“The moral test of a government is how it treats those who are at the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those who are in the shadow of life, the sick and the needy, and the handicapped.” – Hubert Humphrey
passionate pachyderms
Pharmacist Steve steve@steveariens.com 502.938.2414
Congress has approved of lifting a ban on giving medical patients a unique identifier as part of an effort to prevent the practice of doctor shopping for addictive painkillers and reduce medical mix-ups.
Congressman Bill Foster, a Democrat from Naperville, Illinois, introduced the amendment that was approved earlier this month as part of a $99.4 billion United States Department of Health and Human Services appropriations bill.
He said the measure would go a long way to fight the practice of doctor shopping for more prescription pain pills amid a deadly opioid crisis. Doctor shopping involves visiting multiple doctors to obtain multiple prescriptions for pills.
“This would not only guard against doctor shopping by those who are struggling with substance abuse disorder, but could also prevent those in recovery from accidentally being given prescription opioids after an injury, surgery, or childbirth, triggering a relapse,” Foster when he introduced the amendment.
Specifically, assigning a unique number to a patient would give doctors a way to immediately identify a patient’s medical history.
Pennsylvania Republican Mike Kelly said it would lower the cost of medical mix-ups due to misidentification.
“Lives have been lost and medical errors have needlessly occurred,” he said, sharing a story about his elderly father nearly being given the wrong medication during a hospital stay.
“These are situations that could have been entirely avoidable and patients would have been able to have been accurately identified and matched with their records,” Kelly said.
Opponents of an identifier have said it opens up health records to unwanted surveillance or privacy breaches, suggesting biometric identifiers would have the same benefit without assigning a number to people. Others have said it is the first step to nationalizing the private healthcare industry.
Each of us have a few unique identifiers… all digital FACIAL RECOGNITION, digital Finger Prints, digital optical scan… we don’t need any FRIGGIN UNIQUE NUMERIC IDENTIFIER… They need current digital technology… instead of playing a “number’s game”
Drug-related deaths have continued to climb in King County, with fatal overdoses involving methamphetamine and fentanyl on the rise, according to Public Health — Seattle & King County.
Last year, 415 King County residents died from drug or alcohol use — up from 379 in 2017, according to a report released Tuesday by Public Health. Of those who died, 20% to 25% had been drinking alcohol but mostly in combination with other drugs.
Public Health found that 77 percent of people who died had multiple substances in their system. Fatal overdoses from prescription opioids and heroin have remained stable in recent years, while fentanyl-related deaths doubled since 2017, climbing to 66 last year. Illicit opioids were involved in the most deaths overall, but methamphetamine became the most common drug associated with overdose deaths for the first time, as The Seattle Times reported last month.
Question- I am a 65 year old disabled female. Have dealt with pain for past 20 years. My opioid dose was cut in half in 2014 along with so many others. I have taken the same amount, 70 mg (85meq) for worsening conditions, cervicalgia, dystonia, as well as joint hyper mobility since 2014. Life is painful every day regardless. There isn’t much left to my life. I can’t travel well, my mobility has decreased, most all items are delivered, my life is confined to my home for most part.
Yesterday, I had surgery to (1) re-sect margins on a malignant melanoma on my back and (2) do a nipple biopsy on my breast. I was told that since I already take pain meds, the surgeon was ‘between a rock & a hard place’ with being able to prescribe any additional meds. I had received pre-op forms explaining that pain meds would be prescribed for all surgery patients, so I was confused, but tried to be understanding- Until the drugs from surgery wore off yesterday afternoon.
The dr explained to my husband right after surgery that my breast would be very painful for several days. No joke. I cried most of the night. I am tolerant, obviously, to the amount that I am accustomed to taking for fibromyalgia & degenerative issues, labral tear in hip, subluxation shoulder causing unbelievable thoracic pain in back left shoulder blade area. The amount of medication that I have is not enough to cover post surgical pain as well. I will run out before time for my next fill because of the surgery.
The surgery center called this a.m. to see how I was feeling. I explained I had been awake most of the night, hurting all night, having to take something every hour and a half, and still burning, stinging pain within my breast. The nurse said, “well, you have pain meds to take, correct?” I replied that I do, but I am shorting myself later in the month. If she understood, she was unfazed.
Steve, I need a sanity check- am I being unreasonable? Should I have to suffer through this after surgery just because I am already in an amount of pain that is being barely managed? By the way, my family dr manages my pain, conservatively. He stated before the procedure that he could write more meds offering me a tramadol prescription but I probably wouldn’t be able to have it filled. He convinced me I definitely need the surgeries, to go forward with them, and if I run out, he will try to figure something out. Am I missing something? Is this not what pain meds were designed to do? My pain during the winters keeps me bed-bound. My doctor has also said he would have my knees redone but he wouldn’t be able to control my pain?
This is way beyond discouraging. It’s been hard enough to accept that the medical community can do no more than barely keep me comfortable. I like my primary care doctor. And have no ill feelings toward surgeon, hospital, or anyone, except those who have laid out unrealistic limits for patients who are suffering already. I have been disabled for nearly 10 years. During my working career, I carried a top secret clearance with the same government that has me categorized as opioid tolerant. I might as well be on the street corner looking for drugs. I have been misjudged by pharmacists among others in healthcare. I have never asked for my med early, I have never failed a drug test, and am fully compliant with everything my dr has asked. This practice is discouraging future health procedures based on past pain experiences and i feel a form of discrimination. How can this be happening?
Is this average? I will make it thru this somehow, but God forbid, should I need another preventative procedure, I won’t be able to. Tell me others are not having to suffer like this.
Thank you for reading.
Just imagine in days.. months to come… how many “regular people” are going to go under surgery or have a accident that at the very least causes them some substantial pain.. According to thishttps://www.answers.com/Q/How_many_surgeries_are_done_in_the_us_every_yearthere is an estimated 40 million elective surgeries in the USA EVERY YEAR… that is 110,000 surgeries PER DAY.
How many of these surgery pts don’t experience some sort of on going/long term pain before their surgery and they wake up from surgery to be told that they will be given TYENOL/ACETAMINOPHEN to help them deal with their pain. How many of these pt and their family going to “go ballistic” about how they or their family member has been allowed to suffer post surgery ?
How much is their pain and/or frustration is going to be calmed by being told that the healthcare system “don’t want them to become addicted” and that is why they have to just “suffer thru for a few days or a week” ?
Not all surgeries produce “excellent outcomes” and how many pts end up with worse pain or end up with chronic pain post surgery ? All of these new little/no pain management post surgery pts & family going to be “more active” in filing complaints with various agencies over how they or their family were treated poorly or allowed to suffer in pain. The existing chronic pain community may be acquiring new and more active & vocal allies.
Rep. Susan Wild, a freshman Pennsylvania Democrat, revealed her partner’s recent death was a suicide and said she is sharing her story because “I do not want anyone else to suffer.”
The US Senate Finance Committee is demanding that pain societies and advocacy groups disclose any and all payments received from opioid manufacturers.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who heads the committee, and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), the minority leader, sent letters to 10 organizations asking about their financial relationships with opioid makers and other medical entities that manufacture products to treat pain.
“As Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, we have a responsibility to ensure transparency and accountability in matters that directly affect Federal healthcare programs and tax-exempt organizations. This responsibility includes examining the extent to which pharmaceutical manufacturers fund tax-exempt organizations and how these payments may influence pain treatment practices and policy,” the senators write.
The letters were sent to the American Chronic Pain Association, the American Pain Society, the American Society for Pain Management Nursing, the American Society of Pain Educators, the Center for Practical Bioethics, the Federation of State Medical Boards, the Joint Commission, the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, the Alliance for Patient Access, and the International Association for the Study of Pain.
The Senate Finance Committee has a long history of investigating pharmaceutical manufacturers and their ties to tax-exempt entities that influence pain treatment practices and policy, the senators point out in their letter.
Sen. Wyden recently identified several individuals and tax-exempt organizations with “significant” financial ties to opioid manufacturers who have been appointed to various federal panels charged with making decisions and recommendations relating to opioid prescribing practices, the letter states.
Accountability Needed
In December 2018, Wyden launched an investigation to examine conflicts within medical advisory boards and asked the Department of Health and Human Services for information relating to “apparent conflicts” within its Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force (Task Force), as well as Task Force members affiliated with the US Pain Foundation and the American Academy of Pain Medicine.
“Based on information from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Open Payments database, some members on the Task Force have received tens of thousands of dollars from opioid manufacturers.
“It is imperative that Congress ensure that these organizations and their members are adequately disclosing these conflicts to the Federal government to ensure that their guidance remains objective and transparent to the medical community and to patients,” the senators write.
Federal data show that every day in the United States, about 130 people die after overdosing on opioids, including prescription pain relievers, heroin, and synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl.
The total economic burden of prescription opioid misuse alone tops $78 billion a year. This figure includes the costs of healthcare, lost productivity, addiction treatment, and criminal justice involvement.
“These figures demonstrate that the US continues to suffer from an opioid epidemic and that taking prescription opioids for an extended period of time or in higher doses increase a patient’s risk of opioid addiction, overdose, and death,” Grassley and Widen write.
“At the same time, the relationship between opioid manufacturers and non-profit medical organizations remains robust, which calls into question their ability to make impartial recommendations to the medical community and to patients on opioid prescribing practices,” they add.
The senators acknowledge in the letter that the answer to the opioid epidemic continues to be “anything but simple. However, we believe that it is important to shed light on these financial relationships to ensure transparency and accountability in matters that affect Federal healthcare programs and the patients that participate in them,” they write.
The committee has asked that the requested information be sent by July 29, 2019.
Walmart is making some changes as the nation’s health-care landscape continues to evolve.
The discounter is reducing the number of its U.S. pharmacy employees by about 3%, reported the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. A separate report in Bloomberg noted that, according to various sources, these cuts could include as much as 40% of senior pharmacy staff, as well as some new hires and part-time associates.
“We are aligning our staffing with the demands of the business to consistently serve our customers now and in the future,” Walmart said in an emailed statement. “As we continue to position our business, we are making some adjustments in health and wellness that will impact approximately 3% of our pharmacy associates. We’re actively working to place these associates in other open positions.”
The move is part of a “transformational journey” as the company invests in key growth areas, Walmart said in an emailed statement.
A class action lawsuit alleges that CVS unlawfully sends letters to physicians falsely claiming that their patients are reaching out about prescription medications with their patients’ consent, when in reality, the messages are just marketing materials. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this with Scott Hardy from Top Class Actions.
Farron Cousins: One of the biggest issues according to American voters in the 2020 presidential election and pretty much in their day to day lives right now is the issue of healthcare. We’re being overcharged. We’re being overcharged by Big Pharma, we’re being overcharged by our doctors, by hospitals, by our insurance, by everyone. But you know one group that always kind of gets overlooked here is the pharmacies, right? We often forget that pharmacies have an incentive from the pharmaceutical companies to sell us certain drugs. Or to switch us out from, you know, this brand of be it diabetes medicine to this brand of diabetes medicine.
And unfortunately, CVS pharmacy has found a way to make pharmaceutical companies even happier by trying to actively get doctors to prescribe certain drugs for patients. Joining me now to explain exactly what’s happening here is Scott Hardy with Top Class Actions. Scott, there’s few industries I loathe more than pharmaceutical companies, but CVS might be creeping up there on the list because what they’re doing right now, sending out mailers to doctors, is absolutely appalling. Tell us what’s happening. I want you to tell us this story. It’s absolutely amazing.
Scott Hardy: Sure. It’s, it’s really shocking because you know, we all expect and we hope that our pharmacies will call our doctors to refill a prescription, that’s expected. Whenever your prescriptions out, they say, hey, can we call your doctor and, and refill it for you? Yes, absolutely take care of that. But this class action is stating that CVS is being much more proactive and without your permission, is reaching out to doctors and sending out letters to doctors saying that you need this medication. Can we get your permission now? Can you send over a prescription for you? And they’re doing that without notifying you.
And an interesting piece of this is that, you know, this isn’t the, hey, we’re trying to help you out. We’re trying to get your doctor to send these prescriptions without your permission. No, it’s, it’s a big part of the class action is saying that CVS is using you, the consumer to market. Now, CVS is obviously going to make money on selling these prescriptions that they’re hitting the doctor up for. But you as the individual consumer, you’re not getting paid for that marketing, but they’re using your medical information to market their services to make them money. And that’s what was really eye-opening about this class action.
Farron Cousins: Right and the plaintiff in this case, you know, says that he, he went back to his doctor and then the doctor asked him, said, oh, you’re, you’re looking at, you know, why, why would you want this medicine? Why, why did you ask your pharmacy about it? Because that’s what CVS is saying, hey, you know, your customer or your patient, excuse me, asked us about, and they want to get on it. So maybe you should, you know, give them the prescription. That’s also another part of it. And the patient said what, I never had that conversation with anybody.
What are you talking about? And that’s, you know, kind of how this whole story unraveled. But it’s now also in this person’s medical chart that they had asked, even though they didn’t for a particular medication. And of course, any doctor that’s, that’s worth, you know, going to in this country is not going to look kindly on having it in somebody’s chart. Like, oh, this person comes in asking for specific medicines. That’s a red flag for doctors.
They’re going to tell you that they don’t, they don’t like people coming in and saying, I want this particular medicine. So it’s a problem all around for these consumers. But it’s obviously a bigger problem for CVS using these people’s information without their knowledge against their will and trying to give them medications that they in some instances likely don’t even need at all. So yeah. Big Problem here for CVS.
Scott Hardy: Yeah, it is. I mean, from possible, you know, healthcare law violations to just completely stepping out of bounds according to this class action on their actual customer’s rights. I mean, if you’re a CVS customer, you’ve got to be very concerned about this, about them sending letters on your behalf without your permission. And so this one will be really interesting to watch as it makes its way through the court system as to, what was, what they were doing illegal?
How does this actually, was this a, a far reaching marketing ploy that they’re using for all CVS pharmacies? Now what exactly is happening here and how can we as consumers make sure this is stopped? We don’t want to get our health be used and marketed as a ploy to make CVS more money or other pharmacies.
Farron Cousins: Absolutely. This is something obviously as time goes on, we’re going to learn a lot more about this and based on what we’ve seen, both you and I with lawsuits in the past, I, I’m almost certain that the more we learn about this, the worst CVS is going to end up looking. For more information about this issue, please follow the link in the description of this video. Go to topclassactions.com and while you’re there make sure you sign up for their newsletter. It is filled with all the information consumers need to be aware of. Scott Hardy, Top Class Actions. Thank you very much for talking with me.
Scott Hardy: You’re welcome. Thanks for your time Farron.
Hunter Biden, the son of 2020 contender and former Vice President Joe Biden, opened up about his struggle with addiction in a new interview released Monday, saying he did so in part to get ahead of future stories which could impact his father.
“Look, everybody faces pain,” Hunter Biden told The New Yorker’s Adam Entous. “Everybody has trauma. There’s addiction in every family. I was in that darkness. I was in that tunnel — it’s a never-ending tunnel. You don’t get rid of it. You figure out how to deal with it.”
In an extensive and deeply personal interview with The New Yorker, Hunter Biden, 49, details his abuse of alcohol and drugs, which included first using cocaine while in college at Georgetown.
The youngest Biden son, whose older brother, Beau, died after a battle with brain cancer in 2015, has been in and out of an addiction recovery center several times. In 2014, he was discharged from the Navy Reserve after testing positive for cocaine.
During one stretch where Hunter Biden was drinking heavily, he said, his father came to his Washington apartment unannounced to check in on him, saying, ” ‘I need you. What do we have to do?’ “
Family concerns, including Hunter Biden’s troubles, weighed heavily on Joe Biden’s decision whether to run for president in 2020. He had passed up a White House run in the 2016 campaign as his family struggled with the passing of his son Beau just months prior.
“From the time they were born, including my children, they have been in the public eye. It’s not a bad place but not an overwhelmingly comfortable place to be. Everything that happens is public knowledge. You get to celebrate publicly and you have to share your grief publicly. And so they’re not naïve,” Joe Biden said in February.
“The first hurdle for me was deciding whether or not I am comfortable taking the family through what would be a very, very difficult campaign,” he added. “The primary will be very difficult. And the general election, running against President Trump, I don’t think that he’s likely to stop at anything, whomever he runs against.”
In the New Yorker interview, Hunter Biden also discussed his past relationships, including with his former wife, Kathleen, and brother’s widow, Hallie. Hunter Biden married a 32-year-old South African woman in May.
“I called my dad and said that we just got married. He was on speaker, and he said to her, ‘Thank you for giving my son the courage to love again,’ ” Hunter Biden said. “And he said to me, ‘Honey, I knew that when you found love again that I’d get you back.’ “
The article also details Hunter Biden’s business dealings, including work in Ukraine and China, which have become fodder for President Donald Trump and his allies.
Hunter Biden told The New Yorker that after seeing reports that Trump wanted the Department of Justice to investigate him, he noticed a helicopter flying overhead.
“I said, ‘I hope they’re taking pictures of us right now. I hope it’s a live feed to the President so he can see just how much I care about the tweets,’ ” Hunter Biden said. “I told Melissa, ‘I don’t care. F*** you, Mr. President. Here I am, living my life.’ “
Unreported falls. Unexplained bruises. Untreated bedsores. An overdose of insulin — 25 times the prescribed amount. A resident discharged to a hotel without meds, money, food, a phone — or a long-term care plan.
These were violations at some of Tennessee’s 11 most poorly performing nursing homes.
400 ‘underperforming’ facilities
Last month, after U.S. Sens. Bob Casey, D-Pennsylvania, and Pat Toomey, R-Pennsylvania, of the Senate Special Committee on Aging released a report on the nation’s underperforming nursing homes, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services agreed to release a public list of nursing homes that are candidates for its Special Focus Facility program, which get extra attention and inspections.
The names of facilities in the national program, for nursing homes with a documented pattern of poor care, have always been public, but resources for the program are limited. While nearly 400 nursing homes are candidates, a maximum of 88 are picked for the program — and the names of the facilities not in the program haven’t been public.
These nursing homes, which have a “persistent record of poor care” and make up about 2.5% of the 15,700 nursing homes in the United States, aren’t subject to extra inspections, and there’s no way to add them to the Special Focus Facility program without rolling another facility off — even if there’s an especially egregious incident or a law enforcement issue at the nursing home.
And CMS’ own “Nursing Home Compare” site for consumers doesn’t explain that they are Special Focus Facilities, instead using a yellow triangle symbol in place of the “stars” used to rate nursing home care.
Nursing homes that roll out of the SFF program — even if they’ve repeatedly been in it — aren’t specifically identified as such, although consumers can read through hundreds of pages of linked inspection reports to find that information. In addition, the study said, star ratings aren’t always updated to reflect the most recent inspections.
Tennessee nursing homes on list
The study cited examples of nursing home deficiencies in several states and listed every current SFF candidate in the country, including 11 nursing homes in Tennessee:
Asbury Place, Maryville
Bailey Park Community Living Center, Humboldt
Brookhaven Manor, Kingsport
Cornerstone Village, Johnson City
Creekside Center for Rehabilitation and Health, Madison
Dyersburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Greenhills Health and Rehabilitation Center, Nashville
Life Care Center of Columbia
Lauderdale Community Living Center, Ripley
Rainbow Rehab and Health, Bartlett
Westmoreland Health and Rehabilitation Center, Knoxville
Two — the former Brookhaven Manor and Lauderdale Community Living Center — are currently in the Special Focus Facility program.
Taken to hotel without money, meds
Brookhaven Manor entered the program in 2016. Additionally, it was investigated after it discharged a resident for openly breaking smoking rules, even though there wasn’t any documentation he had a clear understanding of those rules.
A state survey found Brookhaven discharged the resident, who had been admitted because of a traumatic head injury, without notifying either the state Long-Term Care Ombudsman or the TennCare CHOICES program, which was paying for his care. The survey said staff drove the resident to a hotel and paid for a three-day stay without ensuring he had money, food, his numerous medications or a phone. While staff later delivered medication — which the resident’s care plan indicated he wasn’t capable of managing on his own — the resident reported having only peanut butter crackers, candy and the hotel’s continental breakfast, no money for other food, and no phone to call out.
Brookhaven is now under criminal investigation by the Tennessee Board of Investigation for the incident.
At various times, Brookhaven also was cited by the state for failure to take steps to make sure a highly contagious bacterial infection didn’t spread from a patient in isolation; failure to prevent a bedsore in another resident; low staffing, bad oversight and too-slow response to help incontinent patients; and failure to make a urology appointment for a resident who needed one.
Now renamed Orchard View, the facility is under new management and ownership by New York-based Plainview Healthcare Partners, which specializes in turning around “troubled nursing homes,” administrator Norman Haley said. “The previous ownership sold the facility to Plainview Healthcare after its failure to maintain quality care and services to the residents that subsequently resulted in the facility having poor surveys and then becoming a Special Focus Facility.”
Since then, Haley said, the facility has had two surveys, both substantially better. Plainview put in place a “strategic plan to change the deficient care and services,” he said, and expects Orchard View to come off the SFF list with the next survey.
“We have made many changes and have yet some others to be made, but with these changes we can and will continue to provide what we believe is ‘not just one of the choices to receive great care, great services, and among great people — but the choice,’ ” Haley said.
Insulin overdose 25 times Rx
Several of the facilities on the list had been in the SFF program at least once. Many had incidents that were serious enough to cause the state to label them “substandard quality of care.”
Among the most egregious was Bailey Park in Humboldt, where an agency nurse “read the dosage wrong” and gave a diabetic resident 100 units of insulin instead of four — putting the resident in a coma.
In 2017, Bailey Park suspended a certified nursing assistant for “rough handling,” slapping and kicking a resident, a survey report said, but did not report the suspension to the state in a timely manner. In addition, the facility didn’t isolate several residents who had urinary tract infections caused by bacteria that produce enzymes that make it contagious and antibiotic-resistant, a survey noted. Four complaints in three years at Knoxville’s Westmoreland Health and Rehabilitation Center resulted in citations, the state said.
A new study finds that nursing home workers often do not change their gloves when they should. Wochit
‘Extremely painful’ fractures
In one instance, a resident at Westmoreland, the former Brakebill Nursing Home, slid out of bed while a CNA was changing her sheets, but the CNA didn’t report it, a state survey said. Only when the resident — who one nurse described as “not a complainer” — screamed in pain over her swollen, bruised knees was she taken to the hospital. X-rays showed fractures in both knees, the survey said.
“She was in extreme pain at the time of admission,” it noted. “The fractures were extremely painful, and they were repaired for palliative reasons.” The resident, who had other health issues, has since died.
Asbury Place, in Maryville, had seven residents with multiple falls — one with nine falls in a year, including a fracture; another with nine falls in four months; another with four falls in two months. After each fall, a state survey report said, staff failed to put in place interventions to prevent more falls — putting residents in immediate jeopardy and labeling the facility “substandard quality of care.”
Medication error rate 65%
Creekside Center for Rehabilitation and Health in Madison had a medication error rate of 65%, including failing to complete blood glucose testing for nine residents; failing to give seven residents insulin as directed; failing to give three residents cardiac and blood pressure medication correctly; failing to give three residents antidepressant and anti-anxiety medication as directed; and failing to follow guidelines for one resident’s wound vac.
The federal threshold for medication errors in nursing homes is 5%.
Lauderdale Community Living Center was cited for a medication error of 7% or greater, stemming from staff giving insulin incorrectly in conjunction with meals. It was cited for poor hand hygiene and poor infection control also — specifically, failure to rinse syringes and properly clean glucometers, putting diabetic residents in immediate jeopardy.
Greenhills Health and Rehabilitation Center in Nashville, in addition to leaving dried food on the tables and routinely running out of clean towels and washcloths for residents, failed to protect residents from being hurt by two residents with violent tendencies, surveys said. The state cited it for being dirty, failing to prevent resident falls, and admitting a resident without assessing mental status because the facility didn’t get an interpreter, among other issues, and labeled it “substandard quality of care.”
Wheelchair flipped off van gate
At Dyersburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in 2017, according to a state survey, a resident who was blind and had both legs amputated at the knee had his wheelchair flip backward off the gate of a transportation van he was getting in to be taken to a medical appointment. He landed on the concrete on his head, suffered a hemorrhage, went into a coma and died in the hospital. The nursing home defended sending him to the appointment without an escort by noting they’d done it 59 times before without an issue, the survey said.
Cornerstone Village in Johnson City put residents in immediate jeopardy by unnecessarily or unsafely using restraints, including on some residents who then were at risk for injury as they tried to free themselves, a survey said. In addition, incontinent patients had to wait an hour for call lights to be answered, so that soiling themselves was unavoidable, a survey said.
Staffing issues, bedsores common
Nursing homes with serious deficiencies often had trouble staffing, one using as many as six agencies. Medication errors were common, as were bedsores — lack of preventing them and inadequate care for them. Several had residents with excessive weight loss, but it’s a different matter that half of them were on their personalized medical weight loss program.
When asked for comment on this story, only Orchard View and Life Care Centers of America responded.
Consumers can view these reports, which are public record. But they may not have the choice to avoid poorly performing facilities, especially in rural parts of the state, wrote Trudy Lieberman for the Rural Health News Service.
“Oversight of America’s poorest quality nursing homes falls short of what taxpayers should expect,” wrote the senators, who pledged to advocate for “increased transparency into consistently under-performing facilities and a robust Special Focus Facility program that has the tools it needs to oversee these nursing homes.”
But Life Care Centers of America President Beecher Hunter said the list is not new and doesn’t change his company’s commitment to safety. Life Care operates or manages more than 200 facilities in 28 states; five, including the one in Columbia, Tennessee, are SFF candidates.
“The public always has access to information such as this to help them select care facilities,” Beecher said. “We support making relevant, transparent information available, so they can make informed care decisions for their loved ones. Survey data is always available for review in all of our facilities as well.
“While there are challenges in any profession, including health care, we love serving our residents and patients across the country.”
Doing stories that make our community better takes times and resources. A subscription to one of our Tennessee publications gives you unlimited access to stories that make a difference in your life and the lives of those around you. You also get the ability to tap into news from the USA TODAY Network’s 109 local sites.
Each of us have a few unique identifiers… all digital FACIAL RECOGNITION, digital Finger Prints, digital optical scan… we don’t need any FRIGGIN UNIQUE NUMERIC IDENTIFIER… They need current digital technology… instead of playing a “number’s game”
CVS Busted Lying To Doctors About Patients’ Prescriptions![Hunter Biden wearing a suit and tie: NEW YORK, NY - MAY 28: Hunter Biden attends the T&C Philanthropy Summit with screening of 'Generosity Of Eye' at Lincoln Center with Town & Country on May 28, 2014 in New York City. (Photo by Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images for Town & Country)]({"default":{"load":"default","w":"80","h":"45","src":"//img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AADHyKH.img?h=450&w=799&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f&x=516&y=283"},"size3column":{"load":"default","w":"62","h":"35","src":"//img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AADHyKH.img?h=352&w=624&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f&x=516&y=283"},"size2column":{"load":"default","w":"62","h":"35","src":"//img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AADHyKH.img?h=352&w=624&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f&x=516&y=283"}})