Opioid Disparities Shed Light on Potential Implicit Bias in Medicine

Opioid Disparities Shed Light on Potential Implicit Bias in Medicine

https://patientengagementhit.com/news/opioid-disparities-shed-light-on-potential-implicit-bias-in-medicine

Researchers posit unequal opioid prescribing habits for Black and White patients in the same hospital are driven in part by implicit bias in medicine.

 – A new study revealing unequal opioid and pain medication prescription access between White and Black patients is calling into question the prevalence of implicit bias in medicine.

The research, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, showed that Black patients are less likely than White patients to get an opioid for pain management, even when receiving care in the same hospital. Although the researchers were careful to call for further investigation into the drivers behind this trend, they suggested inaccurate implicit biases about pain tolerance across racial groups could be at play.
Opioids for pain management are tricky, the team acknowledged in the study. Although opioids can be effective for alleviating acute pain and pain associated with advanced cancer, the medical community has increasingly shied away from over-prescribing opioids for fear of fueling the already raging opioid epidemic.

“Prescribers are challenged to balance these risks with their desire to relieve suffering,” the researchers wrote.

“Historically, this search for balance manifests as more liberal use of opioids for White patients than for Black or Brown patients. Given the complicated trade-offs, we do not yet know which group has fared better overall, but it is hard to imagine that the influence of race in these decisions — given that there is no known physiologic basis — reflects high-quality, equitable care.”

The team noted that limited opioid prescriptions might be protective for Black and Brown people, but that kind of paternalistic approach ignores the very real pain some Black and Brown patients experience.

The team sought to better understand differences in opioid prescriptions by looking at prescribing rates in Medicare patients ages 18 to 64 in and across healthcare organizations. By looking at a population comprised largely of workers with a disability, and by zeroing in on trends within a single institution, the researchers sought to better identify how disparities are playing out.

By and large, those disparities are stark. The team found that White patients were more likely to receive an opioid for pain management than Black patients. And even when Black patients did get an opioid prescription, chances are their White counterparts got a higher dosage. These trends were relevant even among those receiving care within the same hospital.

Across 310 different health systems, 50 percent of Black patients and 52 percent of White patients got any opioid prescription, a statistically significant but small difference, the team said. However, when looking at dosage, there was a bigger discrepancy. The mean annual dose was 36 percent lower for Black people than it was for White people, the team said.

Those findings rang true even when looking at an individual health system. Although the rate of opioid prescription receipt was only slightly lower for Black patients than White patients, 91 percent of health systems prescribed higher doses for White patients than Black.

For three-quarters of health systems, the annual mean dose for Black patients was at least 15 percent lower than for White patients.

The researchers did not investigate the reasons for these disparities, they emphasized as a caveat. That is a critical area for further research.

However, they did posit that implicit bias in medicine could be at play here.

“These opioid-receipt patterns probably reflect both overtreatment of White patients and undertreatment of Black patients,” the researchers wrote. “The findings should prompt systems to explore the causes and consequences of these biased patterns and to develop and test efforts to eliminate the influence of race on the receipt of pain treatment.”

“Could these findings result from something other than racial bias?” they continued. “We do not have the nuanced clinical data necessary to assess the appropriateness of the observed patterns of opioid receipt. Even when clinical data are available, the quality of pain management is hard to assess owing to the complex nature of this care.”

Previous literature about conscious and unconscious bias in medicine suggest to the researchers that those issues could be at play. For example, the medical field has been plagued by common, untrue myths that Black patients experience less pain than White patients, or that they are more likely to misuse opioid drugs. Although proven untrue, these notions could obscure clinicians’ prescribing decisions.

Additionally, poor patient-provider relationships could be erecting barriers. Particularly, patient-provider racial discordance—when the patient and the provider are of difference races—can sometimes lead to poor patient trust, limited empathy, and stunted communication, the researchers said. In turn, that could lead to unequal and potentially ineffective pain management prescribing practices.

And this could move even further beyond the interpersonal patient-provider interaction.

“We expect that systemic structural racism contributes as well,” the researchers posited. “Such systemic factors may include, for example, racially segregated neighborhoods and a lower density of pharmacies and continuity care clinics in predominantly Black neighborhoods than in predominantly White neighborhoods.”

Again, the researchers emphasized the limited evidence they have regarding implicit bias in medicine and the role it might play in opioid prescribing disparities. This is a crucial area for further research, they reiterated.

“We do not know whether or how these differences affect patient outcomes, because both opioid underuse and overuse can cause harm. We do know that skin color should not influence the receipt of pain treatment,” the researchers concluded.

“Our overall observations and system-specific reporting should prompt action by providers, health system administrators, and policymakers to explore root causes, consequences, and effective remediation strategies for racially unequal opioid receipt.”

 

IT AIN’T YOUR DOCTOR

 

KABUL, AFGHANISTAN — AUGUST 17, 2021: Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban spokesman for nearly 2 decades who worked in the shadows, makes his first-ever public appearance to address concerns about the Taliban’ reputation with women’s education, appearance and rights, television music, and executions, during a press conference in Kabul, Afghanistan, Tuesday, Aug. 17, 2021. (MARCUS YAM / LOS ANGELES TIMES)

YOU ARE WITHIN THE NORMS’ 3rd QUARTER QUICK LIST SYNOPSIS AND SUMMARY OF OUR MOST IMPACTFUL PUBLICATIONS ON DEA CRIMES AGAINST DOCTORS AND THE U.S. TAXPAYERS

“WHAT WE ARE ENDURING IS TORTURE”

” I know professionally and personally that what is being done in the United States to chronic pain patients and now surgery and acute pain patients. This honestly is an example of dictatorship and let me be clear, it is morally wrong. I pray Mr. Clement will find a doctor to treat him. I believe he will find that doctor and he will have to go through physical therapy to get his endurance back.”

MELINDA ROGERS: “I AM SO SORRY THAT THE GOVERNMENT LITERALLY HAS TAKEN OVER MEDICINE,” Part-4

“Congress prohibited a doctor from “knowingly or intentionally” dispensing a controlled substance except as authorized “

RUAN, KHAN vs. DOJ-DEA 9-0 RULING BEFORE SUPREME COURT UNITED STATES THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT ONLY CRIMINALIZES ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE THE USUAL COURSE OF A DOCTOR’S PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE.

n June 27, 2022, in a separate and related case ruling 9-0 of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Stephen Breyer in summary, wrote for the majority that prosecutors must prove that doctors knew they were illegally prescribing powerful pain drugs in violation of the federal Controlled Substances Act.
When Congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act, it recognized that many drugs and substances regulated under the statute “have a useful and legitimate medical purpose and are necessary to maintain the health and general welfare of the American people.” 21 U.S.C. § 801(1). Congress, therefore, established five schedules to classify drugs and substances based on their accepted medical use for treatment, the relative potential for abuse, and the likelihood of dependence if abused. S e id. § 812.

 

SUPREME COURT SHUTS DOWN DEA FRAUDULENT LAW ENFORCEMENT PURSUITS OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS (1000’s OF DOCTORS MUST BE RELEASE FROM PRISON)

LAW ENFORCEMENT INTRUSION INTO PERSONNEL PATIENT MEDICAL CARE

 

I AM FELIX BRIZUELA, DO.,: I AM A NEUROLOGIST PHYSICIAN, NOT A STREET OR OFFICE DRUG DEALER OR TRAFFICKER

“WE ARE PHYSICIANS, PHARMACISTS, DENTISTS TREATING PATIENTS IN NEED OF PAIN CARE WITH MEDICATIONS, NOT STREET DRUG DEALERS AND TRAFFICKERS”

 

PAIN AND THE RULE OF LAW The question here is the Rule of Law. The most fundamental concept of our country, without it our society crumbles. This allows an agency to take anything they want unchecked based on their own manufactured rules and misinterpretation of laws, and medical procedures guidelines, creating their science and facts.
The great fear here is that the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has operated unchecked as a rogue sub-agency of government operating outside the rule of law. Creating their own medical science (Auer deference), seizing property using the omnipotent authority of ill-gotten gain over the field of medicine and medical science.

PAIN AND THE RULES OF LAW

Condemn the Opioid Epidemic, Sure…But Remember Those of Us In Chronic Pain Who Need Help

KATHERINE ROSENBERG-DOUGLAS

1306.04(a) “CORRESPONDING RESPONSIBILITY,” DANGERS WHEN PHARMACISTS WITHHOLDS YOUR PAIN CARE: “I DON’T FEEL COMFORTABLE,” THE STORY OF KATHERINE ROSENBURG-DOUGLAS A CHICAGO TRIBUNE REPORTER ‘WHO HAD BROKE-NED HER BACK’

THE BEAU BRINDLY EXPRESS: BRINGS SUCESS DR. STEVEN HENSON, MD (REPUB)

Beau Brindley Esq, Chicago, Il. Defense Attorney for Dr. Steven Hnson MD of Kansas

 

“SCOTUS HAS SPOKEN,” RAUN-KHAN IS THE LAW: BEAU BRINDLEY LAW FIRM SUCCEEDS IN VACATING 4 LIFE SENTENCES OF KANSAS DR. STEVEN HENSON, MD

 

Beware of facades and false prophets

Another Happy Advocate

Somehow she blames me for losing a “friend” because she attacked me, Shasta & our Organization. Trying to spread false accusations & defame us ALL BECAUSE we are actively engaging an advocacy campaign for our community

This is not normal human behavior. This person messages me claims that I caused them to lose friends. Meanwhile I was ASLEEP, minding my own business and taking care of my own life when she took it upon herself to bash me & take to DM’s to tell people lies about me and stay away from me.

Unfortunately this is not the only person that suddenly seems to be on a mission to tell everybody NOT to engage in our Calls to Action.

Organizations & individuals that tell you not to share your feelings with your Lawmakers is a big red flag 🚩

While we are openly critical of other organizations, for being dishonest with the public, we also never tell people who they can, and cannot advocate with. We just want you to know what the organizations stand for before you make that decision. Because we’ve seen a lot of people be told that organization stand for trying to restore access to opioids, and all of their work is actually to help get rid of the opioids. You should be able to choose what organization represents your values, and work with them, without being harassed by other people .

I have even been told that some people are afraid to participate in a call to action because of a woman that has been terrorizing this community for years, a woman that will remain nameless because I don’t want her to bother me

Again, this is a red flag. You should not be afraid to participate in a call to action because someone will “be angry”

Why would anybody be angry for you Advocating for your rights & doing something you believe in? Unless they are not being forthright about what they’re real problem is and what their real motives are themselves.

Always do what you believe in. Do not let other people, who you barely know online, tell you what you should and should not be doing.

If you ever have questions about what we’re doing and the goals and where we’re headed with our work you are encouraged to ask. I will always answer questions because I want you to understand what we’re doing. It’s important to me to help actually empower others. It’s the reason I started this organization. There was no other organization in the nation that did this work so I decided that we would become that organization. And over the years we have done so. There are other organizations doing work. But not the type of work conducted at CIAAG,  not the type of work that will help restore your access to Opioids. Most organizations are working on other issues, advocating for research dollars, and helping implement opioid sparing policies.

If you are interested in Advocating to get your rights to pain medicine restored, then you should stick with CIAAG. As that’s a primary mission of ours, to restore rational access to pain medications & fix the systems that have caused us to be so heavily abused and stigmatized.

If you want research or promoting complementary care, or want to participate in a sort of support group to share your feelings, then you have every right to do so! We just want to make sure you’re fully informed and not mislead by organizations that claim to be advocating to help restore rational access to opioids, when they are not.

Over the years, I’ve become a target as many people online. I actually don’t speak to most people and keep very close to Shasta only because of it. Yet I have so many people who make up outrageous accusations against me, all in an effort to STOP our advocacy from taking place.

This is not only unfair to me, because it sabotages my character, and makes people think I am some horrible monster that is so far from who I really am. But it hurts the entire community and goes out of their way to stop people from doing anything that might actually help them. They want you to keep telling your pain story over and over and over again so that other advocates can take your story and use it to change publichealth policy behind the scenes without even telling you what they’re trying to do. So when we say, don’t keep telling your pain story, it’s not because we want you not to talk. It’s because we don’t want you to be exploited and we want you to use your pain story to advocate for yourself. Don’t let other people use your story to make public health policies that will end up hurting. Also, lawmakers do not respond to pain stories. They respond to policy recommendations which is what we are focused on at CIAAG, fixing the policies that got us here which will in turn help restore the rational access we need.

As always, I’m accused of doing some sort of awful thing. But I’ve never done anything to anyone. If anything, I’ve had nothing but awful things done to me for six years now. By everyone I attempted to collaborate with in good faith (except for Shasta & the organization’s we have partnered with)

This is unfortunately just the way it is. But I want people to see it because I want them to be aware of what’s going on around them, I’m the online spaces in the event you come across it. We are running an organization, and one of the biggest things that we have up against us is our own community online working to spread false information and convince other people that it’s NOT a good idea to advocate. And that the best thing you could do is just tell your pain story and do nothing. Last I checked just telling your pain story over and over again is not gonna change public policy. What it will do is keep us perpetual victims to be used and abused by the people in power.

We want to make change so you do not suffer

It is easy for anyone to claim to be a chronic pain advocate and it easy for some to put up a façade as being a advocate.  Anyone who has been to Disney’s Hollywood studios https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/destinations/hollywood-studios/ and been on their back lot that some of it looks like the main street of a small town, but you open the door of the houses/stores on this street you will find there is nothing behind the door, maybe a outside storage area of misc stuff, not what it appears to be from the street 

 

FDA seeks comments on in-home disposal of opioids

What everyone seems to ignore is that all the opioids that pts take… are metabolized many times into another opioid (active metabolite ) and it is excreted into our sewer system, via the urine or feces. If all people threw down the toilet all unused meds, it is highly unlikely to even add one part per million or billion – however, that is measured. As the old saying goes, this is much to do about nothing.

FDA seeks comments on in-home disposal of opioids

https://ncpa.org/newsroom/qam/2023/06/28/fda-seeks-comments-home-disposal-opioids

Through Aug. 28, the FDA has issued an opportunity to solicit public comments and gather information to help its assessment of in-home disposal methods of opioids. (Currently, the FDA has not decided whether to expand its Opioid Analgesic Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to include in-home disposal products.) Do you think comments will be logged and forgotten? Not necessarily. Last June, NCPA submitted comments to FDA officials on its proposed program regarding mail-back envelopes and education on safe disposal with opioid analgesics. In April 2023, FDA announced that it was requiring manufacturers of opioid analgesics dispensed in outpatient settings to make prepaid mail-back envelopes available to outpatient pharmacies and other dispensers as an additional opioid analgesic disposal option for patients. It’s a win for patient safety (not to mention government receptiveness).