‘Extreme’ Opioid Use And Doctor Shopping Still Plague Medicare
http://www.wnpr.org/post/extreme-opioid-use-and-doctor-shopping-still-plague-medicare
In Washington, D.C., a Medicare beneficiary filled prescriptions for 2,330 pills of oxycodone, hydromorphone and morphine in a single month last year – written by just one of the 42 health providers who prescribed the person such drugs.
In Illinois, a different Medicare enrollee received 73 prescriptions for opioid drugs from 11 prescribers and filled them at 20 different pharmacies. He sometimes filled prescriptions at multiple pharmacies on the same day.
These are among the examples cited in a sobering report released Thursday by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The IG found that heavy use and abuse of painkillers remains a serious problem in Medicare’s prescription drug program. The program, known as Part D, serves more than 43 million seniors and disabled people. Among the report’s findings:
- Of the one-third of Medicare beneficiaries in Part D (or roughly 14.4 million people) who filled at least one prescription for an opioid in 2016, some 3.6 million received the painkillers for at least six months.
- There were wide geographic differences in prescribing patterns, consistent with data released last week by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Alabama and Mississippi had the highest proportions of patients taking prescription painkillers — more than 45 percent each — while Hawaii and New York had the lowest — 22 percent or less.
- More than half a million beneficiaries received what the report defined as high doses of opioids for at least three months — meaning they got the equivalent of 12 tablets a day of Vicodin 10 mg. The figure does not include patients who have cancer or those who are in hospice care, for whom such high doses may be appropriate.
- Almost 70,000 beneficiaries received what the inspector general labeled as extreme amounts of the drugs — an average daily consumption for the year that was more than 2 1/2 times the level the CDC recommends avoiding. Such large doses put patients at an increased risk of overdose death. Extreme prescribing could also indicate that a patient’s identity has been stolen, or that the patient is diverting medications for resale.
- Some 22,000 beneficiaries seem to be doctor shopping — obtaining large amounts of the drugs prescribed by four or more doctors and filled at four or more pharmacies. All states except for Missouri operate Prescription Drug Monitoring Program databases that allow doctors to check, before writing a prescription, whether their patient has already received the drug or similar drugs from other doctors.
- More than 400 doctors, nurse practitioners and physician assistants had questionable prescribing patterns for the beneficiaries most at risk, meaning those who took extreme doses of the drugs or showed signs of doctor shopping. One Missouri prescriber wrote an average of 31 opioid prescriptions for each of 112 patients on Medicare. And four doctors in the same Texas practice ordered opioids for more than 56 beneficiaries who seemed to be doctor shopping. “The patterns of these 401 prescribers are far outside the norm and warrant further scrutiny,” the inspector general said.
To be sure, many seniors suffer from an array of painful conditions, and some opioids are seen as less harmful and addictive than others. Tramadol, often used to treat chronic osteoarthritis pain, for example, was the most frequently prescribed opioid and carries a lower risk of addiction than other opioids, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Moreover, last week’s report from the CDC shows that painkiller use is ticking downward after years of explosive growth.
Still, officials in the inspector general’s office said more can and should be done to combat the problems they observed, even if opioid prescribing is beginning to subside overall.
“I think what we’re saying here is this is still a lot of Medicare beneficiaries,” says Jodi Nudelman, regional inspector general for evaluation and inspections in the New York regional office, who supervised the report. “Regardless of if you are turning a corner, you’re still at these really high levels.”
The inspector general previously has called for Medicare to use its data to focus on doctors who are prescribing drugs in aberrant ways.
The inspector general’s numbers differ somewhat from an April report from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which runs Medicare. The CMS report said that 29.6 percent of Part D enrollees used opioids in 2016, down from 31.9 percent in 2011. The inspector general pegged the 2016 figure at 33 percent, and did not offer any historical comparisons. It was unclear why the two agencies came up with different figures.
In a written statement, CMS said opioid abuse is a priority for the Trump administration. “We are working with patients, physicians, health insurance plans and states to improve how opioids are prescribed by health care providers and used by patients, how opioid use disorder is diagnosed and managed, and how alternative approaches to pain management could be promoted,” the agency said.
Officials have known for years that opioid prescribing has been a problem in Medicare. ProPublica first highlighted the problem in 2013, by publishing data on the drugs prescribed by every physician in the Part D program. Following that report, CMS put in place what it called an Overutilization Monitoring System, which tracked beneficiaries at the highest risk for overdoses or drug abuse. It asked the private insurance companies that run the drug program on its behalf, under contract, to review the cases and provide a response.
In a memo released in April, CMS said its monitoring system has been a success. From 2011 to 2016, it said, there was a 61 percent decrease in the number of beneficiaries who were labeled as “potential very high risk opioid overutilizers.” People were flagged that way if they were taking high doses of opioids for 90 consecutive days and received prescriptions from three or more doctors at three or more pharmacies. But the agency also said it would be implementing changes in January to better target those at highest risk of abuse.
Separately, in 2014, CMS told health providers they would have to register with the Medicare program in order to prescribe medications for beneficiaries. That way, the government could screen them and take action if their prescribing habits were deemed improper. Up to that point, doctors could prescribe drugs to Medicare patients even if they weren’t registered Medicare providers. Delay after delay has pushed back the registration requirement until 2019.
Dr. Cheryl Phillips, senior vice president for public policy and health services at LeadingAge, an association of nonprofit service providers for older adults, says managing pain in seniors is complex. Seniors are more likely to have conditions such as orthopedic problems, cancer or degenerative joint disorders that result in chronic pain. They sometimes don’t react well to nonprescription pain relievers, such as Tylenol, aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicines. And health care providers at nursing homes are still evaluated in part on how well they manage pain, creating an incentive to turn to drugs.
“We have to challenge the notion that being pain-free is a goal,” Phillips says. “It’s not that I want to see people suffering, but being pain-free is perhaps a myth that not only society has been seduced with, but physicians have as well.”
Phillips says she encourages physicians to explore nondrug alternatives, including meditation, mindfulness, moist heat and exercise.
This story was produced by ProPublica, an independent nonprofit newsroom based in New York. Charles Ornstein is a senior reporter. You can compare your doctor’s medication prescribing to his or her peers using ProPublica’s Prescriber Checkup tool.
With 44 million people getting their meds paid for by Medicare Part D… This article focuses on 22,000 potential substance abusers… that is 0.000023% of the Medicare population. IS THIS EXTREME and this article would have you to believe ?
If this was true, why didn’t the Medicare PBM reject payment for these frequent opiate Rxs or where they paid for by cash… it was only after the fact data mining of the various PMP’s databases to uncover these facts .
Do we know – other than what was retrieved from the various PMP’s – that the person(s) filling these prescriptions were in fact the actual person whose name was on the prescription and the driver’s license that was presented.
Do we know.. if many/most/all of these prescriptions were valid prescriptions or forged on counterfeit prescription blanks and the prescriber had no idea that there name/DEA/NPI was being used without their consent ?
Do we know if these prescriptions were actually obtained by people who intended to DIVERT these opiates and that is there BUSINESS PLAN ?
Maybe drilling down to get all the FACTS … rather than just piling similar data into one data pile… to make it sound like something was really bad going on.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Filed under: General Problems | 6 Comments »
