The Government’s Solution To The Opioid Crisis Feels Like A War To Pain Patients

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/government-crackdown-opioid-prescriptions-pain-patients_us_5b51ec57e4b0fd5c73c4a42e

As the feds crack down on opioid prescriptions, patients are taking their own lives, doctors are losing their jobs and overdose rates continue unabated.
Meredith Lawrence's late husband died by suicide after his opioid pain prescription was severely restricted.

Dustin Chambers for HuffPost
Meredith Lawrence’s late husband died by suicide after his opioid pain prescription was severely restricted.

Jay Lawrence, an energetic truck driver in his late 30s, was driving a semitrailer across a bridge when the brakes failed. To avoid plowing into the car in front of him, he swerved sideways and slammed the truck into a wall, fracturing his back. For more than 25 years, he struggled with the resulting pain. But for most of that time, he managed to avoid opioid painkillers.

In 2006, his legs suddenly collapsed beneath him, due to a complex web of neurological factors related to his spinal cord injury. He underwent multiple surgeries and tried many medications to alleviate his pain.

The next year, he began to experience some semblance of relief when his doctor prescribed morphine, one of a class of opioid drugs. By 2012, he was taking 120 milligrams per day.

But this isn’t a story about opioid addiction. Lawrence managed a relatively productive, happy life on the medication for the better part of 10 years.

“This isn’t the life I thought I’d have,” he told his wife, Meredith Lawrence, in December 2016. “But I’m all right.”

Living on disability payments, he could still walk around their two-bedroom trailer home using his cane, take a shower on his own and, on his good days, even help his wife make breakfast.

Then, in early 2017, the pain clinic where he was a patient adopted a strict new policy, part of a wide-ranging national effort to respond to the increase in opioid overdose deaths.  

Citing 2016 guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, her husband’s doctor abruptly cut his daily dose by roughly 25 percent to 90 mg, Meredith Lawrence said. That was the maximum dose the CDC recommends, though does not mandate, for first-time opioid patients. 

The doctor also told Jay Lawrence that the plan was to lower his dose to 45 mg over the next two months, a cutback of more than 60 percent from what he had been taking.

At the end of that traumatic visit, his wife said, Jay Lawrence’s doctor dismissed their concerns and shared his own fear about losing his license if he continued to prescribe high doses of opioids. (When HuffPost followed up, the doctor declined to comment on the case, citing patient privacy.)

For a month, Lawrence suffered on the 90 mg dose. At times, his pain was so bad that he needed help to get out of the recliner, and when his wife looked over, she sometimes saw tears streaming down his face. He dreaded his next appointment when his dose would be slashed to 60 mg. In the weeks before that scheduled visit on March 2, 2017, Lawrence came up with a plan.

On the day of his appointment, on the same bench in the Hendersonville, Tennessee, park where the Lawrences had recently renewed their wedding vows, the 58-year-old man gripped his wife’s hand and killed himself with a gun.

Meredith Lawrence sits in the living room of the home in Gainesville, Georgia, that she bought after her husband's death

Dustin Chambers for HuffPost
Meredith Lawrence sits in the living room of the home in Gainesville, Georgia, that she bought after her husband’s death.

There are at least nine million chronic pain patients in the United States who take opioid painkillers on a long-term basis. As law enforcement and medical regulatory bodies try to curb the explosion in opioid deaths and the rise in illegal opioid use, they have focused on reducing the overall opioid supply, whether or not the drugs are provided by prescription.  

There’s mounting evidence this won’t work ― that curbing patient access to legal prescription opioids does not stem the rate of overdoses caused primarily by illegal drugs ― and that patients are being denied desperately needed relief. There are also troubling indicators that cutting back on opioids increases the risk of suicide among those with chronic pain. 

Some chronic pain patients and advocates have even begun compiling lists of individuals they know who have died by suicide after they were no longer able to treat their pain with opioid medication.

“There is no doubt in my mind that forcibly stopping opioids can destabilize some of the most vulnerable people in America,” said Dr. Stefan Kertesz, a professor of medicine and an addiction researcher at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. “And the outcomes for those folks include suicide, overdose and falling apart medically.”

I mean, people need to take some aspirin sometimes and tough it out a little. Attorney General Jeff Sessions

For a decade or so, government officials in the U.S. have sought to drive down the opioid supply through a range of tactics ― from increased seizures of diverted opioid medications to state crackdowns on “pill mills.” The Trump administration has embraced the hard-line approach

In late January, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a “surge” in Drug Enforcement Administration activity targeting pharmacies and physicians that, in the agency’s view, oversupply opioids. In February, the Justice Department doubled down with the announcement of a new task force that would focus on manufacturers and distributors of opioids. In March, President Donald Trump unveiled a plan to lower opioid prescriptions by a third within three years. And in late June, the federal government arrested 600 people, including 165 medical professionals, for allegedly participating in $2 billion worth of fraud schemes involving opioids.

The Trump administration’s efforts are dramatic even within the context of the CDC’s opioid dose guidelines. The guidelines were originally intended to advise primary care physicians treating chronic pain patients and other pain sufferers. They were urged to exercise caution in prescribing opioids, to use alternatives whenever possible and to prescribe daily doses of no more than 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for new opioid users.

For pain patients like Jay Lawrence who had already been on opioids for years, however, the guidelines simply recommended regularly assessing the harms and benefits of the dosage. They didn’t advise either mandatory cutoffs or any set limits. (The Tennessee Department of Health’s guidelines would also have allowed Lawrence to stay at 120 mg of morphine when prescribed by a pain specialist.) 

But “the CDC guidelines have been weaponized,” said Kertesz. The ramped-up enforcement by the DEA and state regulators has led some doctors to choose caution and to overcorrect in their prescribing, lest they lose their ability to practice medicine at all. Kertesz decried these policies as “simplistic” in a definitive new article published last week in the journal Addiction.

In February, Sessions struck a particularly harsh tone by suggesting that the fate of chronic pain patients was not high on his list of concerns. “I am operating on the assumption that this country prescribes too many opioids,” the attorney general said. “I mean, people need to take some aspirin sometimes and tough it out a little.”

Attitudes like that are based on a series of mistaken assumptions about pain, according to Dr. Thomas Kline, a North Carolina-based family practitioner and former Harvard Medical School program administrator. Kline regularly updates a list of pain patients, published on Medium, who’ve killed themselves in the wake of draconian restrictions on pain medication.

“I ask people to imagine the very worst pain they’ve ever experienced in their lives,” Kline said. “And then that they’re denied relief by a doctor with the one medicine proven effective for pain control for 50 centuries.” (Historical records show that people in ancient Mesopotamia cultivated the poppy plant for medical use.)

The CDC guidelines have been weaponized. Dr. Stefan Kertesz

The government’s aggressive focus on doctors and patients is unlikely to address the very real menace of opioid-use disorders and sharply escalating overdose deaths. Fraud ― driven by pharmaceutical company policies ― and diversion ― the phenomenon of prescription medications being sold as street drugs ― initially spurred a wave of opioid abuse in the late 1990s, as some doctors turned their practices into pill mills. But new reports by the CDC and a drug data firm, the IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science, suggest that prescription drugs play a much smaller role in today’s crisis.

The reports show that total opioid prescriptions dropped 10 percent in 2017 ― the sharpest annual decline in such prescribing in 25 years. While opioid prescriptions peaked back in 2010, the studies found that growth rates in opioid-linked deaths, overwhelmingly due to illegal fentanyl and heroin, have skyrocketed in the last seven years.

Indeed, although two-thirds of the 64,000 overall drug overdose fatalities were linked to opioids in 2016 ― the most recent year for which there is data ― more than 80 percent of those opioid drug deaths came from illegal street drugs such as heroin and fentanyl. Prescription opioid drug deaths alone ― excluding methadone ― amounted to less than 15 percent of all drug overdose deaths, or about 9,500 fatalities.

Still, the CDC’s guidelines have triggered restrictive laws in at least 23 states that mandate ceilings on opioid dosage. (Oregon, in fact, is moving to taper dosages down to zero for all Medicaid chronic patients over a year.) That makes relief less attainable for pain patients and threatens the practices of doctors who treat them. These laws have been augmented by the growth of state prescription monitoring programs that use the software NarxCare, which is designed to flag addiction but can also rope in pain patients based on their prescription history and use of multiple doctors.

And in June, the House of Representatives passed over 50 bills that would establish dramatic new restrictions on opioid prescribing, eliciting alarm among patients and some disability rights groups.

The side effects of the current enforcement efforts are disturbing enough, from patients denied relief to drug shortages to suicides.

No health agency has kept track of all pain-related suicides that may be linked to doctors cutting back on prescriptions. But some preliminary findings from Department of Veterans Affairs researchers indicate that VA pain patients deprived of opioids were two to four times more likely to die by suicide in the first three months after they were cut off, compared to those who remained on their pain medications.

That study isn’t without flaws. Veterans die by suicide at higher rates than average ― currently accounting for 20 suicide deaths a day ― so they are not a nationally representative sample. And the VA study, which was released at a national opioid summit in early April, has not yet been submitted for peer review.

But another study, published last year in the peer-reviewed journal General Hospital Psychiatry, looked at nearly 600 veterans who in 2012 were cut off from dosages after long-term opioid use and found similar results. Twelve percent of the vets showed suicidal ideation or took violent action to harm themselves ― a rate nearly 300 percent higher than the overall veterans community. 

“To protect people, you have to take care of the patient, not the pill count,” said Kertesz, who worked on the VA’s April 2017 study but spoke to HuffPost only as an independent researcher. “The findings suggest that the discontinuation of opioids doesn’t necessarily assure a safer patient.”

Even terminally ill cancer patients are increasingly getting less relief, and there are growing shortages of injectable opioids at local hospitals and hospices, spurred in part by DEA-ordered reductions in opioid manufacturing quotas. 

Leah Ilten, a 53-year-old physical therapist who lives in Kennewick, Washington, told HuffPost that as her 86-year-old father lay dying of pancreatic cancer in a hospice, the medical staff ignored her pleas to provide appropriate opioid pain relief, even cutting his dosage in half on the last day of his life. A few days earlier, when he was in the hospital, one nurse explained to her that opioids could lead to an overdose or could potentially cause the man, who lay moaning in pain, to “get addicted.” 

“I was horrified,” Ilten said.

In mid-April, the DEA responded to the injectable opioid shortage by lifting production quotas. An agency spokesman told HuffPost that it was “a manufacturers’ problem, not the quotas,” while asserting that progress is being made.

There have been production issues, including Pfizer’s foul-ups with a plant in Kansas. But the DEA’s delay in taking action ― shortfalls were flagged in February in a letter from the American Society of Anesthesiologists and other health groups ― definitely contributed to the shortage, according to Dr. James Grant, president of the ASA. He told HuffPost that quotas were among the factors creating the crisis.

I’m not willing to go back to the state I was in before I started treatment. Anne Fuqua

Faced with the hardline national crackdown on opioid prescriptions, people with chronic pain are trying to raise awareness of the suffering caused by the loss of medications. Some are gathering the names of those patients who ended up taking their own lives, both as a memorial to those who died and as a protest against the health establishment that has seemingly abandoned them. Others are seeking comfort from each other on social media.

Lelena Peacock, who declined to name her southeastern city of residence for fear of retaliation from doctors, is struggling with how to treat the pain associated with fibromyalgia. The 45-year-old found that her social media posts drew other pain patients who turned to her for help.

By her own count, Peacock has thus far convinced more than 70 chronic pain patients to call 911 or suicide prevention hotlines instead of killing themselves.

For Anne Fuqua, a 37-year-old former nurse from Birmingham, Alabama, the motivation for compiling a list of chronic pain-related suicides is to track the damage done by what she sees as policies that have left people like her behind.  

“There’s so many people who have died,” she said. “We have to remember them.”

Fuqua has an incurable neurological illness known as primary generalized dystonia that causes Parkinson’s-like involuntary movements and painful muscle spasms. She started taking about 60 mg of Oxycontin a day in 2000. Her doctor began to limit her access to high doses of opioids in 2014, the same year she started chronicling those friends who had killed themselves or otherwise died after being denied pain medications. Her informal list is now up to roughly 150 people, augmented by lists that other pain patient advocates have compiled.

On July 9, Fuqua joined other chronic pain patients at a meeting at the Food and Drug Administration campus in Maryland to express their fears and outrage at the cutbacks. Sitting in the front row in her wheelchair, she told FDA officials about that list and declared, “I’m not willing to go back to the state I was in before I started treatment.”

Anne Fuqua needs exceptionally high doses to manage her pain because of opioid malabsorption.

Courtesy of Anne Fuqua
Anne Fuqua needs exceptionally high doses to manage her pain because of opioid malabsorption.

Fuqua’s own difficulties are compounded by the fact that her body does not respond to even large doses of opioids the way others do ― she suffers from severe malabsorption that hampers her ability to benefit from everything from opioids to vitamin D. Since 2012, she has relied on a strikingly high daily regimen of 1,000 MME of opioids, including fentanyl patches, to manage her pain.

But her physician, Dr. Forrest Tennant, was driven to retire this year after a DEA raid and investigation. The Los Angeles-area physician mailed her a final series of prescriptions, which will run out at the end of July.

“It’s terrifying,” she said looking at her future. “If these were people who had asthma or diabetes and weren’t stigmatized because of opioids, this wouldn’t be allowed to happen.”

Another doctor has quietly stepped forward to continue treatment for Tennant’s remaining patients, Fuqua said, although there’s no assurance that this physician won’t also be investigated in the future.

If these were people who had asthma or diabetes and weren’t stigmatized because of opioids, this wouldn’t be allowed to happen. Anne Fuqua

The raid on Tennant’s home and office last November illustrates the hard-line regulatory and enforcement approach that critics say doesn’t distinguish between pill-mill doctors who deserve to be shut down and legitimate pain doctors who use high-dosage opioids. The wide-ranging search warrant served to Tennant essentially accused him of drug trafficking even though he’d earned a national reputation for deft treatment of ― and research about ― pain patients.

“He’s highly respected and prominent in pain management,” said Jeffrey Fudin, a clinical pharmacy specialist who heads the pain pharmacy program at the Albany Stratton VA Medical Center in Albany, New York, and serves as an associate professor at the Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. “Most of his patients had no other options, and they came from around the country to see him.”

Tennant was known for taking on difficult-to-treat patients, including those suffering from pain as a result of botched surgeries and other forms of malpractice. His research included innovations in the use of hormones to alleviate pain and lower opioid use up to 40 percent, as well as work on genetic testing for enzyme system defects that lead to opioid malabsorption.

“The DEA can trigger an investigation every time they misapply the CDC guidelines without paying attention to the population the physician treats or issues of medical necessity,” said Terri Lewis, a patient advocate and a Ph.D. clinical rehabilitation specialist with Southern Illinois University who trains clinicians on how to manage seriously ill patients with incurable pain.

Special Agent Timothy Massino, a spokesperson for the DEA’s Los Angeles division, declined to comment on the agency’s approach to Tennant. “It’s an ongoing investigation,” he noted.

Tennant’s isn’t alone. Physicians must now balance their prescribing obligations to their patients with legitimate fear for their livelihoods.

DEA enforcement actions against doctors have risen some 500 percent in recent years ― from 88 in 2011 to 449 last year, according to an analysis of the comprehensive National Practitioners Data Bank by Tony Yang, a professor of health policy at George Washington University. Even though that’s a relatively small number of arrests compared to the roughly one million physicians in the country, such arrests can have an outsized impact. 

“They make big news, and they serve as a deterrent for physicians whose specialties require them to use a lot of pain medications,” Yang said. “It makes them think twice before prescribing opioids.”

Meredith Lawrence shows the tattoo she got after her husband'€™s death. The bluejay represents her husband, Jay; a cup of cof

Dustin Chambers for HuffPost
Meredith Lawrence shows the tattoo she got after her husband’€™s death. The bluejay represents her husband, Jay; a cup of coffee is the way she loves to start her day; and the quote is “Sail away with me, what will be will be.”

Dr. Mark Ibsen of Helena, Montana, found himself in a five-year battle against the state licensing board that’s still not over ― even though a judge last month reversed the board’s decision to suspend his license because of due process violations. The court has remanded the case back to the licensing board for potential further investigation of his opioid prescriptions, but Ibsen has decided he won’t resume his medical practice.

That’s bad news for Montana, which has the highest rate of suicide in the country, according to the CDC. What’s more, chronic pain-related illnesses account for 35 percent of all the state’s suicides, as a recent state health department study found.

In the course of his fight with the medical board, the 63-year-old doctor said three of his former chronic pain patients have killed themselves after he and other doctors stopped prescribing opioids. The first of those patients died shortly after attending a hearing to show his support for Ibsen. 

The deaths of pain patients haunt those who treated them and loved them. Meredith Lawrence, who sat with her husband to the very end, said, “It was as horrifying as anything you can imagine.”

“But I had the choice to help him or find him dead someday when I came home,” she added.

Lawrence was arrested and sentenced to a year’s probation for assisting a suicide. Now her goal is to fight restrictions on opioid prescriptions.

“If we don’t stand up, more people will die like my husband.”

If you or someone you know needs help, call 1-800-273-8255 for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. You can also text HOME to 741-741 for free, 24-hour support from the Crisis Text Line. Outside of the U.S., please visit the International Association for Suicide Prevention for a database of resources.

The use of ESI’s has increased dramatically, yet the prevalence of back pain has remained relatively unchanged

After Doctors Cut Their Opioids, Patients Turn to a Risky Treatment for Back Pain

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/31/health/opioids-spinal-injections.htm

WASHINGTON — An injectable drug that the manufacturer says is too dangerous to use along the spine is growing in popularity for back pain as doctors turn away from opioids.

The anti-inflammatory drug, called Depo-Medrol and made by Pfizer, is approved for injection into muscles and joints. Once a drug is approved, however, doctors may legally prescribe it however they see fit. And doctors have long given Depo-Medrol shots, or the generic equivalent, close to the spinal cord for painful backs, necks and conditions like spinal stenosis.

What few doctors or patients know is that Pfizer, faced with hundreds of complaints about injuries and complications related to the shots, asked the Food and Drug Administration to ban that type of treatment five years ago. The company cited the risk of blindness, stroke, paralysis and death — a request that neither the agency nor Pfizer made public.

The F.D.A. declined to issue a ban but toughened the label warning. Other countries — among them Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand and Switzerland — heeded Pfizer’s request.

After concerns were raised about the off-label treatments, use of the injections declined. But the opioid epidemic appears to be spurring their popularity despite risks known to public health officials and doctors.

According to the F.D.A., back problems are the most common cause of disabling, chronic pain. Weekend classes to train physicians in the procedure are flourishing. Critics like Dr. Terri A. Lewis, a rehabilitation specialist and lecturer at the Southern Illinois University, say they are responsible for transforming pain clinics into “drill mills.”

And in June, as part of legislation to tackle the opioid crisis, the House of Representatives approved an increase in Medicare reimbursement for the procedure.

The number of Medicare providers giving steroid injections along the spine, including Depo-Medrol and other drugs, had increased 13 percent in 2016 from 2012. The number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving these injections is up 7.5 percent. The Department of Veterans Affairs reported a 17 percent increase in the injections from 2015 to 2017.

And total sales of brand name and generic Depo-Medrol grew 35 percent to $185 million from $133 million from 2015 to 2017, according to the IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science, a health data firm.

It’s a troubling trend to anti-opioid crusaders like Dr. Andrew Kolodny, co-director of opioid policy research at Brandeis University.

“The victims of our era of aggressive opioid prescribing are being exploited in some cases by interventional pain doctors, who will continue them on opioids in exchange for allowing them to perform expensive procedures that they don’t need,” Dr. Kolodny said. “These are not benign procedures. Patients can be harmed and are harmed.”

Pfizer, in 2013, quietly asked the F.D.A. and regulators in other countries to ban Depo-Medrol for epidural use. “It must not be used by the intrathecal, epidural, intravenous or any other unspecified routes,” the company wrote.

A doctor preparing a Depo-Medrol shot to treat chronic back pain.CreditDr. P. Marazzi/Science Source

It is unusual for a drug company to request a contraindication for one of its own products. In this case, some doctors say Pfizer was worried about liability from the off-label use, which does not give a manufacturer the same degree of protection as approved uses.

When the F.D.A. authorized a stronger warning in 2014, it noted that giving steroid shots close to the spine could cause rare but catastrophic injuries or death. The warning applied to the entire class of epidural steroid injections, estimated at about nine million a year — and not to be confused with the pain blocks, often called epidurals, given to women during childbirth.

Now, interviews with dozens of pain specialists show that pressure to wean patients off opioids is prompting many doctors to refer patients to pain intervention specialists who promote the shots. The cost per shot varies widely, from $100 up to $800, with an additional fee going to the hospital or clinic where it is administered.

“The truth underlying it is that doing an injection is faster and results in higher reimbursements, compared to other ways of managing the same pain,” said Dr. James P. Rathmell, chairman of anesthesiology, perioperative and pain medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. It was Dr. Rathmell who first brought the issue to the F.D.A. and oversaw a panel charged with recommending guidelines on safety.

“The use of injections has increased dramatically, yet the prevalence of back pain has remained relatively unchanged,” Dr. Rathmell said.

Doctors can choose among several types of epidural steroid injections. Depo-Medrol has a major share of the market. Epidural steroid injections in the cervical (neck) area and mid-back are considered the most dangerous.

They work like this: A steroid is injected into the epidural space within the spinal canal. Most of the injuries occur if the needle misses its target and directly injures nerves or places the drug into the spinal fluid or arteries, depriving the spinal cord of blood.

A review of F.D.A. records show that there were 2,442 serious problems reported from Depo-Medrol injections from 2004 through March 2018, including reports of 154 deaths. Pfizer declined to comment on the deaths, pointing to the product’s warning label: “Serious neurologic events, some resulting in death, have been reported with epidural injection of corticosteroids. Specific events reported include, but are not limited to, spinal cord infarction, paraplegia, quadriplegia, cortical blindness, and stroke.”

In West Virginia, the heart of the opioid epidemic, anesthesiologist Dr. Brian Yee said more general practice physicians are referring patients to his clinic for epidural steroid injections and other procedures, like spinal cord stimulation, than in past years.

Dr. Yee believes spinal injections are valuable if administered properly. But he worries that weekend classes aren’t sufficient training.

“With people trying to take away opioids now, we are opening up another doorway for people to overutilize other options that can be helpful with the right doctors and the right patients,” he said.

Carrie Flaten thinks she was one of the wrong patients. A self-described Montana cowgirl, Ms. Flaten badly injured her back and shoulder in a car accident at age 28 in 2007. Months later, she was still in terrible pain and began physical therapy, along with a series of epidural steroid injections.

At first the shots made her feel better. But the relief never lasted, and she ended up having so many Depo-Medrol and other injections over the years that a nurse started calling her “our pincushion.”

Her last shot, in late 2015, left Ms. Flaten in what she described as frequent excruciating pain, with difficulty walking, little bladder control and loss of sexual function. Ms. Flaten said she could not return to her job as a mechanic, and still has trouble keeping up with her children.

When Ms. Brandt went to a different clinic to seek treatment for her pain, they also told her they would only prescribe painkillers if she agreed to an epidural steroid injection, she said.CreditShawn Poynter for The New York Times

Ms. Flaten said her clinic has refused to give her any painkillers unless she resumes the injections — something she does not want to do. Had someone told her that Pfizer sought a ban on using the shots this way, “I would have said absolutely no,” Ms. Flaten said.

Sherry Brandt did say no, and claims that refusal led her pain clinic to dismiss her as a noncompliant patient. The 56-year-old Tennessee resident had suffered back pain for years, and received several epidural steroid injections that did not seem to harm her. But she said they did not help, either.

Physical therapy and opioid painkillers left her stable, but she still had difficulty standing or walking — which worsened after a back surgery several years ago. She said she became more reliant on painkillers until her doctor, nervous about continuing to prescribe them in the current climate, referred her to a local pain specialist. The clinic staff suggested more shots, but by then Ms. Brandt had discovered their risks and declined.

Then she got hit by a truck.

Ms. Brandt went to another pain clinic, where doctors also told her they would only prescribe painkillers if she agreed to an epidural steroid injection, she said. Again she declined, fearing it could worsen her condition. “It’s blackmail,” she said.

The clinics that Ms. Flaten and Ms. Brandt visited declined to comment.

Dennis J. Capolongo often fields calls from people like those patients. The former photojournalist became a patient advocate after epidural Depo-Medrol injections for hip pain in 2001 inflamed his nerves, leaving him bedridden for nearly three years.

Mr. Capolongo, who lives in Potomac, Md., said he still suffers from debilitating central nervous system disorders. He has been campaigning for years for the F.D.A. to ban Depo-Medrol for spinal use.

Pfizer said it cannot track how much Depo-Medrol is used for off-label shots. Company spokesman Thomas Biegi said without an F.D.A. ban, there was nothing Pfizer could do to stop the off-label shots.

“We believe this is a question of medical practice and defer to clinicians and pain experts who utilize these medicines in their practices for the treatment of pain conditions,” Mr. Biegi said.

Dr. Laxmaiah Manchikanti thinks that’s as it should be. Chief executive of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Dr. Manchikanti does not use Depo-Medrol in his own practice but believes it is safe for the lower spinal area.

In May, after the physicians’ group met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill, Representative John Shimkus, Republican of Illinois, proposed raising Medicare reimbursement rates for epidural steroid injections and other interventional procedures.

The doctors’ political action committee had donated $20,000 to Representative Shimkus’s 2016 and 2018 campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political contributions. Democratic co-sponsor Raja Krishnamoorthi, of Illinois, also received a $10,000 donation during this election cycle, and $5,000 during his 2016 race.

The House approved the plan in June, which would reverse previous cuts of 16 to 25 percent. The Senate may consider whether to include a similar plan in its version of the opioid legislation.

Dr. James Patrick Murphy, an anesthesiologist and addiction specialist in Kentucky, believes that recent studies showing the shots do not work better than physical therapy for many patients are reason enough not to use them on so many patients. He also thinks they cost too much.

“The physician fee is usually somewhere between $100 and $300,” Dr. Murphy said, “but the hospital fee for the procedure, the separate fee, can be anywhere from $1,000 to $5,000. That’s a lot of expense for somebody when you really can’t promise you’re going to cure them.”

there goes the SECOND AMENDMENT in FLORIDA


More than 450 people in Florida ordered to give up guns under new law, report says

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/30/more-than-450-people-in-florida-ordered-to-give-up-guns-under-new-law-report-says.html

Hundreds of gun owners in Florida have been ordered to give up their guns under a new law that took effect after the deadly Parkland shooting in February, according to a report published Monday.

The Risk Protection Order, signed by Florida Gov. Rick Scott just three weeks after a gunman killed 17 people at Stoneman Douglas, aims to temporarily remove weapons from gun owners who have been deemed by a judge to possibly be a threat to themselves or others.

Roughly 200 firearms have been confiscated in the state since the law was enacted, Sgt. Jason Schmittendorf, of the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office, told WFTS-TV. “Around 30,000 rounds of ammunition” were also taken, he said.

A five-person team in the county that’s worked solely on the risk protection law reportedly has filed 64 risk protection petitions in court. Broward County, according to the news outlet, has filed 88 risk protection petitions since March. 

“It’s a constitutional right to bear arms and when you are asking the court to deprive somebody of that right we need to make sure we are making good decisions, right decisions and the circumstances warrant it,” Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri told the station in defense of the task force.

Every petition filed under the order in Pinellas County has so far been granted by the judge, according to the report.

FLORIDA GOV. RICK SCOTT SIGNS GUN BILL FOLLOWING PARKLAND MASSACRE, IN BREAK WITH NRA ALLIES

The first gun seizure under the law occurred in April when Florida authorities confiscated an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle from an Army veteran. 

Jerron Smith’s gun was seized when he refused to surrender it voluntarily, the Broward County Sheriff’s Office said at the time. The officers also seized a .22 caliber rifle he owned, hundreds of rounds of ammunition, a bump stock and numerous other weapon-related items.

In addition to confiscating guns, the law also raised the age to buy a rifle to 21 and established a three-day waiting period on gun purchases.

Opioid laws hit physicians, patients in unintended ways

Opioid laws hit physicians, patients in unintended ways

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20180730/NEWS/180739995

New state laws on opioids intended to save lives have physicians complaining about unintended consequences.

None of the doctors interviewed by Crain’s objected to the laws’ intent: Reducing misuse of the powerful painkillers that have contributed to rising deaths and addictions.

But they say regulations have added unnecessary administrative headaches, led to a climate of fear for doctors and left patients unable to get medications when they really need them.

Doctors also say some health insurers are using the laws to inappropriately deny or delay prescriptions, sometimes even for patients with cancer and terminal illness. Some pharmacists are also making it harder to get prescriptions filled in ways that go beyond the law, the physicians say.

A number of doctors told Crain’s they have voluntarily limited the number of opioid prescriptions they write for patients because they fear they might be arrested or disciplined for overprescribing. One physician gave up his DEA license because he didn’t want to learn all the new rules or risk breaking the law.

 

Betty Chu, M.D., president of the Michigan State Medical SocietyBetty Chu, M.D., president of the Michigan State Medical Society
Doctors who include Betty Chu, M.D., president of the Michigan State Medical Society, and Chris Bush, M.D., a family practice physician in Riverview affiliated with Henry Ford Health System, say legislators and the state Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs need to listen to doctors and correct the problems.

“We are hoping that LARA (and legislators) work with us and multiple other stakeholders to fix the laws and improve stakeholders’ goals: reducing deaths and improve patients’ health,” Chu said.

Kim Gaedeke, deputy director with LARA, said the department is working with providers to address problems.

“There also is misunderstanding with these laws,” said Gaedeke, adding: “The message has been really been letting providers know we are all in it together. We have a mutual mission, including our law enforcement partners, to protect health and welfare of citizens.”

Gaedeke said LARA issued an online fact sheet earlier this month to answer some physician and pharmacist questions and address unintended effects related to pharmacies and health insurers.

One big concern is that laws making it more difficult to get prescription drugs could be pushing addicts and some patients into buying heroin or other drugs on the street, Chu and Bush agree.

And that includes black-market prescription drugs. Because prescription drugs for chronic diseases such as diabetes cost so much, some normally law-abiding patients sell their opioid prescriptions to be able to buy insulin or even food, doctors and state officials tell Crain’s.

As a result, the number of deaths and addictions hasn’t appreciably changed the past several years in Michigan, physicians and state officials say.

Nationally, more than 115 people die per day of opioid overdoses. Prescription opioids are powerful pain-reducing medications such as Vicodin or morphine. Illegal opioids include heroin, illegally produced fentanyl and an array of synthetic substances.

In Michigan, opioid deaths and overdoses rank 18th-highest in the nation. In 2016, 2,356 people died of drug overdoses, about six per day, more deaths than from car accidents.

Many health systems are prescribing fewer opioids. It’s less clear that has done anything to slow the epidemic.

While Chu said she hasn’t seen any data showing reduced deaths, Henry Ford Health has tracked a 40 percent reduction in opioid prescriptions the past five years. Chu is vice president of medical affairs at Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital.

“Deaths have not gone down, because of the issue of illicit drugs,” Chu said. “As prescribing has gone down, people still deal with pain.”

Chu said more discussion needs to be directed to non-pharmacy pain resources to help patients. “It’s not like people don’t have pain anymore. They do. There are patients who need something. We as doctors are not just responsible for managing opioid prescriptions, but to manage patient care and pain.”

But Chu said over the past several months the medical society has been getting “a ton of feedback” from physicians and patients about the negative effects of the new laws.

“We are hearing a lot from (doctors) about patients who are suffering because of the laws. We recognize the pressure the legislature had to do something, but … some of the provisions have been very challenging,” Chu said.

State Sen. Mike Shirkey, chairman of the Senate health policy committee, said the Legislature will look at tweaking the bills to fix any problems.

“We have to be patient and avoid reacting to resistance to change versus resistance to unnecessary or non-value-adding regulation,” Shirkey said.

 

Provider conflicts

Chris Bush, M.D., a family practice physician in Riverview affiliated with Henry Ford Health SystemChris Bush, M.D., a family practice physician in Riverview affiliated with Henry Ford Health System
Bush said doctors have told him the new opioid laws are creating additional conflict between prescribers, pharmacists and health insurance companies over correct dosages.

“The bills are mostly good, but legislators took a heavy-handed approach to the crisis, and the result may not have a big effect on opioid” deaths and addictions, Bush said.

For example, one patient who is also a physician, who asked for anonymity, was prescribed a seven-day supply of the painkiller Norco from her doctor, 28 pills. However, the health insurer denied the prescription for 28 pills and allowed only 20 to be filled. The insurer had recently changed its policy to limit opioid prescriptions for acute pain to five days, even though the laws allow for seven.

“How did the pharmacist know it was for acute pain and not chronic pain?” the physician-patient said. “The bottle wasn’t marked.”

“When I challenged with the fact that the state law now gives pharmacists the ability to do split opioid prescriptions, he said that wasn’t what” the pharmacy does, the physician-patient said. “Clearly, (the pharmacy) is making money.”

Beginning March 27, Michigan law allows pharmacists to fill Schedule 2 controlled substances in increments to avoid making the patient go back to the doctor.

Dianne Malburg, COO of the Michigan Pharmacists Association, said there is confusion with some of the opioid laws between doctors and pharmacists. She said common questions from pharmacies range from whether to allow partial refills and whether the prescription was intended for acute or chronic pain.

“We have heard some physicians write two scripts for patients and predate them so patients don’t have to go back again,” Malburg said.

On partial refills, Malburg said patients can’t get the whole prescription filled the same day if there is a limit from the health insurer or state law. “They can come back and get the remainder” when the initial fill has run out, she said.

Pharmacists are concerned they might not know if a prescription is for acute or chronic pain, Malburg said. State law limits opioids to a seven-day supply for acute pain, but prescriptions for chronic pain can be longer.

 

Problems with limits

Beginning June 1, Public Act 248 of 2017 requires physicians who want to issue a prescription for more than three days to first check with the Michigan Automated Prescription System, the state’s online database that houses information on prescriptions for opioid and other controlled substances. The act excludes prescriptions written for a patient in a hospital or ambulatory surgery center.

Fred Van Alstine, M.D., a family physician in Traverse City who specializes in palliative care and is a hospice medical director, said there also should be exceptions in opioid laws for hospice patients and those in palliative care who are dying.

“This was a solution looking for a problem. … It is an administrative burden because our patients are end of life and they need” opioids to control pain, Van Alstine said.

James Forshee, M.D., Priority Health’s chief medical officer, said his company’s prior-authorization rules on opioids exempt patients in palliative care, hospice or in cancer treatment.

“The whole effort of the law is to reduce opioid use, prevent addiction, misuse and abuse,” Forshee said. “That is not an issue with palliative care and hospice treatment. Pain control is the primary purpose.”

Bush said the opioid laws’ blanket restrictions illustrates the quandary physicians sometimes face when they must fill a pain prescription for a major broken limb, when a patient has been discharged after a surgery or has another serious condition.

For example, say the doctor writes a prescription for a seven-day supply on a Monday and the pharmacist or health insurer instead limits the prescription to five days.

“The patient runs out Friday evening, and since no one can ever find their primary physicians on a weekend, the hurting patient goes to the ER, where they will not provide that person with another prescription because they did not take care of the initial problem,” the physician-patient said. “In the end, the poor patient suffers. But the doctor can get two office visits from this and the pharmacy gets two different prescriptions plus markup.”

Chu said there have been reported conflicts between pharmacists and doctors that need to be worked out.

“We passed laws to punish (offenders), but patients have chronic pain and a lot are feeling like they are criminals now” when they fill their prescription, she said.

Elizabeth Pionk, D.O., a hospitalist physician at McLaren Bay Region hospital in Bay City, said the laws have also created problems for doctors at hospitals.

“Our hospitalist group has agreed to discharge patients with two or three days of medicine, but sometimes it is difficult for patients to get a refill after they are discharged before two or three days,” said Pionk, who also is on the foundation board for the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians.

Doctors fear giving opioids to patients for more than three days because of the laws in place, Pionk said.

But that means patients who run out of pain medications will sometimes show up in the emergency room, which won’t give them medications. “The acute pain issue is a difficult one,” she said.

Shirkey acknowledged there is a problem, a “gray area between acute and chronic pain (in the bills) … and the limitations on number of doses per script.”

For example, Shirkey said, physicians may need to be able to give a patient pain medication for more than seven days if they know the patient “need(s) back surgery but cannot get into a specialist for weeks,” he said.

The medical society has received a number of other complaints about the opioid laws from patients. Among them was a patient whose doctor would no longer prescribe pain medications and sent her to a pain clinic, but the pain clinic was booked for weeks because of the new law, Chu said.

Rural Michigan faces problems as well.

Loretta Leja, M.D., a family physician in solo practice in Cheboygan, said shortages of doctors in rural northern Michigan cause people to travel hundreds of miles for primary care and surgeries. Sometimes they run out of pain medications before they can get a doctor to refill.

“I had a patient who was having major surgery downstate, and her doctor told her she could get seven days of pain medication and to come back and see him after three weeks” for a follow-up appointment, said Leja, who is chairman of the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians. “She was worried because what do you do for two weeks with no pain meds?”

Mary Marshall, M.D., a solo practicing family physician in Grand Blanc, said a growing number of her patients are coming to her when they run out of pain pills after they have had same-day surgery.

“For whatever reason the physicians or physician assistants don’t want to write more than a three-day supply of pain medications. The problem is the patient runs out,” said Marshall, who also is president of the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians.

Marshall said pharmacists and health insurers also are questioning more pain prescriptions.

“I prescribed Norco, a common opioid, and the question came up, and you have to stop what you are doing and submit information to the insurance company,” said Marshall.

The laws, and policies from pharmacies and health insurers often don’t match up, she said. “It is such a tangled web.”

Van Alstine said health insurers have used the opioid laws to deny prescriptions for palliative care patients.

“Most hospice patients receive 14-day supplies. The prior authorization process is a nightmare. Insurers are using (the laws) as an excuse to deny,” he said. “Before it was a problem, but it became more acute after the laws passed.”

For example, Van Alstine said recently he had a terminally ill patient discharged from a hospital, and he wanted to prescribe a 14-day supply of oxycontin. The pharmacist called to let him know the health insurer had denied the prescription.

“I spent four hours on a Saturday trying to get him access to medications” for pain related to liver cancer, Van Alstine said. “I filed a complaint with the insurance commissioner on Monday. They got involved and the situation was resolved, but the guy died 24 hours later. He was in pain for days before.”

Some health insurers and pharmacists have over-interpreted the laws, Chu said. “(Some health insurers) will probably use it as an opportunity to decrease utilization,” she said.

Gaedeke said she is unaware that health insurers and pharmacists are rejecting prescriptions from doctors. “They may require more visits (by patients), but we were told the laws don’t require additional visits for pain medications,” she said. “Some (pharmacists) are thinking the seven-day supply for acute pain applies for chronic pain. There is some confusion there.”

Forshee said he knows there has been confusion among physicians. Last year, Priority Health implemented new policies, which are less stringent than the state laws, that eliminated 90-day prescriptions for opioids, and limited prescription coverage to 30 days for long-acting opioids and 15 days for short-acting opioids.

“We saw there was a problem and put in requirements” that reduce the number of opioids prescribed, creates care management plans and offers additional behavioral health and medication management support, Forshee said.

Over the next three years, Priority projects a 25 percent reduction the number of prescribed opioids, Forshee said. He said the company will take another look at its policies later this year after it reviews data.

“We work closely and talk with primary care physicians, specialists like surgeons and pain-management specialists and groups to make sure our policies are based on science and evidence,” he said.

Fear of discipline

In early July, Detroit physician Zeyn Nez Seabron became one of about 53 doctors or pharmacists suspended or otherwise disciplined for overprescribing controlled substances, according to LARA.

LARA’s complaint stated that during nine months in 2017 and 2018, Seabron was a top prescriber of oxycodone and oxymorphone, both commonly abused opioids.

Forshee said he can understand why doctors might hesitate to prescribe for fear of “gotcha” investigations and discipline.

But Gaedeke said LARA hopes over time the new opioid laws will help reduce the number of disciplinary actions taken against prescribers.

“Our goal is to go after the worst of the worst. Those blatantly prescribing, violating laws and causing deaths,” Gaedeke said.

Chu supports the intent of LARA’s crackdown. “It has been too easy to get prescriptions, but we don’t want to make it too difficult for legitimate purposes,” she said.

Opioid laws hit physicians, patients in unintended ways” originally appeared in Crain’s Detroit Business.

From Canada: ‘He wasn’t ready to go’: Callous medical care as man cries in pain haunts family – Nat Health Ins at its finest ?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/greg-garnett-aortic-dissection-delayed-diagnosis-1.4762647

The late Greg Garnett was bullied, kicked and misdiagnosed after he suffered searing chest pain, wife says

Greg Garnett knew something wasn’t right. He told his wife, Cathy, he felt a sharp, searing pain in his chest and down into his legs. He thought he was having a heart attack.

Cathy called 911, telling the operator her husband felt a heaviness in his chest. When Cathy repeated their address in Rowley, about 15 kilometres east of the Saint John Airport, the dispatcher replied, “The ambulance is on the way, OK?”

Then the dispatcher asked Cathy if her husband had ever had a heart attack, but as she responded, the phone connection was lost.

We were so confused because for the last five hours we were told it was nothing, and all of a sudden my husband was dying.– Cathy Garnett

It would take 45 minutes for the ambulance to reach the Garnetts’ home the morning of April 28, 2017.

What Cathy Garnett calls a nightmare was just beginning.

Ambulance New Brunswick and Horizon Health have done little to bring Cathy out of the dark about why her husband was treated the way he was from the time paramedics arrived until more than two hours after he reached Saint John Regional Hospital. 

Nor would Horizon or the ambulance service, managed by Medavie Health Services, agree to requests from CBC News for interviews. 

But this is Cathy’s account of that day and the few weeks Greg remained alive afterward.

“I think about it every day,” she says.

Just a bad back

Two paramedics arrived at the Garnett house prepared for a man with chest pain, but as they assessed Greg, they decided his problem was his back.

Greg couldn’t move his legs, and while waiting in pain for the ambulance, had fallen off the bed. The paramedics wanted him to get himself up and into the stretcher.

He couldn’t. And it was unusual for him to respond this way, says Cathy, since Greg, a former safety inspector, already had medical problems, including high blood pressure and a lower back injury, and dealt with pain every day. 

Convinced they were right about the back pain, the paramedics were rude, Cathy says, and yelled at Greg to get up. One paramedic kicked the burly 52-year-old grandfather in the foot.

Greg Garnett, 52, died of an aortic dissection five weeks after suffering unrelenting pain, which Ambulance New Brunswick determined was a back problem. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

Eventually, the paramedics called the volunteer fire department for help lifting him.

“Greg was a big man, he was 295 pounds and six foot four, so there was not much they could do,” Cathy says.

The lifting help arrived 30 minutes later.

About two and half hours after the 911 call, Greg and Cathy were in the ambulance and on their way to the Saint John Regional Hospital, although not with any obvious urgency. It was a no-lights, no-siren, speed-limit-respecting drive.

‘Maybe they’re right’

“I noticed they were only driving 60 kilometres,” Cathy says. “And I asked the paramedic that was driving the ambulance, ‘Should we not be driving a little bit faster? I did call for a heart attack?'”

“The paramedic said it’s nothing serious, it’s just sciatica, he’s going to be fine. And I thought, ‘You know what? These people know what they’re talking about. Maybe they’re right.'”

Emergency response devastates family
00:00 01:01

Greg Garnett knew something wasn’t right. He told his wife, Cathy, he felt a sharp, searing pain in his chest and down into his legs. He thought he was having a heart attack. 1:01

When the ambulance reached the hospital at about 5:30 a.m., the paramedics conveyed their sciatica, or back pain, diagnosis to ER staff, and Greg was taken to ambulatory care.

He was given a score on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, used by doctors and nurses to assess the urgency of a case. According to his score, CTAS 2, Greg should have been seen by a doctor within 15 minutes, but it was more than 40. 

Rowley is about 35 minutes by car east of Saint John off the road to St. Martins. (Jon Collicutt/CBC)

Even after an emergency room doctor saw him, things continued to go downhill for Greg, who writhed and sometimes screamed out in pain. 

A nurse came into the room and asked the family to “shut him up,” and Cathy, now joined by the couple’s adult children, Beth and Greg, tried.

“I was putting my hands over his mouth to try and muffle the sound so that they couldn’t hear him,” she says. “And I didn’t do anything for him. I just let it happen because no one wanted to help us.”

Around 7:40 a.m., more than five hours after the 911 call, Greg was sent for a CT scan.

The radiologist found a complete aortic dissection. The finding of a tear inside Greg’s aorta woke the hospital up.

Night and day

Cathy Garnett sleeps next to a picture of her husband and listens to a tape of him singing ‘You Still Got A Place In My Heart,’ by Ronnie Milsap. (Jon Collicutt/CBC)

“All of sudden, we go to the trauma section of the emergency room, and it’s like a totally different story,” Cathy says.

“We have new nurses, they are doing things to him, they are putting stuff on him, lines are going in, and we are totally confused as to what’s happening. Then this doctor comes into the room and he is dressed like a surgeon.”

“He told us Greg had suffered a full dissection and his heart was encased in blood and he had a zero to five per cent chance of survival, and that I needed to call family members and get my paperwork in order because he probably wasn’t going to make it through the surgery. 

Greg was in the operating room for nine hours.

“We were so confused because for the last five hours we were told it was nothing, and all of a sudden my husband was dying,” Cathy says.

One of the worst kinds of pain

With an aortic dissection, the inner lining of the aorta tears, sending blood flooding between the inner and middle layers of the blood vessel, causing them to separate, or dissect. If the outer wall of the aorta ruptures as well, it becomes even more serious. 

A dissection causes a sharp, searing pain in the chest and the neck, and it’s one of the worst kinds of pain a human being can experience, says Dr. Francois Legare.

I remember I went back to work and I just so was so happy because I knew when I left that I knew that we were going to get through it.– Cathy Garnett

“It feels like a tearing, gripping, knife-jabbing, kind of pain,” he says. “And it is very sudden. And people feel terrible.

“It’s very different from heart attack pain. Heart attack pain tends to be not so sharp or specific, heart pain is more pressure, dull, not really knowing where. This tends to be very sharp and very sustained.”

According to Legare, Garnett’s symptoms were consistent with a dissection. A patient experiencing a dissection will also have elevated blood pressure and an increased heart rate.

When the symptoms don’t quite fit a heart attack, Legare says, the next thought for medical professionals should be a dissection.

On average, cardiac surgeons will see 10 to 20 dissections a year, with more than one a month reaching surgery, Legare says. The complication rate for survivors can be as high as 30 or 40 per cent.

After surgery, Greg was sent to the ICU. When his kidneys failed, he was given dialysis. The prognosis was not good, according Cathy. 

Greg would suffer many other complications in his five-week stay at the hospital, including infection, blood clots and pneumonia.

But on June 6, 2017, Cathy felt more hope than ever that the man who loved his family, music and fishing for pickerel might be on the road to recovery.  

He was alert when she visited him, and things seemed OK.  

“We talked and we laughed,” she says. “He told me he loved me. I rubbed cream on his feet. It was a lovely two hours.

“I remember I went back to work, and I just so was so happy because I knew when I left that we were going to get through it. I knew the man that I took to the hospital was going to come home. My Greg was going to come home.”

Saying goodbye

Around 4:35 p.m. Greg’s heart stopped.

“It was about two hours after I got to back to my work I got a call and he had coded.”

Greg died at 6:10p.m.

The dissection had moved into his carotid artery. Doctors worked on him for 35 minutes to try to save him, according to Greg’s medical records, which Cathy shared with CBC News.

He deserved a lot more than they gave him. It was their job to look after him and they didn’t.– Cathy Garnett

When she returned to the hospital to say goodbye she felt unprepared.

“I just thought this is it — I’ll never see him again. I’ll never talk to him again. I thank the Lord he gave me that morning with him.”

“It was a good visit, I mean, but you always want more. And he was too young to go, way too young, I was a widow at 50, and he wasn’t ready to go.”

Cathy has high praise for Saint John Regional Hospital staff who treated her husband after his aortic dissection was discovered, but she has filed complaints about his treatment before that. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

Greg’s ashes are kept in the living room of the Garnett home. Atop the light-coloured wooden box are his glasses. Two Easter eggs in front of his picture were placed there by his two grandchildren.

It is a place for family members to remember the live-in-the-moment, loving man they lost.

They haven’t gotten over the loss, Cathy says, and Greg’s experience after first suffering chest pains haunts them.

“I think the part of what we suffered that day was so traumatic that we can’t get past it,” she says.

Cathy says she doesn’t understand why the paramedics and nurses who were there to help her husband didn’t take him seriously, pay attention to his complaint and symptoms, treat him with dignity.

“I’m here to hold them accountable for the way they treated him, the lack of treatment they gave him, and his chance of survival,” Cathy says to explain why she wanted to share the story. 

Questions her own role

In the centre of the Garnett’s living room are Greg’s ashes and his glasses. It’s where Cathy, her kids and grandkids, come to remember him. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

She also questions her own actions, wondering if she failed Greg, if things might have turned out differently had she been more forceful.

“To see someone you love in that much pain for that length of time and be in a place where people can help and no one helped — it’s like we were watching him being tortured and we didn’t do anything about.”

There are reminders of Greg Garnett through the house, and the basement has stayed the same since the day he went to hospital.  

​At night, Garnett lies next to a picture of her husband. She plays an audio recording she found of Greg singing her song, “You’ve Still Got a Place in My Heart,” by Ronnie Milsap, and she falls asleep.

Greg and Cathy Garnett were married for 35 years and raised two children. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

​Cathy has met with senior management at both Ambulance New Brunswick and Saint John Regional Hospital but felt she didn’t get the answers she needed.

She was told no one would lose their job because of her husband’s case, but it would become a learning tool.  

She’s filed complaints with the Paramedics Association of New Brunswick and the Nurses Association of New Brunswick.

Cathy has high praise for Greg’s treatment once his dissection was found. She also admits the condition could have killed him even if paramedics and nurses responded differently. 

She just can’t forget that his symptoms weren’t taken seriously. 

“Greg was a good man. He wasn’t belligerent with anyone. He deserved a lot more than they gave him. It was their job to look after him and they didn’t.”

 

Stopping prescribing opiates in 2014: indicted for “distribution of controlled substances” involving opioids

http://www.doctorsofcourage.org/margaret-easley-np/

Margaret Easley RN, MSN, FNP-C, then President Elect of the Wyoming Council for Advanced Practice Nursing, of Lander, Wyoming, received the WCAPN member spotlight in 2017 with the following accolades:

She worked with the National Health Service Corps in Colorado as a nurse practitioner to help out in underserved populations. In California she held many different positions including Chief Public Health Nursing Officer for San Bernardino County, and worked at various urgent cares in Southern California. She also served as the AANP state Representative for Southern California from 2007-2009. In 2013, she was presented with the opportunity to own her own practice as a Nurse Practitioner in Lander, Wyoming and serve the rural community providing care to an underserved area as the sole practitioner.

In 2014, she stopped prescribing opioids. But last week she became the latest victim of the government overreach into medicine, indicted for “distribution of controlled substances” involving opioids.

Now in 2017, I attended the FDA information-gathering panel in Maryland on education of health professionals on opioids. DEA Director Jim Arnold, Chief Liaison & Policy, Diversion Control Div., had the audacity to stand in front of the group and say:

“Doctors working in their offices don’t have to worry. We are only going after those selling prescriptions in Starbucks”.

Well, here is a perfect case to show that statement is a load of b___s___. Every medical professional in this country is a potential target for one simple Lortab or valium prescription. And we need to come together to fight this atrocity. Ms. Easley’s life should not come to a halt and her face financial ruin because of this massive government overreach into everyday medicine.

Another thing this case points out to me is the purpose behind it all. In the past, I considered the attacks on doctors as a means of ethnic cleansing of the profession, which I still think is a large part of it.  But Ms. Easley is a Nurse Practitioner.  You would think that, as doctors get attacked and more nurse practitioners take their place that her position in the community as a legal, unsupervised sole practitioner, would have government support.

So what is the reason for this attack, among all the others?  When you gather data, you have to look for a common cause, and the one that is staring us in the face is not good. Because I believe this single attack points to the only common ground theory of:

Legal Genocide

 

 

Ms. Easley’s clinic is in a rural, medically underserved area of Wyoming. So if the patients she treats die, the government laughs all the way to the bank. Folks, this is not a good conclusion, but it is the only one that the facts point to—the legal government-driven extermination of the “expendable” populations-the poor, elderly, disabled, and government-insured.

This case also represents the Standard Government MO:

Ms. Easley was first only charged with the first three charges of the indictment:

Unlawful Distribution of Controlled Substances including Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Methadone, and Alprazolam, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(b).

She was offered a plea agreement, but because she is innocent, she declined. And so the government wields their power of attempted persuasion by throwing on two more charges, with a worse possible penalty:

Unlawful Distribution of Controlled Substance Resulting in Death, also in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(b), where each carries potential penalties of up to life imprisonment.

And then, in order to tamper with the jury pool, tainting Ms. Easley’s legitimate patient care with actual illegal drug distribution, United States Attorney Mark Klaassen submits a press release in spite of court orders to the contrary, which stated

“Drug diversion cases involving opioids are a priority for this office…particularly [with] the rising tide of synthetic drug abuse involving fentanyl that can have such deadly consequences,”  “Along with DEA, we will continue to investigate and aggressively prosecute individual providers and prescribers who seek to profit from this illegal activity.”

So in a couple of sentences, the government has equated legitimate patient care with illegal synthetic fentanyl street drugs.  In reality, Mr. Klaassen should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder, as Wyoming residents with pain are now forced to the streets for self-treatment, where they are actually obtaining these illegal fentanyl-laced pills and dying. It is the GOVERNMENT that has created the fake “opioid crisis”, the increase in addiction, and the overdose deaths, not compassionate, trained professionals like Ms. Easley.

Unable to take their case before the public through the media, like the government does, a statement on Landers Family Practice Facebook page exposes the inappropriateness of the government’s release:

“ On July 25, the court unsealed an indictment accusing Family Nurse Practitioner Margaret Easley of unlawful distribution of prescription drugs. We are disappointed by the accusations and the subsequent one sided media release from the US Attorney’s office. Because the Rules of Court prohibit parties from extrajudicial statements, we will limit our statements to assuring our patients and the public that we will continue to provide quality care to our patients, we will continue to adhere to the highest standards of care and we will vigorously defend against the accusations. We call upon the US Attorney’s office to refrain from further extrajudicial statements which violate the rules of court and seek to prejudice the community against Ms. Easley based on mere allegations.

We also want to thank everyone for their love and support during this time.”

We all need to support Ms. Easley during this time of uncertainty.  Patients need to set up protests in front of the DEA and US Attorney’s offices. Set up funding for her legal defense. Don’t let another compassionate professional get crushed by the illegal bullying tactics of the US government.

Would a national health insurance -Medicare for all – be good for the pts ?

Every other year during our “election year” the discussion seems to always turn to some form of national health insurance and/or Medicare for all.

There was an attempt in 2010 with The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA/Obamacare) that was signed into law by President Obama.

It has had mixed results, those who were eligible for premium supplements and who basically were paying low premiums and placed on Medicaid. Those that were not eligible … it was reported dramatically increased premiums and deductibles over what they have been paying on their previous health insurance policies

Some believe that ACA was originally designed to FAIL.. so that an “emergency situation” could be created to that some sort of national health insurance could be quickly implemented to “save the day”.

You may have to go back to a quote by  Rahm Emanuel , Obama’s first chief of staff and current Mayor of Chicago :

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.”

For good or bad…  ACA never reached that point…

In order to propose such a massive health insurance program… numbers are important:

This country’s annual healthcare tab is around FOUR TRILLION and our current national budget is also around FOUR BILLION.  OF course, some of that 4 trillion healthcare tab is included in the national budget… with Medicare/Medicaid, Military/Tricare and government workers.

We are approaching a point were nearly 50% of households…. PAY NO FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

It is also claimed that if the Feds confiscated all the ASSETS of all the Millionaires and Billionaires that it MAY COVER abt 10% of all the UNFUNDED PROMISES that Congress has made to the citizens in our country.

We could move toward a more socialist’s type of system but then there is   Margaret Thatcher’s opinion of socialism:  The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples’ money

Let’s just imagine that all the various financing/money issues are resolved.

Then let’s look at how things – regarding healthcare in this country – especially over the last decade or so.

In 2006, Medicare for the first time had prescription coverage… but … the prescription coverage was handed over to the FOR PROFIT insurance industry, here we are 12 yrs later with three Part D providers controlling about 80%+ of a seniors/disabled.  Have any of you noticed – that have Part D insurance – that what meds are paid for without quantity limits and/or prior authorization requirements have decreased and co-pays have INCREASED.

All we have to do is look at what has happened during this decade… the war on drugs started ramping up during the 2011 – 2012 period.. then the CDC got into the action with their opiate guidelines

Don’t forget all the stories from the Veteran’s Administration… people waiting for months to see a doctor, 22 vets a day committing suicide for various reasons.

There has been various states, insurance companies, PMB’s, and other who have decided what is and is not appropriate care for treating pain…from acute to intractable chronic.

The State of Oregon has a proposal out there right now that they will stop paying for all OPIATES for MEDICAID pts sometime in 2019. Typically what Medicare or Medicaid does… the rest of the insurance industry soon follows their lead.

It is claimed that our healthcare system spends 2-3 times more than other “civilized nations” and many seem to ignore the fact that other nations don’t have the multitude of middlemen with their builtin cost infrastructure and goal to generate a profit.

Given the fact that the insurance industries has one of the top five best funded lobbyists groups, part of the DC lobbyists industry that spends 9+ million/day on the 535 member of Congress to get Congress to pass laws that benefit their particular industry that is paying them.

Just remember the old saying…”those who have the GOLD… makes the rules…” or in the case of a national health insurance… “those who pay the bills… decides what and how much care a person gets …”

Getting coverage for pre-existing issues may be just be the beginning of each of us getting appropriate healthcare

The states using medical marijuana for opioid substitutes

https://www.axios.com/medical-marijuana-opioid-epidemic-1dbe0f8c-9061-4d4e-a201-c6d40a587fdd.html

More states are turning to medical marijuana as an alternative to the addictive prescription painkillers that have driven the public health crisis.

Why it matters: Recent studies found that states with legalized medical marijuana laws have seen lower opioid overdose death rates compared to states that ban it.

By the numbers: 64,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in 2016, about two-thirds of them from heroin, prescription opioids and synthetic opioids, according to the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • 115 Americans die on average every day from an opioid overdose.

The state of play

New York has expanded the use of medical marijuana as a substitute for an opioid prescription, a move that was first announced last month. This also means that people suffering with from severe pain, which doesn’t meet the definition of chronic pain, now qualify to receive medical pot.

  • Overdose deaths involving opioids have increased in New York by roughly 180% from 2010 (over 1,000 deaths) to 2016 (over 3,000 deaths), according to the state’s health department.
  • “Adding opioid replacement as a qualifying condition for medical marijuana offers providers another treatment option, which is a critical step in combatting the deadly opioid epidemic affecting people across the state,” New York State Health Commissioner Howard Zucker, said in a statement.

Pennsylvania added opioid addiction to the Medical Marijuana Program’s list of qualifying conditions in May. Gov. Tom Wolf also licensed eight universities in the state to conduct clinical research on medical marijuana.

Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner will soon make a final decision on whether to sign bipartisan legislation, which would allow patients to buy medical pot from licensed dispensaries based on their doctors’ orders, into law.

  • The measure, passed by state lawmakers last month, would cut bureaucratic red-tape by preventing patients from waiting up to four months for approval and being denied access because of past criminal convictions.
  • Take note: A similar measure got vetoed this week in Hawaii by Gov. David Ige.

The big picture: The growing push to swap opioids with medical marijuna comes amid growing tension between state laws permitting recreational and medical marijuana, and the law enforced by the federal government classifying pot as an illegal narcotic.

  • Attorney General Jeff Sessions has directed U.S. attorneys to more aggressively enforce the federal law, increasing confusion over how marijuana can be used in states where it’s legalized and making research about medical benefits more difficult.

Hayley Wyatt suffered – and DIED – from the most painful condition on Earth

https://www.smh.com.au/world/oceania/hayley-wyatt-suffered-from-the-most-painful-condition-on-earth-20180715-p4zrnt.html

Hayley Wyatt’s last words in this world were “mum, mum”. She was sitting on the sofa, and calling out for help.

Then there was a pause. She said “mum” one last time. It sounded urgent.

But there was nothing Charlotte Wyatt could do to help her daughter.

Hayley's family wants answers.
Hayley’s family wants answers.

Now the family says Hayley was neglected by the New Zealand medical team who cared for her because they didn’t know enough about Complex Regional Pain Syndrome – described by experts as the most painful condition on earth.

Wyatt watched helplessly as her daughter died from complications from the illness. She called an ambulance – it took 10 minutes to arrive. But it “felt like hours”.

When they did finally arrive, the paramedics rushed the family outside while they tried to jolt Hayley back to life with defibrillator paddles.

“When they came out and told us she was dead we just dropped to the ground. I’ve had a gaping hole inside me ever since.”

Hayley's mother, Charlotte Wyatt, has laid complaints with the Bay of Plenty district health board and ACC.
Hayley’s mother, Charlotte Wyatt, has laid complaints with the Bay of Plenty district health board and ACC.

Photo: Supplied

Hayley spent the final four years of her life fighting Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) – a chronic disorder of the nervous system that can be more painful than childbirth.

The McGill Pain Index lists it as more agonising than the amputation of a finger or toe without painkillers.

CRPS is an invasive neurological disease that causes the nervous system to become irregular and send signals to a limb that it’s in acute pain when it’s not.

If the condition is not detected early it can often be incurable and the severe pain causes such frustration, anxiety and depression. It has also been labelled the “suicide disease” by those suffering from it.

CRPS is described by experts as the most painful condition on earth.
CRPS is described by experts as the most painful condition on earth.

Photo: Supplied

Hayley lived with this condition until her death in January this year. She was 21.

Her misery began after what seemed like an innocuous accident in 2014: slipping on a puddle of water and injuring her arm.

Wyatt says Hayley’s initial treatment made the condition worse, and it left her arm looking bruised and beaten.

“We were given the runaround, and it was a year before she was diagnosed with CRPS.”

It would be the beginning of a frustrating relationship with health professionals and New Zealand’s Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC).

The CRPS spread to Hayley’s leg, causing painful open wounds which became infected.

“She was so scared to go the hospital because she knew how she was going to be treated. At times she was treated worse than a sick animal.”

The Wyatt family has lodged a complaint against the Bay of Plenty District Health Board alleging 35 instances of neglect by Hayley’s medical team.

The official complaint includes allegations Hayley was refused entry to a pathology lab because her leg was “leaking too much”, and that one nurse told her that her “leg stinks”.

In response the Bay of Plenty DHB said: “We have been working with Hayley’s family since shortly after her passing to understand and address their concerns over the care she received and we continue to do so.”

During the last four months of her life, the pain was at its worst. But Hayley was not given a pain review, despite the Wyatts “begging” Hayley’s medical team for one.”

The Bay of Plenty DHB has since admitted to the family it was an error that Hayley did not undergo a pain review.

Hayley needed a constant supply of dressings to cope with the three-litres of fluid draining out of her leg every day. Deliveries of the wrong dressings meant she waited months for the right care – the correct dressings arrived only a few days before she died.

“We had to chase doctors for prescriptions, then chase ACC to sign it. Her care and medication was constantly delayed and it could have been a different outcome for Hayley if they had helped her sooner,” her mother says.

“We pleaded for more care before Christmas, but we were told it was the holidays and they couldn’t do it.”

ACC paid $10,000 (AU$9100) for Hayley’s funeral, and wrote a $25,000 cheque to the family compensating for the 24-hour care they provided in her final months.

In response to the complaints of her care, ACC said: “A number of services were in place including attendant care, equipment, housing modifications, and nursing, as well as extensive input from the DHB. Unfortunately Hayley was often resistant to having nurses and any health professional visit her at home, and when she did see them, she often did not follow their recommendations for care.

“That impacted on our ability to ensure Hayley received the required level of care for her leg wounds when she was at home. There were also issues in ensuring she had a regular supply of the large volume of wound dressings she required, as these needed to be ordered by a registered nurse. Prescriptions are overseen by medical professionals.”

But Wyatt says Hayley was resistant because the nurse, contracted by ACC from HealthVision, had no knowledge of CRPS.

HealthVision told the Wyatt family in an apology letter that because “CRPS is so poorly understood by healthcare professionals”, her death would be used “to educate and heighten awareness in the wider team of community nurse specialists”.

“She shouldn’t have died,” says Wyatt. “I don’t want anyone else to go through what we went through.”

“We wish the professionals would own up to their mistakes because I don’t want anyone else to go through what she went through.”

My patients’ quality of life is not worth risking my practice or my license over

Doctors restricted my husband’s pain medication. He committed suicide.

https://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2018/07/24/tennessees-opioid-regulations-precipitated-my-husbands-death/797988002/

There have recently been a few minor stories about the closing of Comprehensive Pain Specialists clinics across the region due to financial issues and a federal criminal investigation. Some have even mentioned that an estimated 45,000 pain patients are now without a pain management doctor. 

If this were 45,000 cancer patients not receiving treatment in the weeks to come, it would be headline news. People would be up in arms over that denial of care. 

If you or somebody you love have not been directly impacted by long-term chronic pain, then you are very fortunate. Keep in mind that we are all just one car accident away from that condition. 

A car accident in the early 1980s is the reason my husband, Jay, developed chronic pain. The backlash against opiate addiction and the ill-conceived U.S. Centers for Disease Control response to that is what caused him to end his life. 

More: The race against pain: As clinics close, patients need new doctors before pills run out

Jay was young and strong enough not immediately to need pain medications to manage his back injury. He dealt with his pain until his condition degenerated, and he was forced to have three back surgeries in 2007 and 2008. It was at this point that he was started on low dosages of pain medications.  As time went on, he developed some tolerance to these medications. 

He worked with a doctor to make sure that he was on the lowest possible dosage that would allow him to maintain some quality of life. He also allowed them to do any other procedure they thought necessary beyond just prescribing medications. This included implanting a device in his side that delivered a constant dosage of medication. 

The back injury did not allow him to work, and it severely limited him in many ways.  A good day was as simple as being able to take our dogs for a walk or to go to the grocery store with me.  A bad day would leave my strong, fiercely-independent husband in so much pain he would sit in his chair and sob.

We were introduced to the CDC guidelines after Tennessee adopted their version of these in early 2017. 

These were guidelines only, not laws (Tennessee passed an opioid law in 2018), that outlined that patients on long term ongoing care with opioid medications must be seen by a pain care provider. The CDC guidelines go further by recommending a lower dosage a pain care specialist can prescribe. 

My introduction to these guidelines came when Comprehensive Pain Specialists told my husband they were cutting his medications by 75 percent. The reason that we were given was that eventually the guidelines might become law. The last thing the doctor said to my husband was “My patients’ quality of life is not worth risking my practice or my license over.”    

It did not matter to them that my husband was not abusing his medication or that he had been their patient for over five years. It did not matter how drastically they were reducing his quality of life. 

Rather than face the unbearable pain that losing his medication would cause him, my husband chose to end his life, and I supported that decision. 

What concerns me most about the closing of these pain clinics can be summed up in what my husband told me after they reduced his medications. He told me he felt like he had been given three choices. He could turn to illegal drugs, he could suffer unimaginable pain or he could end his life.

These are the choices now faced by the 45,000 impacted by these closures.  Imagine if just 1 percent of these people choose the same option he did. That would mean 450 deaths, 450 families without a loved one, 450 funerals. 

Is that what we really want for people with chronic pain?  Is that what you want for yourself or somebody that you love?  What other options are there for these 45,000 patients?

Looking at it now, seeing these clinics closing, you can see that the patients just do not mean anything to the doctor’s or some of our legislators. 

My question for you, the reader, and our legislators now is quite simple.  What are we going to do to prevent any more suicides? 

What are we going to do to take care of these patients? 

How are we going to provide them treatment before any more lives are lost?

Meredith Lawrence is a former resident of Hendersonville, Tenn. She now resides Gainesville, Ga.