Scott Oulton, deputy assistant administrator of the DEA’s Office of Forensic Sciences: The problem Isn’t with pills prescribed by your doctor and dispensed by a pharmacy – it’s the pills on the illicit market. 

This article contains some very interesting facts. a Forensic Scientist (Scott Oulton) over the DEA lab states that OVER 99% of seized opioid tablets contain ILLEGAL DRUGS mostly one or more of the 400 known Fentanyl analogs, and ONLY ONE ANALOG is approved by the FDA for human use. Here is a recent post on my blog where I quoted a member of Congress that the number of tablets confiscated represents 8% to 15% of what actually comes into our country.  when DEA facts and statistics don’t “add up”… what is really the TRUTH ?

The question has to be asked, if this Forensic Scientist that is working for the DEA claims that 99%+ of opioid poisoning/OD are from illegal substances… why is the DEA still raiding and prosecuting prescribers and Oulton wants to be clear: The problem Isn’t with pills prescribed by your doctor and dispensed by a pharmacy – it’s the pills on the illicit market.

Recently, prescribers that the DOJ/DEA has taken to court have been found NOT GUILTY and it is coming to light some of the shenanigans the federal prosecutors and judges do to get a conviction of innocent prescribers.

Also this article only addresses Opioid poisoning/OD up to age 44 y/o. Does this suggest that the rate of opioid poisoning/OD DROPS OFF SUBSTANTIALLY in our older population, because that is where painful diseases begin to impact all of us as we age and people are more interested in attempting to regain and/or maintain some quality of life  and deaths from opioid poisoning/OD drops off substantially and/or what deaths that do involved a opioid- especially one that has been prescribed to the pt… is the opiate that shows up in their toxicology – suggesting that the pt exercised their final option to end their  torturous level of pain that they were forced to live/exist in and committed suicide.

Scott Oulton, deputy assistant administrator of the DEA’s Office of Forensic Sciences: The problem Isn’t with pills prescribed by your doctor and dispensed by a pharmacy – it’s the pills on the illicit market.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/02/health/dea-secret-lab/index.html

Sitting among the warehouses of Dulles, Virginia, is one of the US Drug Enforcement Administration’s forensic labs. It’s one of eight across the country where scientists analyze illegal drugs and try to stay ahead of what’s driving deadly overdoses.

Starting in the late 1990s with overprescribing of prescription narcotics, the opioid epidemic has continued to plague the United States for decades. What has changed is the type of drugs that have killed more than half a million people during the past 20 years.

CNN was granted rare access to the secret lab where the DEA tests seized illicit drugs to understand what’s coming next.

“The market is constantly changing, so we are trying to do everything we can from a science base to keep up with that,”

Scott Oulton, deputy assistant administrator of the DEA’s Office of Forensic Sciences, told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta.

Holding a white bag of fentanyl precursor powder – one of the chemicals used to make the opioid – Oulton explained that the illicitly made painkiller continues to be a dominant presence in the drugs officials are finding.

“This kilogram can be converted into fentanyl to make approximately 800 grams,” he said. “So it doesn’t take that much material, it’s fairly cheap, it’s inexpensive to obtain.”

Fentanyl is the deadliest drug in the United States, and it’s often found in combination with other illicit drugs, including cocaine and heroin. But increasingly, fentanyl is showing up in illicit pills disguised as common prescription drugs like oxycodone, hydrocodone, even Adderall.

Users buying drugs on the street that look like prescription pills may end up with a highly potent, potentially deadly drug they never intended to take.

“Over 99% of what we see are fake. They contain fentanyl,” Oulton says of the pills that the agency is seizing.

The 800 grams of fentanyl that Oulton held could be turned into 400,000 to 500,000 potentially lethal pills.

‘He was murdered’

As more and more of these lethal pills circulate, the opioid epidemic is reaching more of the population.

Deena Loudon of Olney, Maryland, is among those living with its effects.

“I truly love sharing Matthew with the world,” Loudon says as she flips through pictures of her son.

One of her favorite memories is Matthew playing hockey – what Loudon calls his happy place.

“He was using Xanax to help self-medicate himself and I think to help get rid of some of that angst so he could live somewhat of a normal life,” Loudon said.

Matthew was always honest, almost to a fault, Loudon says. “He told me he tried everything. Like everything. Heroin, meth, crack, you name it, cocaine, whatever – until I guess he found what made him feel the best, and it was Xanax.”

And as much as a mother can worry, Loudon says, Matthew always tried to reassure her. “I know what I’m doing,” he would tell her.

She had heard about fentanyl showing up in pills in their area.

“But you don’t ever think it’s going to happen to you,” Loudon said.

She said they even had a conversation about fentanyl the day before he died. “I was sort of naive, wanting to stick my head in the sand and thinking ‘I bet he does know what he’s doing.’ ”

On November 3, 2020, she found 21-year-old Matthew on the floor of their basement.

Matthew’s autopsy report lists his cause of death as fentanyl and despropionyl fentanyl intoxication.

“I don’t say he overdosed. I say he died from fentanyl poisoning. … Truthfully, like, at the end of the day, to me, he was murdered, right? Because he asked for one thing. They gave him something different. And it took his life.”

For a parent, she said, the hardest thing is burying their child. It’s a pain she speaks out about in hopes of keeping other families safe.

“You never know what you’re gonna get,” she warns them.

‘It’s Russian roulette’

When the overdose epidemic began in the US in the late 1990s, it was driven primarily by the overuse of prescription opioids like OxyContin and hydrocodone, which were essentially based on the same chemical structure as heroin.

About 2010, heroin became more easily available, and a surge in heroin-related overdoses followed. Within just a few years, a rise in synthetic opioids – mostly driven by illicitly made fentanyl – led to skyrocketing overdose deaths, reaching record levels in 2021.

That year, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention counted more than 106,000 people dying from drug overdose, an increase of nearly 15% from the previous year. Those with the highest rates of overdose deaths were adults 35 to 44, while young people ages 15 to 24 had among the lowest rates.

Yet even though they have lower rates of overdose deaths overall and drug use among middle and high school students has remained fairly steady over the past decade, overdoses among young people have been climbing.

According to a CDC report, among people 10 to 19 years old, the number of monthly overdose deaths increased 109% from 2019 to 2021, and deaths involving illicitly manufactured fentanyl surged 182%. Counterfeit pills were present in nearly 1 in 4 of those deaths, and about 40% of the time, teens who overdosed also had evidence of mental health conditions.

Duke Burress of Fairfax, Virginia, has lived those numbers. His son Richard was 22 years old when he died from a fentanyl overdose.

Richard, or Will as his dad like to call him, had struggled with drug use since he was prescribed Xanax in middle school. It soon led to him buying it on the street. He had been in and out of rehabilitation and eventually was living in a recovery house less than a mile from home.

In September 2020, police following up on a call from concerned neighbors found Will’s body in his apartment. Duke Burress says they told him they immediately suspected fentanyl – something that acted fast – noting that Will still had his phone in his hand when they found him. The police also found blue pills that looked like Xanax.

“They can very readily mix fentanyl with the pill and press it, and it’ll look like a true blue pill,” Burress said.

He says he owes it to other families to speak out, to be an advocate and warn others.

“It’s Russian roulette,” he said. “You’re endangering your life.”

One pill can kill

The number of pills the DEA has seized skyrocketed in just three years, from 2.2 million in 2019 to 50.6 million in 2022.

The sheer volume of pills has been one of the biggest challenges for the DEA’s lab, Oulton says. As the fentanyl threat continues to grow, the Virginia facility is expanding to accommodate the analysis needed.

The lab can test for something as simple as the presence of fentanyl, but something called the purity of the pill also offers important insight. This means how much fentanyl is actually in one of these illicit pills.

“Lately, we’ve been seeing a purity increase over the last year, where we used to say roughly four out of the 10 seizures that we were receiving would contain a lethal dose of greater than 2 milligrams. As of October last year, we started reporting that we’ve seen an uptick. Now we’re saying that six out of 10 of the seizures that we’re receiving contain over 2 milligrams,” Oulton said.

He says they’re finding an average of 2.3 milligrams of fentanyl in each pill.

Two milligrams may be the cutoff for what is considered lethal, but Oulton says that doesn’t necessarily mean a pill with 1.99 milligrams of fentanyl can’t be deadly.

“One pill can kill” is his warning.

“The message I would like to send out is, don’t take it,” he said. “Don’t take the chance. It’s not worth your life.”

More pills, new drugs

Oulton says he and his team are constantly finding new and different drugs and substances in pills – things they’ve never seen before.

One machine in the lab is almost the equivalent of an MRI in a medical office, showing the structure and detail of a pill.

“We will do what we call structural elucidation to determine that this is a different version of a fentanyl that’s got a new compound and molecule that’s been added to it,” Oulton said.

They’ve seen “hundreds and hundreds of unique combinations,” he said.

“We’ll see one that contains fentanyl, one with fentanyl and xylazine, one with fentanyl and caffeine, one with fentanyl and acetaminophen, and you don’t know what you’re getting.”

Xylazine, a veterinary tranquilizer, poses a unique problem. It’s not an opioid, so even when it’s mixed with fentanyl, drugs designed to reverse an opioid overdose may not work.

Narcan or naloxone, one of the more common overdose-reversing drugs, has become increasingly necessary as the prevalence and potency of illicit drugs increases. About 1.2 million doses of naloxone were dispensed by retail pharmacies in 2021, according to data published by the American Medical Association – nearly nine times more than were dispensed five years earlier.

Oulton wants to be clear: The problem Isn’t with pills prescribed by your doctor and dispensed by a pharmacy – it’s the pills on the illicit market.

Those, Matthew’s mother warns, are easy to get.

“The first pills [Matthew] got was in high school. And it was just flipping out, floating around, and it was easy for him to get his hands on,” she said.

Loudon’s message for parents now: Keep your eyes open.

“Just be mindful of what your children are doing. You just just have to keep your eyes open. And even sometimes, when you keep your eyes open, you can miss some of the warning signs, but I think a parent knows their child best, so just keep talking.”

Smoke & Mirrors:CDC Prescribing Guidelines: Perspective on Genesis and Utility


another example of bureaucrats & attorneys interfering with the practice of medicine & potentially harming pts ?

chuckle of the day 02032023

Lawyers should never ask a Georgia grandma a question if they aren’t prepared for the answer.
In a trial, a Southern small-town prosecuting attorney called his first witness, a grandmotherly, elderly woman to the stand. He approached her and asked, ‘Mrs. Jones, do you know me?’ She responded, ‘Why, yes, I do know you, Mr. Williams. I’ve known you since you were a boy, and frankly, you’ve been a big disappointment to me. You lie, you cheat on your wife, and you manipulate people and talk about them behind their backs. You think you’re a big shot when you haven’t the brains to realize you’ll never amount to anything more than a two-bit paper pusher. Yes, I know you.’
The lawyer was stunned. Not knowing what else to do, he pointed across the room and asked, ‘Mrs. Jones, do you know the defense attorney?’
She again replied, ‘Why yes, I do. I’ve known Mr. Bradley since he was a youngster, too. He’s lazy, bigoted, and he has a drinking problem. He can’t build a normal relationship with anyone, and his law practice is one of the worst in the entire state. Not to mention he cheated on his wife with three different women. One of them was your wife. Yes, I know him.’
The defense attorney nearly died.
The judge asked both counselors to approach the bench and, in a very quiet voice, said,
‘If either of you idiots asks her if she knows me, I’ll send you both to the electric chair.

No alternative text description for this image

what does the DEA consider standard of care and best practice when prescribing controlled substances ?

I asked this question to ChatGPT  https://chat.openai.com/chat one of the new AI BOTS and here is the answer that I got back. I am surprised that it mentioned regulations & guidelines… which the SCOTUS recently ruled in June 2022 that agencies like ATF & EPA cannot make new interpretations/regulations from the laws they are charged with enforcing. Apparently somewhere out there on the world wide web this AI BOT has identified that the DEA has stated or implied that they are in charge of enforcing regulations & guidelines. Does this suggest that the DEA has adopted the 2016 CDC opiate dosing guidelines as the standard of care and best practices, that any prescriber dosing a pt above the 90 MME/day is  without a valid medical necessity and thus the prescriber is providing opiates ILLEGALLY and violating the CSA ?

what does the DEA consider standard of care and best practice when prescribing controlled substances

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) considers the following to be standards of care and best practices when prescribing controlled substances:

  1. Thorough evaluation of the patient’s medical history and condition, including a review of any relevant records and tests.
  2. Use of the lowest effective dose of controlled substances for the shortest duration necessary to treat the patient’s condition.
  3. Monitoring of the patient’s response to treatment and adjusting the treatment plan as necessary.
  4. Regular assessment of the patient’s risk for abuse, addiction, and overdose.
  5. Maintenance of accurate and complete medical records, including all prescriptions for controlled substances.
  6. Implementation of proper security measures to prevent theft, loss, or diversion of controlled substances.
  7. Staying current with relevant laws, regulations, and guidelines related to controlled substance prescribing.

These standards are intended to ensure that controlled substances are used safely and responsibly, and to prevent the abuse, addiction, and overdose associated with these drugs.

magistrate characterized the prosecutors’ conduct as “deplorable.” Shockingly, the magistrate’s findings were ignored by the trial judge

It is claimed that 90%+ of people taken to trial in a FEDERAL COURT is found GUILTY…  This story is just one example pointing out the illegal shenanigans of  a federal prosecutor to get a conviction and now our judicial system is trying to REVERSE a presidential pardon on this same person/case.  This just seems to point out the SOP of federal prosecutors to get a conviction.  If anyone followed Dr Pompy’s case,  the federal prosecutor in that case even tried to get witnesses to perjure themselves to get Dr Pompy convicted, but fortunately those witnesses told the truth when they were on the stand and Dr Pompy was found innocent… https://www.pharmaciststeve.com/in-the-trial-of-lesly-pompy-md-prosecution-rest-testimony-of-detective-marc-moore-michigan-blue-cross-fabricated-case-and-targeted-dr-pompy/

 

Biden’s Justice Department changes presidential pardons for the worse

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/bidens-justice-department-changes-presidential-pardons-worse

The Biden administration has been working overtime to erase Donald Trump’s legacy and now wants to nullify a clemency decision

The Biden administration has spent the last two years reversing almost every decision, executive order, or regulation put in his place by Donald Trump.  This comes as no surprise on issues that largely break along partisan lines, such as climate change, gender identity and immigration. Elections have consequences, after all. But the Biden team has now taken their crusade to erase Trump’s legacy to absurd lengths, going so far as to nullify one of Trump’s clemency decisions. 

Nowhere do presidents have more authority than when granting pardons and commuting prison sentences. Presidents turn to the clemency process to right a prosecutorial wrong, as President Trump did in the case of Philip Esformes. Now, the Department of Justice is trying to undo his clemency.

Esformes was indicted on 32 counts related to his healthcare business.  During the trial, a magistrate judge strongly criticized the prosecutors’ unethical moves to uncover and utilize information that was clearly covered by the attorney-client privilege. 

It’s easy to win a criminal case when you know the other side’s strategy.  And that is exactly what happened. Pointing out that the Justice Department blatantly broke the rules and then tried to cover it up, the magistrate characterized the prosecutors’ conduct as “deplorable.” Shockingly, the magistrate’s findings were ignored by the trial judge. 

With the advantage of having illicit, insider information, the Justice Department was able to convict Esformes on 20 counts. The jury was unable to reach a verdict, however, on six of the charges.  Phillip Esformes was then sentenced to two decades in prison. 

Faith groups brought the Esformes case to Trump’s attention.  Former Attorney-General John Ashcroft – certainly not a person who could be characterized as ‘soft on crime’ – called the prosecutorial misconduct in Esformes’ trial “amongst the most abusive” he has ever seen.

Trump was asked to grant clemency to Esformes on the recommendation of numerous respected legal figures, including former Attorneys-General Edwin Meese, Alberto Gonzales, and Michael Mukasey, as well as former Deputy Attorney-General Larry Thompson. These former law enforcement officials saw the prosecutorial misconduct as fundamentally tainting Esformes’ conviction. 

Looking to right a wrong, Trump commuted Philip Esformes’ sentence to time served. But that’s not the end of the story. 

Still stinging from the criticism of prosecutorial misconduct two years later, the Justice Department is working feverishly to reverse Trump’s clemency decision.  DOJ intends to re-try Esformes on the six counts where the jury couldn’t reach a verdict. 

Prosecutors hate when presidents exercise their clemency powers. They view a grant of clemency as implicit criticism of their work. In the Esformes case, that is exactly what it was. This is an extraordinary move by government lawyers whose pride is hurt. In the annals of American history, no prosecutor has ever tried to reverse a presidential commutation in this manner.

The fact is Trump’s granting of clemency was intended to end the government’s prosecution of Phillip Esformes, according to those who understand the process. But with the Biden administration looking broadly to erase Trump’s record, those burrowed in at the Justice Department saw a three-pronged opportunity.  

By retrying Esformes, partisan operatives at DOJ could further erode the legacy of the prior administration.  They could rewrite the history of the case to cover up the misconduct identified by the magistrate.  And they could set a precedent that fundamentally weakens Presidential clemency powers going forward. 

The Justice Department’s move is audacious.  But for those who believe in a strong chief executive, it represents an alarming attempt to undercut presidential authority to review criminal cases and address unfairness, overzealousness, and other miscarriages of justice. 

the DEA told Newsweek it’s not responsible for pts inability to get prescriptions

DEA Says It Doesn’t ‘Regulate Practice of Medicine’

Amid Patient Backlash to Proposed Opioid Prescription Cuts’

After hundreds of chronic pain patients begged the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to reconsider its proposed cuts to opioid production,

the agency told Newsweek it’s not responsible for their inability to get prescriptions.

If the DEA adopts the cuts, they would reduce production of some of the most commonly prescribed opioids in the United States for the fourth year in a row, drastically cutting fentanyl and oxymorphone, by 31 percent and 55 percent, respectively, as well as hydrocodone (19 percent), hydromorphone (25 percent) and oxycodone (9 percent).

These cuts should have no bearing on the decisions made by caregivers and their “legitimate pain patients,” according to the DEA.

It’s possible patients are getting caught in the crossfire from a flurry of recent federal policies aimed at culling illegal abuse of the drugs, but it’s not clear which policy, if any, is at fault for their reported lack of access.

Millions of Americans Addicted
Tablets of oxycodone from a prescription. A recent DEA proposal would reduce production of some of the most commonly prescribed opioids in the United States for the fourth year in a row. Eric Baradat/Getty images

In proposing the aggregate production quota, the DEA looks at the total amount of substances needed to meet the country’s medical, scientific, industrial and export needs for the year, including dispensed prescriptions, the DEA told Newsweek in a statement. That means the agency’s production limits should match, not control, demand.

The DEA “does not regulate the practice of medicine. We do not get between a doctor and his or her patient,” a DEA spokesperson said. “We also want legitimate pain patients, their families and caregivers to know that DEA does not seek to limit or take away their vital prescriptions.”

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the surgeon general have implemented their own agenda to combat the opioid epidemic, issuing strict guidelines for doctors prescribing the drugs in 2016. On October 10, the Trump administration told physicians to use more caution in applying the guidelines, following widespread reports that people were cut off their prescriptions or even turned away, according to The New York Times.

It’s possible the guidelines, or the general stigma now associated with prescription painkillers, have led to the tapering off of supply reported by many chronic pain patients to the DEA. One patient, a stroke survivor, said he took prescription opioids without problems until 2017, when he said federal regulations made the drugs too hard to obtain. Since then, medical cannabis has helped but became less effective when his condition deteriorated. Now, he can’t travel or leave his home much because of the pain.

In 2018, an investigation by former Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill exposed financial ties between some of the world’s biggest producers of painkillers and third-party advocacy groups. Purdue Pharma, Mylan, Janssen Pharmaceuticals and other major drugmakers donated more than $10 million to patient advocacy groups like the National Pain Foundation, the American Geriatrics Society and the American Chronic Pain Association.

 

 

NY Times reporter looking for pts having trouble getting controlled med Rxs filled

ellen.gabler@nytimes.com

 

Putting artificial intelligence to work for you

Here is a link to a interesting program… it is called ChatGPT and here is a explanation on WIKIPEDIA   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT

Basically you click on the link below and ask (type in ) a question and it will give you back a answer to your question. It is free to use and it has only been around for a few months.  It is not PERFECT, but I posted below the question that I “asked it” and its response.

https://chat.openai.com/chat

filing an appeal with Medicare denial of payment ?

o file an appeal with Medicare denial of payment:

  1. Review the Explanation of Medicare Benefits (EOMB) statement and determine the reason for denial of payment.
  2. Follow the instructions on the EOMB for appealing the decision.
  3. Prepare a written request for a redetermination of payment, stating the reason for the appeal and any supporting documentation.
  4. Submit the appeal within 120 days of the date on the EOMB.
  5. Wait for a response from Medicare, which will be in the form of a revised EOMB or a notice of additional review.

Correcting the misperception of palliative care

Correcting the misperception of palliative care

https://www.mcknights.com/blogs/guest-columns/correcting-the-misperception-of-palliative-care/

Compared to other medical subspecialties, palliative care is relatively young, but it has grown substantially in the last 20 years. As of 2019, 71.5% of US hospitals with more than 50 beds have a palliative care program, compared to just 7.0% in 2001 (Morrison & Meier, 2019). More recently, palliative care outside of the hospital setting has increased in popularity.

But palliative care is an often-misunderstood term. Even for patients and providers who believe they understand what it is, there is evidence that many misconceptions exist. Recurrent misunderstandings and misrepresentations of palliative care prevent patients from getting the care that they need when they need it. We must, therefore, correct the record for all clinicians treating seriously ill patients.

Palliative care is specialized medical care for people living with serious illness. Focused on providing relief from the symptoms and stress of serious illness, the goal is to improve quality of life for both the patient and the family.

Provided by a team of specialists who work together with a patient’s other doctors to provide an extra layer of support, palliative care is based on the needs of the patient, not on the patient’s prognosis. It is appropriate at any age and at any stage, and it can be provided along with curative treatment.

How do we do this? We do this by providing complex pain and symptom management, and in-depth communication geared to quality of life. We acknowledge that our patients are humans with feelings, emotions, and lives outside of the exam room. We view the whole person, provide the facts – and we listen. We allow space for silence and we validate feelings. We do all of this while our patients receive disease-targeted treatment.

Palliative care provides an extra layer of support while people get the best of what medicine has to offer in terms of cure. It is recommended that palliative care be provided all the way upstream, even upon diagnosis, if the need to mitigate complex symptoms and stress is there. Patients who are mothers, fathers, daughters and sons deserve this.