http://www.alternet.org/drugs/opioid-epidemic-greatly-exaggerated

Brian C. Bennett Drug Charts  This link takes you to dozens of charts that demonstrates that in the “larger picture” the abuse of various substances has been greatly exaggerated and inflated by the bureaucracy and the media. When did the media become part of our society’s “morality police” and stopped reporting the news/truth and started reporting their opinions ? The media has always had editors that have expressed their opinions, but they were labeled as such.

Last week, when Michael Walker of Beckley, West Virginia, read in his local paper that high-potency heroin—or opioids sold as or cut with heroin—caused an outbreak of 27 overdoses in just four hours in the nearby city of Huntington, he thought of his 19-year-old son, Matthew, who has been off of opiates for three months, the longest he’s been without the drug in years.

“I know it’s early for Matthew, and what a struggle it still is,” said Walker, 42, a white working-class dad. “A lot of people call this a problem, but it’s an epidemic,” he said, while describing the situation in West Virginia.

West Virginia ranks No. 1 in the nation for overdose fatalities. Pill mills churning out OxyContin addicted many in Walker’s hometown, including his son. Once the dirty doctors were kicked out of town and the pill supply ran dry, Walker said his son turned to heroin. “You could walk down the street and knock on someone’s door, and there heroin was,” he said. 

Situations like the one in West Virginia sound off the opioid epidemic siren. Both local and national news carry its echo across the country, citing each outbreak as the relentless continuation of an ongoing drug crisis—one that’s described as having crept out of the so called inner-city and into affluent suburbs and rural towns, causing premature death en masse among the white population. Ask someone like Walker—middle-aged, working class, who is up on current events about opiates and heroin—and they’ll tell you how dire things are.  

But researchers at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy in Houston, Texas, say government data do not reflect what the media and politicians have said about the magnitude of the epidemic. 

The Baker Institute’s newly released Brian C. Bennett Drug Charts use data collected by the University of Michigan’s Monitoring The Future survey, along with the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, to chart drug-using trends over a span of 40 years. The charts deliver a bird’s-eye view of drug use in America and a counter-narrative to the opioid epidemic. 

Along with the charts—which we’ll get to—Rice University released a policy brief written by William Martin and Katherine Neill, both doctoral fellows in drug policy at Rice. “These charts,” they write, “caution against uncritically accepting alarming announcements of drug abuse epidemics by media, politicians, religious leaders, law enforcement agencies, drug treatment facilities, voluntary associations, or others with real or opportunistic reasons to sound the klaxon.”

Brian C. Bennett is a former military intelligence analyst who uses data to destruct drug war rhetoric. For years, he’s been a thorn in the side of many drug prohibitionists—mainly because his encyclopedic catalog of drug-using trends poke holes in what he calls prohibitionist fear-mongering. Like the time Los Angeles Police Chief Daryl Gates, who founded the DARE drug education program, said that “casual drug users should be taken out and shot.” 

That would be a lot of people dead in the streets. Many people identify as regular drug users each year, and the number of people who call themselves a “frequent-user” remains stable, despite screams that drug use is on the rise.  

In reference to cocaine users, which the LAPD targeted during the ’80s crack epidemic, the authors of the policy brief write, “It is clear that not all use is abuse and that most people who get into trouble with the drug recover from it, many on their own without treatment, participation in a 12-step recovery program, or relapse.” Rarely will you hear law enforcement speak of cocaine use in such plain terms. But that’s what the data show. 

The Fix reached out to Bennett to discuss his newly released charts, and how the numbers behind the opiate crisis paint a less frightening picture.  

Bennett’s charts appear counterintuitive if you’ve been watching the news. For instance, they show heroin use has remained stable between 1979 and 2014. Though there was a jump to 914,000 heroin users from 681,000 between 2013 and 2014, he asks his audience to keep in mind the size of the U.S. population ages 12 and older, which in 2014 was over 265 million. 

Because the charts are scaled to the U.S. population at large, such fluctuations look like flat lines—“insignificant in the big picture when charted,” he said.

The same can be applied to painkillers like OxyContin, says Bennett. In 2014, the number of people who reported using painkillers for “nonmedical use” in the past month was 5.1 million. Martin and Neill, the authors of the policy brief, write, “This is not a small number of potentially problematic users, but it is a small segment of the U.S. population—1.6 percent of those age 12 and older.” 

Bennett told The Fix that, “When looking at pills, the past year use numbers have been declining a bit.” But if you get your information from, say, the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids, who wield a budget of $88.4 million dedicated solely to keeping kids off drugs, they’ll tell you painkiller use is on the rise. 

“There was a brief spike in the use of [painkillers] in the 2009 and 2010 estimates,” said Bennett. But he adds that ad hoc reports exaggerate these upticks. “This helps illustrate an important point concerning reporting of these numbers: the tendency is to cherry pick the numbers to paint the worst possible picture. That is why it is so important to consider the complete data sets when discussing these issues.“

Since the number of heroin users has not spiked dramatically over the years, then what about mortality rates? After all, the CDC reported a record number of drug overdoses—47,055—in 2014. 

“If you compare the number of deaths to the number of [heroin] users, you find that not many of them are actually dying,” said Bennett. Again, the data backs him up: around 900,000 people reported using heroin in 2014 but only 10,574 of them died. That amounts to only 1.16 percent of heroin users dying from the drug. 

“The claim of ‘record numbers’ of deaths may be accurate—but rather insignificant in the big picture,” Bennett said. 

“Let us consider the total number of deaths,” he continued. “In 2014, there were 2,626,418 deaths. Thus the ‘epidemic’ of opioid deaths is greatly exaggerated, and constitutes a mere 0.6 percent of all deaths.” For some context, Bennett said to look to the infant mortality rate, which is currently 582 per 100,000 live births. 

But such statements fly in the face of people like Walker in West Virginia, and many others who have lost loved ones to overdose. “The people that are on the front lines see the hurt and the utter devastation that this is causing,” he said, adding that the people in power could care less about the state of affairs in West Virginia. 

Martin and Neill acknowledge the data do indeed reflect Walker’s experience. “Midwest regions near the Appalachian Mountains have higher levels of problematic opioid use than other parts of the country,” they write, noting West Virginia has the highest rate in the country, at 35.5 per 100,000. To this, they attribute economic insecurity as one of the major culprits driving up overdose rates. 

But Bennett says local data and anecdotal experiences must not trump the “big picture,” especially when it comes to making sensible policy reforms. What do those reforms look like for Bennett? “Let people get drugs of known dose and purity—via pharmacies for chemical compounds, and via the tobacco/alcohol model for naturally occurring forms of intoxicants,” like mushrooms, peyote, or opium, he said. 

As for why there has been exaggeration about the opioid problem, the researchers at Rice say it has to do with who is now affected by opioids. “To put it bluntly, White Lives Matter,” they write.

The CDC has been tracking the recent demographic shift in opiate use. In 2000, black Americans aged 45-64 were the dominant opiate users. Within the last decade, the largest group of opiate users became whites aged 18-25. Because 90 percent of new heroin users—like Walker’s son—are white, the researchers say it is seen as a public health problem deserving of our attention.

And still, heroin use remains a big problem in minority communities, especially where economic and social resources are scarce. 

“Ultimately, the blame for the hysteria lies squarely at the feet of the government agencies for describing their findings the way they do, and the media parrots who do nothing but pass it along unchallenged—or worse, further exaggerate and magnify the hysteria,” said Bennett.

The team at Rice insists an accurate picture of drug use in America will lead to better policy. “Policies that can deal effectively with these complex problems must build on a foundation of accurate data, not fear and stereotypes.”

“The way forward is not via the roads of the past,” said Bennett.

Meanwhile, all Walker says he can do for his son is pray. Walker wants to become an activist and voice for change, but he says people in his community have not been willing to give him a platform. “They don’t want to hear it,” he said.

Filed under: General Problems