AG Session: sizable number of physicians who were over prescribing opioid pain pills, which were not helping people get well

Utilizing the palliative care “loophole” in chronic pain management

www.medium.com/@aaronsells/utilizing-the-palliative-care-loophole-in-chronic-pain-management-6a25611a6f21

The DOJ is successfully escalating angst among general practitioners, who are already reluctant to prescribe narcotics above guidelines, (that were established by the CDC), out of fear of being targeted as outliers by the DEA. In turn, many patients with intractable pain are forced to, “make due”, with what pain medication they are prescribed, and tension runs high between appointments as their doctors push for even further tapering.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced in January that over the next 45 days, a “surge” of Drug Enforcement Administration agents and investigators will focus on pharmacies and prescribers who are dispensing unusual or disproportionate amounts of opioid drugs.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration has arrested 28 people and revoked the registrations of over a hundred others in a nationwide crackdown that targeted prescribers and pharmacies that dispense “disproportionally large amounts” of opioid medication.

For 45 days in February and March, a special team of DEA investigators searched a database of 80 million prescriptions, looking for suspicious orders and possible drug thefts.

The so-called “surge” resulted in 28 arrests, 54 search warrants, and 283 administrative actions against doctors and pharmacists. The DEA registrations of 147 people were also revoked — meaning they can no longer prescribe, dispense or distribute controlled substances such as opioids.

The DEA said 4 medical doctors and 4 medical assistants were arrested, along with 20 people described as “non-registrant co-conspirators.” The arrests were reported by the agency’s offices in San Diego, Denver, Atlanta, Miami and Philadelphia.

In an interview with AARP, Sessions defended the use of data mining to uncover health care fraud.“Some of the more blatant problems were highlighted in our Medicare fraud take down recently where we had a

sizable number of physicians that were over prescribing opioid pain pills which were not helping people get well,

but instead were furthering an addiction being paid for by the federal taxpayers. This is a really bad thing,” Sessions said.“It’s a little bit like these shysters who use direct mail and other ways to defraud people. They will keep doing it until they’re stopped. In other words, if we don’t stop them, they will keep finding more victims and seducing them.”

As a growing trend of doctors across America voluntarily leave pain management, their patients are left without medical care. From there, the sick and disabled get bounced back to primary care. General practitioners, no longer in the business of treating pain, can only offer referrals but rarely communicate or follow up with their colleagues to facilitate a comparable continuity of care. These limitations have been further aggravated, through an effective surreptitious recruitment campaign organized by Dr. Andrew Kolodny, Co-Director of Opioid Policy Research at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management, christened PROP (Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing). Armed with government propaganda, Prop docs function as the CDC mouthpiece and have infiltrated teaching universities, medical schools, CME courses,and large HMOs. There they double down and intentionally disseminate biased misinformation, present flimsy evidence as a matter of fact that, more often than not, aggregates chronic pain and addiction. Is there any way around this patient-doctor dilemma?

In an interview with AARP, Sessions defended the use of data mining to uncover health care fraud. “Some of the more blatant problems were highlighted in our Medicare fraud takedown recently, where we had a sizable number of physicians who were overprescribing opioid pain pills, which were not helping people get well, but, instead, were furthering an addiction, [all] being paid for by the federal taxpayers. This is a really bad thing,” Sessions said. “It’s a little bit like these shysters who use direct mail and other ways to defraud people. They will keep doing it until they’re stopped. In other words, if we don’t stop them, they will keep finding more victims and [keep] seducing them.”
As a growing trend of doctors across America voluntarily leave pain management, their patients are left without medical care. 
From there, the sick and disabled get bounced back to primary care. General practitioners, no longer in the business of treating pain, can only offer referrals, but, they rarely communicate with, or follow up with, their colleagues to facilitate a comparable continuity of care. These limitations have been further aggravated through an effective, surreptitious

recruitment campaign organized by Dr. Andrew Kolodny, Co-Director of Opioid Policy Research at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management, christened PROP (Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing). Armed with government propaganda, Prop docs function as the CDC mouthpiece, and have infiltrated teaching universities, medical schools, CME courses, and large HMOs. There, they double down and intentionally disseminate biased misinformation, present flimsy evidence as a matter of fact that, more often than not, aggregates chronic pain and addiction. 

Is there any way around this patient-doctor dilemma?

The answer might be as simple as a physician order for palliative care — a treatment option already covered by CMS and most private insurance. You can have it at any age and any stage of an illness, but, early on in your illness is recommended.
Palliative care, (pronounced pal-lee-uh-tiv), is specialized medical care for people with serious illnesses. This type of care is focused on providing relief from the symptoms and stress of a serious illness. The goal is to improve quality of life for both the patient and the family. Palliative care is provided by a specially-trained team of doctors, nurses and other specialists who work together with a patient’s other doctors to provide an extra layer of support. It is appropriate at any age, and at any stage in a serious illness, and it can be provided along with curative treatment¹

View at Medium.com

Opioid bill takes aim at doctors as well as pharmaceutical companies

This week, the Senate passed a major bipartisan bill that addresses the opioid epidemic, one U.S. Senator Maria Catwell says will help in Washington state.

Just two years ago, 700 people in our state died of opioid overdoses, mostly in king, Snohomish and Pierce counties.

On Wednesday, sheriffs from each of those counties backed this new bill, saying the problem is so big, law enforcement can’t solve it alone.

“This notion that we are going to arrest out way out of this problem that a pair of handcuffs and a trip to jail that will somehow solve this epidemic is nonsense, “said Snohomish County Sheriff Ty Trenary.

Opioid bill takes aim at doctors as well as pharmaceutical companies

There are four parts of the bill: prevention, expanded treatment coverage, funding for drug courts and holding drug manufacturers accountable.

If drug manufacturers are held accountable, Senator Cantwell said doctors must be held accountable too.

On Monday, she talked about the problem of doctors over-prescribing opioids and used the example of an Everett doctor who wrote thousands of opioid prescriptions over nine years.

KOMO News learned he’s now retired, but he has a paper trail with the Washington Medical Association, whose Deputy Director said the doctor was sanctioned last year for not meeting the standard of care when prescribing opioids to some chronic pain patients.

“We gotta stop it, otherwise we are going to keep increasing the opportunity for more and more people,” Cantwell said in Seattle at a news conference with local law enforcement, including Attorney General Bob Ferguson.

Cantwell’s ‘more and more people’ refers to more opioids, more addictions and more deadly consequences.

The U.S. Senator not only points a finger at drug manufactures, but doctors too.

This is what she told lawmakers from the Senate Floor Monday, “In one example a physician from Washington wrote more than 10,000 prescriptions of opioids. This was 26 times higher than the average prescriber in Everett, Washington.”

We found that doctor, Dr. Donald Dillinger.

We wanted to ask him about those 10,000 opioid scripts, but no answer at his home. His Everett medical office closed and his voicemail said he retired.

The Attorney General’s office knows about him, too.

We discovered he’s was named in a lawsuit filed by the Washington Attorney General’s office in January for writing those 10,000 opioid prescriptions from 2007 to 2016.

Cantwell said spikes in drug distribution should be monitored and reported by drug manufacturers. She hopes proposed legislation that ups fines from $10,000 to $100,000 and in some cases up to a half a million dollars for violators will pass muster with other lawmakers.

“However, the drug manufacturer failed to report this suspicious activity,” said Cantwell.

Dr. Dillinger didn’t return our call, but we learned he was disciplined by the state in 2017 for ‘not meeting the standard of care for chronic pain patients’ said Micah Matthews, Deputy Director for the Washington Medical Association.

Public documents show the state restricted his license and put him on a compliance plan.

We learned today, the commission reopened its investigation after learning of the AG’s lawsuit.

“When the lawsuit was filed it became clear we didn’t have access to all the relevant records,” said Matthews.

The Commission is reviewing those additional records now.

“That’s disgusting to me honestly,” said Kelly an assistant occupational therapist, when she learned that Dr. Dillinger wrote thousands of prescriptions for opioids.

Kelly who is not connected to the case or the doctor said she encounters countless patients addicted and desperate for pain meds all the time.

“You see it all the time, they shop doctors and if they can’t get it from doctors they get it from the streets,” Kelly who didn’t want to reveal her last name.

Like the senator, she thinks the buck stops with manufactures and overprescribing doctors.

“They don’t need to prescribe so much meds because a patient will think they need to take all that,” said Kelly.

WMC’s Deputy Director said Dillinger disagreed with the charges and initial findings and took his case all the way to a formal hearing.

He said the commission determined the doctor violated the standard of care and assigned him two compliance officers.

It’s their job to make sure Practioners comply and are rehabilitated to good practice.

In October, Matthews said Dillinger informally surrendered his license to the WMC.

Matthews said since there was no mechanism in place to officially receive his medical license at the time, the state is currently negotiating the formal surrender of his license.

Matthews said reopening the investigation to look at records connected to the AG’s case may end up a moot point if they reach agreement on Dillinger’s license surrender.

The Commission recently adopted new comprehensive prescribing rules when it comes to opioids that would apply to acute, pre-operative and long term, but not chronic patients.

In those cases it limits the amount of opioids that can be dispensed at one time and requires monitoring and education requirements for providers.

Those new rules take effect in January of 2019.

Imagine this… the doctor wrote 10,000 prescriptions over 10 years.. that is NINETEEN Rx PER WEEK… or about FOUR RXS PER DAY… and the bureaucrats determined that he did not meet the standard of care for chronic pain patients

This TV station is really having to scrape the bottom of the barrel that the only quote that they could get from someone in health care that would tell them what they wanted to hear was:

“That’s disgusting to me honestly,” said Kelly an assistant occupational therapist, when she learned that Dr. Dillinger wrote thousands of prescriptions for opioids.

Kelly who is not connected to the case or the doctor said she encounters countless patients addicted and desperate for pain meds all the time.

“You see it all the time, they shop doctors and if they can’t get it from doctors they get it from the streets,” Kelly who didn’t want to reveal her last name.

spinal injections the only option for pts ?

Disabled Oregonians Suicide Rate Increasing! “Opioid Epidemic” is NOT AN EXCUSE TO ALLOW SUFFERING!

Senator Bill Nelson is up for re-election in Nov – and is CLUELESS about opiates/chronic pain/substance abuse

This is a email that I received from Senator Bill Nelson after writing his office about HR-6 BEFORE THE SENATE VOTED

Dear Mr. Ariens:

Thank you for writing to me regarding pain management and access to prescription pain medication. I have heard from many Floridians about their difficulties obtaining prescribed pain medication, and I appreciate your bringing this issue to my attention.

I support efforts by the State to rein in prescription drug abuse and prevent drug overdose, but I also want to make sure people who need their prescribed medications for chronic pain management have access to the treatment they need.

On March 8, I became a cosponsor of S. 2260, the Opioids and STOP Pain Initiative Act, to allocate $5 billion for a new non-addictive pain management initiative at the National Institutes of Health. The initiative would expand research on our understanding of pain and non-addictive treatments for chronic pain, including new non-addictive drugs, non-pharmacological treatments, and effective models of health care delivery for pain management. The STOP Pain Initiative Act would also implement a strategy to create national registries and datasets for chronic pain conditions and to use precision medicine to prevent and treat pain.

I am committed to finding a balance between the need for responsible drug oversight and the rights of patients and healthcare providers. The Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (P.L. 114-198), which I cosponsored and was signed into law on July 22, 2016, authorizes funding for drug abuse education and prevention programs and creates best practices for prescribing pain medication. This law and other efforts can reduce the prevalence of opioid addiction, while protecting access to medication for legitimate chronic pain patients.

I will keep your views in mind should the Senate consider additional legislation on this issue. If you have any other concerns, please do not hesitate to reach out to me again.

Sincerely,
Bill Nelson

Bill Nelson believe that chronic pain pts should WAIT until some entity discovers a NON-ADDICTIVE MED for pain.. IF ONE EXISTS… and it will only take 10-15-20 yrs for such a drug – if discovered – would take to get it thru clinical trials and available to be prescribed for chronic pain pts…

ISN’T THAT ENCOURAGING ?

Nelson and 98 other Senators voted IN FAVOR OF THIS BILL… only a Republican Senator from UTAH for NO.

Nelson and 32 other Senators are up for RE-ELECTION in NOV.. and it is reported that they are anticipating 50 million dollars on his re-election campaign. Remember that Nelson was one of most/all of the Democratic Senators that VOTED NO on the Medicare Part D program that is now providing medication to Medicare pts .. which there was no coverage for… for the first 40 yrs of Medicare

Nelson was also one of the Democratic Senators that voted against the recent TAX CUT for individuals.. which was suppose to put abt $1000 in middle American’s pocket and Rep Pelosi(D) referred to $1000 as “CRUMBS” and if the Democrats take back control of Congress have said that they are going to raise your taxes and take that $1000 back.. and who knows if they will stop at just that $1000.

Pain Warriors ~ the Movie : RAISED 94% of its goal !!!

See the source image

 

https://www.seedandspark.com/fund/pain-warriors-the-movie#community

Lawsuit blames man’s suicide on St. Matthews pain clinic

Lawsuit blames man’s suicide on St. Matthews pain clinic

http://www.wdrb.com/story/39115785/lawsuit-blames-mans-suicide-on-st-matthews-pain-clinic

Brent Sloane texted his wife “they denied script im done love you” (sic) on Sept. 18, 2017. Thirty minutes later, he killed himself.

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) — The family of a man who committed suicide last year said he did so because a doctor at Commonwealth Pain and Spine wouldn’t sign off on a pain medication prescription that the man needed.

Brent Sloane texted his wife “they denied script im done love you” (sic) on Sept. 18, 2017. Thirty minutes later, he killed himself. According to the lawsuit filed against Commonwealth Pain and Spine in Jefferson Circuit Court on Tuesday morning, the text and suicide could have been prevented.

The suit say Slone was involved in a serious car wreck in 2011 that left him with significant injuries. After the procedure, Slone entered an inpatient recovery center in San Diego, California. While there, he was prescribed oxycodone and oxycontin.

According to the suit, while on a visit to Louisville, Slone went to the emergency room at Baptist Health for a dislocated hip and ulcer. He was prescribed a small amount of pain medication as he had run out of the prescription from the San Diego clinic and was advised to follow up with Commonwealth Pain and Spine. According to the suit, after he was discharged, he called Commonwealth Pain and Spine and requested a “bridge prescription.”

The suit says that notes from the clinic indicated that Dr. Stephen Young said he “needed to see the records from this facility in California.”

Later that day, the suit says Slone faxed the documentation to Commonwealth Pain and Spine. However, Young still refused to fill the prescription, because, according to call log notes, the documentation was from July, and there had been no communication since that time. Slone was advised that he would need to wait for six days for his appointment.

Slone killed himself a few hours later, the suit says.

“The intention of the lawsuit is bring light to that fact that people who experience pain should not be disregarded and tossed aside,” said Hans Poppe, an attorney for the family of Slone.

A lawsuit presents only one side of the arguments in the case. A message sent to an attorney for the clinic was not returned.

The suit claims Slone killed himself because he was not able to deal with the pain from various procedures and complications from the wreck in 2011.  

“This is a problem that will only get worse,” Poppe said. “Mismanagement of pain medication and often leads to suicide or an addiction to heroin.“

Last summer, Kentucky lawmakers tightened restrictions on prescribing pain medication to patients. The change was hotly debated by opponents who said the changes would make it too difficult for people truly in pain to receives necessary medications. 

Your NOVEMBER VOTE could mean better/worse quality of life for you !

The Drug Enforcement Administration has proved itself incompetent for decades

The Federal Agency That Fuels the Opioid Crisis

The Drug Enforcement Administration has proved itself incompetent for decades.

www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/opinion/drugs-dea-defund-heroin.html

Every day, nearly 200 people across the country die from drug overdoses. Opioids have been the primary driver of this calamity: first as prescription painkillers, then heroin and, more recently, illicitly manufactured fentanyl. The death toll has risen steadily over the past two decades.

The Drug Enforcement Administration, the agency that most directly oversees access to opioids, deserves much of the blame for these deaths. Because of its incompetence, the opioid crisis has gone from bad to worse. The solution: overhauling the agency, or even getting rid of it entirely.

The problem begins with poor design. A brainchild of Richard Nixon’s “war on drugs,” the agency sought to cut off supplies of drugs on the black market, here and abroad. But in passing the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, Congress also gave the agency broad authority over how prescription opioids and other controlled substances were classified, produced and distributed. The agency was supposed to curb problematic drug use, but failed to do so because its tactics were never informed by public health or addiction science.

Despite the investment of hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars and the earnest efforts of thousands of employees, the D.E.A.’s track record is abysmal. The agency has been unable to balance legitimate access to and control of prescription drugs. The widespread over-reliance on opioids, along with benzodiazepines, amphetamines and other scheduled medications, has created a booming black market.

The agency’s enforcement strategies, and the support it has lent to local and state police departments, have also fueled abusive police tactics including dangerous no-knock-raids and ethnic profiling of drivers. It has eroded civil liberties through the expansion of warrantless surveillance, and overseen arbitrary seizures of billions of dollars of private property without any clear connection to drug-related crimes. These actions have disproportionately targeted people of color, contributing to disparities in mass incarceration, confiscated property, and collective trauma.

The United States was ill equipped to navigate the worst drug crisis in its history with the D.E.A. at the vanguard. Starting in the late 1990s the manufacturing, distribution and prescribing of opioids began to increase rapidly. Overdose deaths soared since so many people were prescribed opioids and many mixed them with alcohol and other sedative drugs. The D.E.A. could have marshaled a calibrated response, expanding evidence-based treatment and reducing the prescription of especially risky drug combinations.

Instead, the agency pushed for surveillance of prescription records and electronic communication, doubled down on prosecuting prescribers and helped to tighten the screws on patients seeking pain relief. Meanwhile, lifesaving opioid treatments that the D.E.A. closely regulates, like methadone, have remained extremely difficult to obtain. Indeed, these problems were much broader than the alleged industry machinations to muzzle the agency.

A decade into the crisis, more and more prescription drug users turned to the black market. Even though the D.E.A. had tried to “eradicate” illicit drugs for nearly 50 years, users could easily buy stolen and counterfeit pills, along with a cheaper option, heroin. Soon, some began injecting. Outbreaks of H.I.V. and hepatitis C followed. Meanwhile, people who sought evidence-based treatment were rarely able to access it because of the agency’s evolving regulatory and enforcement strategies, like blocking the expansion of mobile methadone clinics and shutting down addiction treatment providers without arranging alternatives for affected patients.

As the engine of overdose deaths shifted from prescription drugs to heroin, the D.E.A. turned to its supply-reduction playbook. This resulted in a major uptick in heroin seizures and high-profile prosecutions, which encouraged traffickers to create more compact, potent drugs. In a single year, from 2014 to 2015, deaths involving the synthetic opioid fentanyl and its analogues almost doubled, setting the stage for its current role as the principal driver of overdose fatalities. And since 2015, the agency has not had an appointed administrator.

We urgently need to rethink how our nation regulates drugs. What should our goals be? How can we design institutions and performance metrics to achieve them?

The answers lie at the local and state levels. In Rhode Island, opioid overdoses are declining because people behind bars have access to effective treatment. Massachusetts has deployed drop-in centers offering treatment, naloxone and other services. San Francisco and Seattle are planning to open safe consumption spaces which show tremendous promise as a tool to reduce overdose deaths and other drug-related harm. But the D.E.A. and its institutional parent, the Justice Department, stand in the way of some of these experiments.

We ought to reinvent the Drug Enforcement Administration. Considering its lack of public health and health care orientation, the agency’s regulatory authority over the pharmaceutical supply could be transferred to a strengthened and independent Food and Drug Administration, while the regulation of medical and pharmacy practice can be ceded to the states. Parts of the D.E.A.’s law enforcement mandate should be transferred to the F.B.I., delegated back to the local or state, or eliminated. A significant portion of the D.E.A.’s budget should be reinvested in lifesaving measures like access to high-quality treatment.

The Drug Enforcement Administration has had over 40 years to win the war on drugs. Instead its tactics have fueled the opioid crisis. To finally make a dent in this national emergency, we need to rethink the agency from the bottom up.

Leo Beletsky, an associate professor of law and health sciences at Northeastern University, is the faculty director of the Health in Justice Action Lab, where Jeremiah Goulka is a senior fellow.

 

no matter how much suffering, suicides, comments… they have their agenda and nothing is going to change ?

Senate passes sweeping legislation to combat opioid epidemic

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/senate-passes-sweeping-legislation-combat-opioid-epidemic-n908901

Lawmakers in both chambers have responded public pressure to find solutions to a deadly crisis that has affected every state in the nation.

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Monday overwhelming approved a sweeping legislative package of bills aimed at combating the nation’s deadly opioid epidemic.

The bipartisan measure passed 99-1. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, was the only senator to vote against it.

Similar to the House package passed in June, the Senate’s Opioid Crisis Response Act of 2018 (OCRA) directs funding to federal agencies to establish or expand programs dealing with prevention, treatment and recovery.

Highlights from the 70 bills in the package include funding that requires the Food and Drug Administration to dole out prescription opioid pills in smaller quantities and money that offers an incentive to the National Institutes of Health to prioritize the development of non-addictive painkillers, two solutions medical experts believe could help decrease opioid addiction in the long run.

The package also includes Ohio Republican Sen. Rob Portman’s Synthetics Trafficking and Overdose Prevention Act “STOP” Act, a bill endorsed by President Donald Trump because it establishes parameters to crack down on shipments of fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, from entering the U.S.

Currently, the U.S. Postal Service is the only transportation carrier that does not collect electronic information on overseas cargo, which makes it harder for Customs and Border Protection agents to screen packages for drugs.

The Senate package comes months after the House passed their 58-bill opioid package, a response to the pressure lawmakers have felt to find solutions for the deadly crisis that has affected every state in the country.

Overdose deaths killed an estimated 72,000 Americans in 2017, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In comparison, over 40,000 Americans died that same year in car accidents, while 12,000 died from gun violence.

The Senate vote on Monday also offers a success for vulnerable Democrats and Republicans to point to during the final weeks leading up to November’s midterm election. Some of these lawmakers have seen ads in their states pressuring them to support opioid legislation.

In an effort to secure a massive bipartisan legislative win before year’s end, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., spent a majority of the summer leading an effort to hammer together dozens of bills passed by five Senate committees this year.

Three sources familiar with the process tell NBC News the Senate and House have already started to iron out minor differences in their legislative packages, including parameters for opioid addicts to access Medicaid-backed mental health facilities. Currently, the Senate version also reauthorizes $500 million per year in opioid grant extensions for the next three years, includes provisions for doctors to understand how to treat young addicts. It also reauthorizes the White House’s ability to oversee narcotic-related issues among federal agencies.

Once a compromised bill is worked out, each chamber will have to pass the bill before sending the final measure to the president for his signature.

Something that all the members – except one (Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah) – can agree upon… talk about your bipartisan bill… The House passed this bill in June and now a vote of 99-1 in the Senate it is going to Pres Trump to be signed into law.  It only took 70 DIFFERENT BILLS to address the singular opiate crisis. Another complex solution to a potentially very simple problem … provided by our Congress..

In Nov, 435 members of Congress and 33 Senators are up for election in Nov … that means that 87% of Congress is up to the voters if they go back to be a member  of Congress starting in Jan 2019.

This Congress is not going to help the chronic pain community… does it really make any difference if they were all tossed out of office and a whole bunch of novices takes over Congress in Jan 2019 ?

They have discounted your pain… they have encouraged your TORTURE… they have ignored the TRUTH and FACTS… they have DISCARDED your comments,  Dozens or HUNDREDS of petitions have been discarded…  Your reality is not their reality…  Do they deserve YOUR VOTE ?