Woman sues Walgreens, says Farragut workers ignored medical emergency

http://www.wate.com/news/local-news/woman-sues-walgreens-says-farragut-workers-ignored-medical-emergency/1103783631

FARRAGUT, Tenn. (WATE) – A woman is suing Walgreens after she says she had a medical emergency while shopping at the Farragut location, but workers did nothing to help and treated her son like he was trying to steal something when he ran to get help.

A representative of Beasley Allen Law Firm said in a release on May 18, 2017, Jamie Collins Doss was shopping with her son Elijah when she began having a severe medical emergency. Doss has Addison’s disease and began recognizing the signs of a crisis.

Doss sent her son to get her husband who was waiting in the car. Instead, the lawyers say the store manager detained Elijah, kept him from leaving the store, and started searching his backpack as though he had stolen something.

The complaint also says that even though Doss showed her Medic Alert bracelet and asked for help, no one in the store helped her. Eventually, her husband came in looking for his family, but by that time, Doss had lost consciousness.

The suit says Doss suffered a much worse medical crisis than she should have, to the point of threatening her life, and she and her family were all traumatized.

A spokesperson for Walgreens has not yet commented on the suit.

Journal of American Medicine: Legalizing Marijuana Could Help Solve the Opioid Crisis

www.mediaite.com/online/journal-of-american-medicine-legalizing-marijuana-could-help-solve-the-opioid-crisis/

Two large papers published in JAMA Internal Medicine Monday may point to an unlikely solution to the opioid crisis – marijuana legalization.

According to the papers, which analyzed over five years of Medicare Part D and Medicaid prescription data, in states that legalized marijuana, opioid prescriptions and the daily dose of opioids drastically decreased – by a rate of 40 fewer opioid prescriptions per 1,000 people each year in one study, or 4 percent, and 14 percent fewer prescriptions in the other study. These drops were even more drastic in states which legalized both medical and recreational weed.

“In this time when we are so concerned — rightly so — about opiate misuse and abuse and the mortality that’s occurring, we need to be clear-eyed and use evidence to drive our policies,” W. David Bradford, an economist at the University of Georgia and an author of one of the studies, told Stat News. “If you’re interested in giving people options for pain management that don’t bring the particular risks that opiates do, states should contemplate turning on dispensary-based cannabis policies.”

This research supports smaller 2014 research findings that states with medical marijuana laws had almost 25 percent fewer deaths from opioid overdoses. These papers are the first to connect marijuana legalization to prescription painkillers with data sets of such a large scale.

Senate panel unveils draft bill to combat opioid addiction

http://www.heraldcourier.com/news/national/senate-panel-unveils-draft-bill-to-combat-opioid-addiction/article_babb417b-33ac-5f13-8667-f4164fa4ff81.html

WASHINGTON — The Senate health panel on Wednesday released a discussion draft intended to curb opioid addiction. The development comes as other House and Senate committees also prepare legislation.

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee plans to discuss this legislation at an upcoming hearing on April 11. The panel has already held six hearings on the opioid crisis so far this Congress featuring representatives from agencies including the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as governors from states affected by the crisis.

“We’ve been listening to the experts for the last six months on how the federal government can help states and communities bring an end to the opioid crisis, and the bipartisan proposals in this draft reflect what we’ve learned,” HELP Chairman Lamar Alexander said.

“By working together, listening to researchers, officials, experts, and families facing the crisis, and pulling in the ideas of Senators from both sides of the aisle — we have been able to take an important step with this draft bill toward addressing the wide set of challenges caused by the opioid epidemic,” said Sen. Patty Murray, the panel’s ranking Democrat.

The draft bill would affect the NIH, the FDA, the CDC, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and the Health Resources and Services Administration, as well as provide support for families and workers affected by the opioid crisis.

Many of the items under consideration parallel efforts in the House, which is considering its own legislative package this spring.

The draft bill would grant the NIH additional flexibilities to approve new projects that would help to combat the crisis, including searching for a nonaddictive painkiller.

The bill would also give additional authorities to the FDA, such as the ability to require manufacturers to package drugs like opioids in a so-called blister pack to limit overprescribing for patients who may only need a smaller supply. In addition, the bill would require manufacturers to give patients a way to dispose of excess drugs as part of their packaging. It would boost coordination between the FDA and U.S. Customs and Border Protection in an effort to improve the agencies’ ability to seize synthetic opioids such as fentanyl.

It would include, through SAMHSA, upgrades to recovery-housing best practices, first-responder training and comprehensive opioid recovery centers. It would also include language to help prevent abuse in children and young adults.

The discussion draft has several provisions that are meant to expand the size of the addiction treatment workforce, particularly in areas where treatment options are lacking.

The draft would expand eligibility for federal student loan repayment to include more members of the health workforce who provide addiction treatment services. Currently, workers at stand-alone addiction treatment centers in areas that would otherwise be eligible for the loan repayment program don’t qualify. The bill would change that, and would further expand the program’s scope to provide more addiction treatment and mental health services in schools.

The bill would also allow the DEA to allow certain addiction facilities to prescribe medication-assisted treatment using telemedicine. Most of the effective prescription addiction drugs, like buprenorphine and methadone, are controlled substances themselves. Patients receiving the treatment for the first time currently need to physically meet with their doctor.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Finance Committee are also taking steps in the near future to address the crisis.

Alexander has said he hopes to mark up the draft legislation this spring, while House Energy and Commerce Chairman Greg Walden has also publicly said he hopes the House will pass an anti-opioids package by Memorial Day.

The slate of over 30 bills and discussion drafts being discussed by Energy and Commerce as well as the aspects of the Senate HELP Committee draft package share similarities, including a focus on recovery and prevention, as well as improvements in data and technology.

Increasing interoperability of state prescription drug monitoring programs, which aim to ensure that patients do not abuse prescriptions, would be part of both chambers’ packages. Each chamber is also considering language, commonly known as Jessie’s Law, to help physicians find out more easily if a patient has a history of abuse.

The Senate Finance Committee is eyeing holding its own hearing next week, though proposals from members are still being discussed. According to a lobbyist, tentative plans for the hearing include a focus on drug monitoring programs, increasing information for prescribers and expanding access to health screenings.

Let’s not forget… healthcare is basically a FOR PROFIT BUSINESS


Image may contain: text

 

I hate posting my problems to Facebook and I also hate that it has come to this, but I don’t know what else to do and our endocrinologist has tried everything he possibly could.

Reed was diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes on November 9, 2017. While in the hospital with Diabetic Ketoacidosis, he also had an allergic reaction to Novolog and had to have an epi pen with him all night. Because of that, our endocrinologist changed his prescription to Humalog, which has worked very well. He stated that the higher Reed’s insulin needs become, the worse the allergic reaction would become. Our Insurance doesn’t cover Humalog, therefore our endo and his diabetic educators have been battling our insurance nonstop since trying to help us get coverage. Almost a week ago we got this letter in the mail, telling us no and also telling us there is no chance to appeal. Our endo doesn’t know what else to do and has never experienced insurance rejecting to this point, so he said to go put our story out there as much as possible. That’s why I’m posting now.

I also want to point out that Humalog, the insulin we need, is $2.00 cheaper than Novolog. Insulin is incredibly expensive. Our not even 2 year old son has to have Humalog to survive. This is more severe than an “unfortunate medical circumstance” as BCBS stated. We will get Reed’s insulin no matter what and can, but we pay insurance for this reason, therefore we believe that in this specific case of an allergic reaction, they should cover it just as they do the more expensive medication.

why would a insurance company provide reimbursement for a single manufacturer’s medication and no EXCEPTIONS to get another brand… even if the pt is ALLERGIC to the preferred medication ?

BECAUSE… the insurance company gets the BIGGEST KICKBACK from that one company if the insurance company promised EXCLUSIVE use of the particular’s company’s product.

The pharma gets to sell more product… the insurance company gets to make more profits.. and the pt is left to deal with whatever QOL they get and/or ends up paying for the most appropriate product out of pocket.  Since Insulin can be several HUNDRED DOLLARS a bottle.. the annual cost to the pt can be substantial.

My husband is disabled due to severe chronic pain.

Dear Steve
My husband is disabled due to severe chronic pain. He is completely compliant with the pain mgmt doctor. She wrote a script out and escripted it to the pharmacy on March 23rd to be picked up after the  31st. We called to make sure it would be ready and was told yes and given the cost. When my husband got there he was told they had to talk to dr.and would call us.Tuesday the doctor still hadn’t called so I called her
the receptionist got on the phone and gave the pharmacist some diagnosis codes and that injections and neurontin this was not good enough for pharmacist. she told me she needed to know what other medicines were tried what other diagnoses there were what other therapies were tried.

Our doctor called back and reached a different pharmacist. doctor told her that 1 she didn’t have a release to speak to her ie hippa 2 it was none of her business 3 that the other pharmacist had no right to deny the legitimate script and that she will not send another one

We are stuck in the middle my husband is in horrible pain. They had the script for a week and never saw anything wrong with it

I’m sorry for rambling Im frustrated and don’t know his rights. We feel like he is in trouble for something he didn’t do.

thanking you in advance for your help

 

 

CDC refuses responsibility in Chronic Pain Care – Opioid crisis

Reporter doing story about denial of pain care SUICIDES

Terry called me and he is doing research to generate a report/story on  – whatever number he can validate – the  number/names of chronic pain pts that have committed suicide because their meds have been reduced or stopped since the CDC released their opiate dosing guidelines two years ago.  If you have information please contact him

Terrence McCoy
Washington Post
Reporter
202-334-5215

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/terrence-mccoy/

 

Fed Cir: Veterans Can Now Get Disability From Pain Alone, VA Opposition ‘Illogical’

www.disabledveterans.org/2018/04/04/fed-cir-veterans-can-now-get-disability-pain-alone-va-opposition-illogical/

The Federal Circuit just reversed years of bad case law finding veterans can receive a service-connected disability for pain alone without a present diagnosis or pathology.

Basically, the Court concluded the Department of Veterans Affairs added additional criteria to what the term “disability” means as it related to disability compensation. The Court called VA’s argument as to the interpretation of what “disability” means “illogical in the broader context of the statute”.

The decision finds the Court of Appeals For Veterans Claims misinterpreted what a disability was when adjudicating the claim of Melba Saunders for her knee pain. The veteran lacked a current specific diagnosis or other identified disease or injury. Nonetheless, the three-judge panel concluded veterans include Melba may still be entitled to a disability rating for such pain.

RELATED: Screwed By VA? Top 5 Must Reads For Disabled Veterans

“We conclude that pain is an impairment because it diminishes the body’s ability to function, and that pain need not be diagnosed as connected to a current underlying condition to function as an impairment.”

The Secretary was unsuccessful in explaining why “pain alone is incapable of causing an impairment in earning capacity” despite trying hard to strain a gnat in his contrarian argument.

His representation did not go down without a fight. They even tried classic law school slippery-slope argument strategies claiming the Court’s holding would result in veterans getting disability ratings for pain when they do not deserve the ratings.

RELATED: California Veterans Wait Longer For Disability Ratings

Yawn.

In short, a veteran’s disability must be linked to an in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or personal injury.

Can you imagine how many veterans were screwed by the agency’s improper interpretation of 38 USC § 1110 and its interpretation of what a “disability” actually is?

VA probably knows the amount of money it was saving by screwing veterans with its illogical interpretation of the statute, right down to the penny.

Saunders v Acting VA Secretary Wilkie Quotes

Here were some of my favorite quotes in italics from the case, Saunders v Wilkie:

We next consider whether pain alone can serve as a functional impairment and therefore qualify as a disability, no matter the underlying cause. We conclude that pain is an impairment because it diminishes the body’s ability to function, and that pain need not be diagnosed as connected to a current underlying condition to function as an impairment. The Secretary fails to explain how pain alone is incapable of causing an impairment in earning capacity, and we see no reason to reach such a conclusion. In fact, the Secretary concedes that “pain can cause functional impairment in certain situations, that disability can exist in those cases, and that a formal diagnosis is not always required.” Appellee Br. 26 (emphasis in original).

The Veterans Court’s interpretation of “disability” is also illogical in the broader context of the statute, given that the third requirement for service connection is establishment of a nexus between the present disability and the disease or injury incurred during service. If the disability must be the underlying disease or injury, there is no reason for a nexus requirement—and therefore Sanchez–Benitez I eviscerates the nexus requirement.

… 

This holding is also supported by common sense. As Saunders explains, a physician’s failure to provide a diagnosis for the immediate cause of a veteran’s pain does not indicate that the pain cannot be a functional impairment that affects a veteran’s earning capacity.

… 

To establish the presence of a disability, a veteran will need to show that her pain reaches the level of a functional impairment of earning capacity. The policy underlying veterans compensation—to compensate veterans whose ability to earn a living is impaired as a result of their military service—supports the holding we reach today.

Reporter looking for stories of collateral damage of the opiate crisis crackdown

Hi there,

I’m a reporter with the Washington Post, and I’m reaching out in the hopes you might be able to help me with a story. It’s about the increasingly complex geography of opioid proscriptions. As a growing number of states pass stricter legislation targeting over-prescription, and doctors become skittish, obtaining an opioid proscription in many states has become no easy matter. Unevenly-distributed policies has resulted in some longtime pain patients having to travel long distances to obtain proscriptions. I’ve heard this is much the case in Montana, and I was hoping to learn more and talk to a few people who have been forced into this situation. I’m interested in doing a story on what could be considered the collateral damage of America’s war on opioids.

Thanks a lot, and I’m looking forward to hearing from you.

Terry

_______
Terrence McCoy
Washington Post
Reporter
202-334-5215

UPDATE:

04/04/2018 this reporter just called me and he is interested in talking to people who are having to travel long distances to see a prescriber to get the pain management

 

The death of Kessee is currently under investigation by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation.

https://youtu.be/MOz5zcePaEA

NPD Reviews Officer Interactions with Marconia Kessee

 
Date of Press Release: 
Tue, 01/23/2018
Press Release By: 
Sarah Jensen

The Norman Police Department responded to a report of a disturbance inside the waiting area of the Norman Regional
Hospital – Porter Campus, 901 N. Porter Avenue, at approximately 7:30 p.m. on January 16. Upon arrival, officers located a hospital security guard with the individual later identified as 34-year-old Marconia Kessee. Hospital security advised that Kessee had been seen by medical staff and released from the facility, but refused to leave. The officers assisted Kessee into a wheelchair and escorted him outside of the waiting area.

Once outside, two NPD officers attempt to persuade Kessee to seek shelter at the Salvation Army located nearby. Despite repeated attempts, Keesee refused to leave hospital property. Due to his refusal, hospital security cited Kessee for trespassing. Kessee was taken into custody by the two officers and transported to the Cleveland County Detention Center. Prior to transport, Kessee was determined to be fit for incarceration by a hospital physician. The body camera video provided shows the two officers’ contact with Keesee.

NPD was later notified that Kessee was found unresponsive in his cell approximately two hours after being booked into
the detention center. Detention center staff called 911, and a medical response by the Norman Fire Department and EMSSTAT was initiated. Kessee was transported by EMSSTAT back to Norman Regional Hospital – Porter Campus where he was pronounced deceased.

Protocol following an incident of this nature includes a review of the body camera footage of the department’s interactions with Kessee. Following the review of the video, it generally appears that the officers followed basic protocol. There is no indication at this time that the actions of the two officers contributed to the death of Kessee. However, the department has launched an administrative review of the actions and disparaging comments made by the two officers. By policy, the officers have been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the internal investigation. The officers involved are Master Police Officer Kyle Canaan who has been with NPD since October 9, 2009 and Officer Daniel Brown who has been with NPD since October 4, 2013. The internal investigation is ongoing.

The death of Kessee is currently under investigation by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation. 

Watch the full body camera video of NPD’s interaction with Marconia Kessee:https://youtu.be/MOz5zcePaEA