placed and is available 24 hours a day.

Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »

Tampa Bay doctor says CVS Pharmacy refused to fill prescription for COVID-19 patient

https://www.wfla.com/community/health/coronavirus/tampa-bay-doctor-says-cvs-pharmacy-refused-to-fill-prescription-for-covid-19-patient/

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (WFLA) – A Tampa Bay area doctor is confused and upset after a pharmacy refused to dispense medication for a patient with COVID-19. This is the first time the doctor says he’s ever been questioned about a prescription.

Doctor Speros Hampilos got a call from a patient with alarming news.

“So he called me yesterday and said doc, I was in the ER diagnosed with pneumonia and COVID-19 and I still don’t feel good,” said Dr. Speros Hampilos.

Leaning on 35 years of experience, the doctor wrote a script for three medications, among them, hydroxychloroquine which was approved 65 years ago to treat malaria the drug also helps people with rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

Controversy has surrounded the drug as of late as different studies are looking into whether it helps treat people sick with coronavirus.

“When my assistant gave the COVID-19 diagnosis CVS said, sorry we can’t dispense the drug,” he said.

Doctor Speros was shocked.

“This is the first time we’ve been asked for a diagnosis and was declined,” said Dr. Speros.

He called another pharmacy and got it filled right away. He reached out 8 On Your Side wanting to know more than the reason he was told over the phone by the pharmacist.

“But unless your hands are tied by corporate policy there isn’t much they can do,” said Dr. Speros.

“That’s what they told you the reason was right,” asked 8 On Your Side’s Marco Villarreal.

“Policy. We can’t dispense it for that diagnosis.”

CVS Pharmacy sent 8 On Your Side this statement:

We’re balancing the off-label use of certain prescription medications to treat COVID-19 pneumonia with the ongoing needs of patients who are prescribed these drugs to help manage chronic conditions such as lupus, HIV, rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. Our goal is to limit stockpiling of medication that could result in future shortages and gaps in care. Our pharmacies are following dispensing guidelines regarding the use of these medications for COVID-19 that have been established in certain states. In states with no guidelines, our pharmacies are limiting the dispensing for COVID-19 treatment to a 10-day supply with no refills.

Pharmacists also consider a variety of factors when evaluating prescriptions. These factors, along with a pharmacist’s professional judgement, help them to determine when it’s necessary to verify information with a physician before filling a prescription.

Dr. Speros says that’s unacceptable to patients who need that medication to battle coronavirus.

“If I would have said malaria or lupus I’d probably would have gotten it,” he said.

Doctor Speros says he has reached out to representative Gus Bilirakis with the hope this doesn’t happen again.

Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »

Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »

Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »

The Defund the Police Movement is Coming for the DEA

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/dyzkvq/the-defund-the-police-movement-is-coming-for-the-drug-enforcement-administration

Critics say the Drug Enforcement Administration has fueled mass incarceration and is a “100 percent failure” at curbing drug trafficking. Sociology professor Alex S. Vitale is unambiguous in his assessment of the Drug Enforcement Administration and its stated mission of reducing drug trafficking in the United States: “They have been a 100 percent failure by any measure you can think of.” Vitale, coordinator of the Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn College and the author of The End of Policing, said the DEA hasn’t saved any lives, nor has it made drugs less available. “Anybody in America can get any kind of drugs they want,” Vitale said.

The idea of defunding the police has become more mainstream in recent months, as part of the wider discussion around police brutality towards Black people stemming from the police killing of George Floyd. So far, the focus has largely been on local police forces rather than federal law enforcement agencies. But drug and police reform advocates believe dismantling the DEA, which they say is responsible for carrying out a discriminatory war on drugs, should be a priority. In June, a group of 76 former DEA agents put out a statement decrying systemic racism within the agency. Last week, the Drug Policy Alliance, an organization that advocates for ending prohibition, announced a framework for decriminalizing possession of all drugs federally. One of the major tenets of the policy is taking away the DEA’s authority to classify drugs under the Controlled Substance Act and giving that power instead to the National Institutes of Health. More broadly, the Drug Policy Alliance argues drugs fall under the jurisdiction of public health authorities rather than law enforcement.

“The DEA has been completely ineffective at stemming the flow of the drugs. We have more people dying of accidental overdoses than we ever have before,” said Matt Sutton, spokesman for the Drug Policy Alliance. Preliminary data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows 2019 was the deadliest year in U.S. history for overdoses, with nearly 71,000 deaths. Even so, the DEA received more than $3.1 billion this fiscal year, and is on track to get even more money next year.

In an email statement, Sean Mitchell, acting chief of DEA media relations, said the DEA is the “only U.S. law enforcement component that possesses the authorities and capabilities to disrupt and dismantle the most prolific drug trafficking organizations domestically and across the globe.”

Mitchell said in 2019, the DEA’s actions denied cartels $5 billion in revenue. He said the DEA “will always follow the science and entities such as the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (and) continue to research many drugs for medical efficacy” and that the administration does not pursue individual drug users. Although the DEA’s goal is to target high-level drug trafficking in the U.S. and disrupt the drug supply abroad, recent developments show its powers can extend beyond that. Following nationwide protests in reaction to the killing of Floyd, the Department of Justice authorized the DEA to to “enforce any federal crime committed as a result of protests over the death of George Floyd,” according to a memorandum obtained by Buzzfeed News. Under the new powers, DEA special agents were allowed to “conduct covert surveillance” and share that information with federal, state, and local authorities. Scott Roberts, senior director of criminal justice campaigns at Color Of Change, a nonprofit civil rights organization, said the memo shows how easily federal agencies can be authorized to go beyond their original mandate for political reasons. “Now we’re seeing the types of surveillance tools that were built and designed to theoretically go after drug cartels… being used to surveil and trap protesters and frankly limit and encroach on people’s First Amendment rights.”

Mitchell said the DEA’s powers during the civil unrest in June included establishing and maintaining perimeters, protecting federal property, and monitoring crowd movements to identify bad actors and criminal activity and that those authorities have expired and have not been extended. Created under President Richard Nixon in 1973, the DEA was originally billed as a means of combating a drug abuse crisis in the United States. But its real purpose was criminalizing Black people through the war on drugs, Roberts said. In a 1994 interview with journalist Dan Baum, published in Harper’s magazine, Nixon-era domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman admitted the war on drugs was a ruse to target Nixon’s political opponents. “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did,” Ehrlichman told Baum. According to filmmaker Ava DuVernay’s documentary 13th, about the genesis of mass incarceration, the U.S prison population more than doubled, ballooning from 513,000 in 1980 to 1,179,200 in 1990, after Ronald Reagan was elected president and aggressively ramped up the war on drugs.

About half of federal prisoners are incarcerated for drug crimes. In 2019, more than 75 percent of people convicted of federal drug crimes were non-white, according to the Drug Policy Alliance. “They did a great job with filling prisons with Black and brown folks and decimating our communities,” said Bonita ‘Bo’ Money, co-founder of the National Diversity and Inclusion Cannabis Alliance (NDICA), a group that advocates for equity in legal weed. Roberts said conservative politicians pushed the narrative that Black communities were “hot beds for illicit drug use” and so pumped resources into over-policing Black neighbourhoods. “Black communities were positioned as the scapegoat,” he said, despite the fact that Black and white people use drugs at similar rates.  Roberts said the DEA funnels millions of dollars into local police departments while teaming up with them for drug trafficking stings, which encourages them to enforce prohibition. He said local law enforcement teams also pick up on the DEA’s “militarized approach to drug enforcement”—such as SWAT teams. “A lot of the more frankly virulent approaches to policing like SWAT teams were born of the war on drugs,” Roberts said. Money’s organization NDICA is currently granting $2,700 to people leaving jail for cannabis crimes to help them transition back into society. She said instead of funding agencies like the DEA, which has a history of corruption scandals, money should go towards reparations for communities harmed by the war on drugs, especially job training. “We need more programs like that where we’re supporting folks who are getting out of prison that have been traumatized for spending 20, 30 years in prison for weed,” she said. Roberts said there’s reason to be hopeful that agencies like the DEA will face more scrutiny, particularly as attitudes around drugs change. Although cannabis is “the lowest hanging fruit,” he said 20 years ago it would have been unimaginable that so many states would be decriminalizing or selling weed. The opioid crisis, which has hit white communities in middle America hard, has also disrupted the narrative that drug addiction is a problem limited to poor Black communities, he added. “Hopefully we can get to a point where we’re investing more in public health solutions and less in institutions like the DEA. And maybe eventually we’ll realize that we don’t need it,” he said.

Filed under: General Problems | 4 Comments »

Kamala Harris’s Anti-Catholic Bigotry

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harriss-anti-catholic-bigotry/

Someone might want to remind Joe Biden, who’s just picked progressive California senator Kamala Harris as his running mate, that his vice-president-to-be believes Catholics are unfit to serve in our nation’s courts. (Biden, of course, as I considered at length on the homepage today, has spent his entire political career invoking his Catholic faith.)

In late 2018, while evaluating the nomination of Brian Buescher to serve as a district judge in Nebraska, Harris posed a series of questions insinuating that his involvement in the Knights of Columbus — a charitable Catholic fraternal organization — disqualified him from serving on the bench. Here’s one of her written questions:

Since 1993, you have been a member of the Knights of Columbus, an all-male society comprised primarily of Catholic men. In 2016, Carl Anderson, leader of the Knights of Columbus, described abortion as “a legal regime that has resulted in more than 40 million deaths.” Mr. Anderson went on to say that “abortion is the killing of the innocent on a massive scale.” Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman’s right to choose when you joined the organization?

She went on to ask Buescher whether he was “aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed marriage equality when [he] joined the organization” and whether he had “ever, in any way, assisted with or contributed to advocacy against women’s reproductive rights.”

Harris’s colleague, Democratic senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, went a bit further, asking Buescher whether he intended to “end [his] membership with this organization to avoid any appearance of bias” — in other words, intimating that she would withhold her vote at least until he had left the Knights of Columbus.

These two Democrats were, in short, suggesting that belonging to a Catholic group with millions of members, which has been an important charity in the U.S. for more than a century, renders an individual unfit to serve as a judge

More sinister even than that, Harris used Buescher’s membership in the Knights of Columbus as a pretext to insinuate that opposition to abortion, a core component of Catholic teaching on the dignity and value of human life, disqualifies an individual from the bench.

Buescher eventually was confirmed, and at the behest of Nebraska senator Ben Sasse, the Senate later voted unanimously to reaffirm the constitutional clause forbidding religious tests for public officeholders. But the fact remains that Harris was guilty of reprehensible anti-Catholic bigotry, and there’s no reason to believe her views have changed.

Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »