Medicare for all … or … Medicaid for all…

There is a lot of talk about “Medicare for all”… but they seem to be talking about is Medicaid for all… because they seem to be inferring that what they are talking about is national health insurance paying from FIRST DOLLAR…

Medicare now… only Part A has no premiums but has a $1200- $1400 deductible each time a person is admitted to a hospital… deductible is “forgiven” if the pt is readmitted to a hospital within 60 days of being discharged.

Medicare Part B has a monthly premium of $135.50 and a $185 annual deductible and 20% copay

Medicare Part D ..which is a policy offered by a FOR PROFIT INSURANCE COMPANY… and has various premiums, copays, deductibles.

One of the people who is floating around as a 2020 Presidential candidate has claimed that the whole insurance industry should be eliminated but what this candidate doesn’t seem to know is that both Medicare Advantage policies and Part D policies are provided by FOR PROFIT PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES

All one has to do is look at what is going on with the VA medical system and what is going on with chronic pain pts and their pain management as being dictated by HHS/CMS to get what a national health insurance program may look like…

Here is a article about how the 70 million Medicaid pts are having trouble finding a physician to treat them…

 

You’ve Got Medicaid – Why Can’t You See the Doctor?

https://health.usnews.com/health-news/health-insurance/articles/2015/05/26/youve-got-medicaid-why-cant-you-see-the-doctor

Medicaid insures more than 70.5 million Americans, according to the most recent report from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Largely low-income health care consumers, these patients have had a notoriously difficult time finding physicians to treat them, and in a reasonable amount of time.

With an influx of people qualifying for the public insurance and changes to providers’ reimbursement rates, it’s difficult to say if these troubles will improve or worsen. So it’s crucial that Medicaid beneficiaries know what they’re up against.

In an effort to make it easier for Medicaid patients to see the doctor, the federal government increased Medicaid reimbursement fees in 2013 as part of the Affordable Care Act. When 2014 came to a close, so did that program, and fees once again fell in many states – though some states chose to continue paying higher rates on their own.

It’s too early to say with certainty how the fee changes – both the rise and subsequent fall – have affected patients, but even prior to the fee bump and before the ACA expanded Medicaid to include millions more Americans, these patients sometimes struggled to get in to see the doctor, had worse health outcomes and found themselves holding a good insurance policy with nowhere to use it.

“There are certain aspects of Medicaid, particularly for low-income populations, where it is really almost superior to private [insurance] coverage, with very low copays and no deductibles,” says Stephen Zuckerman, co-director and senior fellow with the Urban Institute’s Health Policy Center. “But at the same time, Medicaid beneficiaries are significantly more likely to report having difficulty finding a provider or delaying care because their health care coverage isn’t widely accepted.”

A 2011 nationwide survey of doctors found 31 percent were “unwilling” to accept new Medicaid patients, with acceptance rates across states varying widely. Across the nation, the study estimated 69 percent of doctors were accepting Medicaid, but state acceptance rates ranged from a low of 40 percent in New Jersey to 99 percent in Wyoming, according to the study published in Health Affairs. This was pre-ACA expansion and prior to any reimbursement fee changes.

Why Some Doctors Won’t Accept Medicaid

When comparing reimbursement rates among health insurance plans, Medicaid is the lowest payer, meaning it’s not a moneymaker for doctors’ offices. Paired with the administrative requirements of accepting public insurance, doctors sometimes just don’t want the hassle

The fee bump of 2013 to 2014 sought to make Medicaid acceptance more enticing by putting those fees on par with Medicare reimbursement rates.

“We don’t know if physician participation in the Medicaid program really increased as a result of the fee increases,” Zuckerman says. But a study he worked on with colleagues from Urban Institute and the University of Pennsylvania did find one way the fee bump helped.

Evaluating wait times for appointments in two periods – November 2012 through March 2013, and May 2014 through July 2014 – the study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, reported Medicaid patients found it easier to make appointments after the fee bump, and those states with the biggest changes in wait time were those with the largest increases in reimbursement rates.

It’s this study that may have motivated some states to continue reimbursing doctors at higher rates after the federal bump expired on Dec. 31, 2014. According to the University of Pennsylvania, 16 states have elected to continue paying at least partially higher rates than they had pre-bump, to continue encouraging doctor participation in the Medicaid program. In the other states, fees have dropped.

Given that states have wildly different acceptance rates, different reimbursement rates and various state-set nuances, the effects of all this remain to be seen. But it stands to reason that beneficiaries may struggle again for their appointment times.

“You would think if there were access problems that the fee bump dealt with for a couple of years, that those access problems could reemerge,” says Zuckerman, who reiterates the lack of data backing this hypothesis. On the other hand, Zuckerman says, doctors knew the fee adjustment wasn’t permanent, and those who increased their participation may not make major adjustments in light of any changes.

What Does It Mean For You?

If you’re on Medicaid, this may be more than you care to know. The bottom line: You need a doctor, and you shouldn’t have to wait an unreasonable amount of time for an appointment. How you navigate your state’s Medicaid system likely hasn’t changed, but finding a doctor may require some legwork.

If you had a doctor prior to receiving Medicaid approval, call the office to discuss staying on as a patient. If the doctor accepts Medicaid, you likely won’t have to look for a new provider.

If you need a doctor, check your state’s Medicaid website for a provider directory. If your state doesn’t offer one, contact the doctor you’re interested in and ask if he or she is accepting new Medicaid patients. Ask what the average wait time is for a new patient appointment, and use that answer to compare a few different providers in your area. You can also use tools such as the Medicare.gov Physician Compare, Healthgrades or the U.S. News Doctor Finder to see how doctors stack up.

If you live in a state where Medicaid doctors are in short supply, you may find using a health center or community clinic is your best option. And before you turn up your nose, know that the ACA-funded major improvements and the expansion of health centers across the country in part to help deal with the influx of new Medicaid patients. Further, a Kaiser Family Foundation study found these centers to largely be on par (or even better) than other Medicaid managed care organizations in terms of quality, even before the ACA-funded improvements.

It is possible to get high-quality medical care under the Medicaid system. Navigating your way through the system, however, can be difficult. Regardless of how doctors are getting reimbursed or who is accepting the public insurance, your health should remain a top priority. So don’t delay medical care out of frustration, and remember to stay flexible with your provider choices.

 

Veteran. On opiates for 10 years. 50% cut.

Veteran. On opiates for 10 years. 50% cut.
Sick
As
Hell.
Language alert.

Is this the type of healthcare we can expect… if we get Medicare for all… and HHS/CMS is in control

Largest Chronic Pain Patient Survey Is Still Looking For Your Opinion

Largest Chronic Pain Patient Survey Is Still Looking For Your Opinion

www.nationalpainreport.com/largest-chronic-pain-patient-survey-is-still-looking-for-your-opinion-8838724.html

What is believed to be the largest-ever patient survey on chronic pain is being kept open. Over 3,000 chronic pain patients and loved ones have filled it out in the last year.

“There’s nothing like it out there,” said Terri Lewis, Ph.D., who is the study author.

She told the National Pain Report this week that the survey has generated over 200,000 lines of comment data which she and her team are busy tabulating.

One thing she told us really stood out—that respondents have tried 262 different alternatives to treat their chronic pain.

If you have not yet filled out the survey, you can do so here.

You’ll note that this survey originally was designed to present data to the FDA for its Public Meeting for Patient-Focused Drug Development on Chronic Pain last summer. But Dr. Lewis has kept the survey active because of the vast information it’s generating.

She said that the data collected will be able to use in three basic ways.

  1. “What the survey results can be are a weapon for people to take to their doctors, to their fellow patients and to their state legislature.”
  2. “The data will also give clinicians the confidence to change their behaviors and not be cowed by the government.”
  3. “It should also be a driver in helping change and create uniform policy which ultimately will hold people accountable to do the right thing.”

Dr. Lewis points out that a big number of people who are responding would otherwise be in the prime of their working and economic lives were it not for injury and illness that they endure.

“They are very unhappy with the system they have to rely on. They are extraordinarily negatively impacted by shrinking footprint of healthcare and public policy,” she pointed out.

Many of the respondents have been dealing with their illnesses and injuries for many years and had achieved some degree of stability of care until the opioid wars destabilized their provider system.

If you have not yet added your voice to this—please do.

If you are not yet following us on Twitter, please do:

@NatPainReport

@edcoghlan

To follow Dr. Lewis, and to keep up on her on behalf of chronic pain patients, find her @tal7291

 

The worst CVS pharmacy is the one I work at

Let me start out by saying that I’m the lead tech at a store in a college town and have worked as a tech for 4 years. My store has, in the past year and a half both of our pharmacists quit (we only have 2) then got a new staff pharmacist in and a Pharmacy manager until after 6 months our pharmacy manager quit. For the past 9 months we have had an interim pharmacy manager, who was only supposed to be here 3 months, and the pharmacist who was supposed to replace him quit after 3 days. A few months later a pharmacist from out of state was going to take over, he quit after his 5th day. 3 techs have transferred in and ALSO QUIT getting better jobs on campus.

Not only are employees treated as disposable but patients are pretty much shit on with how our district leader wants us to treat them. We are supposed to turn on text messaging, script sync, and readyfill even after the patients decline it. Want off PCQ calls? Too bad. I’ll be calling every weekend until you wise up and go to a better pharmacy. Have Caremark insurance and can’t go anywhere else? Lube is in aisle 11.

We already have horrible customer service as we at max have 2 techs at a time for 5 hours. Opening and closing is done by one tech. Every day there is a line of people in drive through, in store picking up and dropping off and 3 PHARMACY CALLS. The wait time we tell people is an hour, 2 hours for C2s and if we are transferring from another pharmacy it’s 24 hours.

When people complain we are not allowed to tell them we are understaffed and busy.

Our interim pharmacy manager is about to jump ship and I will be too after I graduate. Really hope one day CVS goes bankrupt as a corporation.

If my district leader is reading this, sincerely go fuck yourself.

www.reddit.com/r/CVS/comments/apxylf/the_worst_cvs_pharmacy_is_the_one_i_work_at/

For anyone who missed the Senate HELP Committee hearing this morning, here is the video archive

When the profits of a practice is more important than caring for pts ?

I took my yearly drug screen 2 weeks ago. I noticed that unlike before, adderall and xanax were listed as rxs I take. I asked about the xanax tablets because I’ve taken 3 (Three tablets) in the past  year. 2 (two tablets) for tests, and 1, (one tablet) for surgery. Adderall  has been a regular RX of mine since Feb. 2005. Four days after the urine screen my Dr’s office calls says my screen is “inconsistent” for xanax. I say, “I’m in the car, ill be right there to take another test and get a copy of the previous urine screen results.” I’m shaken up, I’ve done nothing wrong, nothing whatsoever, I took nothing, used nothing. The Med assistant said they didn’t want another test, but informed me the N.P. needs to see me before she’ll prescribe for me again. Still driving, I say yes, I want an appt. asap. I arrive at the N.P. office only 5 minutes after I’d answered their call. Again I ask for a UDS, again, “No”. I filled out the form to obtain my UDS from the previous week, When I review the report I see it states that the definition of “inconsistent” in my case is that there was “NO TRACE” of xanax. I went to my appt with the N.P. I waited 1 1/2 hours in an exam room. She came in she asked why I was there and I repeated the message her assistant called me with. The N.P. began loudly stating conclusions about me and said she should’ve done a pill count on me and that she’ll no longer write rx for me. When it was over I walked calmly to the checkout desk and asked for my records. I received my med records yesterday, which ends with the statement that I “failed” my drug test. What do you recommend? I live in a small community that my family and myself have been well thought of for decades. I need a lawyer. My welfare, reputation and life have been damaged, The final page of my healthcare record in their office states I failed my drug screen

 

I have seen this before, a pt is discharged because of a “bad lab” and refusal to let the pt take a second test.

This situation is stranger than most, the pt had taken a total of 3 doses of Xanax over the last year at the time of procedures.

And the NP was looking for a positive urine test for Xanax days or weeks after the pt had taken a Xanax as a single dose on two separate occasion.

I have often expected that the reason(s) behind some of these irrational discharges is because the practice has taken on too many pts and/or someone has quit and they can’t find a replacement or chose not to replace them.

Are they going thru the billing records and seeing which insurance is paying less than others, a slow payer or one requiring a higher number of PA’s, or the pt is one of the lower generator of revenue/yr..  not all pts generate the same amount of revenue.  After all healthcare is nothing but a FOR PROFIT BUSINESS.

Guest view: Montana has become a wasteland for pain management

Guest view: Montana has become a wasteland for pain management

https://mtstandard.com/opinion/columnists/guest-view-montana-has-become-a-wasteland-for-pain-management/article_0dd1d1ec-9add-5ad2-8a02-f637ac1b6bde.html

Why would we be sycophants for the Attorney General, who misrepresents the facts for political gain, so he can claim a “victory” in a drug war (against people) that is 50 years old, costing $2 trillion?

AG Fox is featured in the Montana Medical Association bulletin this month, supporting added mandates for physicians and others who provide prescription medications. “Know your Dose” is a program right out of American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, not scientifically based, and holds a prominent ad buy in the bulletin.

The surge in back pain in Montana is directly related to the surge in procedures.

Drs. Bender and Danaher testified under oath in Dr. Christensen’s trial, in order to take out their competition.

Dr. Christensen took on opiate refugees from Missoula Spine, as the plan, now successful, was to eliminate opiates, so as to enable more procedures. Did you know that epidural steroids are NOT approved by FDA? That ESIs can cause adhesive arachnoiditis, and Intractable Pain?

That .01 percent of patients metabolize opiates so rapidly that they require very large doses (similar to diabetics who require huge insulin doses)?

That Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing, a group of addiction doctors, claim that opiates for pain are heroin pills, and never should be used, and they claim this without evidence?

There is another side to this whole story that has yet to be told, or is being told by doctors and patients who have been marginalized, and that includes myself. The Board Of Medicine took me out, in coordination with DEA. It worked.

But the DEA, regulators and legislators are practicing medicine without a license, always mindful of: “We cannot tell you what to do, we are not doctors.”

It is well known that the board of medicine deprived me of my due process rights, had “experts” that were found to be lying (not credible) and ignored the findings of their own hearing officer, David Scrimm. The intimidation of doctors in this state has worked. It worked on me.

The consequences, intended or not, are that Montana has been turned into a wasteland for pain management. We have become a Third World state, with people in such misery that they kill themselves.

Let’s have an open debate about the terror that doctors have been feeling.

Let’s look at the tribalism and shaming happening around pain and addiction.

Let’s interview patients who were taken from their familiar primary care MD, and forced to see a mid level NP or PA, who took them off their stable regimen.

It’s nasty.

Follow the money. 

But remember FEAR: false evidence appearing real.

In a letter to the Statesman Journal, Dr. Darryl George wrote: “I have seen providers misread drug tests and dismiss patients with rapid or no tapers. They fail to do confirmation testing to ensure the office test is accurate. They look for any excuse to fire the patient. Many of these patients will become unable to work, become less functional at home, and personal relationships become strained. Some patients end up divorced or contemplate suicide when their pain is uncontrolled.

The “ugly” happens when federal and state agencies blame the opioid epidemic on providers and patients.”

The facts are coming out. Montana leads the nation in suicides. Pain mismanagement and malfeasance have created a hostile regulatory environment for doctors.

I’m a member of The Montana Medical Association.

MMA could start standing up for patients who have been abandoned and physicians who try to help them.

Of course, the message and messengers were not welcomed.

Truth will come out.

Where will we be standing when it does?

Mark Ibsen, MD, is the former owner of Urgent Care Plus in Helena. 

DEA states that they want legit pts to get needed medication – YEA RIGHT ? DEA practicing medicine ?

Jeff Walsh, DEA Asst. Special Agent, sits down with WESH 2’s Matt Grant to discuss issues patients are having getting legitimate prescriptions filled.  Feb 2015

DEA agents are involved in “drug raids” … when there is no chance of being shot ?

Columbus police officials and the DEA respond to the Southeastern Regional Pain Center

https://www.wrbl.com/news/local-news/columbus-police-officials-and-the-dea-respond-to-the-southeastern-regional-pain-center/1776722372

COLUMBUS, Ga (WRBL) – A large group of officers responded to the scene early this morning at the Southeastern Regional Pain Center.

Officers, with the Drug Enforcement Administration were in and out of the facility all morning. At least six police cars were on the scene as well. Police officers were busy monitoring traffic and keeping vehicles away from the premises. A spokesperson with The Office of Inspector General, Federal Department of Health and Human Services tells News 3, their division was executing a search warrant.

We reached out to officials on the scene for further details on the case, but they refused to make a comment. We were told the investigation continues. We will keep you posted for more updates to this story online.

DEA: providing MJ medical/dosing information/warning – just what we need from LAW ENFORCEMENT ?

DEA warns of dangers of marijuana edibles

https://foxsanantonio.com/news/local/dea-warns-the-dangers-of-edibles

Gummy bears, cookies and drinks have THC. But what many people don’t know it can knock you out for days.

It used to be pot brownies were the only edibles around, but now brownies aren’t the only thing that contains that secret ingredient that many now swear by: THC, which is extracted from pot.

The Drug Enforcement Administration, DEA, is warning those who are buying marijuana edibles about their strength.

THC derived from cannabis is now a big seller even in states where marijuana is still illegal. But as the DEA tells us, many who are buying it have no idea that edibles take longer to affect you and may be taking more than they should with some extreme effects.

“You have these items that you can actually eat, it could be bakery products, candy-looking products, that contains THC, which is the content in marijuana that gives you the high,” said Dante Sorianello, DEA.

As we saw during our recent trip to Colorado, the legalization of recreational marijuana has produced a whole new line of consumable products. Legal recreational pot products have become as common as what most of us have at happy hour according to this cannabis dispensary owner in Colorado.

“Having a joint at night or having the cannabis edibles at night do not affect you anymore then having a glass of wine at night with your spouse,” said Wanda James, owner of Simply Pure Marijuana Dispensary.

But according to the DEA, the problem is that edibles take a little longer to affect most people, so instead of taking one gummy, they may take more, causing them to ingest a lot more THC than they should. THC is the psychoactive ingredient that gives you that high. As we were told by law enforcement in Colorado, some people have passed out for more than 8 hours because they ate too much THC. Another issue, according to the DEA, is that some of these edibles look like candy and can be picked up by children or by an unsuspecting adult.

“There may be a warning label on the packaging when they sell it, but if you have those open on the table, how do you know? How do you know, if you go to a friends house and you go to a candy dish, and I’d like to say I hope your friends aren’t doing this, but they have some sort of edible candy that contains THC, ” said Sorianello.

For now though dispensaries in states where cannabis is legal are seeing huge profits from edibles, especially in one key demographic that may surprise you.

“So women are the fastest growing consumers of cannabis, especially on the edible side,” said James.

“It’s important to get that load of narcotics off the street, but if there are people out there suffering or risking potential death, we want to do that first,” said Sorianello.