quote of the day: each of the 169,936 PREVENTABLE deaths recorded in 2017 were PREVENTABLE

Report: Americans Are Now More Likely To Die Of An Opioid Overdose Than On The Road

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/14/684695273/report-americans-are-now-more-likely-to-die-of-an-opioid-overdose-than-on-the-ro

For the first time in U.S. history, a leading cause of deaths — vehicle crashes — has been surpassed in likelihood by opioid overdoses, according to a new report on preventable deaths from the National Safety Council.

Americans now have a 1 in 96 chance of dying from an opioid overdose, according to the council’s analysis of 2017 data on accidental death. The probability of dying in a motor vehicle crash is 1 in 103.

“The nation’s opioid crisis is fueling the Council’s grim probabilities, and that crisis is worsening with an influx of illicit fentanyl,” the council said in a statement released Monday.

Fentanyl is now the drug most often responsible for drug overdose deaths, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in December. And that may only be a partial view of the problem: Opioid-related overdoses also have been undercounted by as much as 35 percent, according to a study published last year in the journal Addiction.

The council has recommended tackling the epidemic by increasing pain management training for opioid prescribers, making the potentially lifesaving drug naloxone more widely available and expanding access to addiction treatment.

While the leading causes of death in the U.S. are heart disease (1 in 6 chance) and cancer (1 in 7), the rising overdose numbers are part of a distressing trend the nonprofit has tracked: The lifetime odds of an American dying from a preventable, unintentional injury have gone up over the past 15 years.

“It is impacting our workforce, it is impacting our fathers and mothers who are still raising their children,” said Ken Kolosh, manager of statistics at the National Safety Council. Kolosh said that those accidental deaths usually affect people in the “core of their life,” with greater financial and emotional ramifications than deaths of those in their later years.

Vehicle crashes remain a leading danger as well. Kolosh said half of people who died in crashes they analyzed were not wearing seatbelts. Meanwhile, the frequency of pedestrian deaths has increased, led by a jump in fatalities in urban areas.

Pedestrian deaths have been at a 25-year high, according to the Governors Highway Safety Association. A 2017 study found that an average of 13 people a day were killed by cars between 2005 and 2014, and that people of color and the elderly are disproportionately at risk.

“Historically, roadways have been designed to make it as efficient as possible for the vehicle,” Kolosh said, noting that bicyclists and pedestrians have been shortchanged. “We now have to do a far better job of building our infrastructure to accommodate all road users.”

Kolosh said he hopes the council’s analysis will allay unfounded fears, and remind people of more common dangers.

“As human beings, we’re terrible at assessing our own risk,” Kolosh said. “We typically focus on the unusual or scary events … and assume that those are the riskiest.”

He said data show the opposite is true.

For example, an American’s likelihood of dying in a “cataclysmic storm” is just 1 in 31,394.

Dying as an airplane passenger? 1 in 188,364.

In a train wreck? 1 in 243,765.

Falling? 1 in 114.

Kolosh said the probability of dying in a fall has increased (it was 1 in 119 last year), driven by more recorded falls among older adults as the U.S. population ages. Experts say the best way to prevent that risk is exercise. It’s a reminder, Kolosh said, that each of the 169,936 preventable deaths recorded in 2017 were preventable.

“Your odds of dying are 1 in 1,” Kolosh quipped. “But that doesn’t mean we can’t do something. If, as a society, we put the appropriate rules and regulations in place we can prevent all accidental deaths in the future.”

My math may be wrong… but we have about 320 million people in this country and if we have 1 in 119 chances of dying from a fall… would that mean that you divide 320 million by 119 ?  That comes out to 5.8 million will die from a fall..

Use the 1 in 96 chance of dying of a opiate overdose … comes out to 3.3 million dying from a opiate overdose.. where the last I saw the CDC reported some 70,000 deaths from ALL DRUG OVERDOSES…

Maybe they are using the “new math” and I am still using the “old math ” ?

Using these numbers and the reports out yesterday that the USA’s birth rate is at a THIRTY YEAR LOW… between the two… the population of USA could be totally EXTINCT in a few generations ?

The “bad” happens when patients are forcibly tapered off their medications, leaving them with no way to adequately address their pain

Oregon’s illegal drug users rewarded as chronic pain patients suffer

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/opinion/2019/01/11/oregons-illegal-drug-users-rewarded-chronic-pain-patients-suffer/2548946002/

As a general practitioner, I have seen the “good,” the “bad,” and the “ugly” of the “opioid epidemic.”

The “good” happens when patients are stabilized on their analgesics and able to return to work or volunteer and regain a better quality of life. 

Clinically proven questionnaires are available and I use them in my practice to pre-screen and continually rescreen all patients, which helps significantly with identifying and addressing any areas of concern. 

I review Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data every morning on every patient that I will see that day.  Unfortunately state law doesn’t require that level of review, so many providers fail to use this benefit, but at times it’s an inaccurate resource. There are time considerations in utilizing the PDMP, and some providers say they don’t have time, but when they can assign a staff member to do it, there’s no  excuse for not using this valuable tool.

The issue: Two Views: Is Oregon abandoning those living with chronic pain?

A different perspective: Chronic-pain patients suffer as agencies try to regulate addiction

The “bad” happens when patients are forcibly tapered off their medications, leaving them with no way to adequately address their pain.  Only recently have some insurers started providing more physical therapy, chiropractic, and other treatments, but unfortunately with limitations to the number of visits or total overall costs, they fall short of even a complimentary treatment. 

I have seen providers misread drug tests and dismiss patients with rapid or no tapers.  They fail to do confirmation testing to ensure the office test is accurate.  They look for any excuse to fire the patient. Many of these patients will become unable to work, become less functional at home, and personal relationships become strained.  Some patients end up divorced or contemplate suicide when their pain is uncontrolled.

The “ugly” happens when federal and state agencies blame the opioid epidemic on providers and patients. 

They are easy targets because the provider has an office and the patient uses a pharmacy. They have tried unsuccessfully for decades to arrest the street dealers and buyers who hide in the shadows. 

The government’s own data shows that the vast majority of “opioid” deaths occur as a combination of illicit drugs that were never prescribed to the deceased. But patients who have been using their drugs properly are attacked and degraded. 

Patients are dismissed from their providers for doing nothing wrong, all because the provider fears the government will take away their license if they continue prescribing pain medications. 

The illegal drug users get rewarded with lighter sentences, safe injection places to use their illegal drugs, and disability or unemployment benefits because they’re too busy doing drugs to do anything else. 

They are not dismissed or tapered, and continue getting their Methadone or Suboxone medications from treatment centers even when they fail their drug tests. 

Many of today’s opioid opponents were once prescribers themselves making a living off patients’ pain. Then public opinion shifted. So those prescribers changed their tune. They went where the government’s money flows.

That’s how sharks congregate.

Dr. Darryl George is with Affordable Integrative Medicine in Roseburg, Oregon. Reach him at office@doctor-george.net.

She was stuck – unable to change doctors without a referral from her current pain doctor, who refused

Chronic-pain patients suffer as agencies try to regulate addiction

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/opinion/2019/01/11/chronic-pain-patients-suffer-agencies-try-regulate-addiction/2548890002/

Could the fact that a prescriber CHANGES or DELETES a pt’s diagnosis and replaced it with a diagnosis does not fit the pt’s health condition be considered MALPRACTICE particularly if the “new therapy” causes the pt’s quality of life to deteriorate ?  And the prescriber basically “holds the pt hostage” for refusal to refer the pt out ?

The pt’s insurance should have a network of approved prescribers and they should be able to intercede on the pt’s behalf in find a new prescriber and should the pt file a complaint with the state’s Medical License Board for both malpractice, pt abuse and unprofessional conduct ?

Opioid. For many, the word elicits images of addiction, but that’s only one side of the story.

This is our side, the one that’s no longer socially acceptable, that shatters bias and stigma. It’s the side of the story that I live — that of the chronic pain patient (CPP), not the addict.

The vast majority of people who use prescription opioids never become addicted; they use their medication as prescribed. It facilitates their lives, and if it’s discontinued they will lose quality of life.

The issue: Two Views: Is Oregon abandoning those living with chronic pain?

A different perspective: Oregon’s illegal drug users rewarded as chronic pain patients suffer

My mom worked at the United States Post Office, a job she loved. After a work injury and failed surgeries, she was left in pain, permanently disabled, and unable to function.

She tried every alternative, but nothing helped. Finally, she started opioid medication and began living again — raising her grandchildren, maintaining her home and life. Then her primary doctor retired. She was referred to a well-known Salem pain doctor who, despite 13 years of MRIs, other tests and records, insisted she either accept a diagnosis of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) and receive Suboxone or be tapered completely off medication, and receive nothing for pain. She did everything right, didn’t fail one drug urinalysis (UA), took medication as prescribed, but it didn’t matter.

She was stuck – unable to change doctors without a referral from her current pain doctor, who refused. She wasn’t an addict, didn’t have SUD, but was desperate to maintain her life.

Suboxone was ineffective for her pain — it isn’t even approved for pain. Without effective medication, my mom stopped living. She agonized in bed all day, every day. She’s not alone.

Today, a father is confined to his bed with untreated pain because his doctor was forced to taper him off analgesics. A parent looks down at the deceased body of their child who chose to die rather than face another day in horrible pain.

These stories are not unique or hypothetical — many are suffering. 

Legislation, proposals and rules threaten this fate for every CPP. While opioids are not the answer for everyone, for some they’re a life saver.

Merging CPP with addict is a misconception not supported by data. It’s a tactic to blur the lines. It starts with a heart-wrenching story of addiction and ends with punishing CPPs.

Recently, there was a press release for the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program which began with a tragic account of addiction. The solution was to further restrict CPPs, instead of curbing addiction. This is a common tactic.

CPPs are shamed, suffer discrimination and stigma. We are guilty until proven innocent, and forced into highly regulated pain contracts, random UAs, and even with compliance, many are forced off their medication.

You’ve heard one person every three days dies of an opioid overdose in Oregon (not necessarily CPP). In those three days, over 15 times more people die of alcohol-related deaths.

Four years ago, a drunk driver permanently broke my body so now I’m a CPP, and yet he is free to drink as much as he chooses while I am in danger of losing my quality of life.

All in the name of fighting addiction.

Wendy Sinclair, who lives in Adair Village, is co-founder of the Oregon Pain Action Group and Oregon Legislative Coordinator for The Alliance for the Treatment of Intractable Pain. Reach her at wendyrsinclair@gmail.com.

 

It is a RIGGED GAME !

Liking vs Sharing on FACEBOOK

Some of us have regularly discussed why many in the chronic pain community do not seem to be connected in general.

I have been paying attention to the number of “likes” verses the number of “shares”

There in may lie the problem… according to what I have read when someone “likes” on a post or comment in FB.. apparently all it does is place one of various “icons” on the post

Whereas, when someone “shares” a post… it is copied out to all of their FB friends.. which might almost bring them up to speed on what is happening or not happening in or to the chronic pain community and in turn they may share if with all their friends.

Maybe more “sharing” of FB posts might get more in the chronic pain community on the same page and more “bodies” into “the fight”

sick of suffering website

Four lawsuits have been filed so far. I have joined 2 so far and will be joining the other 2 this week.

Please join all of them if you can. Especially if you or someone you love is in pain and being tortured because of opioid hysteria and lies that the CDC publicly admitted to telling via padding the OD statistics.

If you live in a state not yet listed and want to file please contact Robert D. Jr. Rose and let him know.

Please share like crazy!

A glimpse into the future of healthcare in America ?

The No. 1 takeaway from the 2019 JP Morgan Healthcare Conference: It’s the platform, stupid

This is very interesting “crystal ball view” into the way that healthcare is provided and received.  Some of my readers have some difficulty to understanding the larger picture outlined here.  The biggest casualty of all of this consolidation could be a lot of the for profit insurance industry and the PBM industry. Strangely what is being discuss seems to parallel those processes behind the concept of Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) which was described in that structure as ACO’s (Accountable Care Organizations) which basically hypothesized that the ACO’s would be a collective organization that would provide “total care” to a fixed number of pts for a certain $$$/pt/month and be at financial risk.  I also find it interesting that it is mentioned in this article that this all started about 10 years ago…. which just happens to be about the same time that the Obama administration came to power. Whether pts benefit or suffer from this type of organization is yet to be seen and may not have a final picture/conclusion for a decade or more into the future.

If you want to understand the shifting sands of healthcare, you’ll find no better place than the nonprofit provider track during the infamous JP Morgan Healthcare Conference that took place this week in San Francisco.

Over 40,000 players were in town from every corner of the healthcare ecosystem. However, if you want to hear the heartbeat of what’s happening at ground level, you needed to literally squeeze into the standing room only nonprofit provider track where the CEOs and CFOs of 25 of the most prominent hospitals and healthcare delivery systems in the country shared their perspectives in rapid-fire 25 minute presentations.

This year those presenters represented over $300 billion, or close to 10 percent of the annual healthcare spend in U.S. healthcare. These organizations play a truly unique role in this country as they are integrated into the very fabric of the communities that they serve and are often the single largest employer in their respective regions. In other words, if you work in or care about healthcare, understanding their perspective is a must.

Every year I take a shot at condensing all of these presentations into a set of takeaways so healthcare providers who aren’t in the room can share something with their teams to help inform their strategy. So what do you need to know? Glad you asked, here you go.

Shift Happens — Moving from Being a Healthcare Provider to Creating a Platform for Health and Healthcare in Your Community

Trying to synthesize 25 presentations into a single punch line is pretty stressful. I listened to every presentation, debriefed with other healthcare providers in the audience afterwards and then spent the next 48 hours trying to process what I heard. I was stumped.

But then, finally, it hit me. To take a new spin on an old phrase, “It’s the platform, stupid.” To be clear, even though I’ve been in healthcare for close to 30 years, “stupid” in that sentence is absolutely referring to me.

So the No. 1 takeaway from the 2019 JP Healthcare Conference is this — for healthcare providers, there is a major shift taking place. They are moving from a traditional strategy of buying and building hospitals and simply providing care into a new and more dynamic strategy that focuses on leveraging the platform they have in place to create more value and growth via new and often more profitable streams of revenue. Simply stated, the healthcare delivery systems of today will increasingly leverage the platform and resources that they have in place to become a hub for both health and healthcare in the future. There is a level of urgency to move quickly. Many feel that if they don’t expand the role that they play in both health and healthcare in their community, someone else will step in.

Folks in tech would think of this as the difference between a “product” strategy (old school) and a “platform” strategy (new school). Think of this as the difference from cell phones (Blackberry) to smartphones (iPhone and Android devices). One was a product, the other was a platform. Common platforms that we’re all familiar with such as Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple and even Starbucks have always 1) started with a very small niche, 2) built an audience, 3) built trust and 4) then added other offerings on top of that platform. By now there is no need for a “spoiler alert.” We all know that this strategy works and these companies have created a breathtaking amount of value. The comforting news for hospitals and healthcare delivery systems is that many have already completed the first three steps and have many of the building blocks they need to leverage a “platform” as a business strategy. The presentations at the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference made it clear that most are now actually taking that fourth step to separate themselves from the pack.

There is enormous upside to those who understand this pivot and take advantage of this change in the market. Dennis Dahlen, CFO of Mayo Clinic, shared his perspective on this: “Thinking differently in the future is essential. In many ways, at Mayo, we are already operating as a platform today, but we have to continue to leverage this approach to uncover additional ways that we can be a hub for both health and healthcare in our community.” Mayo’s platform includes leveraging research, big data, expert clinic insights and artificial intelligence to create new value for Mayo’s clinical practice as well as new opportunities for Mayo’s partners.

To be clear, the mental shift here is massive. It’s the difference of being on defense (where most healthcare providers are) to be being on offense (which is where they know they need to be). Executive teams have focused their time, energy and resources on driving and supporting inpatient admissions via a traditional bricks and mortar presence coupled with the acquisition of physician practices. The difficulty of thinking through what it means to truly be “asset light” and taking a different approach shouldn’t be underestimated. The good news is that the recent financial results of many health systems have improved, providing a little breathing room for investments to enable this shift in strategy. Those who don’t may fall way behind. 

A New Way of Thinking — What it Means to be a Hub

Being a hub is essentially bringing together people with common interests to spark innovation and facilitate work getting done more efficiently. Examples include Silicon Valley as a “tech hub,” Los Angeles as an “entertainment hub,” New York as a “financial hub,” Washington, D.C. as a “hub for politics” and how essentially every college town is or can become a “research hub.”

Given that hospitals and health systems are the largest employers in their community, they are already set up to become a hub. In the past, they leveraged that position to simply care for the sick. Increasingly in the future, these organizations will be health and healthcare hubs for innovation and building new companies, for bringing the community together to tackle issues like hunger and homelessness, for education and training, for research and development partnerships, for coordinated, compassionate and longitudinal care delivery for treatment, for support groups for specific chronic conditions, for digital and virtual care, and for thoughtful and effective support for mental and behavioral health. Changes in the care delivery market over the last 10 years have put the right building blocks in place to make this happen.

Hiding in Plain Sight — The Single Biggest Change in Healthcare We May Ever See Has Already Happened

Taking advantage of becoming a hub and leveraging the strategic concept of being a platform requires new thinking, new structures and new skill sets. The great news for healthcare providers is they have already made the toughest move of all in order to set this in motion.

Over the last decade, there has been a massive level of consolidation with hundreds of hospitals and thousands of physician practices being acquired every year. While more mergers and acquisitions will still happen, this stunning and fundamental restructuring of healthcare delivery has taken place and there is no turning back. This is likely the single biggest shift relative to how healthcare is structured in this country that will take place during our lifetime, and it barely gets mentioned. The strategy many were chasing was primarily being driven by a “heads in beds” pay-off that was both based on offense (“an easier way to grow”) and defense (“we better buy them before someone else does”). That said, as this consolidation happened most healthcare delivery systems were really just an amalgamation of stand-alone hospitals set up as a holding company that provided no real leverage other than more top-line revenue.

During the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference, it was clear that most have made the shift from a holding company into a single operating entity. Chicago-based Northwestern Medicine shared a very refined playbook for quickly bringing acquisitions onto their “platform,” and the results are pretty stunning as they have transformed from a $1 billion academic medical center into a $5 billion regional healthcare hub in a handful of years.

And over the last few years, these organizations have gotten super serious about making the toughest decisions right away. The mega-merger of Advocate Health and Aurora Health, the largest healthcare delivery systems in Illinois and Wisconsin respectively, was accompanied by a gutsy decision to fast-track the implementation of Epic at Advocate to get the leverage of a single EHR platform across the system. While many focus on the cost of the transition and the shortcomings of some of the applications, what gets missed is the enormous long-term leverage this provides regarding communication, integration, continuity of care and, of course, access to data and the potential to improve clinical and financial performance. This creates a “platform-like” experience for both employees and customers. 

So, the twist in the story is that the pay-off for consolidation will likely be very different and perhaps much better than many had originally intended. They have the building blocks in place to be a health and healthcare platform for their community. But now they need to figure out how to truly take advantage of it.

Your Action Plan — 6 Ideas from 25 Healthcare Delivery Systems on How to Leverage Your “Platform”

During their presentations the 25 non-profit provider organizations opened up their playbooks on how others can leverage their platforms and the idea of becoming the hub for health and healthcare in their respective communities. Here is what they shared.

1. Create the Digital Front Door — or Someone Else Will

The big shift in play right now is the moving away from traditional reliance on transactional face-to-face interactions with individual providers. Building relationships and trust is something that has been a core competency and core strategic asset for hospitals in the past. In the future, this simply won’t be possible without leveraging digital platforms as we do in every other aspect of our lives today. As Stephen Klasko, MD, CEO of Philadelphia-based Jefferson Health, shared, the real strategy will be to deliver “health and healthcare with no address.”

Many provider organizations are moving aggressively to create digital front doors. Kaiser Permanente delivered 77 million virtual visits last year. Intermountain introduced a virtual hospital that provides over 40 services and has delivered over 500,000 interactions. Nearly every health system leverages MyChart or a similar personal health record platform. There is an enormous amount of risk for hospitals and health systems that don’t take action here, as traditional healthcare providers will be competing with more mainstream and polished consumer brands for the relationships and trust of the folks in their community.

As the team from Spectrum Health shared, “87 percent of Americans measure all brands against a select few — think Amazon, Netflix and Starbucks.” Google, Apple and Facebook as well as Walgreens or CVS are all going after this “digital handshake,” and are big threats to healthcare providers. There is no question that some of these organizations will be “frenemies,” where they are both competing and collaborating. Healthcare organizations will need to approach any partnerships mindful of that risk.

2. Drive Affordability and Reduce Cost — or Risk Being the Problem

As the burden of the cost of care increasingly shifts to the patient’s wallet, healthcare providers will need to play in driving affordability. Coupled with the recent federal requirement to post prices online, there is a great deal of visibility around the price of care, even if the numbers are way off the mark. Understanding and reducing the total cost of care is now viewed as a requirement. As legacy cost accounting applications relied on charges as a proxy for cost and were limited to the acute care setting, most provider organizations have or are now in the process of deploying advanced cost accounting applications with time-driven and activity-based costing capabilities including a number that presented during the conference, such as Advocate Aurora Health, Bon Secours Mercy, Boston Children’s Hospital, Hospital for Special Surgery, Intermountain Healthcare, Northwestern Medicine, Novant Health, Spectrum Health and Wellforce.

This was one of the hottest topics during the conference, and there was significant buzz regarding having a single source of truth for the cost of care across the continuum. Vinny Tammaro, CFO of Yale New Haven Health, commented, “We need to align with the evolution of consumerism and help drive affordability in healthcare. How we leverage data is mission critical to making this concept a reality. Bringing clinical and financial data together provides us with a source of truth to help both reduce the cost of care as well as reallocate our finite resources to high impact initiatives in our community.” Organizations like Intermountain Healthcare, which implemented a 2.7 percent price reduction in exchange pricing, are taking the next step in translating cost reduction into lower prices for consumers. And now healthcare systems are starting to work together to create additional leverage via Civica Rx, which now includes 750 hospitals joining forces to help lower the cost of generic drugs.

3. Tackle Social Determinants of Health — or You Won’t Be the Hub for Health in Your Community

It is always less expensive to prevent a problem than it is to fix it. The good news is that the economic incentives for hospitals and healthcare delivery systems to both think and act that way are beginning to line up. They are certainly there already for providers that are also health plans such Intermountain, Kaiser Permanente, Providence St. Joseph Health, Spectrum Health and UPMC. They are also in place for providers that have aggressively taken on population-based risk contracts such as Advocate Aurora Health. With that said, it feels like every health system is starting to lean in here — and they should.

Being the central community hub for these issues makes a ton of sense. The way that Kaiser framed it is that while they have 12 million members, there are 68 million people in the communities they serve. Taking that broader lens both allows them to make a bigger impact but also broaden their market. Many organizations, such as Henry Ford Health System, are taking on hunger via fresh food pharmacies. Geisinger shared how a 2.0 reduction in Hemoglobin A1c reduction leads to a $24,000 cost reduction per participant in their fresh food “farmacy.” So while hospitals are perfectly positioned, have the resources and know it’s the right thing to do, they are now also beginning to understand the business model tied to targeting the social determinants of health. There is also strong strategic rationale associated with taking on a broader role of driving health versus only providing healthcare.

4. Create Partnerships for Healthcare Innovation — or Lose the Upside

Spectrum Health has a $100 million venture fund. Providence St. Joseph’s Health announced a second $150 million venture capital and growth equity fund. Mayo Clinic Ventures has returned over $700 million to their organization. Jefferson Health has a 120-person innovation team focused on digital innovation and the consumer experience, partnering with companies to build solutions. These are all variations on a theme as virtually every organization that presented is leveraging their resources to make a bigger impact and drive additional upside from their platform. “We have close to 900 agreements with over 500 partners,” stated Sanda Fenwick, CEO of Boston Children’s Hospital. “Our strategy is to be a hub for research, innovation and education in order to help evolve how care is delivered. This can only be done by collaborating with others.”

5. Become the Hub for Targeted Services and Chronic Conditions — or They Will Go Elsewhere

Perhaps the best example here is the work of Hospital for Special Surgery, the largest orthopedics shop in the world. It is has become a destination for good reason — fewer complications, fewer infections, a higher discharge rate to home and fewer readmissions. The most compelling data point is that when patients come to HSS for a second opinion, one-third of the time they receive a non-surgical recommendation. The same type of shopping is increasingly going to happen for chronic conditions.

Healthcare delivery systems that take a more holistic yet targeted approach have significant potential. They will need to think more deeply about the end-to-end experience and become immersed within the community outside of the four walls of the hospital. Other players in the community, such as CVS Health and Walgreens, would say they have a platform — and they would be right. The platform that healthcare providers have built and are building will absolutely be competing against other care delivery platforms.  

6. Leverage Applied Analytics — or You’ll Lose Your Way

In order to enable everything listed above, the lifeline for every health and healthcare hub will be actionable data. Applied analytics is a boring term that is actually gaining traction and starting to dislodge buzzwords like big data, machine learning and artificial intelligence relative to its importance to healthcare providers.

Similar to how analytics are being used in a practical way in baseball to determine where to throw a pitch to a batter or position players in the field, healthcare providers are pushing for practical data sets presented in a simple, actionable framework. That may seem obvious, but it is simply not present in many healthcare organizations that have been focused on building data warehouse empires without doors to let anyone in. Many organizations, such as Advocate Aurora Health, Bon Secours Mercy and Spectrum Health, have deployed more dynamic business decision support solutions to access better insight into performance and care variation. This allows them to assess opportunities to reallocate resources to invest in more productive ways to leverage their platform.   

While leveraging a platform as a business strategy is new to healthcare providers, the good news is that building blocks are already in place. It’s time to leverage that platform to drive better outcomes and more affordable care in the community. And now is the time to get started.

Dan Michelson is the CEO of Chicago-based Strata Decision Technology. Mr. Michelson has authored recaps of JP Morgan Healthcare conferences for the past several years for Becker’s. Read his account of the 2018 event here and the 2017 event here.

Presenting non-profit provider organizations during the 2019 JP Morgan Healthcare Conference included the following: AdventHealth, Advocate Aurora Health, Ascension, Baylor Scott & White Health, Bon Secours Mercy Health, Boston Children’s Hospital, CommonSpirit Health, Geisinger, Hartford HealthCare, Henry Ford Health System, Hospital for Special Surgery, Intermountain Healthcare, Jefferson Health, Kaiser Permanente, Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan Kettering, Northwell Health, Northwestern Medicine, Novant Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Providence St. Joseph Health, Spectrum Health System, SSM Health, University of California Health, UPMC and Wellforce.

We’re doing an ongoing series about the opioid epidemic

We’re doing an ongoing series about the opioid epidemic

https://politico.forms.fm/opioid-epidemic/forms/4903

We’re doing an ongoing series about the opioid epidemic, which is arguably America’s biggest public health crisis since AIDS. Opioids (including legal painkillers, heroin and fentanyl) killed a record 42,000 people in 2016, and death rates are rising, according to the CDC.

We want to hear about your experience. Tell us your story and a reporter may follow up with you.

(Read the story: 5 unintended consequences of addressing the opioid crisis https://politi.co/2FUB3iA)

Contact email

ayu@politico.com

A Little State Debunks A Big Lie: The DEA’s Opioid Scam

https://www.acsh.org/news/2018/11/21/little-state-debunks-big-lie-deas-opioid-scam-13614

 It’s more than a little ironic that the state motto for New Hampshire is:

“Live Free or Die”

Because it conflicts with a new motto I have just made up. Since we are nothing if not economical here at ACSH I figured that I could save time and energy coming up with new mottos for the CDC and DEA. But I only need one:

“Feel Free To Lie”

I’ve been writing all along (most recently Who Is Telling The Truth About Prescription Opioid Deaths? DEA? CDC? Neither?) about how the CDC and their flunkies from the Physicians Responsible for Opioid Prohibition (1) have been spinning their bogus statistics in order to tell us a story that isn’t even remotely true: That prescription opioids are killing bazillions of Americans and the way to combat this is to crack down on prescribing these drugs.

My article above catches the DEA making up the same crap – 164 pages worth of it. Somehow, despite both common sense and plenty of evidence to the contrary, the agency fell into line with the CDC and reached a similar conclusion. The graphs in the article do a pretty good job of showing you why these conclusions are nonsense.

But not as good as this one:

Source: CDC “Synthetic Opioids” means illicit fentanyl and its analogs. (2)

Well, I’ll be damned! Those numbers sure look strange. Why, if you happened to come across this graph without a calculator how could you possibly know that:

  • Fentanyl was involved 83% of the overdose deaths in New Hampshire 

  • Heroin was in 8% of the overdose deaths in New Hampshire 

  • You can figure out the rest.

Of course, different states will have different patterns of abuse, but if 9% of OD deaths in one state came from opioid analgesic drugs like Vicodin and Percocet then it’s a pretty good bet that most of the time you’re going to see a pattern that is at least vaguely similar to that of New Hampshire, despite the fact that it has (by far) has the lowest percentage of opioid analgesic OD deaths in the country. You see this in the Northeast. The majority of OD deaths are not from pills.

  • New Jersey – 30%
  • Connecticut – 31%
  • New Jersey – 30%
  • New York – 27%
  • Massachusetts – 19%

The next set of numbers is especially interesting. The Midwest is constantly described in the news as “being ravaged by the opioid crisis.” This is true, but most of the ravaging isn’t coming from prescription pills. 

  • Kentucky – 43%
  • Ohio – 24%
  • West Virginia – 46%
  • Indiana – 37%

In 19 states the percentage of deaths from pills exceeds 50% of the total. Some examples:

  • Maine – 51%
  • South Carolina – 61%
  • Alaska – 54%
  • Arkansas – 78%
  • California – 58%
  • Georgia – 58%

What is more interesting, however, is the slope of the (green) line between 2010 and 2016 – the time when these pill deaths supposedly skyrocketed. Here’s a close-up of New Hampshire. It is quite obvious that the number of deaths between 2010 and 2016 remained more or less constant.

New Hampshire opioid deaths 2010-2016. The green line represents prescription opioid analgesics. The black hatch line connects 2010 with 2016. It is quite level. 

The same held true for other states with a low percentage of pill deaths. The black hatch line shows that pill deaths between 2010-2016 were fairly constant in these states.

 

 

But the same also held true for the states with a high percentage of pill deaths (South Carolina being the exception).

So, here’s the obvious question:

So, where is the opioid epidemic?

Between 2010-2016, the years when everyone became hysterical about “heroin pills” there was just about no change in the number of deaths in states where pill death rates were low or where they were high. The answer is obvious. The “opioid epidemic” is due to heroin and fentanyl, not pills. As I’ve written before, we are not having an “opioid epidemic.” We are having a fentanyl epidemic. It’s been obvious all along. Yet, we keep hearing the same old garbage from our government and the press and the only “plan” our “leaders” have is to tighten up the pills.

Like this:

“Controlled Prescription Drugs (CPDs) … are still responsible for the most drug-involved overdose deaths and are the second most commonly abused substance in the United States.”

DEA Report, November 8, 2018.

Maybe they’re just high.

Or, in some cases, quite low. 

NOTES:

(1) I may have gotten the name wrong. But those guys don’t care much for accuracy, so big deal.

(2) For some reason, tramadol is classified a synthetic opioid but it has little in common with real opioids. (It has also been called a pseudo-opioid.) I don’t think it should be called an opioid at all. It is far weaker and bears little structural resemblance to either the semi-synthetics (oxycodone, hydrocodone) or the fentanyls. So, it hits a few receptors. Big deal. So do other drugs that aren’t opioids either. 

What (doesn’t) happen when you are part of the “good ole boys” DOJ club ?

Ex-DEA agent gets probation for selling ARs to ‘members of a drug trafficking organization’ on border

www.guns.com/news/2019/01/11/ex-dea-agent-gets-probation-for-selling-ars-to-members-of-a-drug-trafficking-organization-on-border

Although federal prosecutors sought jail time, citing memories of Fast and Furious gun-walking scandals, the former Drug Enforcement Agency agent was given probation on weapon charges.

Joseph Gill, 42, was sentenced on Monday to five years probation with the first six months of the term spent in home detention after pleading guilty last October to two counts of illegally dealing firearms. While investigators determined he may have been sold as many as 100 guns in private transactions over the past several years, it was the sale of two AR-15s to members of a drug trafficking organization in 2016 that triggered his arrest.

In a memo to the court penned by Assistant U.S. Attorney Phillip Smith prior to sentencing, the prosecutor argued that Gill should receive at least 18 months jail time, followed by three years probation and a $100,000 fine, saying, “He sold weapons when he knew he should not have, and under circumstances which he should not have.”

A former supervisory special agent assigned to the border town of Nogales, Arizona, court documents show that Gill came under scrutiny after he sold “scores” of guns without a federal firearms license. Although at one time he had an ATF Curio and Relics (C&R) license, the type typically maintained by collectors of vintage firearms, he let it lapse. Similarly, he withdrew a further application for an FFL.

In the case of the ARs sold in 2016, Gill purchased three rifles for $632 each through an online retailer in Kentucky and had them shipped to a local FFL in Arizona. He then resold two of them for $1,000 each the next month in two transactions to men that he “had reason to believe intended to use or dispose of the firearm unlawfully.” One of the guns was subsequently recovered by federal agents.

While Gill, charged last August after he resigned from the DEA, later entered a guilty plea that opened him up to as much as five years in prison, his attorney argued to the court that he had an otherwise exemplary career and his crime was “one of willful ignorance.”

To this, Smith scoffed, saying, “The defendant was a sworn federal agent at the time he committed this crime, and he knew what he was doing was a crime and did it anyway—all for personal profit.”

Further, Smith invoked the notorious gun-walking scandal that allowed licensed firearm dealers to sell guns illegally in hopes of tracking the weapons back to trans-border drug cartels. “Perhaps most shockingly, the defendant committed this crime with assumed knowledge of the infamous joint DEA-ATF ‘Operation Fast and Furious,’ which resulted in a federal agent being murdered by a weapon that had been acquired illegally by a straw purchaser and had ended up in Mexico,” Smith said.

Nogales straddles the border with Mexico, with part of the city in Arizona and part in the Mexican state of Sonora. Customs and Border Protection Agent Brian A. Terry, 40, was killed northwest of the city in 2010 with a gun that had been purchased by an Operation Fast and Furious subject.

In addition to his probation, Gill received a $15,000 fine, with orders to pay it off $250 per month.