DEA Responds to Claim That Agency Will Reclassify Cannabis on August 1
As I blogged about a couple of days ago… Could this be a can of worms ?
It would appear that the DEA’s intention of decriminalizing MJ.. is mostly to open up research and as I pointed out in the above article.. that could take 10-15 yrs for Big Pharma to do the double blind clinical studies before some of the 400 + components within the various varieties of MJ could become available for legal use.
The DEA is responding to a claim by an anonymous DEA lawyer that the federal agency plans to reschedule cannabis to a Schedule II drug on August 1. The story was first reported by the Santa Monica Observer. And the Internet of Weed jumped all over it.
(Well, not everyone did. Some realized that the story was based on a single anonymous source and a very questionable scenario.)
However, now the DEA has been forced to comment. As we’ve reported before, the DEA actually is expected to respond to a petition calling for the reclassification of cannabis. And in an interview with aNewDomain, DEA staff coordinator Russ Baer wouldn’t confirm or deny the Observer’s report, but gave several indications that rescheduling might happen.
Baer stressed the complexity of the cannabis plant, pointing out its hundreds of chemical actors, or cannabinoids. “Also, we are talking about synthetic THC, CBD (based treatments), oils, extracts edibles,” he said. The challenge for researchers and government agencies is to “identify the parts of the plant that might have benefit, and separating out (the beneficial) parts from the ones that aren’t beneficial or harmful.”Baer also said the federal agency is interested in making cannabis research easier, which rescheduling would accomplish. “We do want to remove the roadblocks for research,” he said.
In any case, Baer’s statements reflect the DEA’s changing perspective on the Drug War. “We have limited resources, remember,” Baer continued. “Marijuana is important, but our efforts are mainly focused on the nation’s growing opioid crisis.”
Filed under: General Problems
Leave a Reply