Patient at now-closed Kingsport medical clinic: ‘I’m scared. I don’t know what to do’

http://wjhl.com/2018/01/05/patient-at-now-closed-kingsport-medical-clinic-im-scared-i-dont-know-what-to-do/

KINGSPORT, TN (WJHL) – A Kingsport medical clinic’s doors are shut, and some patients say it’s left them with nowhere to go.

Centerpointe Medical Clinic posted a sign on their doors stating they’re unable to remain in business.

The clinic is one of several groups named in an ongoing lawsuit filed on behalf of a plaintiff named Baby Doe, a child born dependent on drugs. It claims several defendants contributed to the over-prescription of powerful drugs, leading to an opioid epidemic.

Friday, Centerpointe patient Greg Adams called the clinic his life line, and said its closing was something he never saw coming.

In 2012, Adams was diagnosed with lung cancer, followed by a colon cancer diagnoses a few years later. For his daily medication, he turned to Centerpointe Medical Clinic.

“They’re not answering their phones. Their doors are locked. There’s no way to get in touch with anybody,” Adams said.

The clinic shut its doors and posted a sign outside, dated January 3rd. The sign reads that, due to mounting legal fees associated with the opioid lawsuit in which the clinic is named, they were unable to stay in business.

“I’m scared. I don’t know what to do. I’m trying to find a doctor. I’m trying to get my medical records, insurance. It’s hard,” Adams said.

The lawsuit was filed by three local district attorneys back in June.

We reached out to one of them, District Attorney General Barry Staubus, and he said he couldn’t comment because he’s a party to the lawsuit.

Centerpointe’s note goes on to say that they’ve done nothing wrong and have “been unfairly targeted by the Sullivan County DA and the Shelby County DA.”

Meanwhile, patients like Adams are scrambling, shocked and scared.

“Tell us you’re closing down; let us know we need to find a doctor. That’s all they had to do, and I would have been ok with that. But shutting the doors overnight is unacceptable, unethical,” Adams said.

Through the sign on the clinic’s door and a voice mail recording, the clinic has told patients about ways to access their medical records.

Nevada: group of docs have found THEIR BALLS AND THEIR BACKBONES ?

I-Team: Doctors sound off about concern, questions of new opioid law

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/news/i-team-doctors-sound-off-about-concern-questions-of-new-opioid-law/900883916

LAS VEGAS – The National Crusade Against Opioid Pain Medications hit a brick wall in Nevada Wednesday. Nevada’s medical community told the State Medical Board that a new state law has gone too far and could cause doctors to retire or even leave the state.

The I-Team who’s been covering the opioid controversy extensively, was at a meeting when doctors sounded off.

It isn’t often you see doctors speak with one voice, and even rarer to see them wade into a political fight, but Wednesday they declared in unison that the law which took effect on Jan 1. is a mistake, is already causing problems for patients and is a medical crisis in the making. The comments came during a medical board workshop designed to discuss how to punish doctors for wrongful prescriptions.

“They’re all saying vote no now. Everyone agree? Any vote yeses now? No? No, 100 percent no,” said Dr. Shawn McGivney, Nevada physician.

For a post-holiday workshop in the middle of the week and the middle of the day, the packed turnout spoke volumes. Doctors and others unloaded on the proposed enforcement measures that could see them lose their medical licenses if they make mistakes in prescribing controlled substances, not just opioids.

The proposed discipline stems from new regulations that took effect on Jan. 1 thanks to Assembly Bill 474, adopted by the legislature last year. The bill was in response to the so-called opioid crisis. Three days in, doctors say, the law is already having unintended consequences.

“We started hearing from providers and patients. We now have a whole new set of real concerns,” said Dr. Joe Hardy, Physician and Nevada State Senator.

“The relationships with my chronic pain patients is already changing,” said Dr. Andrew Pasternak, Washoe Medical Society. “Instead of a trusting relationship, I feel like I’m playing detective.”

“I’ve spoken to oncologists who say they will not prescribe pain medication anymore,” said Dr. Cole Sondrup, emergency room physician. “When it reaches the oncologists level, I think we need to address that. We have gone a little too far.”

“We have heard all the things I’m sure you’ve been hearing too about how are we going to do this. I’m not going to practice anymore. My patients don’t trust me anymore. It’s creating so many problems.”

Doctors in both Reno and Las Vegas acknowledge Assembly Bill 474 is already the law, and there’s not much that can be done, but they unanimously opposed further enforcement by the medical board on a law few understand and many fear.

Some witnesses complained that pharmacies have taken it on themselves to reject all opioid prescriptions, causing severe suffering among chronic pain patients. Emergency room physicians say new rules take away precious minutes when time can be the difference between life and death.

Patient advocates told horror stories about doctors being raided by the DEA. Pain management experts said the new law would likely send patients into the streets to seek relief for their pain.

“We’ve created a target rich environment for illegal, illicit suppliers to provide counterfeit and illegitimate and poorly compounded medications, and we will see an increase in drug overdoses,” said Dr. James Marx, Las Vegas Pain Management physician.

The witnesses urged the state board to not only halt the implementation of tougher enforcement but also to start the process of repealing AB 474 altogether, and to put patient care in the hands of doctors, not the state, they argued. A few of them clearly saw recent I-Team reports about the plight of pain patients.

“I noticed there is a camera there,” said Dr. Shawn McGivney. “I think it is Channel 8 news. They have a whole program called Our Pain. I want to introduce it as evidence all the video links to their website of that is of many Nevadans saying, ‘I’m, going to suffer. This isn’t good for me.'”

Even though the workshop was supposed to discuss new heightened enforcement for prescribers, the attendees unloaded on the anti-opioid law that took effect on Jan. 1. This will be re-visited in the next legislature, if not sooner. You can see those reports on our website.

Pot has zero to do with San Diego’s violent crime – DEA survey

https://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2018/jan/05/ticker-pot-has-zero-do-san-diegos-violent-crime/#

The latest shot at pot taken by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions may have left marijuana legalization in the clouds, but in the meantime, another drug is the focus of worries by local narcotics fuzz.

A survey of law enforcement and intelligence agencies conducted by the federal Drug Enforcement Agency says

marijuana usage has been responsible for zero percent of crime against San Diego persons and property as stated by experts on  this webpage

while methamphetamine’s availability and its associated threat to law and order here continue to grow.

“The 2017 National Drug Threat Assessment is a comprehensive strategic assessment of the threat posed to the United States by domestic and international drug trafficking and the abuse of illicit drugs,” the forward of the annual report, released late last fall.

 “The report combines federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement reporting; public health data; open source reporting; and intelligence from other government agencies to determine which substances and criminal organizations represent the greatest threat to the United States.”

The Southwest border “remains the main entry point for the majority of methamphetamine entering the United States,”

according to the document.” Meth seizures jumped 157 percent from 2012 to 2016, with 47 percent of the 2016 busts made in the San Diego corridor.

Warns the document, “Methamphetamine seizures along the [Southwest border] will likely increase as demand in the United States remains high. Domestic production will likely continue to decline as methamphetamine produced in Mexico continues to be a low-cost, high-purity, high-potency alternative.”

Meanwhile, marijuana was particularly easy to find in San Diego, with the region tying San Francisco at 89 percent for “high availability,” per the report’s correspondents. Denver headed the list of pot-prevalent U.S. cities at 91 percent, with Seattle close behind at 90 percent. Los Angeles checked in at 87 percent with Phoenix at 74 percent. When it comes to criminal cases you might have to find a lawyer after an arson charge or a lawyer that suits your needs.

Those numbers have not translated into associated criminal statistics, according to the survey. San Diego’s top drug threat, is methamphetamine, at 55.6 percent. Heroin and marijuana tied for second place with 16.7 percent. Controlled Prescription Drugs came it third at 11.1 percent.

The most significant illegal drug contributing to violent crime in San Diego was found to be heroin, at 77.8 percent, followed by cocaine and methamphetamine, each with 5.6 percent. Marijuana was listed at zero, compared to the survey’s national average of 4.3 percent.

Methamphetamine was reported to be the top drug contributing to San Diego property crime, at 72.2 percent, with heroin at 22.2 percent and Controlled Prescription Drugs at 5.6 percent. Pot again was listed as having a zero association, compared to the national average of 6.9 percent.

Still, the DEA report warns against complacency in the federal war against weed. “Marijuana arrests and seizures have declined due to changing state laws, not due to declining supply or demand,” the report says.

“Marijuana is widely available in the Pacific and West Central regions and many criminal organizations operate in these areas,” says the document, “however, most law enforcement respondents do not report marijuana as their greatest drug threat, likely due to changing public perceptions on marijuana and law enforcement attention on other illicit drug threats, such as opioids.”

“Some state laws are easily abused by criminal organizations. Personal state-approved marijuana cultivation often referred to as ‘home grows’ attracts drug traffickers to Colorado and California, where they can establish networks of grow houses to produce large amounts of marijuana to sell in out-of-state markets.”

Cocaine traffic has also remained significant here, with fifty percent of seizures along the U.S. border with Mexico occurring in the San Diego corridor.

“This marks the second consecutive year seizures in the San Diego corridor have increased, while seizures in the Rio Grande Valley corridor previously decreased between 2014 and 2015,” says the report.

“Traffickers most commonly smuggle cocaine into the United States via privately owned vehicles passing through ports of entry along the [Southwest border]. Cocaine is hidden amongst legitimate cargo on commercial trucks or secreted inside hidden compartments built within passenger vehicles.”

PROP Leads New Effort to Silence Pain Patients

https://www.painnewsnetwork.org/stories/2016/4/13/prop-leads-lobbying-effort-to-silence-pain-patients

Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP) has joined in the lobbying effort to stop asking hospital patients about the quality of their pain care.

In a petition to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), PROP founder and Executive Director Andrew Kolodny calls on the agency to stop requiring hospitals to survey patients about their pain care because it encourages “aggressive opioid use.” PROP is funded and operated by Phoenix House, which runs a chain of addiction treatment centers, and Kolodny is its chief medical officer.

“Medication is not the only way to manage pain and should not be over-emphasized. Setting unrealistic expectations for pain relief can lead to dissatisfaction with care even when best efforts have been made to resolve pain. Aggressive management of pain should not be equated with quality healthcare,” Kolodny wrote in the petition on PROP stationary, which is co-signed by dozens of addiction treatment specialists, healthcare officials, consumer advocates and PROP board members.

The same group signed a letter, also on PROP stationary, to The Joint Commission (TJC) that accredits hospitals and healthcare organizations, asking it to change its pain management standards.

“The Pain Management Standards foster dangerous pain control practices, the endpoint of which is often the inappropriate provision of opioids with disastrous adverse consequences for individuals, families and communities. To help stem the opioid addiction epidemic, we request that TJC reexamine these Standards immediately,” the letter states.

Medicare has a funding formula that requires hospitals to prove they provide good care through a patient satisfaction survey known as the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS).  The formula rewards hospitals that are rated highly by patients, while penalizing those that are not. 

The petition asks that these three questions be removed from the survey:

During this hospital stay, did you need medicine for pain?

During this hospital stay, how often was your pain well controlled?

During this hospital stay, how often did the hospital staff do everything they could to help you with your pain?

As Pain News Network has reported, 26 U.S. senators and the Americans College of Emergency Physicians have sent similar letters to Medicare asking that the pain questions by dropped from the survey. A recently introduced bill in the U.S. Senate called the PROP Act of 2016 would also amend the Social Security Act to remove “any assessments” of pain in hospitalized patients.

The PROP-led petition cites a 2013 study that found opioid pain medication was prescribed to over half of the non-surgical patients admitted to nearly 300 U.S. hospitals.

“Pain management is obviously an important part of patient care and we’ve always acknowledged that. But the problem here is that one should not have financial incentives and that’s essentially what happens through the CMS survey,” said Dr. Michael Carome of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, who co-signed the petition.

“The way the CMS survey and Joint Commission standards have driven the focus on pain has overemphasized its importance. We’re not saying don’t assess it at all, we’re saying the survey and standards have done more harm than good,” Carome told Pain News Network.

A top Medicare official recently wrote an article in JAMA defending the CMS survey.

“It has been alleged that, in pursuit of better patient responses and higher reimbursement, HCAHPS compels clinicians to prescribe prescription opioids. However, there is no empirical evidence that failing to prescribe opioids lowers a hospital’s HCAHPS scores,” wrote Lemeneh Tefera, MD, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. “Nothing in the survey suggests that opioids are a preferred way to control pain.”

Before joining Phoenix House in 2013, Kolodny was Chairman of Psychiatry at Maimonides Medical Center in New York City, a hospital that was given a one-star rating by patients in the CMS survey.   Only 61 percent of the patients said their pain was “always” well controlled at Maimonides and 11 percent said their pain was “sometimes” or “never” controlled. Only 59% of the patients said they would recommend Maimonides, compared to a national average for hospitals of 71 percent.

PROP has long been active in lobbying federal agencies to rein in the prescribing of opioids. It recently had some major successes in achieving its goals.

Five PROP board members helped draft the opioid prescribing guidelines released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which discourage primary care physicians from prescribing opioids for chronic pain. 

The Obama administration also recently asked Congress for over a billion dollars in additional funding to fight opioid abuse, with most of the money earmarked for addiction treatment programs such as those offered by Phoenix House, which operates a chain of addiction treatment clinics. A proposed rule would also double the number of patients that physicians can treat with buprenorphine, an addiction treatment drug. 

According to OpenSecrets, Phoenix House spent over a million dollars on lobbying from 2006-2012.  PROP calls itself “a program of the Phoenix House Foundation” on its website.     

PNN and the International Pain Foundation recently conducted a survey of over 1,250 pain patients and found that over half rated the quality of their pain treatment in hospitals as poor or very poor. Over 80 percent said hospital staffs are not adequately trained in pain management. Nine out of ten patients also said they should be asked about their pain care in hospital satisfaction surveys.

5 Main Emerging Online Pharmacy Trends to Watch Out for in 2018 and Beyond

http://www.tgdaily.com/enterprise/biz/5-main-emerging-online-pharmacy-trends-to-watch-out-for-in-2018-and-beyond

  • The Internet has revolutionized every aspect of human life: from social interactions to e-commerce. Amazon, the world’s giant online retailer, started off as an online bookstore back in the mid-1990s. Today, you can purchase virtually anything from the e-commerce store from the safety and comfort of your home. Pharmacies have not been left behind,filling an important gap that left by traditional drug stores. The multi-billion pharmaceutical industry is highly regulated across the globe to protect lives of those seeking medicine for a myriad of conditions.

    Why the Steady Growth

    Unlike traditional pharmacies that are location-specific, you can access a pharmacy online remotely from anywhere in the world; all you need is an Internet enabled device such as smartphone phone, laptop or tablets. This means that access to medicine is not limited to your physical location. They are also convenient and affordable since medicine from other countries such as India and Mexico are fairly priced compared to similar ones from the United States or the UK. Buyers also have access to a wide variety of medicine from hundreds of online pharmacies, you can always find the right drugs for your condition.

    Risk Factors

    Just like any other ecommerce service, online pharmacies are not free from risks. The main challenge has been on the quality of the medicine sold by these sites. It is not easy to identify legit from counterfeit or low-quality medicine, which is not the case with conventional medicine. There are also higher cases of medication errors since there is no direct patient-pharmacist interaction resulting in uptake of medicine without supervision, taking medication under unfavourable condition and mix-ups with other drugs.

    Emerging Trends

    Despite the complex nature of the industry, the e-pharmacies like Canadian Pharmacy are picking up and experts project that they are bound grow rapidly in the coming years. In fact, there have been rumours that Amazon is seriously considering venturing into this industry. What does that then mean? With approximately 1 in 6 American consumers having bought some form of drugs from an online pharmacy, one can only see an industry that has lots of potential to grow. To realize that growth, here are some emerging trends to watch out for.

    1. Proper Regulation

    Different countries have specific requirements, but a close analysis shows many similarities. In as much as it is a requirement that all pharmacies and drug dispensing stores be licensed by their relevant bodies, this is not the case for most of online pharmacies. As a result, there have been cases of some websites selling banned, expired, counterfeit or smuggled drugs online. This poses serious health risks to the unsuspecting consumers across the globe. In future, it is expected that sellers of drugs online must comply with strict regulations.

    There is need to hire experienced pharmacists to dispense these drugs. Unfortunately, a large percentage of individuals dispensing medicine online are common people with no specialized training in the field. As a result, chances of wrong instructions or sale of wrong medicine are a bit high. Having a physical address that will be used as a contact point whenever there is need by the customers as well as the authorities is an important requirement that all sellers will have to comply with.

    2. Improved Customer-Pharmacist Interaction

    As complicated as it might sound, it is possible to attain some level of buyer-pharmacist interaction online. The adoption of live chats by online pharmacists is rapidly picking up. This service is essential in helping the pharmacists understand the buyer’s condition, properly instruct on dosage, answer questions and provide other important information. This can be done through video chats or social media. It is believed that this form of interaction will reduce challenges related to miscommunication between the two parties. It is also important for better customer satisfaction, information on the cost of the product, availability and shipment details.

    3. Over-the-Counter Vs. Prescription Medicine.

    You can buy any type of medicine online; both over-the-counter and prescription-only medicine. There is actually no limit on what medicine to buy or medical condition to treat when purchasing medicine from an online pharmacy online. However, it has been noted that online pharmacies are gladly selling prescription drugs to anyone interested irrespective of whether they have a doctor’s prescription or not. Some, instead of demanding for the prescription from the doctor, simply ask their customers to fill online questionnaires. This might not be as effective. Most buyers find it cumbersome and expensive to consult a doctor for a prescription before buying. These rules are rigid but online pharmacies are working on mechanisms to improve on this. One option that has been recommended is to compel the doctor to directly contact the selling online pharmacy with the prescription on behalf of the buyer.

    Even though this mode is seen as a sure way to minimize risks related to the drugs, it is faced by three main challenges: it limits the buyer from purchasing the drug from any store since the doctor cannot be asked to contact each one separately. It is also seen as inconvenient, as the patient losses the freedom to request for medication whenever need arises. Also, there are no mechanisms of authenticating the prescription as having originated from a practicing doctor, leading to a rise in fake prescriptions. Irrespective of what is adopted, there is need to regulate the sale of prescription drugs online.

    4. Emphasis on Techno-legal Requirements

    As things stand now, anyone can, or purport to own an online pharmacy. Research indicate that 80% of web surfers settle on the first page of the search engines results page (SERPs), with a majority trusting the first three results. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that the sites that appear on top are the best based on the keywords. Countries such as the UK have clear regulations following a change in the 2005 amendments to the NHS’ pharmacy regulations.

    Going forward, there is a lot of emphasis on the need for privacy, protection of the buyer’s data, and compliance with relevant cyber laws by all e-pharmacies, among others.

    5. Online Marketing

    Marketing is very essential in the growth of any industry. To survive online, every business, including e-pharmacies, have to invest heavily in marketing. The use of various online marketing methods such as social media, email marketing, network marketing, affiliate marketing, video, content marketing, seo tools, and many others have been rising as businesses struggle to lock in more online clients. This will eventually result in a boost in the whole sector, leading to the availability of a wide variety of drugs targeting various conditions.

    Final Thoughts

    It has been difficult for authorities to effectively regulate online pharmacies. This has exposed buyers to risks related to the medications. Nevertheless, many countries are currently working towards proper regulations that will lock out non-complying businesses, leaving only legitimate e-pharmacies that comply with set regulations to operate. As difficult as this might sound, it can be achieved with concerted efforts from all stakeholders, from the regulators of the pharmaceutical industries to pharmacists and buyers.

Bloomington woman talks about the other side of the opioid epidemic

One in 10 Opioid Users Treated With Naloxone Die

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/887848

WASHINGTON, DC — About 10% of people who overdose on opioids and are treated with naloxone die within a year, new research shows.

The reason for the study was to get a concrete statistic to share with people who overdose that would spur them to get help for their addiction, which the “vast majority” don’t seek, said investigator Scott Weiner, MD, director of the comprehensive opioid response and education program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

“Now I tell patients that you have a one in 10 chance you will be dead within a year,” he told Medscape Medical News. “I want it to hit home. I want them to understand the scope of the problem.”

Dr Weiner and his colleagues tracked more than 12,000 naloxone administrations in Massachusetts over 30 months, which averages out to about 406 each month.

 

Of the people who received the opioid overdose antidote from emergency medical services personnel, 6.5% died the same day, Dr Weiner reported here at the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) 2017 Scientific Assembly.

Just under 10% of people who received naloxone died within a year, and half of those died within a month.

And of those who died within a year, about 40% died outside a hospital.

“That, to me, means that people are dying before healthcare can get to them,” Dr Weiner explained. These are the people who using opioids at home, by themselves, and are found dead. “That’s where bystander naloxone needs to come into play. If friends and family know someone is using, they need to have naloxone.”

Congress is considering legislation that would allow naloxone to be sold over the counter, which makes sense because naloxone “is a much safer medication than Tylenol,” he pointed out. Currently, the loved ones of opioid users can obtain it through a physician’s standing order, but “it’s still a little circuitous.”

People who abuse opioids should be considered to be at extremely high risk, and should receive interventions — such as buprenorphine, counseling, and referral to treatment — before they are discharged from the hospital, he added.

A related study presented at the meeting indicates that more than half the patients who present to the emergency department with opioid misuse problems suffer from mental health issues and high rates of early childhood trauma exposure.

Results from a recent ACEP poll of 1261 emergency physicians suggest that the number of patients seeking opioids in emergency departments has increased or remained the same in the past year.

 

Virtually every emergency physician in the country is affected by the opioid crisis, said ACEP President Paul Kivela, MD, from the Napa Valley Emergency Medical Group in California, who presented the poll results.

 

According to 57% of respondents, detox and rehabilitation facilities are rarely or never accessible, which leads to few referral options.

 

“It’s been a problem for a long time, and the majority of emergency physicians out there say there are no treatment programs for these patients,” said Dr Kivela. “We need to expand our capabilities or scope of care.”

 

He said he is pleased that President Trump has declared the opioid crisis a public health emergency, and hopes the federal government will provide financial and other resources to help tackle the epidemic.

It’s heartbreaking and shameful that people who genuinely want help can’t get it.
 

The study findings and poll results are “extremely relevant” to what emergency physicians experience every day, said Angela Mattke, MD, from US Acute Care Solutions in Cleveland.

 

Several years ago, she handled about one opioid overdose each month, she told Medscape Medical News. “Now I see several a shift.”

 

“Because naloxone is now so widely available, I’m seeing fewer overdoses,” she added. “Frequently, I do have patients who would like addiction treatment, but there are no resources available. It’s heartbreaking and shameful that people who genuinely want help can’t get it.”

 

Dr Weiner is a shareholder and member of the scientific advisory board for General Emergency Supplies and Epidemic Solutions. Dr Kivela and Dr Mattke have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

 

American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) 2017 Scientific Assembly: Abstract 402. Presented October 30, 2017.

 

Follow Medscape on Twitter @Medscape and Maureen Salamon @maureensalamon

 
 

Med non-compliance crisis :About 125,000 people die annually because they took their medications incorrectly ?

Patients Forgetting Medication Can Be Costly, Fatal. Is Tech The Answer?

http://www.capradio.org/articles/2018/01/04/patients-forgetting-medication-can-be-costly-fatal-is-tech-the-answer/

Neil W. MacLean and Sue Carey have built a quiet, simple life in their Sacramento home. The sitting room is lined with books, the coffee table covered in magazines and newspapers. Their long-haired dachshund Wally dozes to the ticking of a grandfather clock.

MacLean is 83, and he’s been cautiously optimistic since receiving an Alzheimer’s diagnosis two years ago. He’s in the early stages, and he can still mostly keep track of his medications — with a little help from Carey.

Every Sunday, Carey sorts MacLean’s five prescriptions and assorted vitamin supplements into a pill organizer. He takes the pills and writes down what he took. Carey double checks to make sure he swallowed everything.

Sometimes, though, MacLean forgets to log the pills.

“If I’m not sure if I’ve taken it, we just skip it,” he said. “Because we figure that’s safer than doubling up.”

010318Pills (P)Neil W. Maclean and his partner, Sue Carey, keep track of his medication in a box marked with the days of the week. (Andrew Nixon / Capital Public Radio)

It’s the sort of patient error that doctors and pharmacists are worried about. About 125,000 people die annually because they took their medications incorrectly, and the problem costs the healthcare system more than $100 billion a year, according to an analysis from health research institute IQVIA.

Dr. Dean Schillinger, a primary care doctor at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco, said there are a lot of reasons behind what experts call “medication nonadherence.” Some patients feel the cost of their medication is too high, or they don’t understand why they have to take it. Others have trouble reading the labels or doing the math on dosage.

He said there’s often a breakdown in communication between doctors and patients, or patients and pharmacists.

“We talk about a lot of errors that are done in hospitals, but we don’t talk a lot about errors that we, common folk, make at home,” he said. “The issue of adherence is one of the most complex human behaviors that one could study.”

Technology is rapidly emerging as a possible solution. At least 50 health care companies focused exclusively on helping people take their medications have popped up in the last few years — six of them in California, according to startup site AngelList.

Some pharmacies recently started selling prescription vials with countdowns on the cap that tell patients how long it’s been since they last popped the top. The vial can also send email or text reminders and create medication reports.

This fall, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration made headlines for approving the first “digital pill.” The medication, intended for schizophrenia, is embedded with a special sensor connected to a patch on the stomach. When the pill hits the stomach, a patch the patch alerts a mobile app that the dose was ingested.

These innovations tend to be expensive, and they’re not well known to the average patient. But Dan Gebremedhin, a principal at a healthcare-focused venture capital firm in Boston, said he expects they’ll have a growing presence on the market.

“You’re just going to see more of it. It’s not going to slow down, it’s only going to speed up.”

BJRX Pharmacy in Stockton is trying something new to help patients stick to their medications. This fall, they installed a pill-dispensing robot from a company called Omnicell. It looks a bit like a vending machine.

A pharmacy employee can feed a patient’s prescription regimen into the machine, and the machine produces a day-by-day packet with up to four dose times for each day. The machine sorts through all the patient’s medications and distributes exactly what’s needed into each of the packet’s dose compartments. The compartments are tear-off, so patients can travel with a week’s worth of doses or even just a few hours.

Jeannie Duckworth, regional long-term care sales director for the pharmacy, said the packets get delivered to patients at 150 facilities across California who would otherwise be manually counting out pills from vials into organizers, also called “med minders.”

“They’re using good old pill bottles, and it’s very confusing,” she said. “It’s a lot of work. And a lot of times the med minders themselves don’t have the right amount of slots. So, we’ve taken care of morning, noon, evening and night for them.”

Schillinger of UCSF said there are other innovations that could be implemented on the pharmacy level, such as standardized, easy-to-read labels for prescription bottles and more accommodation for people who don’t read English.

But he said the lack of collaboration between pharmacies, hospitals and physicians has historically hindered efforts to improve medication adherence on a large scale.

“It’s a fragmented health system, and no one entity has the incentive to do this — to invest the funds needed to create a logical system on this,” he said. “So, what you get is chaos.”

Neil MacLean said that, if he eventually can’t remember to take his medications on his own, he’ll rely more heavily on his partner, Sue Carey, to guide him. He’s still in the early stages of the disease, so he can do a lot for himself.

He said he still remembers most of his career as an architect, his childhood in Brooklyn and the last 40 years with Carey. He also remembers what happened to his father — also a victim of the degenerative brain disease that slowly chips away at cognitive function.

“He didn’t even know his own name toward the end,” he said. “I remember at the time thinking, ‘Geez, I hope that doesn’t happen to me.’ …  Well, it’s happening.”

The Alzheimer’s Association has a tip sheet on taking medications. They also give free advice through the Alzheimer’s Association 24-seven helpline at (800) 272-3900.
people who abuse opiates and other controlled substances are typically TAKING MORE THAN THEY ARE PRESCRIBED… which is basically a NON-COMPLIANCE ISSUE… Prescribers are held responsible for people taking more than they are prescribed and occasionally dies of a OD… but.. no one is being held responsible for pts NOT TAKING THEIR MEDICATIONS.
Pharmacy/Pharmacists could be at the forefront of this… they know the last time that a pt got a prescription filled and the number of doses they are suppose to take every day…
With reportedly 125,000 people dying every year because people don’t take their medications as prescribed… are we headed toward a point where some of the healthcare professionals going to be held responsible for their failure ?
IF not, then why are we holding physicians responsible for pts taking more than prescribed and ODing ?

CVS/Aetna merger: becoming a healthcare provider with an economic orientation to care outside of hospitals

Healthcare at the tipping point: 2018 has high risks for hospitals

http://www.philly.com/philly/health/health-cents/healthcare-at-the-tipping-point-2018-has-high-risks-for-hospitals-20180104.html

Innovation has been a buzz word and marketing tagline in healthcare for more than a decade.  Virtually every organization has invested in staffing an innovation activity.  Despite these investments the pace of change has been frustrated by an entrenched reliance of providers on traditional ways that they make money.  Healthcare organizations remain disproportionately dependent upon high utilization rates of expensive inpatient services.

 Certainly, there have been changes in healthcare.  There has been an enormous amount of consolidation and attempts to improve economies of scale. 

There has been a constant effort to aggregate physicians, align them with hospital providers and organize care more economically across the inpatient and outpatient settings.

Nonetheless change has been painfully slow.  Two recent transactions, Optumcare’s acquisition of DaVita Medical Group and CVS’s acquisition of Aetna herald that change will rapidly accelerate in the near future, threatening those that rely on historic business models.  The tipping point is here.

The common denominator of the CVS and Optumcare transactions is the focus on the provision of care outside of hospitals coupled with creative strategies to manage financial risk for populations. 

Both CVS and Optumcare have insurance capabilities and data to manage excess utilization.  The CVS and Optumcare strategies are aimed at producing enormous profits by moving care from high cost fee-for-service competitors.

  CVS’s acquisition includes Aetna’s “transformative markets initiative” which is focused not on expanding its insurance base (United), but rather becoming a healthcare provider with an economic orientation to care outside of hospitals.  Optumcare’s war chest to acquire physician practices in key markets combined with the analytics of its sister organization, Optum Analytics, places them in a position of materially disrupt markets and drive down costs.

The basis for the economic battle is clear.  The table below represents the stratification of the highest components of cost in healthcare:

Total national healthcare expenditures $3.2 Trillion
$1.04 Trillion Hospital costs
$.84Trillion physician and professional services
$.43 Trillion pharma and retail medical products
$.21 Trillion private health insurance expenditures
 

Both CVS and Optumcare have direct control over all the factors listed above except for hospital cost.  Their intent is clear.  They will move as large a portion as possible of the $1.04 Trillion spent on hospitals to less expensive care outside of the hospital environment. They are incented to invest in easier and more convenient ways to meet patient needs.  They will be early adapters of new technology, expanded roles for nurses and physician assistants, and care in the home.

What is the risk for hospitals now that we are at this tipping point?  Though inpatient care is a critical part of healthcare services, the demand for hospital admissions will dramatically decline resulting in less financially sound hospitals with increasingly burdensome overhead costs.  Because a majority of capital available to healthcare has been invested in inpatient facilities, many hospitals will lack the capital to transform and directly compete with disruptive organizations like CVS and Optumcare.  The fundamental question to be faced by hospital leadership is “can we move at a sufficient pace to counter the predictable changes which will come from the disruption of these new and well-funded competitors”?

Unfortunately, historical evidence suggests that many hospitals will continue to embrace traditional economics of their current business models.  Many will dismiss the implications of this critical junction, this “tipping point”, until they find themselves in highly compromised economic circumstances.  This tipping point will result in the sudden and dramatic economic decline of many hospitals which now are seen as stable and strong organizations in our communities.

Counting on the national pharmacy chains to “take care of you” ?

My husband and I have been refuses our medication because the pharmacy says they only get a certain amount. And it is not a neighborhood doctor that they are familiar with. My husband and I have both been on these prescriptions for pain control and is been on them for a little while now, well on it long enough that not getting on medication may end up sending us to an emergency room that I have a feeling Will not give us medication that even for a few days. My doctor called the pharmacist in my neighborhood they called Walmart because there a national chain. My doctor has even called medications in  Hawaii. He tried to get our prescriptions called in and they refused him he is has federal number, they have the medication in pharmacies in the neighborhood. And there’s a blizzard going on in from here in Pennsylvania where we are right now up the eastern seaboard we were going to leave today to go into New York, to see a doctor, actually more than one doctor. Family and due to the snow we cannot drive in there today the prescription I am speaking about is the suboxone which has to be already by computer, I have my prescription from last month that I could show them that it’s a legitimate doctor they can also call the Pharmacy guy usually using New York to find out they’ve been Fiskett prescribing it for years and they refused to do any of that my Dr. even went as far as calling Walmarts corporate office. He had no success they don’t know the doctor so therefore they will fill it but when you punch mine on my husbands name in the national computer it comes up what medications were on so we’re not Dr. hunting we’re not drug seeking these are medications that are prescribed for conditions that we have it’s legal I have last months empty prescription on me and it comes out if you put it in the computer because since come up when we’ve gone to dock is not for that medication but any doctor for any reason these look up to see what medications you’re taking so the choices to drive to New York in a blizzard, or to go without a medication which ended by 24 hours if I don’t have my next dose medication can put me into such stress on my body that I could have a stroke and seizures. We only found out that this phone was going to be this Ed left last evening so there was no time to make arrangements to come in earlier in the week. Plus my doctor was on a little bit of a vacation so he wasn’t taking patients until the fourth and fifth they had covering PAs and I was good until today with my medication and he came back yesterday. Because of disabilities the doctor is really concerned with us driving to New York to try to get on medications today Anna you’re now there are several doctors we keep in New York I has been is Disabled’s, so we keep a few doctors in New York not just this one he personally called and spoke to the pharmacist to assure her that this is it legitimate danger for us not to have a medication and or to drive to New York today. Very upset and so are we. So she is causing our bodies harm may even end up in emergency room. And they might not even be able to give us that the emergency room don’t know if they carry it . Snow is falling at 2 inches an hour with 8 inches on the ground already go to where we have to go. And my mother-in-law or who’s house were staying out when we go see the doctors and my granddaughter. Is 80 years old I cannot send her out in this whether to grab my prescriptions today from the pharmacy is my doctor was to call it in in New York I would still have no way of getting it is you have two out inches an hour there’s a blizzard going on visibility is a quarter-mile. Bottom line I need my medication I have a legal prescription and illegal doctor prescribing it who has a federal number to prescribe this medication they all have Suboxone in their pharmacies in my area but I’m not one of the regular customers they won’t even give me a 2 to 3 day supply till I can go see my doctors they’re putting my bought body and my husband’s body in danger of seizures and everything else there’s no reason for them to deny this we had the open computer system they can look into it see that the same has-beens prescribing the same medication for years they can Google him if they want and find out that he’s a very good legitimate Dr. thank you for listening hopefully you can help us with this and rectify this situation there’s power outages everywhere on top by the way my name is D M telephone number xxx.xxx.xxxx thank you in advance for your help myself phone number is xxx.xxx.xxxx thank you, by the way we’re both in our 50s were not young kids that they need to be concerned about.

The DEA has stated that pts that travel a long distant to see a prescriber or to get a prescription filled is a RED FLAG and apparently in some pharmacist’s minds…there is no extenuating circumstances that they could determine that what appears to be a RED FLAG is really an anomaly and the life’s road that everyone travels from time to time should be perfectly smooth.

The rest of us, who live in the “real world”, understand that there are no “perfect circles” in our lives and especially when mother nature gets involved.

Once again here is a website that can help anyone find a independent pharmacy by Zip Code http://www.ncpanet.org/home/find-your-local-pharmacy

Having had my own independent pharmacy for 20 yrs, I understand the mindset and they are less likely to “play games” with pt’s legit medical needs and will go “above and beyond” to see that pts are taken care of.

It is a shame that pts are going to be forced to schedule vacations and other trips around their prescription refill dates… because many pharmacists will not let you refill a prescription early because of travel plans.